Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN MARKETS. We are all the same in the market for c

    SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN MARKETS.

    We are all the same in the market for consumption.

    We are all the same in the market for the resolution of disputes.

    We are not the same in the market for the production of normative commons (Polities)

    We are not the same in the market for production of goods, services, and information (the commercial market)

    We are not the same in the market for micro-polities(neighborhoods).

    We are not the same in the market for families (reproduction)

    We are not the same in the market for friends.

    As individuals we are the same.

    As groups we are different.

    It’s not complicated.

    And that we can all transcend into the

    gods we imagine if we practice truth,

    reciprocity, natiotnalisrn, and a gentle

    reduction of the size of our underclasses.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-02 11:44:00 UTC

  • LET’S CLARIFY WHAT THIS MEANS: SMARTER PEOPLE CARRY DUMBER PEOPLE. HIERARCHIES E

    LET’S CLARIFY WHAT THIS MEANS: SMARTER PEOPLE CARRY DUMBER PEOPLE. HIERARCHIES EVERYWHERE.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-23 09:13:00 UTC

  • Quote. First, I think right-populism or the “new right,” is deeply damaged and t

    Quote. First, I think right-populism or the “new right,” is deeply damaged and this presents a huge opportunity for left-leaning populists if they are smart about it. Let’s begin by discussing why this is so problematic for the “new right.” End quote.

    Is Curt Doolittle ‘s term, “New Right” finding a home on significant pages and, more importantly, in conservative minds?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-19 19:48:00 UTC

  • We can single out elites, or we can single out the bottom – but the elites have

    We can single out elites, or we can single out the bottom – but the elites have allied with the bottom against the middle. We Must End Both.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-19 18:09:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/898970228289396736

    Reply addressees: @Virageous @Trump @realDonaldTrump @POTUS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/898968111352750080

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Virageous

    @curtdoolittle @Trump @realDonaldTrump @POTUS Inequality is the means by which an insecure, undeserving elite
    bullies us into advancing its genes at the expense of its potential
    betters

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/898968111352750080

  • AMERICANS: FATTENED UP LIKE CHICKENS FOR INTERGENERATIONAL GENOCIDE (Americans a

    AMERICANS: FATTENED UP LIKE CHICKENS FOR INTERGENERATIONAL GENOCIDE

    (Americans are fat, Naive, Children. Yes. We know. That makes them great members of the laboring, working and middle classes. They are simply herd animals being farmed for the purpose of their own destruction.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 12:48:00 UTC

  • Democracy was, and always will be, a means by which an emerging upper middle cla

    Democracy was, and always will be, a means by which an emerging upper middle class can ally the emerging middle and working classes against the aristocracy. Just as Theocracy was and always will be, a means by which an elite can organize the upper and lower against the middle.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 11:23:00 UTC

  • ***it is no more moral to force the underclasses and minorities to live by merit

    ***it is no more moral to force the underclasses and minorities to live by meritocracy, than it is to ask the working and middle classes to live by equality.***

    Which is why we must separate.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 12:01:00 UTC

  • “Why did the fascists call their rally “unite the right”?”— Tim Larkin The ‘wh

    —“Why did the fascists call their rally “unite the right”?”— Tim Larkin

    The ‘white nationalists’ were copying the left’s ‘identity politics’ by trying to form a coalition (‘unite”) of the various groups within the masculine white working and middle class identity, just as the left has done so among the effeminate and underclass and minority identities.

    I told them over two years ago that they were going to fail, because it is no more moral to force the underclasses and minorities to live by meritocracy, than it is to ask the working and middle classes to live by equality.

    And so the proper answer is not to seek power under the left’s model uniting under identity politics against western civlization’s meritocracy, but to agitate for secession, and ‘going our separate ways”.

    Which is a moral proposition. Because whether left fascism or right fascism both sides are demanding what is not in the interest of the other side. And if that moral proposition is not met, the violent revolution is the only alternative.

    That is what will happen now, I expect. And it was probably necessary for the alt-right to fail at using the alt-left’s identity politics in order to resign themselves to civil war.

    But it was what I have been saying for over a decade.

    Revolution comes.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 10:47:00 UTC

  • “Identity politics is really about entitlement, that is to say, in the American

    —“Identity politics is really about entitlement, that is to say, in the American context it is the idea that you can get something (e.g. respect, money and recognition) simply by virtue of what you identify as/with. But you see, there is no reason why anybody should be entitled to so and so for nothing. Reward, cooperation and value are all the result of production. The more mutually beneficial production is, the more likely it is to be sustained and reproduced. Not only is it racist and unproductive to constantly yap about identity and entitlement, it is actually counter productive because, as I have said, normal people know that nothing on this earth is ever gained without merit, sacrifice or work. Rioting, name calling and crying wolf are examples of unproductive activity.”— Ayelam Valentine Agaliba

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 08:42:00 UTC

  • Retweeted vij (@vijinho): Sickening how the UK govt allied with the banks to fle

    Retweeted vij (@vijinho):

    Sickening how the UK govt allied with the banks to fleece and indebt the public in WW1. Gordon Brown 2008 echoes.

    https://t.co/NJMxqz0Ea3 https://t.co/Be4idrd9Sb

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 04:50:00 UTC