Theme: Class
-
The Economics Of Planets And Their Populations
Humans will make excellent domesticated animals to use as pets (amusing slaves), slaves(cheap labor), or food (I”m betting on food). Otherwise It sure looks like planets are rare and valuable enough – and trade costly and useless enough – that they are the ultimate ‘good’ in the community. Economics in everything. Marginal difference produces trading incompatibility, and cooperative in compatibility. Investment in a competitor is a catastrophe – which is the less on I take from Colonization. Habitable planets are scarce *in time*. -
THE ECONOMICS OF PLANETS AND THEIR POPULATIONS Humans will make excellent domest
THE ECONOMICS OF PLANETS AND THEIR POPULATIONS
Humans will make excellent domesticated animals to use as pets (amusing slaves), slaves(cheap labor), or food (I”m betting on food). Otherwise It sure looks like planets are rare and valuable enough – and trade costly and useless enough – that they are the ultimate ‘good’ in the community.
Economics in everything.
Marginal difference produces trading incompatibility, and cooperative in compatibility. Investment in a competitor is a catastrophe – which is the less on I take from Colonization. Habitable planets are scarce *in time*.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-09 13:33:00 UTC
-
The Economics Of Planets And Their Populations
Humans will make excellent domesticated animals to use as pets (amusing slaves), slaves(cheap labor), or food (I”m betting on food). Otherwise It sure looks like planets are rare and valuable enough – and trade costly and useless enough – that they are the ultimate ‘good’ in the community. Economics in everything. Marginal difference produces trading incompatibility, and cooperative in compatibility. Investment in a competitor is a catastrophe – which is the less on I take from Colonization. Habitable planets are scarce *in time*. -
The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), a
The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), and peasantry(socialism), is that each starts with a very different value attached to the different choices of cooperation: predation by violence, production by cooperative exchange, flight, boycott and resistance by inclusion or exclusion from the group. Aristocracy begins with the preference for ‘taking it all now’ by violence, and profiting from the domestication of animal man; Burghers (bourgeois) assume the continuous value of trade. And dependents, serfs,slaves, and enemies, seek to circumvent the competition and conflict by demand for redistribution (insurance, and sharing) because for all intents and purposes they are otherwise powerless.
I start from the premise that continuous evolution of man through continuous suppression of inferiorities, and continuous reward for excellences, is the only long term good, and that the strong and productive must have incentive to tolerate the weak and the unproductive.
There is no shortage of humans, but an oversupply.
People are not intrinsically valuable to one another, to mankind, or to the universe. They can only strive to be, and demonstrate that they are, by the evidence of their actions.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 12:57:00 UTC
-
The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), a
The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), and peasantry(socialism), is that each starts with a very different value attached to the different choices of cooperation: predation by violence, production by cooperative exchange, flight, boycott and resistance by inclusion or exclusion from the group. Aristocracy begins with the preference for ‘taking it all now’ by violence, and profiting from the domestication of animal man; Burghers (bourgeois) assume the continuous value of trade. And dependents, serfs,slaves, and enemies, seek to circumvent the competition and conflict by demand for redistribution (insurance, and sharing) because for all intents and purposes they are otherwise powerless. I start from the premise that continuous evolution of man through continuous suppression of inferiorities, and continuous reward for excellences, is the only long term good, and that the strong and productive must have incentive to tolerate the weak and the unproductive. There is no shortage of humans, but an oversupply. People are not intrinsically valuable to one another, to mankind, or to the universe. They can only strive to be, and demonstrate that they are, by the evidence of their actions. -
The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), a
The difference between aristocracy (propertarianism), burgherism (liberalism), and peasantry(socialism), is that each starts with a very different value attached to the different choices of cooperation: predation by violence, production by cooperative exchange, flight, boycott and resistance by inclusion or exclusion from the group. Aristocracy begins with the preference for ‘taking it all now’ by violence, and profiting from the domestication of animal man; Burghers (bourgeois) assume the continuous value of trade. And dependents, serfs,slaves, and enemies, seek to circumvent the competition and conflict by demand for redistribution (insurance, and sharing) because for all intents and purposes they are otherwise powerless. I start from the premise that continuous evolution of man through continuous suppression of inferiorities, and continuous reward for excellences, is the only long term good, and that the strong and productive must have incentive to tolerate the weak and the unproductive. There is no shortage of humans, but an oversupply. People are not intrinsically valuable to one another, to mankind, or to the universe. They can only strive to be, and demonstrate that they are, by the evidence of their actions. -
MSNBC fires Sam Seder after ‘alt-right’ group digs up old Polanski joke Sam Sede
MSNBC fires Sam Seder after ‘alt-right’ group digs up old Polanski joke
Sam Seder, an MSNBC contributor and podcast host, has been let go by the network in response to the backlash over a 2009 (since-deleted) Tweet satirizing defenders of Roman Polanski. Seder contends that outrage was part of a smear campaign by “alt-right” figure Mike Cernovich designed to get him fired.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 03:32:00 UTC
-
MSNBC fires Sam Seder after ‘alt-right’ group digs up old Polanski joke Sam Sede
MSNBC fires Sam Seder after ‘alt-right’ group digs up old Polanski joke Sam Seder, an MSNBC contributor and podcast host, has been let go by the network in response to the backlash over a 2009 (since-deleted) Tweet satirizing defenders of Roman Polanski. Seder contends that outrage was part of a smear campaign by “alt-right” figure Mike Cernovich designed to get him fired. -
MSNBC fires Sam Seder after ‘alt-right’ group digs up old Polanski joke Sam Sede
MSNBC fires Sam Seder after ‘alt-right’ group digs up old Polanski joke Sam Seder, an MSNBC contributor and podcast host, has been let go by the network in response to the backlash over a 2009 (since-deleted) Tweet satirizing defenders of Roman Polanski. Seder contends that outrage was part of a smear campaign by “alt-right” figure Mike Cernovich designed to get him fired. -
“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything the
—“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks
That’s not true – if anything they’re underpaid. Doctors are (empirically) the most talented subroup in america, spending an absurd amount of wealth on their educations, and their cost per patient is trivial. The problem is the overhead administration costs of regulation placed upon doctors and the vast army of clerks that are needed to support them. (that’s the deal, really).
A doctor takes four years undergraduate, four years medical school, and three to seven years of internship, before they are eligible for a license. And they are in control of your life and death. A doctor’s average salary is 180k (round up to 200k). Thats 15 years of training. They have huge debt to repay – usually around 170k.
Now, if you are say, a computer software engineer with the same or higher IQ than a doctor, you need little or no university education, although it helps dramatically, and if you work equally as hard, you can make as much as a doctor does for fifteen more years than a doctor does.
So 15*200,000 = $3m + 250k for medical school, + 100K for university degree = $3.35M. Now, a resident for – let’s take an average of four years – is paid an average of 55K per year. So that’s 200-55 = 145k * 4 years = 580K. So 3.35M + .58M = $3.9M.
Now, that means that a 30 year old MD has accumulated an average of 170k in debt before he can earn that income, despite being one of our top performing people. But can work 45 to 50 years once obtaining that – while paying an average of 20k liability insurance per year.
Now, a software developer cannot (and need not) work that many years, but by his late 30’s has earned millions of dollars.
The principle benefits to being a doctor are social and long term financial, for the simple reason of ever-increasing demand, and persistent shortage.
The primary threat to your income is not the market but the government.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 16:55:00 UTC