Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • Roland Anderson I like the perspective this article provides. The “elites” runni

    http://www.returnofkings.com/112252/the-elites-have-no-idea-what-is-comingDaniel Roland Anderson I like the perspective this article provides. The “elites” running and staffing the Deep State are, very likely, a degenerate coterie of complacent, smug, inept, version of their predecessors.

    When is the last time they successfully pulled of a political assassination? These Deep Staters may have lost a step or three.

    I’m not sure this version of the Deep State is the nearly omnipotent, omniscient conspiracy some folks make it out to be.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-05 18:55:00 UTC

  • The Ambitions of Cattle

    —“Curt, what are your thoughts on metamodernism?”— No matter how you slice it, activists on the left are nothing more than human cattle seeking the monopoly of a cattle herd, the indifference (equality) of cattle in a herd, and the safety of cattle in the herd, in order to obtain a sense of ‘not being left behind’, and ‘a sense of control over a world” in which the continuous production of differences and hierarchies is constantly equilibrated by markets that are by definition out of our control, but entirely in our service. People who obtain their direction from the movement of the herd, their information from the herd, and color their decisions from the herd, display the cognitive biases of the herd: the sentiments of women. Meanwhile the conservative says “if we simply raise good families, and produce good commons the markets will provide by externality all that we can want or imagine”. These are the cognitive biases of the pack. The sentiments of men. It was men who made markets, property, families, marriage, continuous innovation, and the worship of the sun and stars, against the will of women, who at all times and all places seek to return us to the primitivism that is not in their interest but ours. The left are to be sated, comforted, and disciplined, but like women, never permitted to fulfill their ambitions and return us to primitivism.

  • The Ambitions of Cattle

    —“Curt, what are your thoughts on metamodernism?”— No matter how you slice it, activists on the left are nothing more than human cattle seeking the monopoly of a cattle herd, the indifference (equality) of cattle in a herd, and the safety of cattle in the herd, in order to obtain a sense of ‘not being left behind’, and ‘a sense of control over a world” in which the continuous production of differences and hierarchies is constantly equilibrated by markets that are by definition out of our control, but entirely in our service. People who obtain their direction from the movement of the herd, their information from the herd, and color their decisions from the herd, display the cognitive biases of the herd: the sentiments of women. Meanwhile the conservative says “if we simply raise good families, and produce good commons the markets will provide by externality all that we can want or imagine”. These are the cognitive biases of the pack. The sentiments of men. It was men who made markets, property, families, marriage, continuous innovation, and the worship of the sun and stars, against the will of women, who at all times and all places seek to return us to the primitivism that is not in their interest but ours. The left are to be sated, comforted, and disciplined, but like women, never permitted to fulfill their ambitions and return us to primitivism.

  • Dont be stupid. The difference between races, subraces, tribes and classes is de

    Dont be stupid. The difference between races, subraces, tribes and classes is demonstrated by ingroup preference (Kin selection). The fact that species can or cannot cross reproduce says nothing about what they prefer to reproduce with, and what they prefer to reproduce with is that which they can judge superiority and inferiority (investment) between.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 16:58:00 UTC

  • Um. We don’t live under capitalism whatsoever. We live under financialism, and s

    Um. We don’t live under capitalism whatsoever. We live under financialism, and social democracy (the redistributive state).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 12:23:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992379292716818432

  • Good genes seek safety in competition.

    The upper classes make good families because they propagate good genes. The lower classes make bad families because they propagate bad genes. It’s not surprising why the upper classes would form packs and the underclasses want to join a herd: bad genes seek safety in numbers. Good genes seek safety in competition.

  • Good genes seek safety in competition.

    The upper classes make good families because they propagate good genes. The lower classes make bad families because they propagate bad genes. It’s not surprising why the upper classes would form packs and the underclasses want to join a herd: bad genes seek safety in numbers. Good genes seek safety in competition.

  • Don’t and We Can’t Give a Whit, What Those Lacking Agency Desire. They’re Just Pets.

      The suppression of local rents by the empire and the increases in trade from the north sea to india made choices available to the underclasses in the past, just as the industrial revolution made choices available to the underclasses in modernity. And so you’re saying that because it is far harder to train those unwashed filthy, ignorant, and rather stupid masses in rational thought, the common law of reciprocity, and stoic virtues, and heroic myths, that we should allow the spread of marxist, socialist, postmodern, pseudoscientific, supernatural, and authoritarian falsehoods and allow another abrahamic dark age ‘because the self same uplifted underclasses cannot bear the reality of their lower sexual, social, economic, and political market value, despite their newfound ability to experience, and consume, because of their betters. So yes, there was an abrahamic dark age. No it does not matter what semi-domesticated animals feel, want, desire, when they can be trained to be at least far better domesticated animals with a bit of cost and effort. We lost over a THOUSAND YEARS, we lost multiple great civilizations, multiple lines of intellectual thought, because of the jewish conversion of roman deflationary language (idealism) into moral sophisms (that you do not know you are yourself repeating at this very moment). The christian destruction of knowledge, the arab destruction of knowledge and the failure of jews with the greatest ability and greatest literacy to do NOTHING AT ALL GOOD and everything possible bad to mankind before we forced aristotelianism upon them in exchange for their freedom – no longer worrying that they would cause prior catastrophes. So I do understand history. I just don’t make EXCUSES for the familiar, the weak, who, out of twisting my compassion would again put us into ignorance and deceit. Why is it a good, to tolerate those subhumans lacking the agency to face existential reality? It’s demonstrably not. It’s just more rewarding to rule them, and profit from doing so than it is to outright kill them off. Or at least, it was until recently. Now it looks like the opposite is true.

  • Don’t and We Can’t Give a Whit, What Those Lacking Agency Desire. They’re Just Pets.

      The suppression of local rents by the empire and the increases in trade from the north sea to india made choices available to the underclasses in the past, just as the industrial revolution made choices available to the underclasses in modernity. And so you’re saying that because it is far harder to train those unwashed filthy, ignorant, and rather stupid masses in rational thought, the common law of reciprocity, and stoic virtues, and heroic myths, that we should allow the spread of marxist, socialist, postmodern, pseudoscientific, supernatural, and authoritarian falsehoods and allow another abrahamic dark age ‘because the self same uplifted underclasses cannot bear the reality of their lower sexual, social, economic, and political market value, despite their newfound ability to experience, and consume, because of their betters. So yes, there was an abrahamic dark age. No it does not matter what semi-domesticated animals feel, want, desire, when they can be trained to be at least far better domesticated animals with a bit of cost and effort. We lost over a THOUSAND YEARS, we lost multiple great civilizations, multiple lines of intellectual thought, because of the jewish conversion of roman deflationary language (idealism) into moral sophisms (that you do not know you are yourself repeating at this very moment). The christian destruction of knowledge, the arab destruction of knowledge and the failure of jews with the greatest ability and greatest literacy to do NOTHING AT ALL GOOD and everything possible bad to mankind before we forced aristotelianism upon them in exchange for their freedom – no longer worrying that they would cause prior catastrophes. So I do understand history. I just don’t make EXCUSES for the familiar, the weak, who, out of twisting my compassion would again put us into ignorance and deceit. Why is it a good, to tolerate those subhumans lacking the agency to face existential reality? It’s demonstrably not. It’s just more rewarding to rule them, and profit from doing so than it is to outright kill them off. Or at least, it was until recently. Now it looks like the opposite is true.

  • The upper classes make good families because they propagate good genes. The lowe

    The upper classes make good families because they propagate good genes. The lower classes make bad families because they propagate bad genes. It’s not surprising why the upper classes would form packs and the underclasses want to join a herd: bad genes seek safety in numbers. Good genes seek safety in competition.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 21:50:00 UTC