Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • THE VALUE OF THE CLASSES There is a very great difference between transforming t

    THE VALUE OF THE CLASSES

    There is a very great difference between transforming the state of the physical world by physical coercion (labor), and transforming the choices and organization of people using incentives (layers of entrepreneurship and management). The physical world can’t choose between options. Man can choose between options unless he is in fact a slave – thereby lacking exit. Now, one might say that exit is not itself a favorable choice, but then it is a choice for labor, and not a choice for slaves. The Communist and Socialist wants to create serf labor – lacking exit but the management (state) takes ownership for the survival of the serfs. The Democratic socialist wants to preserve voluntary organization of production but monopolize involuntary production of commons by maximum extraction of the profits of the market. The classical liberal wants to preserve the private production of goods, services, and information, and the private production of all commons it is possible to produce in that market, while limiting the involuntary production of commons to those of via-negativa constraint: Military, Justice, Law. The anarchist (libertarian) wants to prohibit the production of involuntary commons (despite this is as impossible as communism since there is no incentive to participate in an uncompetitive polity, when a polity is and of itself, a commons. We cannot restore pastoralism(zero-commons). Even if those peoples that have never succeeded at agrarianism and been through it’s evolutionary grinder, desperately want to restore it and resist civilization at every opportunity. All the potential value is created by the martial aristocracy. All the value is created by the entrepreneurial class. The vast amount of the benefit is obtained by the laboring classes, and the underclasses that would otherwise be dead. The beneficiary of civlization is largely labor. The principle benefit of the few at the top, and the minority in the middle, is signaling that preserves their identification as those who successfully organize potential, organize production distribution and trade, and organize the labor that requires little other than the physical to transform the physical world.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-16 11:00:00 UTC

  • We Can’t Get out Of It. People at The Bottom Will Increase Drag

    The OECD also highlights a decoupling between productivity growth and higher real average wages in many countries, resulting in continued declines in labour’s share of national income. In turn, the Compendium shows that the contribution of labour utilisation (hours worked per capita) to GDP growth has risen markedly in a number of countries, notably in the United Kingdom and the United States. However, rises in labour utilisation reflect two opposing effects: higher employment rates but lower average hours per worker, which points to more part-time working, often in low productivity jobs. Higher employment rates are welcome. But the fact that they, rather than increases in labour productivity, have been the most important driver of GDP per capita growth in many economies in recent years is a concern for long-term economic prospects, it adds. The OECD says productivity is ultimately a question of “working smarter” – measured by ‘multifactor productivity’ – rather than “working harder”. It reflects firms’ ability to produce more output by better combining inputs through new ideas, technological innovations, as well as by way of process and organisational innovations, such as new business models. May 14, 2018 2:23pm

  • We Can’t Get out Of It. People at The Bottom Will Increase Drag

    The OECD also highlights a decoupling between productivity growth and higher real average wages in many countries, resulting in continued declines in labour’s share of national income. In turn, the Compendium shows that the contribution of labour utilisation (hours worked per capita) to GDP growth has risen markedly in a number of countries, notably in the United Kingdom and the United States. However, rises in labour utilisation reflect two opposing effects: higher employment rates but lower average hours per worker, which points to more part-time working, often in low productivity jobs. Higher employment rates are welcome. But the fact that they, rather than increases in labour productivity, have been the most important driver of GDP per capita growth in many economies in recent years is a concern for long-term economic prospects, it adds. The OECD says productivity is ultimately a question of “working smarter” – measured by ‘multifactor productivity’ – rather than “working harder”. It reflects firms’ ability to produce more output by better combining inputs through new ideas, technological innovations, as well as by way of process and organisational innovations, such as new business models. May 14, 2018 2:23pm

  • New World Order: The First Step Was to Kill the Kings

    New World Order = Rule by Merchants. by Bill Anderson The first step was to kill all the kings. Completed via WWII. The king is the Father of the Nation, biologically related to his subjects, the embodiment of the genetic self-interest of a nation. The moderns are very careful to propagandize monarchy as evil and wicked, because the king has the incentive to limit the opportunities of the merchant class to profit from the consumption of capital of the nation. The Merchants frame the story of America as the culmination of the defeat of kings, raising anti-monarchy to religious fervor, and sacralizing the value. Monarchy is a heresy to them. This value system led America to become the Kingslayer and kinslayer in both WWI and WWII. Little did we know that when we slew the Fathers of the nations, that we were killing our Father in our collective cultural psyche, rendering a final judgement against authoritarianism as evil, and enshrining that value system. It’s the value system of the Son in rebellion against the Father. Now we see this anti-Father value system reaching the flower of its expression : where all masculinity is toxic, where men no longer defend their borders or their breeding rights. The restoration of Men, of patriarchy (rule by fathers), requires the re-sacrilization of the Father in our value system. This requires the destruction of the mythos of the merchants, including the propaganda that the American project was noble or virtuous only because it destroyed kings. The was virtue in being explorers and conquerors, but not in leading the charge to institute rule by merchant.

  • New World Order: The First Step Was to Kill the Kings

    New World Order = Rule by Merchants. by Bill Anderson The first step was to kill all the kings. Completed via WWII. The king is the Father of the Nation, biologically related to his subjects, the embodiment of the genetic self-interest of a nation. The moderns are very careful to propagandize monarchy as evil and wicked, because the king has the incentive to limit the opportunities of the merchant class to profit from the consumption of capital of the nation. The Merchants frame the story of America as the culmination of the defeat of kings, raising anti-monarchy to religious fervor, and sacralizing the value. Monarchy is a heresy to them. This value system led America to become the Kingslayer and kinslayer in both WWI and WWII. Little did we know that when we slew the Fathers of the nations, that we were killing our Father in our collective cultural psyche, rendering a final judgement against authoritarianism as evil, and enshrining that value system. It’s the value system of the Son in rebellion against the Father. Now we see this anti-Father value system reaching the flower of its expression : where all masculinity is toxic, where men no longer defend their borders or their breeding rights. The restoration of Men, of patriarchy (rule by fathers), requires the re-sacrilization of the Father in our value system. This requires the destruction of the mythos of the merchants, including the propaganda that the American project was noble or virtuous only because it destroyed kings. The was virtue in being explorers and conquerors, but not in leading the charge to institute rule by merchant.

  • NEW WORLD ORDER: THE FIRST STEP WAS TO KILL THE KINGS New World Order = Rule by

    NEW WORLD ORDER: THE FIRST STEP WAS TO KILL THE KINGS

    New World Order = Rule by Merchants.

    by Bill Anderson

    The first step was to kill all the kings. Completed via WWII. The king is the Father of the Nation, biologically related to his subjects, the embodiment of the genetic self-interest of a nation.

    The moderns are very careful to propagandize monarchy as evil and wicked, because the king has the incentive to limit the opportunities of the merchant class to profit from the consumption of capital of the nation.

    The Merchants frame the story of America as the culmination of the defeat of kings, raising anti-monarchy to religious fervor, and sacralizing the value. Monarchy is a heresy to them. This value system led America to become the Kingslayer and kinslayer in both WWI and WWII. Little did we know that when we slew the Fathers of the nations, that we were killing our Father in our collective cultural psyche, rendering a final judgement against authoritarianism as evil, and enshrining that value system. It’s the value system of the Son in rebellion against the Father.

    Now we see this anti-Father value system reaching the flower of its expression : where all masculinity is toxic, where men no longer defend their borders or their breeding rights.

    The restoration of Men, of patriarchy (rule by fathers), requires the re-sacrilization of the Father in our value system. This requires the destruction of the mythos of the merchants, including the propaganda that the American project was noble or virtuous only because it destroyed kings. The was virtue in being explorers and conquerors, but not in leading the charge to institute rule by merchant.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-14 14:38:00 UTC

  • “Men find their place in the competence hierarchy. Women either deny the hierarc

    —“Men find their place in the competence hierarchy. Women either deny the hierarchy or insist on its instability.”—Megan Kusui

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 23:50:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995813514953584640

  • “Men find their place in the competence hierarchy. Women either deny the hierarc

    —“Men find their place in the competence hierarchy. Women either deny the hierarchy or insist on its instability.”—Megan Kusui

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 19:50:00 UTC

  • THE URBAN AREA AS GENERATOR OF SCHIZOPHRENIA (AND THEREFORE LEFTISM) A particula

    THE URBAN AREA AS GENERATOR OF SCHIZOPHRENIA (AND THEREFORE LEFTISM)

    A particularly stable and replicable finding has been the association between living in an urban environment and the development of schizophrenia, even after factors such as drug use, ethnic group and size of social group have been controlled for.[153] A recent study of 4.4 million men and women in Sweden found a 68%–77% increased risk of diagnosed psychosis for people living in the most urbanized environments, a significant proportion of which is likely to be described as schizophrenia.[154]

    The effect does not appear to be due to a higher incidence of obstetric complications in urban environments.[155] The risk increases with the number of years and degree of urban living in childhood and adolescence, suggesting that constant, cumulative, or repeated exposures during upbringing occurring more frequently in urbanized areas are responsible for the association.[156]

    Various possible explanations for the effect have been judged unlikely based on the nature of the findings, including infectious causes or a generic stress effect. It is thought to interact with genetic dispositions and, since there appears to be nonrandom variation even across different neighborhoods, and an independent association with social isolation, it has been proposed that the degree of “social capital” (e.g. degree of mutual trust, bonding and safety in neighborhoods) can exert a developmental impact on children growing up in these environments.[157]

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-12 22:46:00 UTC

  • Humans must calculate something in order to choose from fields of choices, and s

    Humans must calculate something in order to choose from fields of choices, and status signaling is the acquisition with the highest returns both practical and emotional. This isn’t a problem UNLESS YOU’RE SPENDING OTHER PEOPLE’S CAPITAL (a parasite). Virtue signaling is theft.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-10 20:35:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994677355653292032

    Reply addressees: @standsApart @KennethBuff @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994676440976289792

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994676440976289792