Doubling Down On This:
The middle class matters, not the elites.
The economy matters, not the government.
The militia matters, not the army.
The natural law matters not religion or ideology. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1770509984297570700
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-20 18:01:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770510953190216021
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1770509984297570700
—”Quigley emphasizes the importance of a strong middle class for the stability and prosperity of a civilization. He argues that the decline of the middle class leads to the decline of the civilization as a whole.’—
It’s the middle class that matters, not the elites.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-20 17:57:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770509984297570700
WE TALK ABOUT THE ENEMY’S CONSPIRACY AGAINST US BUT WE RARELY TALK OF THE ANGLO CONSPIRACY 😉
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/991680.The_Anglo_American_Establishment
The anglo plan for world rule.
Would have been good really. 😉 It’s just trade. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-20 17:52:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770508848295469428
Edit “….formation – and only then the christian religion of the underclasses.”
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-20 17:50:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770508282853032237
Reply addressees: @Saurabh_Shah1 @radiofreenw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770507251809124831
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
It’s not concrete and testable enough. And this form of construction is used only when trying to manipulate by use of conflation.
The west consists of the natural religions, the germanic semi-formalization, the greco-roman formalization, and the greek philosophical formation, culminating in stoicism.
The method for comparing civilizational differences consists of:
1) Given the three means of coercion possible:
… 1. Religion/Social by Seduction/Ostracization
… 2. Economic by Trade/Boycott
… 3. State by Defense/Violence
2) Given the path dependence of institutional formation:
… 1. Religion(Strong) > State(Weak) > Law(fail)
… 2. Religion(Strong) > Law(Weak) > State(fail)
… 3. State(Strong) > Religion(Weak) > Law (fail)
… 4. State(Strong) > Law (Weak) > Religion (fail)
… 5. Law(Strong) > Religion(Weak) > State (fail)
… 6. Law(Strong) > State(weak) > Religion (fail)
3) Given the Innovative ability of those institutions:
… 1. Limited: Religion
… 2. Only Under Stress: State
… 3. Continuous: Law
4) Given the adaptability of those institutions:
… 1. Slow: Religion
… 2. Medium: Law
… 3. Fast: State
5) Given the demographic composition of the polity (IQ):
… Slow: Below Minimum (85) – no innovation or adaptation
… Medium: Below Innovation (100) – adaptation
… Fast: Above threshold (105) – innovation
6) In addition:
… Relationship between rulers and ruled (parasitic vs productive)
… Homogeneity (good) vs Heterogeneity (bad)
… Resources
… Geography
… Climate
… Condition vs competing states.
This determines the condition of the population.
Cheers
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1770507251809124831
(Blacks did fine in their own communities. They made more progress before the civil rights movement then after. It was the leftist, Democrat forced migration out of those communities (into the ‘slaughter of the cities’) that destroyed the class structure of black communities and the existing economic, social, and family structure which was, quite naturally, maturing to American norm. My original point is that (a) proximity remains a problem because of the differences in class sizes, physical, behavioral, and mental development and particularly impulsivity and aggression. (b) Small homogenous ethnostates naturally evolve institutions that serve the genetics of their populations. (c) And that we can cooperate by trade – we do not have to share the same polity and territory. In fact it’s detrimental to both groups.)
Reply addressees: @carl_lennen @TheFlushening
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-20 16:06:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770482034596626432
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770454953317826959
I wish that were the case. The fact that bottom class whites are just as bad is obscured by their much smaller percentage and numbers. But no group is free of the problems of the lower classes. Only the percent and size of them.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-19 15:23:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770108760880488509
Reply addressees: @Airmanareiks
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770108237074850218
Correct. But then, again, supporting my argument, that the problem is class sizes and absence of eugenic reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-19 15:00:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770103061593071654
Reply addressees: @taiwtaiwb8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770102603751293265
This woman is amazing.
Her books, her career, her education.
This is what Upper Class Africa can produce.
The Race Problem Is Only A Class Problem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW8ci2zHCWs
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-19 13:28:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770080001620095294
Marxist Ideology sequence. The Pill. Economics. IQ. Taxes.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 23:45:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769872762581950722
Reply addressees: @__100______
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769866587610226909
That’s a False Criticism: the argument is that the DISTRIBUTION of CLASS SIZES differs between the races. This absolutely positively unquestionably true. And trying to personalize the truth as an attack on Musk is just intellectually dishonest.
And will stansil is the most absurd left wing propagandist.
You interviewed young people who are on the extreme edge of leftist thought. And not those who have careers that specialize in differences.
In fact even someone as dedicated to NOT advancing racism as Dr Reich, who runs the best genetic research firm in the world, has cautioned that we must come to terms with rather large differences in the genetic expression of racial groups.
The largest differences are:
(a) Evolutionary neoteny and it’s consequences
(b) The impact of neotenic differences in evolution on our self regulation and intelligence.
Every counter argument is a lie.
Quite by accident, I specialize in sex and group differences in lying.
As far as I know I’m the leading researcher in the world on this subject.
And the author of the above video, and Will Stancil, and the marginal researcher from Harvard are all engaging in lying. Where lying means they are seeking to justify a falsehood and a prior rather than disambiguate and testify to the evidence as it exists.
We solved IQ before 2000. We solved sex differences by 2012. We solve race differences by 2018. These differences are easily understood. Their cause is easily understood.
One would need a superior theory in order to compete with the rather obvious data.
We are very clear that the postwar pseudoscientific attempt to falsify darwinian evolution natural selection and group differences caused by geographic isolation and speciation and hybridization as humans spread across the continents has been as intentional a pseudoscientific pursuit as was marxist economics and postmodern literature.
The game is up.
We must learn to govern despite our differences rather than the pretenses that we have none.
Reply addressees: @JoshLekach
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 18:32:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769431605532037122
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769378838675329510