The objective of marxism was underclass (labor) rule by revolutionary overthrow of meritocracy. Lenin understood this must be done by gaining political power. Then by violence against meritocratic peoples. When the underclass failed, Gramsci demanded the destruction of culture.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-27 15:29:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354451524907388932
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353081244347736065
THE CHOICE OF THREE POSSIBLE ELITES – AND THE CONSEQUENCES
There are only three sets of these elites in the West vying for power:
The Jewish Female Authoritarian strategy of undermining, and continuing the rapid conquest of western civilization by incentivizing race, class, sex, cultural, informational conflict – and even logical conflict, and underclass invasion – repeating the fall of Rome, and their repetition in Bolshevik revolution and terrors, and German counter-revolution against it.
The Semitic Roman Catholic and French Feminine Authoritarian strategy of state dominance, bloody terrors, and socialism leading to slow conquest of Europe by Islam.
Or the European, Germanic, and Anglo continuation of our masculine ancient rule of law repeating the otherwise unimaginable success of Europeans in the Bronze Age of pre-literate Indo-European expansion, the Iron Age Greek reason Roman administration and Roman peace – that dragged mankind out into reason and failed, and the European age of sail and steel’s that dragged mankind single-handedly, kicking and screaming all the while, out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vice of oppression between human tyranny and the vicissitudes of a nature, geology, climate, solar system, and universe all but hostile to the existence of life – and is on the verge of failure.
We have a choice between a future under the Jewish Muslim Semitic civilization of endemic lying, parasitism, stagnation, decline, and dysgenia – another dark age and the very real possibility of failing to pass through the Great Filter – or to continue the European Tradition and its high costs, and to transcend ourselves into the gods we imagine by continuing our long history of discovery, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, nature, and nature’s god.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 14:56:19 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105616938023477020
NO THE JEWS ALWAYS HAD CHOICES – THEY CHOSE
—“It’s not an accident that Jews in Europe excelled at financial endeavors and professions: it was all they were allowed to do, so characterizing it as “parasitism” is unfair. Every human economic activity can be characterized as “parasitic.”— @KCDefenseLawyer
You haven’t stated why it’s all they were allowed to do (record of conspiracy against the population), or why they were able to do it (non-payment for ore responsibility for defense, institutions, commons, territory), or why they were allowed to do it (the nobility lacked bankers until the Templars), or what the rate of interest was (300%+), or why they charged that rate of interest (baiting into seizure), or what they did if it couldn’t be paid (seizure).
The Jewish group evolutionary strategy is ‘avoiding the cost of territory, commons, rule, and defense, by creating a state within a state, by undermining by baiting into hazard while escaping warranty and liability and maintaining plausible deniability’. This is the group strategy of human females.
This is why I am concerned that reforming our laws to prevent this method of fraud made possible by our first right of self-determination isn’t enough – because it’s a genetic strategy and they manifest feminine cognition, verbal ability, speech, method of argument, workload.
We don’t think of it this way but females are more aggressive than males. Jews and Arabs are more aggressive than Europeans. This has something to do with sensitivity to status signals (lower neoteny) and is likely related to the Jewish and Arab and all south Eurasian tendency to lie by face before truth even when unnecessary and to treat deceit as cunning and prideful.
As for claiming people are generally parasitic, that’s false. All cooperation under reciprocity is non-parasitic – and it’s disproportionately productive. There is no other action that is more beneficial than cooperation. Adaptive cooperation is the most beneficial which i why we can afford these expensive brains.
The purpose of the common natural law is to incrementally suppress parasitism. There is a unique vulnerability in western civilization because we use adversarial meritocratic markets in every aspect of life, under the principle of self-determination by sovereignty. This means we do not defend the population against scams like other peoples do.
As in all things the west is an engine of natural selection but only if it continues to suppress methods of irreciprocity no matter how complex.
(Original Post)
gab.com/curtd/posts/105616705074710248
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 13:59:09 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105616713213825777
THE REASON FOR MARX’S HATRED
European Capitalism: organized investment in production, vs Jewish Financialism: organized investment in parasitism. Marx was fine with organized parasitism, poverty but socialized, but not with organized production and prosperous but re-socialized.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-23 13:44:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352975546855125000
Instead, the anglo Irish(absent) aristocracy abusively charged rent and taxes to farmers. And everyone under-responded to the crisis and some of it was market fundamentalism without an understanding of markets. very, very, bad government. Doesn’t stop writers from making sh-t up.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-23 00:28:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352775184223244288
Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352769306518405121
“In Europe as well, up until about 1800, the wealthy had considerably more children than the poor. There was no public assistance for single mothers, so there were strict sanctions against illegitimacy. Women generally did not marry men who could not support them, and many people in the serving classes, therefore, did not marry or have children. And when the lower classes had illegitimate or unwanted children they often exposed them; dead babies were a common sight in gutters or on rubbish heaps.” The serial ‘killers’ with by far the largest numbers were women who disposed of unwanted babies. Unfortunately for archaeologists, Roman sewers were filled with them.My point is this: throughout history, women have killed far more babies than men have in wars. Women have killed three times as many babies by abortion(+60m) since 1973 as soldiers and civilians were killed in world war one(20m). Men > War -vs- Women > Infanticide. Now tell me, what’s the difference? We both defend what we must. So, you know, I have less of a problem with the abortion argument than I do with infanticide. And I have more of a problem with common property, no fault divorce, alimony, child support, and welfare. Negative Feedback loops matter. Ergo: Dysgenia is rampant today.
“In Europe as well, up until about 1800, the wealthy had considerably more children than the poor. There was no public assistance for single mothers, so there were strict sanctions against illegitimacy. Women generally did not marry men who could not support them, and many people in the serving classes, therefore, did not marry or have children. And when the lower classes had illegitimate or unwanted children they often exposed them; dead babies were a common sight in gutters or on rubbish heaps.” The serial ‘killers’ with by far the largest numbers were women who disposed of unwanted babies. Unfortunately for archaeologists, Roman sewers were filled with them.My point is this: throughout history, women have killed far more babies than men have in wars. Women have killed three times as many babies by abortion(+60m) since 1973 as soldiers and civilians were killed in world war one(20m). Men > War -vs- Women > Infanticide. Now tell me, what’s the difference? We both defend what we must. So, you know, I have less of a problem with the abortion argument than I do with infanticide. And I have more of a problem with common property, no fault divorce, alimony, child support, and welfare. Negative Feedback loops matter. Ergo: Dysgenia is rampant today.
There is almost no difference between the last two right generations and the past two leftist generations: irresponsible, lazy, privileged, unearned pride, false virtue signals – and abysmally ignorant.The difference is that the left shows up, follows direction, takes initiative.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 19:22:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352335870850904070
Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352335027112054785
the data says ‘republicans’ because they own businesses and accumulate capital. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-20 16:29:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351929753402531847
Reply addressees: @paper_ghost
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351927607911038976
Conservatives are habituated and pretty damned dim.
Republicans (Classical Liberals) are competent but pretty damned foolishly optimistic.
Libertarians are pretty sophomoric ass clowns constantly punching above their weight.
Anarchists are tilting at windmills of rage.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-20 15:59:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351922303135838216