Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK by Andy Lunn Postmodernism is an evolution of Abrahami

    ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK by Andy Lunn Postmodernism is an evolution of Abrahamism: |REVOLTS| Monotheism > Marxism > Postmodernism All three are underclass revolts against the dominant class; All three are attacks against western technologies of reason > enlightenment (empiricism) > science. We engage over millennia in attack and counter attack. The weapons change but those wielding them remain the same. They attack Christianity not because of what it is, but because of the people who remain Christian today.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“It is perhaps not for nothing that Christ

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“It is perhaps not for nothing that Christianity was first popular with the under classes during the Roman times – women and slaves. The idea that you should not struggle to improve your lot but rather to bear it and receive some unspecified benefits in some future life was also attractive to the ruling class, to promote among the underclasses. … As for the Emperor – monotheism was attractive as the idea is “you don’t like your god? Too damn bad, he’s the only one you got.” Rather than polytheism which is a form of religious democracy. If a God stops taking care of you, you go a sacrifice/worship another God. There is a type of responsibility that a Deity has.”— Andrey Sokoloff

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 19:41:25 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK by Andy Lunn Postmo

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK
    by Andy Lunn

    Postmodernism is an evolution of Abrahamism:

    |REVOLTS| Monotheism > Marxism > Postmodernism

    All three are underclass revolts against the dominant class;

    All three are attacks against western technologies of reason > enlightenment (empiricism) > science.

    We engage over millennia in attack and counter attack.

    The weapons change but those wielding them remain the same.

    They attack Christianity not because of what it is, but because of the people who remain Christian today.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 19:12:34 UTC

  • “Marxism = Feminism. Post-Modernism = Full-Spectrum Feminist Hegemony”—Claire

    —“Marxism = Feminism. Post-Modernism = Full-Spectrum Feminist Hegemony”—Claire Khaw

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 16:27:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024330677452525579

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Marxism = Feminism. Post-Modernism = Full

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Marxism = Feminism. Post-Modernism = Full-Spectrum Feminist Hegemony”—Claire Khaw

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 16:27:10 UTC

  • “It is perhaps not for nothing that Christianity was first popular with the unde

    —“It is perhaps not for nothing that Christianity was first popular with the under classes during the Roman times – women and slaves. The idea that you should not struggle to improve your lot but rather to bear it and receive some unspecified benefits in some future life was also attractive to the ruling class, to promote among the underclasses. … As for the Emperor – monotheism was attractive as the idea is “you don’t like your god? Too damn bad, he’s the only one you got.” Rather than polytheism which is a form of religious democracy. If a God stops taking care of you, you go a sacrifice/worship another God. There is a type of responsibility that a Deity has.”— Andrey Sokoloff

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 15:41:00 UTC

  • ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK by Andy Lunn Postmodernism is an evolution of Abrahami

    ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK

    by Andy Lunn

    Postmodernism is an evolution of Abrahamism:

    |REVOLTS| Monotheism > Marxism > Postmodernism

    All three are underclass revolts against the dominant class;

    All three are attacks against western technologies of reason > enlightenment (empiricism) > science.

    We engage over millennia in attack and counter attack.

    The weapons change but those wielding them remain the same.

    They attack Christianity not because of what it is, but because of the people who remain Christian today.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 15:12:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“As a conservative, would you prefer a hyp

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“As a conservative, would you prefer a hypothetical effeminate capitalist society or a hypothetical masculine socialist society?”—

    STRANGE QUESTION – THE CORRECT ANSWER

    Hmmm…. Socialism(equality) is the result of the female reproductive strategy, and capitalism(markets) is the result of a young (ascendent) male reproductive strategy, and classical liberalism(hierarchy) is the result of the established male reproductive strategy, and authoritarianism (command) regardless of redistributive, market, or extractive, is the result of dominant male reproductive strategy. As far as I know fascism has won the postwar competition as the means of rule, and markets as the means of production, and redistribution as the means of gaining the publics permission to rule. All nations of any scale are now fascists (intolerant) mixed economies, with minor variations in corruption and liberty.

    https://www.quora.com/As-a-conservative-would-you-prefer-a-hypothetical-effeminate-capitalist-society-or-a-hypothetical-masculine-socialist-society/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=418aaf6d&srid=u4Qv

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 13:11:30 UTC

  • How Do We Evolve (genetically) and Why?

    (groups and genetics) 1 – We can evolve (a) through normal mutation (b) through selection by intergenerational expression (c) class (quality) sortition, rates of reproduction, and rotation, (d) through selection by group strategy and reorganization resulting in asymmetric rates, , (e) through technological innovation. Although “d” is misunderstood. 2 – Of these five methods of evolution it appears c,d,e are faster and more influential than a,b. And that in general we are selecting between low dimorphism and increased rates of maturity (male) in hotter climates, higher populations, and greater disease gradients, versus higher dimorphism and decrease rates of maturity (female) in cooler climates, lower populations, and weaker disease gradients. 3 – The primary axis of difference between the races and sub races, if not tribes, consists in (a) the distribution of dimorphism (balance of male and female traits between the genders), (b) degree of neoteny (balance of rates of maturity or delayed maturity), and (c) success at culling the underclasses (defectives). 4 – We do not face this reality yet in the postwar era due to (((suppression))) of scientific truths, but some races and sub races are more evolved than others and we can test this because rates of maturity (neoteny), degrees of dimorphism (cognitive structure, and endocrine responses), and IQ distribution (degree of suppression of the underclasses). In this sense races and sub races are vastly unequal. 5 – But this only means that in large part some groups express different excellences in their middle, upper middle and upper classes, and that some groups have been more successful at culling the lower classes due to climate and available means of production. 6 – In other words, we can continue to speciate by our various group excellences if and only if homogenous nation states that practice economic eugenics (reproductive limitations).

  • How Do We Evolve (genetically) and Why?

    (groups and genetics) 1 – We can evolve (a) through normal mutation (b) through selection by intergenerational expression (c) class (quality) sortition, rates of reproduction, and rotation, (d) through selection by group strategy and reorganization resulting in asymmetric rates, , (e) through technological innovation. Although “d” is misunderstood. 2 – Of these five methods of evolution it appears c,d,e are faster and more influential than a,b. And that in general we are selecting between low dimorphism and increased rates of maturity (male) in hotter climates, higher populations, and greater disease gradients, versus higher dimorphism and decrease rates of maturity (female) in cooler climates, lower populations, and weaker disease gradients. 3 – The primary axis of difference between the races and sub races, if not tribes, consists in (a) the distribution of dimorphism (balance of male and female traits between the genders), (b) degree of neoteny (balance of rates of maturity or delayed maturity), and (c) success at culling the underclasses (defectives). 4 – We do not face this reality yet in the postwar era due to (((suppression))) of scientific truths, but some races and sub races are more evolved than others and we can test this because rates of maturity (neoteny), degrees of dimorphism (cognitive structure, and endocrine responses), and IQ distribution (degree of suppression of the underclasses). In this sense races and sub races are vastly unequal. 5 – But this only means that in large part some groups express different excellences in their middle, upper middle and upper classes, and that some groups have been more successful at culling the lower classes due to climate and available means of production. 6 – In other words, we can continue to speciate by our various group excellences if and only if homogenous nation states that practice economic eugenics (reproductive limitations).