Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • IQ, ignorance, religion, bravado. Conservatism is anti intellectual, romantic,me

    IQ, ignorance, religion, bravado. Conservatism is anti intellectual, romantic,meaning religious or secular religious, and working class. There is no market for conservative intellectuals in the aryan tradition like Jefferson or the founders. Libertarianism as intended ended them.

    Reply addressees: @bot3685

  • IQ, ignorance, religion, bravado. Conservatism is anti intellectual, romantic,me

    IQ, ignorance, religion, bravado. Conservatism is anti intellectual, romantic,meaning religious or secular religious, and working class. There is no market for conservative intellectuals in the aryan tradition like Jefferson or the founders. Libertarianism as intended ended them.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-23 18:35:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1308837485015953411

    Reply addressees: @bot3685

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1308759815229829120

  • Look. Simple. The postwar jewish intellectuals brought the bolshevik revolution

    Look. Simple. The postwar jewish intellectuals brought the bolshevik revolution to the states, and transformed it first into neo-marxism, then finally into postmodernism-feminism-libertarianism in order to reverse the demonstration of the darwinian revolution that european civ, not only in the modern, but ancient world, was eugenic. And that this bolshevism, like french moralism, and german phenominalism, is simply a more AGGRESSIVE counter-revolution against the restoration of europeanism (aristotle), and the restoration of germany (the holy roman empire, greater germania, western europe), to it’s historical trejectory as a west indo european aristocrxatic eugenic civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-23 06:54:00 UTC

  • —-”Q: Curt: Was communism ever a good idea in Russia?”—- (a) Russia practice Sta

    —-”Q: Curt: Was communism ever a good idea in Russia?”—-

    (a) Russia practice State Socialism, with a central economy, and it was never possible to achieve communism. (It never will be). And using the communist-to-socialist (platonic) frame of reference confuses the issue. Instead, Russia created a fully militarized State, and ran the country as **an industrial age military organization**.

    (b) A military doesn’t use the market process. It creates a command economy. It organizes to produce strategic goals. The benefit of a militarized society with a command economy, is that without a market process it does not need to pay market wages. Everyone has a ‘rank’ with prescribed benefits. In this sense, Russia took Napoleonic ‘total war’ to the extreme, as a permanent political, economic, social, and familial order. Her only mistake was in attempting to ideologically expand. She made the same mistake as Hitler: ideology over empiricism.

    (c) So the **benefit** of a military order over a market order is that the savings from not having to pay market wages (wages always consume profits), could be invested in the production of commons. It’s this massive production of commons that allowed Russia to modernize.

    (d) the **drawback** is i) the problem incentives, ii) the problem of economic calculation, iii) the problem of skill atrophy, iv) the problem of creating a market for corruption, v) the problem of creating a black market, vi) the (severe) externalites that are caused by policing the problem of incentives, economic calculation, skill atrophy, corruption, and black markets. Unfortunately, Soviets (Russians) did not know how to transition out of a military economy. Observing the consequences, the Chinese copied the americans instead of the Russians and used debt and cheap labor to indusrialize at the rest of the world’s expense just as america did to europe in the 1800’s.

    (e) **Consequences**: The russians have escapted the degredation of culture since the 1960’s brought about by the ewish postwar migration of insurgency from germany to america, and the conversion of the marxist program to the neo-marxist, postmodernist, anti-male feminist program (culminating in the 2020 attempt to repeat the Bolshevik revolution here in america using BLM/Antifa).

    The west may not survive the next few decades. Russia will – and she will very likely pick up the pieces ‘for cheap’.

    In retrospect, the Fascists created a corporate state, as defense against communists that created a military state. The British and Americans failed to grasp the seriousness of the threat of communism, as a repeat of the christian destructino of rome, and the muslim destruction of the ancient world. The Chinese are not christian and not idealistic: they have adopted fascism: intolerant, ethnocentric, state corporatism, and total war. But they have used credit (the anglo invention of scale finance) to achieve what the Soviets failed to, and in doing so demonstrated that the fascists were not unique, they were simply practicing the norm in history. And chinese in doing so have restored history to it’s regular state now that the european age of optimism is ended.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 19:40:00 UTC

  • Overstatement. A minor contribution to it as the rights and methods of the arist

    Overstatement. A minor contribution to it as the rights and methods of the aristocracy were slowly drawn down-class as the economy increased in complexit

    Capitalism Is an abrahamic term. Instead, we have practticed corporatism rather than tribalism for five thousand years.

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm

  • Overstatement. A minor contribution to it as the rights and methods of the arist

    Overstatement. A minor contribution to it as the rights and methods of the aristocracy were slowly drawn down-class as the economy increased in complexit

    Capitalism Is an abrahamic term. Instead, we have practticed corporatism rather than tribalism for five thousand years.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 23:10:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307457123266289673

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307337419457548288

  • the poorest 20 percent of Americans

    the poorest 20 percent of Americans https://t.co/uNbydn87kq

  • Translating a Criticism of Paul Krugman

    TRANSLATING A CRITICISM OF PAUL KRUGMAN

    —“I often tell people that America is every bit as class-driven as the UK, if not more so, despite our facade of informality.”—

    @paulkrugman
    It hasn’t stopped you from continuing your tradition of undermining the martial aristocratic classes at every turn, so that they can’t continue the demand for testimony as the normative mode of speech so that you can practice your baiting in to hazard by false promise.

    It’ll soon be common knowledge: your technique of profiting from baiting-into-hazard, using false-promise of circumvention of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by sophistry and Social Construction, and the lie that Aristocracy oppressed rather than domesticated man.

    —“can you translate that into dumbf_ckistanian?”— a Tweeter

    Paul tells sophisticated lies that make people believe they can escape a harsh reality. Contrary to traditional European modes of thinking such as testimonial speech.

    European man institutionalized court testimony as the normative mode of speech. It’s the most expensive normative construction in human history. The technique (pilpul) that Paul practices is the opposite. Most fascinating subject in history: The art of institutionalizing lying.

    In Paul Krugman’s case, he is usually weaving together three or four categories of lies.

    … 1-The myth of oppression;
    … 2-The false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and;
    … 3-His pseudoscientific econ that evades full accounting of all changes in capital.

    Paul’s particular systemic Fraud is using those three techniques to bait a democratic people into the hazard of abandoning rule of law, markets, the resulting eugenics, and adopting protective (socialist), Semitic (academic/priest-caste), discretionary (authoritarian) rule.

    We know how that worked out everywhere else. The Christian and Muslim expansion resulted in over a thousand years of dark age, destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world and reduced them to a uniform totalitarianism, ignorance, poverty, and dysgenia from which they appear unable to escape.

    The programs of pseudoscience (boaz, freud, gould,) marxism, socialism, and sophistry (the frankfurt school), and social construction (deceit) via postmodernism, hostile-feminism, and human biodiversity denialism all seek to reverse the restoration of Aristotelianism, the restoration of european ism, and the continuation of the european political tradition of rule of law.

    I mean, the Marxists and socialists are only responsible for 100M dead. The feminists are only responsible for the reproductive depopulation of Europeans. The postmodernists are only responsible for destroying truthful speech. The denialists are only responsible for destroying psychology, sociology, politics, and economics.

  • Translating a Criticism of Paul Krugman

    TRANSLATING A CRITICISM OF PAUL KRUGMAN

    —“I often tell people that America is every bit as class-driven as the UK, if not more so, despite our facade of informality.”—

    @paulkrugman
    It hasn’t stopped you from continuing your tradition of undermining the martial aristocratic classes at every turn, so that they can’t continue the demand for testimony as the normative mode of speech so that you can practice your baiting in to hazard by false promise.

    It’ll soon be common knowledge: your technique of profiting from baiting-into-hazard, using false-promise of circumvention of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by sophistry and Social Construction, and the lie that Aristocracy oppressed rather than domesticated man.

    —“can you translate that into dumbf_ckistanian?”— a Tweeter

    Paul tells sophisticated lies that make people believe they can escape a harsh reality. Contrary to traditional European modes of thinking such as testimonial speech.

    European man institutionalized court testimony as the normative mode of speech. It’s the most expensive normative construction in human history. The technique (pilpul) that Paul practices is the opposite. Most fascinating subject in history: The art of institutionalizing lying.

    In Paul Krugman’s case, he is usually weaving together three or four categories of lies.

    … 1-The myth of oppression;
    … 2-The false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and;
    … 3-His pseudoscientific econ that evades full accounting of all changes in capital.

    Paul’s particular systemic Fraud is using those three techniques to bait a democratic people into the hazard of abandoning rule of law, markets, the resulting eugenics, and adopting protective (socialist), Semitic (academic/priest-caste), discretionary (authoritarian) rule.

    We know how that worked out everywhere else. The Christian and Muslim expansion resulted in over a thousand years of dark age, destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world and reduced them to a uniform totalitarianism, ignorance, poverty, and dysgenia from which they appear unable to escape.

    The programs of pseudoscience (boaz, freud, gould,) marxism, socialism, and sophistry (the frankfurt school), and social construction (deceit) via postmodernism, hostile-feminism, and human biodiversity denialism all seek to reverse the restoration of Aristotelianism, the restoration of european ism, and the continuation of the european political tradition of rule of law.

    I mean, the Marxists and socialists are only responsible for 100M dead. The feminists are only responsible for the reproductive depopulation of Europeans. The postmodernists are only responsible for destroying truthful speech. The denialists are only responsible for destroying psychology, sociology, politics, and economics.

  • The Comforting False Promise: —”Curt: Why do many people still believe in communism even though it has been proven throughout history that it does not work?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER – AND A COMPLETE ONE

    —”Why do many people still believe in communism even though it has been proven throughout history that it does not work?”—

    Short answer? Why do people believe in judaism, christianity, islam, hinduism, buddhism, new age occultism, rather than practice philosophy, stoicism, and epicureanism all of which are true?

    The cheap, easy, false promises, that use empathic communities as a means of sedation.

    Why do people believe in communism, socialism, democracy, libertarianism, or anarchism?

    The cheap easy false promise of freedom from whatever scarcity that they face, where that scarcity is self-determination (power), by the eradication of competitors.

    The only successful method of eliminating competitors is Islam and it comes at the cost of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, dysgenia, disease, suffering, and victimization by the vicissitudes of nature. We are only equal in poverty and powerlessness (slavery).

    The Complete Answer

    Cooperation is more productive than any and all alternatives, and the greater the division of labor the more so. Any life form that cooperates (using volition) must maintain consistency with physical laws if it will not go extinct, or lose the incentive to cooperate:

    (a) Acquisitiveness (all life forms). We evolved to acquire. The greatest returns in the shortest time, at the least cost, with the lowest risk, and greatest certainty. All human behavior can be restated as acquisition. This is why economics has evolved into the language of social science as well as psychology – and why the left avoids it at all costs.

    (b) Judgements choices of returns on cooperation (judging opportunity costs)

    (c) Reciprocity: whether we both benefit or lose, or whether benefits and losses are asymmetrical – according to each individual’s measure.

    (d) Accounting of Debts (what we owe others) and Credits (what others owe us).

    (e) Punishment by Killing of, Ostracization of, Punishment of, and even costly altruistic punishment of predators, parasites, deceivers, cheaters, discounters (laziness), free riders, frauds, those who privatize commons or socialize losses, those who engage in conspiracy, sedition, or treason.

    (f) Within the limits of Proportionality – Incentive to Defect. This maintains the equilibrium of the cooperative and physical worlds.

    (g) Mediated by the value of Kin Selection (Tolerance for cost-bearing decreases with genetic distance).

    All our moral intuitions are governed by those rules of cooperation. They have to be because **those rules are necessary for evolutionary survival of any cooperative species in competition with others -** especially one with a large brain that is eleven times as costly as muscle of the same weight.

    And likewise, just as those natural laws of cooperation are dependent upon the physical (material) laws of the universe, they are also dependent upon the evolutionary laws of the universe: accumulation of **genetic load, regression to the mean, the red queen of superior competitors, and the window of time** available for a costly species to evolve. Those factors lead to what we consider the classes, which constitute a range of sexually, socially, productively, politically, and militarily low to high market (evolutionary) values, in which some are born with every advantage and some with every disadvantage and everyone in between. As the division of labor increases along with the population, ( … ) 


    The Abrahamic Method of Deceit, whether:

    … (a) in **Supernatural** form (Judaism, Christianity, or Islam), or
    … (b) in a **pseudoscientific** form (Marxism, Boasianism, Freudianism ), or
    … (c) as Social construction of **Undermining** (the Frankfurt neo-Marxist school), or
    … (d) as **Sophistry** (Postmodernism), or
    … (e) as Science **Denial** (HBD denial, Genetic Determinism Denial, Sex Difference Denial, IQ **Denial**, Personality Trait Denial, or, and yes, class, subrace, and race difference denial)

    All rely on three **false promises**:

    (a) the false promise of freedom from **scarcity** (violation of physical law),
    (b) the false promise of freedom from **reciprocity** (the natural law of cooperation),
    (c) the false promise of freedom from **evolution** (dysgenia, genetic load, regression to the mean, and and therefore class (sexual, social, economic, political, military, and strategic market value);

    Using one or more of the possible methods of human deception:

    (a) the fictionalism of **magic**->pseudoscience->pseudomathmatics
    (b) the fictionalism of **sophistry**->idealism->supernormalism
    (c) the fictionalism of **occult**->supernatural->theological
    (d) the fiction **loading**, framing, suggestin, obscuring -> fictionalizing -> lying.
    (e) critique(undermining) -> Avoidance (GSRRM) -> **Denial**

    In order to achieve **POWER**. In order to reverse the Darwinian Revolution and the 4500 years of european and Chinese (Han, Korean, Japanese) Eugenics as the explanation for vast differences in civilizational progress. Where priests, politicians, financiers, and others can parasitically depend upon revenue of a permanent ignorant, subservient underclass (think medieval and ancient world peasants).

    So people want what they want, in particular what they want is freedom from the reality of the genetic status and the consequences of it. And they hope or want the false promise that it is possible to defeat scarcity (physical laws), incentives (natural laws), and reproductive competition (evolutionary pressure) in this world rather than an afterlife.

    And why is it possible for them to hold these false beliefs when we control the education system and we are capable of teaching basic contract law (ethics of cooperation), basic micro economics (ethics of cooperation), basic macro economics (world equilibration of prices and trade), and eugenics (why europeans alone discovered the sciences, and why europeans and east asians alone discovered reason, and even if the east asians fell behind after 1000ad. (not 1400)

    THREE GENERATIONS OF LIES, IN TWO GREAT EPISODES OF CIVILIZATIONAL DESTRUCTION

    In other words, the left thought leadership used three generations of lies in the ancient world, and three generations of lies in the modern world, to destroy civilizations that practiced eugenics, by selling the promise of freedom from being ‘left behind’ in the ancient world with the promise of life after death, and promise of freedom from being ‘left behind’ in the modern world with the promise of equality after the revolution.

    All leftism is predicated on three false promises (lies), which cannot deliver such freedom but whose purpose it is to destroy advanced civilizations.

    This is how Islam has reduced everything it touches to ignorance, poverty, disease, suffering, and dysgenia, while destroying the arts, letters, culture, knowledge, of each great civilization it reduces to ashes.

    Marxism, Neomarxism, Postmodernism, and “Denialism” are just revolts against the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe and leftists cast Europeans (and Chinese if they can) as oppressors who invented these rules, rather than liberators who discover them, adapt to them, and apply them, thereby dragging mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, disease, and early mortality at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the bottom third.
    The fact that both Europeans and Chinese practiced manorialism (systemic, institutionalized eugenics) accounts for the vast difference in european and east Asian neoteny, lower violence, lower impulsivity, superior distribution of primary personality traits (IQ, Consietiousness), and Agency(self-regulation).

    Any people can copy this group strategy. The Marxists do the opposite. They applaud and encourage decivilzation and dysgenia with the myth of oppression rather than continuous human domestication.