Curt Doolittle

Theme: Class

  • The Reactionary Movement Reunited Libertarians and Conservatives Restoring The Elites To Thought Leadership In Europeanism

    NRX and P originate in the same body of thought but Yarvin is jewish and proposes a typical Jewish universalist administrative solution (libertarian). I propose a typical european rule of law solution (aristocratic). I consider my work part of the reactionary movement – and the reactionary movement the end of the libertarian divergence from conservatism, and the restoration of libertarians (legalists) as the thought leadership of conservatism where conservatism is reciprocal insurance of one another’s self-determination exchange of insurance of one another’s sovereignty by reciprocity in display, word, and deed. And the resulting markets that emerge in all aspects of life: action, association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war. The west has always practiced markets for elites, we call trifunctionalism, with elites in masculine (negative) war, in feminine (positive) faith, and in the (neutral) law to mediate our differences. As such there are and always will be three factions in the west, with the law limiting the extremes of masculine hierarchy, competitiveness, and eugenics, and left equality, communism, and dysgenics. This is my understanding of the change in political forces among the non-semitic (european) right and left. The problem is that the semitic counter revolution against european advancement by the marxist-pomo-feminist-pc/woke movement is the second attempt at the destruction of the west, repeating the destruction of Rome, by taking advantage of the frailty of the martial, legal, and ‘faith’ elites, by the introduction of a false elite with false promises of victory for the bottom – when the bottom cannot rule itself, it’s families, any business, or any polity, or any army. We must restore our intolerance. The fall of our religion because the xians would not reform, opened the door for a false religion just as the failure of the romans to reform their religion to include the newly emergent working classes opened the door for a false religion (judaism, xianity, islam). intolerance must return.

  • CONTEXT It’s a natural consequence. We’re Incompatible. If you try to create a u

    CONTEXT
    It’s a natural consequence. We’re Incompatible. If you try to create a universal, urban, feminine, equalitarian, dysgenic, socialist, utopia at the expense of the productive laboring, working, and middle classes, it’s civil war or revolutionary reformation.

    YOU DID THIS

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-11 18:16:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337461382938169344

    Reply addressees: @grace_panetta

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337444327656747014

  • JOIN US IN A POLITICAL SOLUTION that satisfies right and left at the expense of

    JOIN US IN A POLITICAL SOLUTION that satisfies right and left at the expense of the globalists, the deep state, the financial sector, media, and academy that prey upon our people through false promises and false fears.

    https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/ https://t.co/ucKXUUtQqz

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-11 16:50:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337439628165570560

  • (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest

    (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest (i) Our financial system isn’t sovereign, delivers us to predatory parasitic globalists, impoverishes our middle, working, and laboring classes, and deprives us of +1T per year in commons. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1337423563960295426

  • Presumes states remain intact. They wouldn’t. Any act of separation would see re

    Presumes states remain intact. They wouldn’t. Any act of separation would see red regions and major blue cities followed by mass migration of middle class out of blue cities, accelerating the economic destruction of the cities one at a time.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-10 22:17:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337159628459810818

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337158856246505472

  • Not quite. That’s like Russians saying they won the war when they were just will

    Not quite. That’s like Russians saying they won the war when they were just willing to throw more bodies at walls of bullets than everyone else.

    We’re throwing accumulated capital across the spectrum at a problem that is inescapable: competitive demographics.

    Define ‘winning’.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-10 21:02:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337140704045363200

    Reply addressees: @BenWinegard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337111853940535296

  • Um. The left entirely consists of stealing. That’s the difference between right

    Um. The left entirely consists of stealing. That’s the difference between right and left? Right Capitalizing Eugenic, and Left Parasitic Dysgenic.

    We are incompatible because our first causes (moral intuitions and reproductive strategies) are polar opposites.

    Separate or war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-10 15:59:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337064487703207941

    Reply addressees: @SuzMcBrideBooks

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1336758651441344514

  • I Call Them Luxurtarians: Conspicuous Consumption of Luxury Beliefs

    LUXURY BELIEFS By:  @LukeWeinhagen The belief that the world is not a dangerous place or the belief that anyone but you is responsible for your safety are luxury beliefs. Even this article will be viewed far too narrowly by most. Compared to the rest of the world, the west are all “rich”. We have insulated ourselves so effectively from the consequences of stupidity and dishonesty, and created such a vast illusion of safety in the west that unless you are actively attempting to falsify your beliefs it is safe to assume they are all luxury beliefs. ‘Luxury beliefs’ are the latest status symbol for rich Americans …

    A former classmate from Yale recently told me “monogamy is kind of outdated” and not good for society. So I asked her what her background is and if she planned to marry. She said she comes from an affluent family and works at a well-known technology company. Yes, she personally intends to have a monogamous marriage — but quickly added that marriage shouldn’t have to be for everyone. She was raised by a traditional family. She planned on having a traditional family. But she maintained that traditional families are old-fashioned and society should “evolve” beyond them. What could explain this? In the past, upper-class Americans used to display their social status with luxury goods. Today, they do it with luxury beliefs. https://nypost.com/2019/08/17/luxury-beliefs-are-the-latest-status-symbol-for-rich-americans/

    Few apply even a minimal set of tests such as @ThomasSowell’s 3 questions

    1. Compared to what? 2. At what cost? 3. What hard evidence do you have? Fewer seek a more robust set of tests such as Propertariansim’s Testimonialism @ThruTheHayes 1. Is it categorically consistent? 2. Is it logically consistent? 3. Is it empirically consistent? 4. Is it existentially possible? 5. Is it reciprocally consistent? 6. Is it fully accounted?

    Q&A: “Curt; Do You Have a Concise Definition for Testimonialism?” Colloquially: “The completion of the scientific method for the purpose of the conduct of law”. Testimonial Truth: Testimony (Speech) that is warrantied by the speaker through the performance of due diligence against imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deception and fraud. The only truth that can exist is that which is spoken. We can never speak the perfect truth because we can never know if we possess it. The most perfect truth we can speak is that which we have performed due diligence, that we do not speak in falsehood: fraud. Testimonialism: A set of tests of due diligence, the satisfaction of which allows us to warranty that to the best of our ability our speech (testimony) is free of the falsehoods: imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deceit, and fraud. Truth: That testimony we would give if we possessed perfect (complete) knowledge, perfect language, and an audience possessed of the same. And, at that point we speak a name, not a description. Everything has a true name. We seek that name. In seeking it we seek truth.

    If it is important to you that your beliefs have value, I suggest you test them to make sure they derive their value from their quality rather than their luxury. I Call Them Luxurtarians By:  @emblem21CEO My reeducation camp list includes: * middle class white women * academics & intellectuals * libertarians & libertines and liberals * the overeducated * the runaway enlightened They prefer liberty & luxury over reality. “Magic thinking is a luxury, only available to those with a buffer between themselves and the direct contact with a dangerous reality.” — @LukeWeinhagen “Democracy is not an intrinsic good, produces no goods, but is a risky emotional luxury [feeling righteous whilst acting degenerately] made possible by Full Integration into ‘Whiteness’” – @curtdoolittle

  • I Call Them Luxurtarians: Conspicuous Consumption of Luxury Beliefs

    LUXURY BELIEFS By:  @LukeWeinhagen The belief that the world is not a dangerous place or the belief that anyone but you is responsible for your safety are luxury beliefs. Even this article will be viewed far too narrowly by most. Compared to the rest of the world, the west are all “rich”. We have insulated ourselves so effectively from the consequences of stupidity and dishonesty, and created such a vast illusion of safety in the west that unless you are actively attempting to falsify your beliefs it is safe to assume they are all luxury beliefs. ‘Luxury beliefs’ are the latest status symbol for rich Americans …

    A former classmate from Yale recently told me “monogamy is kind of outdated” and not good for society. So I asked her what her background is and if she planned to marry. She said she comes from an affluent family and works at a well-known technology company. Yes, she personally intends to have a monogamous marriage — but quickly added that marriage shouldn’t have to be for everyone. She was raised by a traditional family. She planned on having a traditional family. But she maintained that traditional families are old-fashioned and society should “evolve” beyond them. What could explain this? In the past, upper-class Americans used to display their social status with luxury goods. Today, they do it with luxury beliefs. https://nypost.com/2019/08/17/luxury-beliefs-are-the-latest-status-symbol-for-rich-americans/

    Few apply even a minimal set of tests such as @ThomasSowell’s 3 questions

    1. Compared to what? 2. At what cost? 3. What hard evidence do you have? Fewer seek a more robust set of tests such as Propertariansim’s Testimonialism @ThruTheHayes 1. Is it categorically consistent? 2. Is it logically consistent? 3. Is it empirically consistent? 4. Is it existentially possible? 5. Is it reciprocally consistent? 6. Is it fully accounted?

    Q&A: “Curt; Do You Have a Concise Definition for Testimonialism?” Colloquially: “The completion of the scientific method for the purpose of the conduct of law”. Testimonial Truth: Testimony (Speech) that is warrantied by the speaker through the performance of due diligence against imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deception and fraud. The only truth that can exist is that which is spoken. We can never speak the perfect truth because we can never know if we possess it. The most perfect truth we can speak is that which we have performed due diligence, that we do not speak in falsehood: fraud. Testimonialism: A set of tests of due diligence, the satisfaction of which allows us to warranty that to the best of our ability our speech (testimony) is free of the falsehoods: imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deceit, and fraud. Truth: That testimony we would give if we possessed perfect (complete) knowledge, perfect language, and an audience possessed of the same. And, at that point we speak a name, not a description. Everything has a true name. We seek that name. In seeking it we seek truth.

    If it is important to you that your beliefs have value, I suggest you test them to make sure they derive their value from their quality rather than their luxury. I Call Them Luxurtarians By:  @emblem21CEO My reeducation camp list includes: * middle class white women * academics & intellectuals * libertarians & libertines and liberals * the overeducated * the runaway enlightened They prefer liberty & luxury over reality. “Magic thinking is a luxury, only available to those with a buffer between themselves and the direct contact with a dangerous reality.” — @LukeWeinhagen “Democracy is not an intrinsic good, produces no goods, but is a risky emotional luxury [feeling righteous whilst acting degenerately] made possible by Full Integration into ‘Whiteness’” – @curtdoolittle

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: LUXURY AND THE LUXURTARIANS @emblem21CEO; @LukeWeinhagen; @cur

    RT @ThruTheHayes: LUXURY AND THE LUXURTARIANS
    @emblem21CEO; @LukeWeinhagen; @curtdoolittle

    Someone must afford you luxuries. Some syste…

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-10 14:57:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337048912604131330