Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/43879950_10156705261012264_6656299216798744576_o_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/43879950_10156705261012264_6656299216798744576_o_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/43879950_10156705261012264_6656299216798744576_o_10156705261007264.jpg CONTEXT PARETO GENERATIONS IN THE USACurt DoolittleLast two are Gates and Bezos, but they are not the most powerful. The most influential are the people in the fed, and who head the major financial institutions, and who donate most to election campaigns.Oct 13, 2018 2:43pmMichael ChurchillThe influence of billionaires who donate to elections cannot be overstated. I did an analysis of this once. It is unbelievable. Soros himself really does have incredible power. Also Adelson and Simons and a few other cats. There are a couple on the right as well. Think tanks and donations to politicians … that is where the power is. That is the reason to try to make a billion.Oct 13, 2018 3:34pmLance KennedyAdelson, Simons, Soros…Oct 13, 2018 5:57pmCONTEXT PARETO GENERATIONS IN THE USA

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 14:41:00 UTC

  • THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING —“lots of

    THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING

    —“lots of words, lots of confusion mixed with lots of true facts which are unfortunately unrelated to the topic. It’s all very simple: The essence of Marx and Marxism is economic class. Marx and real Marxists focus on economic class–rich vs. poor, owners vs. employees, etc. Real Marxists call themselves “Marxists”. So-called “cultural Marxists” do not call themselves “cultural Marxists”, and they mainly ignore economic class. They focus instead on everything BESIDES economic class. Their thinking is in many important ways the OPPOSITE of Marxism. It’s very simple. I don’t know why so many people refuse to even acknowledge these basics.”– Illarion B. Bykov

    Because you’re confusing what people intend. Instead it matters:

    1) What method of argument (sophism, and self deception)

    2) Whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises,

    3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce,

    4) Whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics.

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN. It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia.

    1) People were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them.

    And;

    2) The classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because (a) we are materially different in the distribution of personality traits, and weighted to the bottom without continuous eugenic administration; (b) we are different in utility to one another due to Pareto distribution of ability (ten percent of people do half the work, recursively unto the last person); and (c) man MUST organize by Pareto (power) distributions for the same reason that the Iron Law of Oligarchy exists: decisions must be made from a distribution of coincidences of wants.

    And;

    3) There are only three means of organizing people with those traits: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction).

    And;

    4) There are only three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), or conflated into a monopoly (egypt, mesopotamia.

    5) We do not believe, and the evidence is, marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) does not, possess the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort marxist/postmodernist/feminist/ex-serf/slave (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Great Ape Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias.

    SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS, ACTIONS, AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 04:24:00 UTC

  • NEW TERM COINED: “Neuro-Commoner.” This corrects the term “neurotypical”, by inc

    NEW TERM COINED:
    “Neuro-Commoner.”

    This corrects the term “neurotypical”, by including it’s class position.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-12 22:31:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050876619798323200

  • IQ by Major (colleges Do Not Produce This Data on Purpose)

    October 12th, 2018 12:47 PM IQ BY MAJOR (COLLEGES DO NOT PRODUCE THIS DATA ON PURPOSE) [T]here are five different measures we use to answer this question: 1) the iq of high school students applying for university (we have their iq scores from standardized tests) 2) the sat scores of college students by major 3) the gre scores of grad students by major 4) the long term tracking of students from high school to life. 5) the lifetime performance of all degree holders by socio economic status. Most of these tests show volatility because 1) weschler is the best measure but only available in high school students, 2) mathematics appears to be the best functional test of intelligence at the high end, and ‘verbal ability’ was added to raise the measure of girls/women on tests, 3) the personality trait ‘industriousness’ is so influential on performance 4) sat scores test education, gre scores select upward, 5) colleges and universities vary vastly in the capability of students they attract and the difficulty of the major they provide. 6) smaller numbers of men go to college and tend to have higher abilities, and larger numbers of women go to college regardless of their abilities. 7) girls mature much earlier, and boys much later, so IQ stabilizes in adulthood (and any advances evaporate), and we have no means of IQ testing after 23 when this stabilization occurs other than lifetime performance. The numbers in the the OP reflect an effect which is well understood in the data: more women go to college than men by far now, and that lowers the score of women to the median because of regression to the mean at scale. Moreover, some degrees have a negative impact on lifetime earnings (social work, sociology, education). This is important for the simple reason that most published proxies for intelligence of gender and occupation use the number of degrees independent of major as a proxy for IQ which tends to vastly overstate or understand the biological intelligence, functional intelligence, of demographic areas. None of which is complicated. But the reminder needs to be out there constantly that this is how aggregates are produced.

  • “Neuro-Commoner”

    October 12th, 2018 6:31 PM

    NEW TERM COINED:“Neuro-Commoner.” This corrects the term “neurotypical“, by including it’s class position. 😉

  • “Neuro-Commoner”

    October 12th, 2018 6:31 PM

    NEW TERM COINED:“Neuro-Commoner.” This corrects the term “neurotypical“, by including it’s class position. 😉

  • NEW TERM COINED: “Neuro-Commoner.” This corrects the term “neurotypical”, by inc

    NEW TERM COINED:

    “Neuro-Commoner.”

    This corrects the term “neurotypical”, by including it’s class position.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-12 18:31:00 UTC

  • Countering Right Criticism of Cultural Marxism

    October 11th, 2018 3:31 PM COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM ( In response to: https://www.facebook.com/pepe.escobar.77377/posts/10156644462266678 ) So you didn’t actually make an argument I can counter, other than “Misinterpreted” – when the universal criticism of the left is that while the right can understand the left (rationally) the left cannot comprehend the right (intuitionistically) and resorts to psychologisms (Critique). What outcomes, arguments, propositions, assumptions were misinterpreted? THE UNDERLYING ARGUMENT Pilpul consists of a technique using sophisms (“justificationism”). Critique consists of a technique by which straw-man criticism without providing an alternative construction, for the opposition to criticize, substitutes for argument. And Feminine Competitive Instinct relies on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, straw manning, and reputation destruction instead of competing with (answering) the objections put forth in the argument. Feminine group strategy relies on prosecution of reciprocity in support of advancing proportionality indirectly. These are all methods of sophomoric rhetorical fraud. They are instinctual. And they appear to have evolved to control alphas (reproductive choice). Whereas Aristotelianism, Empiricism, Scientific method, Economics, and Rule of law require Operational Language (Testimony), warranty, demonstrated due diligence, and active suppression against ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms, and deceit as means of demanding reciprocity. Conversely, Abrahamism (pilpul, critique, false history, supernaturalism), reformed into Marxism-Boasianism-Freudianism-(even Cantorian sets)-Adorno/Frankfurt practice of pseudoscience that advances the feminine reproductive and competitive strategy and the feminine method of speech, to undermine reciprocity and testability in order to prevent full accounting of merit. And when the pseudoscientific(marxist analysis) and pseudo-rational (dialectic) argument failed, the French postmodernists reformed into (resorted to) outright Denialism (iq, race, gender, culture, class, causality, truth, un- decidability etc). Which is what the Right Refers to as “Cultural Marxism” and the Academy, Media, State complex make use of these narratives (propaganda, cult mythology) in combination with the downward expansion of college and university education, to fund teaching of, research into, and the production of literature, and the creation multiple generations of new ‘cultists’.

This activism resulted in the successful displacement of the aristocracy (military) from political rule, and the replacement of the church with the academy/media/state complex. And resulted in the incremental (quite intentional) selection of cases brought before the Supreme Court in order to undermine the constitution (via legislation from the bench) due to the weakness of the constitution not providing a vehicle for return of undecidable propositions to the legislature. The right has consistently resisted, and held onto the moral argument sufficiently to deny political power, (albeit in archaic enlightenment prose), but the left achieved through single motherhood expansion and underclass immigration, and involuntary transfer of reproduction to the lower classes through taxation, that which they could not achieve by ideas. This has resulted in a Racial Polity, and the racialization of both parties with single white women and vulnerable underclasses as the only race-defectors. So, the Right argument (Aristocratic-hierarchical, Meritocratic, Market, Rule of Law, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, and Eugenic), is not that there is some vast left conspiracy – because the right doesn’t believe the left (Feminine, Herd, Dysgenic) mind possesses any agency whatsoever (hence the evolution of the Useful Idiot label into the NPC Meme). But instead that the cult of supernaturalism was replaced first by a cult of pseudoscience, and having failed at pseudoscience, replaced by a cult of outright denialism. The fact that these sophomoric arguments (pilpul) were all produced using Critique, in support of the feminine reproductive strategy (proportionality of the herd), in order to circumvent rule of law by reciprocity (ancient customary law of tort), and to enforce discretionary rule instead,(despite that the country was designed as a ‘third way’ between authoritarian discretion of the aristocracy, and authoritarian socialism of the church.) Democracy is (majoritarian monopoly) little more than the search for power external to the market. The right attempts to preserve the market (meritocracy and reciprocity of the pack) while the left attempts to circumvent the market (equality and proportionality of the herd.) Yes there are the Soros’ of the world that do this by intent. By by and large the left is just lacking the right’s Agency, which is what separates right and left: Agency. [Left: Female Reproductive Strategy]: Consumption : Equality Devotion Proportionality [Libertarian: Unfranchised Male Reproductive Strategy]: Production: Reciprocity, Liberty [Conservative: Franchised (established) Male Reproductive Strategy]: Conservation: Reciprocity Hierarchy/Loyalty, Purity.

 Arguably only libertarians only have any agency since they are the only faction with sufficient understanding of both economics and rule of law to possess it, but as a minority they are ineffective outside of think tanks and policy influence. The conservatives however remain dedicated to the individual as the central object of the law of tort; the family as the central unit of policy; and the civic order as the central unit of commons production; and the state limited to service as the insurer of last resort. Since this combination is a prescription for a eugenic social order, and that eugenic order (“manorialism”) was successful in both the far east and far west in sufficiently eugenic limitations on reproduction to produce a nearly completely middle class polity, this social order is both the origin of east and west prosperity, but in conflict with the expansion of single mothers, and third worlder underclasses without such genetic cultural traditional, and institutional histories. We provide agency through science: the use of correspondence with reality, using operational language to produce consistency between existence, action, perception, and intuition. And we use the scientific method to insure that the frauds sophisms, fictionalism, and outright deceits so common outside of the west, are incrementally suppressed. Unfortunately the continentals and the mesopotamians retain their sophisms, pseudosciences, and supernaturalisms, and their desperate followers try to bring moral FICTIONS into reality by the act of chanting them. “Thus endeth the lesson.” Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Countering Right Criticism of Cultural Marxism

    October 11th, 2018 3:31 PM COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM ( In response to: https://www.facebook.com/pepe.escobar.77377/posts/10156644462266678 ) So you didn’t actually make an argument I can counter, other than “Misinterpreted” – when the universal criticism of the left is that while the right can understand the left (rationally) the left cannot comprehend the right (intuitionistically) and resorts to psychologisms (Critique). What outcomes, arguments, propositions, assumptions were misinterpreted? THE UNDERLYING ARGUMENT Pilpul consists of a technique using sophisms (“justificationism”). Critique consists of a technique by which straw-man criticism without providing an alternative construction, for the opposition to criticize, substitutes for argument. And Feminine Competitive Instinct relies on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, straw manning, and reputation destruction instead of competing with (answering) the objections put forth in the argument. Feminine group strategy relies on prosecution of reciprocity in support of advancing proportionality indirectly. These are all methods of sophomoric rhetorical fraud. They are instinctual. And they appear to have evolved to control alphas (reproductive choice). Whereas Aristotelianism, Empiricism, Scientific method, Economics, and Rule of law require Operational Language (Testimony), warranty, demonstrated due diligence, and active suppression against ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms, and deceit as means of demanding reciprocity. Conversely, Abrahamism (pilpul, critique, false history, supernaturalism), reformed into Marxism-Boasianism-Freudianism-(even Cantorian sets)-Adorno/Frankfurt practice of pseudoscience that advances the feminine reproductive and competitive strategy and the feminine method of speech, to undermine reciprocity and testability in order to prevent full accounting of merit. And when the pseudoscientific(marxist analysis) and pseudo-rational (dialectic) argument failed, the French postmodernists reformed into (resorted to) outright Denialism (iq, race, gender, culture, class, causality, truth, un- decidability etc). Which is what the Right Refers to as “Cultural Marxism” and the Academy, Media, State complex make use of these narratives (propaganda, cult mythology) in combination with the downward expansion of college and university education, to fund teaching of, research into, and the production of literature, and the creation multiple generations of new ‘cultists’.

This activism resulted in the successful displacement of the aristocracy (military) from political rule, and the replacement of the church with the academy/media/state complex. And resulted in the incremental (quite intentional) selection of cases brought before the Supreme Court in order to undermine the constitution (via legislation from the bench) due to the weakness of the constitution not providing a vehicle for return of undecidable propositions to the legislature. The right has consistently resisted, and held onto the moral argument sufficiently to deny political power, (albeit in archaic enlightenment prose), but the left achieved through single motherhood expansion and underclass immigration, and involuntary transfer of reproduction to the lower classes through taxation, that which they could not achieve by ideas. This has resulted in a Racial Polity, and the racialization of both parties with single white women and vulnerable underclasses as the only race-defectors. So, the Right argument (Aristocratic-hierarchical, Meritocratic, Market, Rule of Law, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, and Eugenic), is not that there is some vast left conspiracy – because the right doesn’t believe the left (Feminine, Herd, Dysgenic) mind possesses any agency whatsoever (hence the evolution of the Useful Idiot label into the NPC Meme). But instead that the cult of supernaturalism was replaced first by a cult of pseudoscience, and having failed at pseudoscience, replaced by a cult of outright denialism. The fact that these sophomoric arguments (pilpul) were all produced using Critique, in support of the feminine reproductive strategy (proportionality of the herd), in order to circumvent rule of law by reciprocity (ancient customary law of tort), and to enforce discretionary rule instead,(despite that the country was designed as a ‘third way’ between authoritarian discretion of the aristocracy, and authoritarian socialism of the church.) Democracy is (majoritarian monopoly) little more than the search for power external to the market. The right attempts to preserve the market (meritocracy and reciprocity of the pack) while the left attempts to circumvent the market (equality and proportionality of the herd.) Yes there are the Soros’ of the world that do this by intent. By by and large the left is just lacking the right’s Agency, which is what separates right and left: Agency. [Left: Female Reproductive Strategy]: Consumption : Equality Devotion Proportionality [Libertarian: Unfranchised Male Reproductive Strategy]: Production: Reciprocity, Liberty [Conservative: Franchised (established) Male Reproductive Strategy]: Conservation: Reciprocity Hierarchy/Loyalty, Purity.

 Arguably only libertarians only have any agency since they are the only faction with sufficient understanding of both economics and rule of law to possess it, but as a minority they are ineffective outside of think tanks and policy influence. The conservatives however remain dedicated to the individual as the central object of the law of tort; the family as the central unit of policy; and the civic order as the central unit of commons production; and the state limited to service as the insurer of last resort. Since this combination is a prescription for a eugenic social order, and that eugenic order (“manorialism”) was successful in both the far east and far west in sufficiently eugenic limitations on reproduction to produce a nearly completely middle class polity, this social order is both the origin of east and west prosperity, but in conflict with the expansion of single mothers, and third worlder underclasses without such genetic cultural traditional, and institutional histories. We provide agency through science: the use of correspondence with reality, using operational language to produce consistency between existence, action, perception, and intuition. And we use the scientific method to insure that the frauds sophisms, fictionalism, and outright deceits so common outside of the west, are incrementally suppressed. Unfortunately the continentals and the mesopotamians retain their sophisms, pseudosciences, and supernaturalisms, and their desperate followers try to bring moral FICTIONS into reality by the act of chanting them. “Thus endeth the lesson.” Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM ( In response to: ) So you didn’t

    COUNTERING RIGHT CRITICISM OF CULTURAL MARXISM

    ( In response to: https://www.facebook.com/pepe.escobar.77377/posts/10156644462266678 )

    So you didn’t actually make an argument I can counter, other than “Misinterpreted” – when the universal criticism of the left is that while the right can understand the left (rationally) the left cannot comprehend the right (intuitionistically) and resorts to psychologisms (Critique). What outcomes, arguments, propositions, assumptions were misinterpreted?

    THE UNDERLYING ARGUMENT

    Pilpul consists of a technique using sophisms (“justificationism”). Critique consists of a technique by which straw-man criticism without providing an alternative construction, for the opposition to criticize, substitutes for argument. And Feminine Competitive Instinct relies on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, straw manning, and reputation destruction instead of competing with (answering) the objections put forth in the argument. Feminine group strategy relies on prosecution of reciprocity in support of advancing proportionality indirectly. These are all methods of sophomoric rhetorical fraud. They are instinctual. And they appear to have evolved to control alphas (reproductive choice).

    Whereas Aristotelianism, Empiricism, Scientific method, Economics, and Rule of law require Operational Language (Testimony), warranty, demonstrated due diligence, and active suppression against ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms, and deceit as means of demanding reciprocity.

    Conversely, Abrahamism (pilpul, critique, false history, supernaturalism), reformed into Marxism-Boasianism-Freudianism-(even Cantorian sets)-Adorno/Frankfurt practice of pseudoscience that advances the feminine reproductive and competitive strategy and the feminine method of speech, to undermine reciprocity and testability in order to prevent full accounting of merit. And when the pseudoscientific(marxist analysis) and pseudo-rational (dialectic) argument failed, the French postmodernists reformed into (resorted to) outright Denialism (iq, race, gender, culture, class, causality, truth, un- decidability etc). Which is what the Right Refers to as “Cultural Marxism” and the Academy, Media, State complex make use of these narratives (propaganda, cult mythology) in combination with the downward expansion of college and university education, to fund teaching of, research into, and the production of literature, and the creation multiple generations of new ‘cultists’.

This activism resulted in the successful displacement of the aristocracy (military) from political rule, and the replacement of the church with the academy/media/state complex. And resulted in the incremental (quite intentional) selection of cases brought before the Supreme Court in order to undermine the constitution (via legislation from the bench) due to the weakness of the constitution not providing a vehicle for return of undecidable propositions to the legislature.

    The right has consistently resisted, and held onto the moral argument sufficiently to deny political power, (albeit in archaic enlightenment prose), but the left achieved through single motherhood expansion and underclass immigration, and involuntary transfer of reproduction to the lower classes through taxation, that which they could not achieve by ideas. This has resulted in a Racial Polity, and the racialization of both parties with single white women and vulnerable underclasses as the only race-defectors.

    So, the Right argument (Aristocratic-hierarchical, Meritocratic, Market, Rule of Law, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, and Eugenic), is not that there is some vast left conspiracy – because the right doesn’t believe the left (Feminine, Herd, Dysgenic) mind possesses any agency whatsoever (hence the evolution of the Useful Idiot label into the NPC Meme). But instead that the cult of supernaturalism was replaced first by a cult of pseudoscience, and having failed at pseudoscience, replaced by a cult of outright denialism. The fact that these sophomoric arguments (pilpul) were all produced using Critique, in support of the feminine reproductive strategy (proportionality of the herd), in order to circumvent rule of law by reciprocity (ancient customary law of tort), and to enforce discretionary rule instead,(despite that the country was designed as a ‘third way’ between authoritarian discretion of the aristocracy, and authoritarian socialism of the church.)

    Democracy is (majoritarian monopoly) little more than the search for power external to the market. The right attempts to preserve the market (meritocracy and reciprocity of the pack) while the left attempts to circumvent the market (equality and proportionality of the herd.)

    Yes there are the Soros’ of the world that do this by intent. By by and large the left is just lacking the right’s Agency, which is what separates right and left: Agency.

    [Left: Female Reproductive Strategy]: Consumption : Equality Devotion Proportionality

    [Libertarian: Unfranchised Male Reproductive Strategy]: Production: Reciprocity, Liberty

    [Conservative: Franchised (established) Male Reproductive Strategy]: Conservation: Reciprocity Hierarchy/Loyalty, Purity.

    Arguably only libertarians only have any agency since they are the only faction with sufficient understanding of both economics and rule of law to possess it, but as a minority they are ineffective outside of think tanks and policy influence. The conservatives however remain dedicated to the individual as the central object of the law of tort; the family as the central unit of policy; and the civic order as the central unit of commons production; and the state limited to service as the insurer of last resort.

    Since this combination is a prescription for a eugenic social order, and that eugenic order (“manorialism”) was successful in both the far east and far west in sufficiently eugenic limitations on reproduction to produce a nearly completely middle class polity, this social order is both the origin of east and west prosperity, but in conflict with the expansion of single mothers, and third worlder underclasses without such genetic cultural traditional, and institutional histories.

    We provide agency through science: the use of correspondence with reality, using operational language to produce consistency between existence, action, perception, and intuition. And we use the scientific method to insure that the frauds sophisms, fictionalism, and outright deceits so common outside of the west, are incrementally suppressed. Unfortunately the continentals and the mesopotamians retain their sophisms, pseudosciences, and supernaturalisms, and their desperate followers try to bring moral FICTIONS into reality by the act of chanting them.

    “Thus endeth the lesson.”

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 15:31:00 UTC