Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • Could You Outline The Differences Between Marxism And Communism?

    Technically speaking,

    1) communism consists of equidistribution of goods, services, and labor by purely voluntary means. Communism is achieved through socialism.

    2) socialism is the stage under which the state (priests) centralizes all production, distribution, and trade (cooperation), until it is no longer necessary (heaven) and people merely consume what they need and produce what they need, because they are finally of good character for some reason (they are in heaven).

    Socialism destroys private property, the capacity to produce incentives, and the capacity to produce prices, and as such the ability to organize invention, production, distribution, and trade – and worse it’s dysgenic.

    Social democracy evolved when we understood that it was not possible to control production distribution and trade, but instead, for the state to maximize takings to the point where people continued to work. Economists have tried to calculate this number forever, but they believe in a homogenous population it might be between 50% and 70%. (I think that’s dependent upon a very ignorant populace with very extraordinary wealth that is only possible in periods of global circumstances that allow windfalls (like postwar western civ). ).

    Classical liberalism evolved when we understood that we were wealthy enough due to increasing trade, to prevent the rent seeking of the landed nobility, and to institutionalize the church’s traditional responsibilities by centralizing taxation rather than splitting taxes between the church and the state.

    Anarchism evolved when we understood that other than rule of law, and constitutional monarchy, all roads lead to despotism, corruption, and poverty.

    What we didn’t expect was that it would lead to our genocide.

    SPECTRUM:
    Communism – no property -no possibility

    Socialism – no property – virtual slavery- and centralization of production of commons.

    Social democracy – property but no retention of profits – and central production of commons.

    Classical liberalism – property and retention of profits and very limited central production of commons .

    Anarchism = property and retention of profits but no commons, and no state – an impossibility.

    https://www.quora.com/Could-you-outline-the-differences-between-Marxism-and-Communism

  • What’s The Purpose Of White Shaming/white Guilt?

    Obtaining social, economic, and political power by means of social disruption rather than by merit in social and economic achievement.

    https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-s-the-purpose-of-white-shaming-white-guilt

  • Why Do People Take An Interest In ‘racism’?

    Because race, subrace, tribe, and class are meaningful and successful means of identifying kin, and the vast majority of us associate with, work with, vote with, reproduce with, kin, and the outliers (15%) are at the extremes where their sexual market value is vastly lower, or vastly higher than the mean of their kin group. And it’s good for each to do so. Diversity (Miscegenation) is extremely bad for genes except on the margins (low sexual and social market value). Because they cannot easily be corrected through ingroup selection.

    All accusations of racism are just forms of gossip and shaming in order to obscure pursuit of political power without earning it through market means. Disapproval, shaming, gossiping, rallying, protesting, and propagandism are means by which the inadequate attempt to reduce the superior sexual, social, economic, and political market value of their superiors. It’s the industrialization through media of politics of pubescent girls, employed by infantile minds unable to ascend into the responsibilities of adulthood.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-take-an-interest-in-Racism

  • Could You Outline The Differences Between Marxism And Communism?

    Technically speaking,

    1) communism consists of equidistribution of goods, services, and labor by purely voluntary means. Communism is achieved through socialism.

    2) socialism is the stage under which the state (priests) centralizes all production, distribution, and trade (cooperation), until it is no longer necessary (heaven) and people merely consume what they need and produce what they need, because they are finally of good character for some reason (they are in heaven).

    Socialism destroys private property, the capacity to produce incentives, and the capacity to produce prices, and as such the ability to organize invention, production, distribution, and trade – and worse it’s dysgenic.

    Social democracy evolved when we understood that it was not possible to control production distribution and trade, but instead, for the state to maximize takings to the point where people continued to work. Economists have tried to calculate this number forever, but they believe in a homogenous population it might be between 50% and 70%. (I think that’s dependent upon a very ignorant populace with very extraordinary wealth that is only possible in periods of global circumstances that allow windfalls (like postwar western civ). ).

    Classical liberalism evolved when we understood that we were wealthy enough due to increasing trade, to prevent the rent seeking of the landed nobility, and to institutionalize the church’s traditional responsibilities by centralizing taxation rather than splitting taxes between the church and the state.

    Anarchism evolved when we understood that other than rule of law, and constitutional monarchy, all roads lead to despotism, corruption, and poverty.

    What we didn’t expect was that it would lead to our genocide.

    SPECTRUM:
    Communism – no property -no possibility

    Socialism – no property – virtual slavery- and centralization of production of commons.

    Social democracy – property but no retention of profits – and central production of commons.

    Classical liberalism – property and retention of profits and very limited central production of commons .

    Anarchism = property and retention of profits but no commons, and no state – an impossibility.

    https://www.quora.com/Could-you-outline-the-differences-between-Marxism-and-Communism

  • What’s The Purpose Of White Shaming/white Guilt?

    Obtaining social, economic, and political power by means of social disruption rather than by merit in social and economic achievement.

    https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-s-the-purpose-of-white-shaming-white-guilt

  • NASSIM TALEB ON ACTORS (Nassim Nicholas Taleb) To understand why what happens in

    NASSIM TALEB ON ACTORS

    (Nassim Nicholas Taleb)

    To understand why what happens in Hollywood is irrelevant to the rest of humans:

    a) How many ACTORs do you have among your friends?

    b) How many ACTOR friends do your friends have?

    Actors rarely mix with real people.

    2) Romans banned actors from marrying, even mixing with citizens.

    Same dynamics in modern times, but self-inflicted: engineers can mix w/gynecologists… actors stay with actors.

    Look at the funerals of “gens du spectacle”.

    3) I do not know many industries where people are hired either a) on looks, or b) ability to impersonate what one is not.

    4) Actors should not be the ones lektchuring the rest of us on ethics & morality.

    They also have a tendency to conflate virtue and its external manifestation, given that everything in their world is appearance.

    5) And for the slow thinkers on the thread, you don’t see gynecologists or train engineers lektchuring the rest of the world on virtue.

    Actors do.

    Gabish?

    6) Remember: actors are trained to not seem stupid.

    7) Now a harder questchon: what is the proportion of actors who voted for Hilary Monsanto-Malmaison?

    8) OK, let me be blunt.

    How many professions do you know, other than the ones where physical attributes are essential, where the modus “sleep your way up” prevails?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-29 06:30:00 UTC

  • Nassim Taleb On Actors

    (Nassim Nicholas Taleb) To understand why what happens in Hollywood is irrelevant to the rest of humans: a) How many ACTORs do you have among your friends? b) How many ACTOR friends do your friends have? Actors rarely mix with real people. 2) Romans banned actors from marrying, even mixing with citizens. Same dynamics in modern times, but self-inflicted: engineers can mix w/gynecologists… actors stay with actors. Look at the funerals of “gens du spectacle”. 3) I do not know many industries where people are hired either a) on looks, or b) ability to impersonate what one is not. 4) Actors should not be the ones lektchuring the rest of us on ethics & morality. They also have a tendency to conflate virtue and its external manifestation, given that everything in their world is appearance. 5) And for the slow thinkers on the thread, you don’t see gynecologists or train engineers lektchuring the rest of the world on virtue. Actors do. Gabish? 6) Remember: actors are trained to not seem stupid. 7) Now a harder questchon: what is the proportion of actors who voted for Hilary Monsanto-Malmaison? 8) OK, let me be blunt. How many professions do you know, other than the ones where physical attributes are essential, where the modus “sleep your way up” prevails?

  • Why Has There Been So Much Debate Recently About Race And Iq?

    Because only Europeans and East Asians have reduced the size of their underclasses sufficiently to produce advanced civilizations – and even so, the east asians still fell prey to bureaucracy and stagnation in the absence of rule of law(empiricism), markets(empiricism), and science(empiricism) in addition to the chinese predilection for political lying (deny and delay), predilection for lying in order to preserve face, and the endemic familial corruption they still practice, and catastrophic legal system.

    The rest of the planet has not reduced the size of their underclasses.

    The size of your underclass determines group hostile to your race, subrace, cult(religion), tribe, and clan.

    The reason being that behavioral norms are determined by the median of the population.

    We rarely see criticism of the immigration of cognitive elites – all of whom practice some form of aristotelianism(empiricism), and out of necessity, adhere to rule of tort law. (although there are exceptions).

    So westerners have spent thousands of years ridding ourselves of underclass, and downward pressure from the middle classes, the young and the old to fill underclass roles, yet most ‘immigrants’ are from the underclasses, and violate our middle class norms, traditions, values – and worse, they vote for the democrats AGAINST our middle class norms, traditions, and values.

    The left has achieved through underclass immigration and the destruction of the family what it could not achieve through their ideas.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-has-there-been-so-much-debate-recently-about-race-and-IQ

  • My answer to Which is a bigger problem in the US classism or racism?

    My answer to Which is a bigger problem in the US classism or racism? https://www.quora.com/Which-is-a-bigger-problem-in-the-US-classism-or-racism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-26 17:54:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/956948546225344512

  • My answer to Which is a bigger problem in the US classism or racism?

    My answer to Which is a bigger problem in the US classism or racism? https://www.quora.com/Which-is-a-bigger-problem-in-the-US-classism-or-racism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=cc68bfce

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-26 17:54:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/956948358240849920