Why should the financial sector obtain all the returns of all businesses, instead of the state and then the people?
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-23 15:19:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385614315143708672
Reply addressees: @Travel_ThruTime
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385613524718735360
So the fundamental difference between humans of 125+ IQ narrows rapidly, but the behavior groups due to variation in the reproductive, status, economic, and class value of the generations (races) remains due to the median of the distribution. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384623468348645377
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-20 21:43:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384623801380519937
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384623468348645377
I love egyptian people. Many egyptian people have asked me this question. It causes me pain, because I understand. The answer is that the people at the bottom must have one child until the want of islam has ended. Then egypt needs a new ‘mythology’, of restoring its greatness.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-17 21:29:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383533075733254145
Reply addressees: @_notmo
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383531408308596739
(… more from post:)
4) The movement of the frankfurt school to the USA in the postwar era was done with intent: having failed to use marxism and Leninism to turn the laboring classes against the middle classes – a class that with their rule of law of commerce (property) would suppress 2000 years of ‘huckstering’ (preying on the underclasses), they sought a new form of huckstering at industrial scale: marxism and Leninism.
5) But capitalism had proven them wrong and provided benefit to the lower middle, working and laboring classes. So they had to move somewhere that capitalism couldn’t solve. They moved to America to weaponize the African population as they had tried to weaponize the laboring populations. They knew full well that the problem is genetic, and that capitalism couldn’t solve it. We know because they wrote it down, publicized it, and then did it. They stated that they would use the black population, western female sensitivity, democracy, to “…destroy the institutions of cultural production…” that if it continued to evolve, would prevent their continued parasitic existence by huckstering.
6) For this ‘huckstering’ (lie) to succeed they had to demonize the eugenics movement. That required creating the sequence of anthropological, psychological, social, political, and economic pseudosciences. And they used nepotism and the university system, and the new need for education, given the post-war opportunity for upward class expansion due to the collapse of the world means of production during the wars and devoted every ounce of effort to promote this set of lies.
7) And that’s where we are today. Although I might mention that this is a repetition of how the Christians destroyed the “institutions of cultural production” in the Roman world.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 23:21:28 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106077571545818433
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106077569262398868
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
1) The left thas to lie because their entire edifice is predicated on the false promise that people were oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated (genetically pacified) in order to increase the quality of life by the increase in scope of markets, by the increase in the suppression of irreciprocity, by the increase in the scope of law and policing. The painful truth is that there are four to six living generations of humans, of different levels of domestication, leading to different rates of development, leading to differences in normative behavior, leading to conflicts between groups. This is fine within group but it’s not across groups in proximity. Because Domestication syndrome produces people more fit for markets, and failure of domestication syndrome produces people less fit for markets. We call these differences in fitness ‘class differences’. But the primary difference between the races is the size of their underclasses that have not experienced domestication syndrome because the climate wasn’t harsh enough (cold). So in an advanced, technological society, the problem is the shrinking of the unfit for markets at the same rates as shrinking our ignorance of the natural world through innovation adaptation and exploitation of that world. 2) So what are the Left’s Lies? a) the false promise of the end of scarcity, b) the false promise of the nature of man (amoral superpredator), c) the false promise of the malleability of man (we can train some discipline and mindfulness but we can’t improve IQ and conscientiousness which are results of domestication syndrome: decrease in rates of development that increase cognitive development in exchange for a decrease in aggression – producing a virtuous cycle. Roughly speaking IQ is the universal measure of group success at self-domestication. d) and the constant problem of accumulating genetic load, regression the mean, and the problem of defeating the red queen in a narrow window of climatological, geological, stellar, and galatic opportunity. 3) The left blames Europeans for oppression when European success was the result of placing progress over harmony, in exchange for a religion of tragedy (greco-roman-germanic and Christian), where we discovered adapted to and applied the laws of the universe to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality and early death. So the left blames Europeans as a proxy for blaming the universe (or theologically ‘hating god’). (more … in comments…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106077569262398868
1) The left thas to lie because their entire edifice is predicated on the false promise that people were oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated (genetically pacified) in order to increase the quality of life by the increase in scope of markets, by the increase in the suppression of irreciprocity, by the increase in the scope of law and policing. The painful truth is that there are four to six living generations of humans, of different levels of domestication, leading to different rates of development, leading to differences in normative behavior, leading to conflicts between groups.
This is fine within group but it’s not across groups in proximity. Because Domestication syndrome produces people more fit for markets, and failure of domestication syndrome produces people less fit for markets. We call these differences in fitness ‘class differences’.
But the primary difference between the races is the size of their underclasses that have not experienced domestication syndrome because the climate wasn’t harsh enough (cold). So in an advanced, technological society, the problem is the shrinking of the unfit for markets at the same rates as shrinking our ignorance of the natural world through innovation adaptation and exploitation of that world.
2) So what are the Left’s Lies?
a) the false promise of the end of scarcity,
b) the false promise of the nature of man (amoral superpredator),
c) the false promise of the malleability of man (we can train some discipline and mindfulness but we can’t improve IQ and conscientiousness which are results of domestication syndrome: decrease in rates of development that increase cognitive development in exchange for a decrease in aggression – producing a virtuous cycle. Roughly speaking IQ is the universal measure of group success at self-domestication.
d) and the constant problem of accumulating genetic load, regression the mean, and the problem of defeating the red queen in a narrow window of climatological, geological, stellar, and galatic opportunity.
3) The left blames Europeans for oppression when European success was the result of placing progress over harmony, in exchange for a religion of tragedy (greco-roman-germanic and Christian), where we discovered adapted to and applied the laws of the universe to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality and early death. So the left blames Europeans as a proxy for blaming the universe (or theologically ‘hating god’).
(more … in comments…)
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 23:20:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106077569262398868
OUCH:You can reduce the difference in group evolutionary strategies between civilizations to their use of the underclasses: exploitation(middle east), limiting their damage(India), reducing their number(China),or sifting them via merit, limiting reproduction of the rest (Europe).
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 22:27:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383185396717195274
8) All of these (six) factors produce a problem for members of every race other than the upper-middle class of that race. This is because humans value status and self-image more than anything other than life.
9) so while the upper-middle class can travel the world successfully, the upper and lower classes organize in defense of one another, as elites gain status prestige and wealth seeking political-economic and demographic advantage for the lower and middle classes that can’t compete with other races – within the same polity.
10) so the painful truth is that globalization and race-mixing favors the upper-middle class, at the cost of the middle, working, laboring, and dependent classes.
11) and that America has a foreign, hostile, upper-middle-class that is conducting war on the anglo and germanic and scots Irish middle, working, and laboring classes as well as the anglo upper classes.
12) we know that this was done on purpose and it’s well documented – this is an act of war just like the bolshevik revolution in Russia and the Marxist revolution in Germany were acts of war against the host people – offering false and impossible promises to the underclasses by claiming they were oppressed rather than uncompetitive in the new industrial and technological world that made their relative prosperity possible.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-15 00:41:09 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066560230179862
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066558909416161
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
5) And the genetic distribution (size of the underclass) in each race varies by the latitude of its history, and this genetic distribution causes demand for behavior, norms, culture, institutions, and most importantly status. These factors combine to create demand for different norms, traditions, values, institutions. This is the underlying issue. People who would be compatible in separate states because they could cooperate by trade are not compatible in polities, social orders, neighborhoods because their biological interests require different socio-economic-political conditions. Mostly, this is due to the fact that some groups can afford high investment parenting (East Asians), other high investment parenting in the commons (Europeans), and others pay high costs of parenting in the first place due to the rate of maturity of their offspring (islam, africa). So PROXIMITY CAUSES FRICTION AND ENVY which creates HOSTILITY. 6) there are at least four to six generations of mankind, that we call races, that progressively isolated, adapted, and as they moved north produced neoteny so that the East Asians are the most neotenic, the Europeans next, the south Eurasians (north Africa to India) next, and the various Africans least. So the Africans have the most rapid maturity and aggression, followed by the middle east, followed by various others, followed by Europeans, with east Asians far out ahead in neoteny such that they live longer too. Let’s note that there is a limit to the return on neotenic development. 7) the most taboo topic is the difference in IQ between the races that’s due to neotenic evolution and increased cranial volume because of longer development cycles. This does not mean that races determine intelligence. It means that the size of the underclass determines the racial average of intelligence, so a lower racial intelligence only means that they were unsuccessful at reducing the size of the underclass in warmer climates – and people in cold climates, and cold climates under agrarianism more so. The primary difference in IQ between the races has to do with male-spatial, female-verbal biases, and the number of outliers they produce over 140 because of a slightly wider standard deviation. (Ashkenazim). … more …
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066558909416161
5) And the genetic distribution (size of the underclass) in each race varies by the latitude of its history, and this genetic distribution causes demand for behavior, norms, culture, institutions, and most importantly status. These factors combine to create demand for different norms, traditions, values, institutions. This is the underlying issue. People who would be compatible in separate states because they could cooperate by trade are not compatible in polities, social orders, neighborhoods because their biological interests require different socio-economic-political conditions. Mostly, this is due to the fact that some groups can afford high investment parenting (East Asians), other high investment parenting in the commons (Europeans), and others pay high costs of parenting in the first place due to the rate of maturity of their offspring (islam, africa). So PROXIMITY CAUSES FRICTION AND ENVY which creates HOSTILITY.
6) there are at least four to six generations of mankind, that we call races, that progressively isolated, adapted, and as they moved north produced neoteny so that the East Asians are the most neotenic, the Europeans next, the south Eurasians (north Africa to India) next, and the various Africans least. So the Africans have the most rapid maturity and aggression, followed by the middle east, followed by various others, followed by Europeans, with east Asians far out ahead in neoteny such that they live longer too. Let’s note that there is a limit to the return on neotenic development.
7) the most taboo topic is the difference in IQ between the races that’s due to neotenic evolution and increased cranial volume because of longer development cycles. This does not mean that races determine intelligence. It means that the size of the underclass determines the racial average of intelligence, so a lower racial intelligence only means that they were unsuccessful at reducing the size of the underclass in warmer climates – and people in cold climates, and cold climates under agrarianism more so. The primary difference in IQ between the races has to do with male-spatial, female-verbal biases, and the number of outliers they produce over 140 because of a slightly wider standard deviation. (Ashkenazim).
… more …
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-15 00:40:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066558909416161
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066556523739154
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
You cannot judge a person by the properties of his class (race, religion, culture, class ), but you can judge a class (race, religion, culture, class) by the properties of its people. In other words. there are good people in every race, and bad people in every race. That said, 1) all people are biased toward their race, with that bias increasing with stress, and decreasing with lack of social, economic, political stress, and increasing with the ability to virtue signal at other race member’s expense. 2) All but a small percentage of people marry, reproduce, work with, live in neighborhoods with, and associate with members of their race, class, religion etc. 3) Human Sexual, social, economic, and political market value is determined by not only symmetry and health but the degree of neotenic evolution. 4) Differences in neotenic evolution cause races to mature at different rates, and reach different depts of maturity. This manifests as higher aggression and lower executive function and lower accomplishment, to just the opposite. And these behavioral differences that only mediate in relatively old age. …more…
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066556523739154
You cannot judge a person by the properties of his class (race, religion, culture, class ), but you can judge a class (race, religion, culture, class) by the properties of its people. In other words. there are good people in every race, and bad people in every race. That said,
1) all people are biased toward their race, with that bias increasing with stress, and decreasing with lack of social, economic, political stress, and increasing with the ability to virtue signal at other race member’s expense.
2) All but a small percentage of people marry, reproduce, work with, live in neighborhoods with, and associate with members of their race, class, religion etc.
3) Human Sexual, social, economic, and political market value is determined by not only symmetry and health but the degree of neotenic evolution.
4) Differences in neotenic evolution cause races to mature at different rates, and reach different depts of maturity. This manifests as higher aggression and lower executive function and lower accomplishment, to just the opposite. And these behavioral differences that only mediate in relatively old age.
…more…
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-15 00:40:12 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066556523739154
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066549330090873
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
QUESTION: “What does Curt Doolittle think of when people say no race (ethnicity) is better than another race (ethnicity)?” ANSWER: READ THE COMMENTS OF THIS POST (Short Version: Races are in fact better or worse so to speak, (more adaptive or less adaptive, more evolved or less evolved) but there are good and bad people in each race. And it has more to do with the size of the underclass than the race. Because the size of the lower classes determined the necessary behavior of the people, their norms, traditions, values, and institutions.) (gab doesn’t allow me to write full posts, so I have to break it up into a set of comments)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106066549330090873
I use this modification to Paul Fussel’s US Class Hierarchy:
Top out-of-sight
Upper
Upper Middle or UK Middle
———
US Middle
(High prole) Lower Middle
(Mid-prole) Working
(Low prole) Laboring
———
Lower class (dependent)
Destitute (criminals, unemployable, etc)
Bottom out-of-sight
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-13 15:24:21 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106058708547357484