Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (3

    I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (30 or so) and Races (3-4), that pedomorphic selection and testosterone coincide and so do facial features, with dimorphism varying between groups. ie: east asians lowest, africans highest.

    The way to domesticate a human animal is no different from any other. Overtake its dominance hierarchy and cull impulsivity and aggression. This turns out to produce neotenic trait expression, prolongation of maturation, and general decline in testosterone (and many other things)

    It’s pretty obvious. Some of us had to mature quickly in high disease gradients and some of us could afford to mature more slowly and produce fewer offspring in colder climates. Add prohibition on cousin marriage, the meat grinder of agrarianism/manorialism and underclass shrinks

    It’s not so much that any group is superior to any other group so much as that some groups have been more successful at culling the underclasses. If you can get your median above 105 very good things start to happen. I assume in the future that number will continue to increase

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 13:59:00 UTC

  • Feminine disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, and gossip merely provide the

    Feminine disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, and gossip merely provide the aristocracy with opportunity to counter. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 04:34:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973417057441271809

    Reply addressees: @CHMPBEGFORSDLA

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973399968693260288

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973399968693260288

  • 13 – Had it not been for the success in immigrating masses of the third world fr

    13 – Had it not been for the success in immigrating masses of the third world from different class distributions with different group strategies, the Jewish Century would have come and gone with the same relative damage as did the French, German, Russian, and Chinese.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-12 12:16:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973170843227508736

    Reply addressees: @nathancofnas

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688

    IN REPLY TO:

    @nathancofnas

    My analysis of Kevin MacDonald’s pseudoscience: https://t.co/eRfp6B8g0e

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688

  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: * 80% of people are in the bottom 80% of people. * <20%

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: * 80% of people are in the bottom 80% of people. * <20% of people organize the bottom 80%. * <1% of people organize the remaining top 20%. * <.1% of people are ‘important’ to organizing the top 1%. * People are not intrinsically valuable, because labor is not intrins…

  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: * 80% of people are in the bottom 80% of people. * <20%

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: * 80% of people are in the bottom 80% of people. * <20% of people organize the bottom 80%. * <1% of people organize the remaining top 20%. * <.1% of people are ‘important’ to organizing the top 1%. * People are not intrinsically valuable, because labor is not intrins…

  • THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES The lifting of the laboring and und

    THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES

    The lifting of the laboring and underclasses from subsistence to consumption was made possible by the increases in relative productivity.

    In other words, we are simply wealthy enough that we can afford (for a time) to reverse four thousand years of the domestication of human groups, by the rapid expansion of th eunderclasses and their movement from rural agrarian marginal self-sustenance to

    Nothing occurred because of feminine (left’s) good intentions, but instead the left caused the consumption of increases in productivity as increases in population rather than the traditional western means of increasing the commons.

    People were not oppressed. They were domesticated, generation by generation like every other animal through harsh winters, manorialism (most important) and aggressive hanging of up to one percent of the population every year.

    The industrial revolution reversed the trend, and we have already lost one standard deviation in median intelligence in the much of the west through dysgenia.

    Cities are exacerbating the issue since they are IQ and ovary graveyards.

    This is just the data.

    It is what it is.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 18:22:00 UTC

  • THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES The lifting of the laboring and und

    THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES The lifting of the laboring and underclasses from subsistence to consumption was made possible by the increases in relative productivity. In other words, we are simply wealthy enough that we can afford (for a time) to reverse four thousand years of the domestication of human groups, by the rapid expansion of th eunderclasses and their movement from rural agrarian marginal self-sustenance to Nothing occurred because of feminine (left’s) good intentions, but instead the left caused the consumption of increases in productivity as increases in population rather than the traditional western means of increasing the commons. People were not oppressed. They were domesticated, generation by generation like every other animal through harsh winters, manorialism (most important) and aggressive hanging of up to one percent of the population every year. The industrial revolution reversed the trend, and we have already lost one standard deviation in median intelligence in the much of the west through dysgenia. Cities are exacerbating the issue since they are IQ and ovary graveyards. This is just the data. It is what it is.

  • THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES The lifting of the laboring and und

    THE REASON FOR “PROGRESSIVE” CLASS INCREASES The lifting of the laboring and underclasses from subsistence to consumption was made possible by the increases in relative productivity. In other words, we are simply wealthy enough that we can afford (for a time) to reverse four thousand years of the domestication of human groups, by the rapid expansion of th eunderclasses and their movement from rural agrarian marginal self-sustenance to Nothing occurred because of feminine (left’s) good intentions, but instead the left caused the consumption of increases in productivity as increases in population rather than the traditional western means of increasing the commons. People were not oppressed. They were domesticated, generation by generation like every other animal through harsh winters, manorialism (most important) and aggressive hanging of up to one percent of the population every year. The industrial revolution reversed the trend, and we have already lost one standard deviation in median intelligence in the much of the west through dysgenia. Cities are exacerbating the issue since they are IQ and ovary graveyards. This is just the data. It is what it is.

  • WHY ARE PEOPLE ATTRACTED TO SOCIALISM? INFANTILISM. It is because you begin with

    WHY ARE PEOPLE ATTRACTED TO SOCIALISM? INFANTILISM.

    It is because you begin with the child’s relationship to the parent (family), not the political relationship between families, clans, tribes, and nations.

    1 – The first question of rational choice is “why don’t I commit suicide”.

    2 – The first question of ethics, is, and always will be, “Why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?”

    3 – The first question of politics, is, and always will be “why don’t me and mine, kill you and yours, and take your stuff.

    4 – The first question of all relations is “why don’t I/we kill you/you(plural) and take your stuff?”

    It is only after answering the question, that we decide how we cooperate or not.

    TRANSFORMATION INTO ADULTHOOD VS INFANTILIZATION

    A female, a child, (and a beta male) all admit their weakness and irrelevance when they begin with the presumption of the value of cooperation.

    Cooperation is only valuable until it is not.

    Hence, as an advocate for the organizational model of the family, all of whom demonstrate kin selection, you are attracted to the extension of that kin selection outside of your kin, and to the socialist’s (child,female) strategy.

    You seek it as ideal for the underclass family (genetic inferiors) but is not the ideal for the middle and upper class family (genetic superiors).

    And the markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities, are the means by which the competent evolve and the incompetent are removed from the gene pool – or at least, some equilibrium is maintained. Hence why those of us who exterminated our underclasses (east asians and western europeans) possess higher distributions in the middle and upper middle and the other groups possess lower distributions in the lower middle, and lower classes, and especially the extremely costly underclasses.

    So some of us are fully mature adults and understand this, and some of us are still infantilized (or coddled) and do not.

    The strong and able need a reason not to kill, enslave, enserf the weak and less able. And markets and rule of law, are the only means by which it is more profitable to cooperate for all than for the strong and able to enserf, enslave, prey upon, or kill the weak and unable.

    It takes about .001% of the male population to alter the political order. Socialism provides the incentive for the strong to defeat the weak. The only reason socialism had any footing whatsoever is that the christian peoples have a desperate desire to virtue signal their magnanimity – as a means of imitating their ancestral nobility.

    Everywhere even the most feeble attempt has been tried, the outcome has been cyclical degeneration of knowledge, craft, economy, norm, and tradition. Just as religions produced a cyclical degeneration of the same.

    Thus endeth the lesson.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 09:58:00 UTC

  • Why Are People Attracted To Socialism? Infantilism.

    It is because you begin with the child’s relationship to the parent (family), not the political relationship between families, clans, tribes, and nations. 1 – The first question of rational choice is “why don’t I commit suicide”. 2 – The first question of ethics, is, and always will be, “Why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?” 3 – The first question of politics, is, and always will be “why don’t me and mine, kill you and yours, and take your stuff. 4 – The first question of all relations is “why don’t I/we kill you/you(plural) and take your stuff?” It is only after answering the question, that we decide how we cooperate or not. TRANSFORMATION INTO ADULTHOOD VS INFANTILIZATION A female, a child, (and a beta male) all admit their weakness and irrelevance when they begin with the presumption of the value of cooperation. Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Hence, as an advocate for the organizational model of the family, all of whom demonstrate kin selection, you are attracted to the extension of that kin selection outside of your kin, and to the socialist’s (child,female) strategy. You seek it as ideal for the underclass family (genetic inferiors) but is not the ideal for the middle and upper class family (genetic superiors). And the markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities, are the means by which the competent evolve and the incompetent are removed from the gene pool – or at least, some equilibrium is maintained. Hence why those of us who exterminated our underclasses (east asians and western europeans) possess higher distributions in the middle and upper middle and the other groups possess lower distributions in the lower middle, and lower classes, and especially the extremely costly underclasses. So some of us are fully mature adults and understand this, and some of us are still infantilized (or coddled) and do not. The strong and able need a reason not to kill, enslave, enserf the weak and less able. And markets and rule of law, are the only means by which it is more profitable to cooperate for all than for the strong and able to enserf, enslave, prey upon, or kill the weak and unable. It takes about .001% of the male population to alter the political order. Socialism provides the incentive for the strong to defeat the weak. The only reason socialism had any footing whatsoever is that the christian peoples have a desperate desire to virtue signal their magnanimity – as a means of imitating their ancestral nobility. Everywhere even the most feeble attempt has been tried, the outcome has been cyclical degeneration of knowledge, craft, economy, norm, and tradition. Just as religions produced a cyclical degeneration of the same. Thus endeth the lesson.