Theme: Class

  • Hmmm…. My Promotion of Aristocracy Is Nothing so Simple

    —“My impression is that Curt is rather fond of the power disparity that separated the noble aristocracy from the other people, and that he would rather restore that so that aristocrats would have the time to run the world instead of having to bother defending themselves. One reason he likes ancestor worship is because it delineates who is in and out without a fight, in theory.”—Giego Caleiro

    [S]ome element of truth in there somewhere. But it’s more along the lines of I would prefer I was governed by my betters – successful intergenerational families – than those who are not, because I don’t want to govern all these barbarians and someone has to at last defend decent people from them. 😉 But the more precise explanation is that the purpose of rule of law, monarchy and militia is to deny ANYONE power, and the purpose of nobility (successful intergenerational families) is to suppress the fashions and passions of the mob that is not successful at the production of intergenerational families, so that we can all keep power distance local and low over our lives, and find meaning in the civil society instead of political warfare.. The reason I prefer ancestor worship is to maintain intergenerational debt (transfer), nationalism, the willingness of the underclass not to reproduce, and the willingness of the productive classes to redistribute, and preservation of the traditions of western civilization and it’s novel organization that has and will continue to transcend man – rather than tolerate another invasion by the newest sophistm, pseudoscience and lie.

  • Hmmm…. My Promotion of Aristocracy Is Nothing so Simple

    —“My impression is that Curt is rather fond of the power disparity that separated the noble aristocracy from the other people, and that he would rather restore that so that aristocrats would have the time to run the world instead of having to bother defending themselves. One reason he likes ancestor worship is because it delineates who is in and out without a fight, in theory.”—Giego Caleiro

    [S]ome element of truth in there somewhere. But it’s more along the lines of I would prefer I was governed by my betters – successful intergenerational families – than those who are not, because I don’t want to govern all these barbarians and someone has to at last defend decent people from them. 😉 But the more precise explanation is that the purpose of rule of law, monarchy and militia is to deny ANYONE power, and the purpose of nobility (successful intergenerational families) is to suppress the fashions and passions of the mob that is not successful at the production of intergenerational families, so that we can all keep power distance local and low over our lives, and find meaning in the civil society instead of political warfare.. The reason I prefer ancestor worship is to maintain intergenerational debt (transfer), nationalism, the willingness of the underclass not to reproduce, and the willingness of the productive classes to redistribute, and preservation of the traditions of western civilization and it’s novel organization that has and will continue to transcend man – rather than tolerate another invasion by the newest sophistm, pseudoscience and lie.

  • Demonic gods are not terrifying except to children. What’s terrifying is market

    Demonic gods are not terrifying except to children. What’s terrifying is market competition and acceptance of our inequality and your status in the market. The solution? Develop alternative markets, not for accomplishment but for adherence.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-23 13:14:00 UTC

  • In other words 40% of the US economy is financialism (extraction) at the cost of

    … In other words 40% of the US economy is financialism (extraction) at the cost of knowledge, skill, capital, and local production.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 20:11:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253053865018130435

    Reply addressees: @judicialist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253053163709530115


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @judicialist And one can not possible make the claim that he has the right to price stability of a commodity – money included. What he can do if he wants a gold standard is continuously convert fiat money into hard money holdings (which is how the oil business functions). The only reason…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253053163709530115

  • You see, this is Mises/Rothbard’s attempt to retain the rent seeking of the jewi

    You see, this is Mises/Rothbard’s attempt to retain the rent seeking of the jewish diaspora on host governments and people when it’s unnecessary. Especially once fiat money is either paper or digital (shares in the economy).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-22 19:35:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253044890214240256

    Reply addressees: @judicialist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253044486034395143


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @judicialist Now, how is using the constitution, law, or government to deny people from borrowing against their future production (gambling together) not rent seeking? You aren’t contributing to production your blackmailing them, right? (And I haven’t gotten to international competition yet.)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253044486034395143

  • Let me help you a bit more: European TRIFUNCTIONALISM. (Not Semitic MONOPOLY) 1.

    Let me help you a bit more:
    European TRIFUNCTIONALISM. (Not Semitic MONOPOLY)
    1. Martial-Hierarchical (Dominant Male)
    2. Judicial-Contractual (Ascendent Male)
    3. Public Intellectual (priestly)-Communal (Feminine)
    The competition: male eugenic pack -vs- female dysgenic herd https://t.co/EASx0sCORK


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 13:25:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252589385117204480

    Reply addressees: @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252587729831038977


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @paulkrugman Also, in english “You” can refer to both individual and collective. 🙂 What I said was true. If you ever think I err, you’re incorrect. https://t.co/H2THTThZbZ

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1252587729831038977

  • A COMPETITION FOR CONTROL AND CONSUMPTION OF THE COMMONS – SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION b

    A COMPETITION FOR CONTROL AND CONSUMPTION OF THE COMMONS – SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION

    by Bill Joslin

    —“…the minute you give up on your other classes, you give up on the commons.”– CurtD

    As soon as social variation gives way to social diversity – regardless of where those dividing line are carved – social stratification becomes competition over the commons. Not so much that we given up on the commons, but rather the point at which commons are no longer viewed as “shared common property”, – but rather viewed as shared private property. Politics becomes a competition for control and consumption of the commons.

    I think there’s a subtler understanding to property en toto that gets overlooked.

    We intuit that we defend property by the investment (born cost, contribution) into a property that we’ll bear additional costs to maintain control/access.

    There’s a flip side to this condition. We invest also because we rely upon that property. i.e. lower middle classes rely upon commons for survival – and this reliance forms part of their interest in the property. This reliance then motivates investment.

    How is this relevant? One can invest into a property, but never use our rely upon it. The upper classes don’t need most commons to survive, but form the substantial contribution to it. Where as the lower and middle classes rely heavily upon the commons and thus will seek to invest and defend it.

    This creates a convergence of different types of incentives between different stakeholder concerns. The interplay between them results in robust care for the commons.

    Without a militia, those whose stake in the commons revolves around reliance, have no means to protect their interests, and thus this robust care for the commons declines.

    And the ecology of stakeholder interest devolve into seeking control or, whinging about control, from one stakeholder group to another: competition for control over the commons.

    Thus killing a community, society or civilization is rather simple: Social construction by creating a competing (divergent) frame.

    In doing so the separate factions of the society will consume each other in the competition for consumption and or control over their shared properties.

    Divide and let them conquer themselves for you


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 12:43:00 UTC

  • Are you trying to claim that class (SES) does not reflect IQ+Conscientiousness,

    Are you trying to claim that class (SES) does not reflect IQ+Conscientiousness, and that aggregate racial differences are not the result of differences in the size of the lower classes, and that europeans and east asians did not practice agrarian eugenics creating the advantage?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 11:20:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251832997688549378

    Reply addressees: @PGA_Golf_Picks @IonRamaru

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251703301013475330

  • Define underclass

    Define underclass.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-19 01:32:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251685130055245826

    Reply addressees: @TFascetioust

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251684402247204864

  • Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the old world, Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism

    Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the old world, Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Denialism in the Modern world – the revolt by the cognitively feminine underclass dysgenic against the cognitively masculine middle and upper class eugenic civilizations of east and west. 2k yr War.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 20:24:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251607632235945986

    Reply addressees: @DuchesneRicardo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251583017971331072