YEah, well, I have no problem paying bribes vs taxes. At least I know the bribes are paying people with low salaries. Corruption in the west is paying taxes to pay people who already ahve high salaries…. lol
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-29 23:23:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487566979124842497
Reply addressees: @10FathomLine @pavelnikulin1 @anders_aslund
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487566627407208448
That said, we are (and certainly the intel community is) aware of the multi-dimensional nature of incentives, and the difference in incentives between rulers, elites, and the common people. We have known this plan since it leaked to intel. (Most Kremlin plans leak).
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-29 22:28:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487553363998826500
Reply addressees: @pavelnikulin1 @10FathomLine @anders_aslund
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487552406246277127
Apparently you are unfamiliar with class, personality, and IQ differences in cleanliness. I’m not. The neurotic worry. The mentally healty simple keep everythng clean, including themselves.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-29 03:55:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487273192620232704
Reply addressees: @Lisa47786210 @mongotooz @xMOLONLABEx @tedcruz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487195861402591233
@Angry_Norman@RadioFreeNorthwest — “They’re peasants who dream of being patricians.” —
They’re COGFEMS (cognitively female) who dream of being male (rational and capable)
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:33:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696332420232446
@Weiss_Drache
(continued from above comment ….)
Worse, as far as I can tell with the present failure of liberalism, the success at repeating class bolshevism with race (identity) bolshevism, creating the same conflict as Marxists in Europe, and bolsheviks in Europe, and communists in China, the restoration of the conflict of civilizations and the balance of power between civilizations, has resulted in fascism (meaning ethnonationalism, ethnocentric secular state religion, civilization-states instead of federations, intermixed vs mixed economies, the organization of the population as commercial military order within the economy, and radical intolerance for hyperconsumption, deviancy, and feminization, is sweeping the world, meaning fascism has won the debate of the industrial age.
So the narrative is going to collapse from the empirical evidence alone. It’s certainly going to collapse with the end of the boomer generation. The only question is whether the Jewish race-bolshevism, of the woke-pc-anti-white pseudoscientific and sophomoric religion, succeeds in the west, resulting in the third-worlding of European civilization, continuing the Abrahamic destruction of six civilizations of the ancient world, or whether the ‘fascists’ win restoring western civilization so that it can equally compete with the other macro civilizations.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 19:49:14 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696157755247848
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696155632141287
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
@Weiss_Drache Does anyone really deny that the camps existed, that they were imitations of the Jewish bolshevik use of camps of Russia, or that the prisoners were put to work as forced labor, or that by the end of the war the prisoners were starved to death or murdered in large numbers because the state decided no longer to pay for their maintenance and care? As far as I know the only debate is over whether the jews were practicing corruption by the usurpation of institutions of cultural production (as they had repeatedly elsewhere), whether the numbers of dead were dramatized, whether or not there was use of gas chambers, whether the original intent was relocation or extermination, and that the natural economics of any such program by a country losing a war would be to maximize resources directed to the people and military rather than ‘undesirables’, resulting in the camps we saw at the end of the war. In other words, who is being honest or dishonest? what is the truth. The truth is rather obvious from the evidence. The untruth is rather obvious from t he evidence, and the motivated reasoning, and motivated propaganda. AFAIK every objector is just demanding the truth. (And yes, there may be some fking crazies who deny it all, just as there are crazies that fictionalize it all. ) As far as I can tell when the postwar generation has died off, which will occur shortly, the public understanding will adjust to the evidence, and the evidence is pretty clear that camps were created with the intent of relocation, that the war caused need for slave labor, then drove deprivation, starvation, and killings. That smaller numbers died than claimed. That postwar propaganda was used for political purposes. That the Germans were organizing to prevent the expansion of Jewish bolshevism from Russia into Germany (and anglo liberalism as well). That the postwar jewish marxists moved from germany to the usa and converted from class warfare that caused russian and german conflict, to race warfare that caused broader european and american social conflict. As such, there was no different intention of a purge of the jews this time than any other, or any different from the exit of the Moors from Spain, and that the original rather optimistic nature of the camps degenerated as the war pressed on for rather ordinary reasons that would occur and have occurred in history as resources are depleted. As far as I know, that’s the empirical evidence, and it’s all rational, it’s not dramatic, or especially ‘evil’ at all. It’s nothing compared to the Albegentsian crusades, the Inquisition, or even the protestant use of claims of witchcraft as a proxy for continuing the dominance of Protestantism over catholicism and other ‘heretics’. ( continued in next comment … )
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696155632141287
Does anyone really deny that the camps existed, that they were imitations of the Jewish bolshevik use of camps of Russia, or that the prisoners were put to work as forced labor, or that by the end of the war the prisoners were starved to death or murdered in large numbers because the state decided no longer to pay for their maintenance and care?
As far as I know the only debate is over whether the jews were practicing corruption by the usurpation of institutions of cultural production (as they had repeatedly elsewhere), whether the numbers of dead were dramatized, whether or not there was use of gas chambers, whether the original intent was relocation or extermination, and that the natural economics of any such program by a country losing a war would be to maximize resources directed to the people and military rather than ‘undesirables’, resulting in the camps we saw at the end of the war.
In other words, who is being honest or dishonest? what is the truth. The truth is rather obvious from the evidence. The untruth is rather obvious from t he evidence, and the motivated reasoning, and motivated propaganda. AFAIK every objector is just demanding the truth. (And yes, there may be some fking crazies who deny it all, just as there are crazies that fictionalize it all. )
As far as I can tell when the postwar generation has died off, which will occur shortly, the public understanding will adjust to the evidence, and the evidence is pretty clear that camps were created with the intent of relocation, that the war caused need for slave labor, then drove deprivation, starvation, and killings. That smaller numbers died than claimed. That postwar propaganda was used for political purposes. That the Germans were organizing to prevent the expansion of Jewish bolshevism from Russia into Germany (and anglo liberalism as well). That the postwar jewish marxists moved from germany to the usa and converted from class warfare that caused russian and german conflict, to race warfare that caused broader european and american social conflict. As such, there was no different intention of a purge of the jews this time than any other, or any different from the exit of the Moors from Spain, and that the original rather optimistic nature of the camps degenerated as the war pressed on for rather ordinary reasons that would occur and have occurred in history as resources are depleted.
As far as I know, that’s the empirical evidence, and it’s all rational, it’s not dramatic, or especially ‘evil’ at all. It’s nothing compared to the Albegentsian crusades, the Inquisition, or even the protestant use of claims of witchcraft as a proxy for continuing the dominance of Protestantism over catholicism and other ‘heretics’.
( continued in next comment … )
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 19:48:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696155632141287
(continued from post….)
Worse, as far as I can tell with the present failure of liberalism, the success at repeating class bolshevism with race (identity) bolshevism, creating the same conflict as Marxists in Europe, and bolsheviks in Europe, and communists in China, the restoration of the conflict of civilizations and the balance of power between civilizations, has resulted in fascism (meaning ethnonationalism, ethnocentric secular state religion, civilization-states instead of federations, intermixed vs mixed economies, the organization of the population as commercial military order within the economy, and radical intolerance for hyperconsumption, deviancy, and feminization), is sweeping the world, meaning fascism has won the debate of optimum political organization of the industrial and scientific age. Simply because it is the optimum organization of human, institutional, informational, material, and territorial capital – the most scientific government possible. The only difference is whether you can produce a high trust polity like the europeans and rely more on rule of scientific law, or are stuck with less evolved, lower trust polities like the rest of the world, that need more authoritarianism, because they’re less adaptive.
So the narrative is going to collapse from the empirical evidence alone. It’s certainly going to collapse with the end of the boomer generation. The only question is whether the Jewish race-bolshevism, of the woke-pc-anti-white pseudoscientific and sophomoric religion, succeeds in the west, resulting in the third-worlding of European civilization, continuing the Abrahamic destruction of six civilizations of the ancient world, or whether the ‘fascists’ win restoring western civilization so that it can equally compete with the other macro civilizations.
At least that’s the science.
Not that either side of the fence isn’t selective in their tolerance for the science.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 19:45:17 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696142244779559
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696138112274496
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
HOLOCAUST TRUTH Does anyone really deny that the camps existed, that they were imitations of the Jewish bolshevik use of camps of Russia, or that the prisoners were put to work as forced labor, or that by the end of the war the prisoners were starved to death or murdered in large numbers because the state decided no longer to pay for their maintenance and care? As far as I know the only debate is over whether the jews were practicing corruption by the usurpation of institutions of cultural production (as they had repeatedly elsewhere), whether the numbers of dead were dramatized, whether or not there was use of gas chambers, whether the original intent was relocation or extermination, and that the natural economics of any such program by a country losing a war would be to maximize resources directed to the people and military rather than ‘undesirables’, resulting in the camps we saw at the end of the war. In other words, who is being honest or dishonest? what is the truth. The truth is rather obvious from the evidence. The untruth is rather obvious from t he evidence, and the motivated reasoning, and motivated propaganda. AFAIK every objector is just demanding the truth. (And yes, there may be some fking crazies who deny it all, just as there are crazies that fictionalize it all. ) As far as I can tell when the postwar generation has died off, which will occur shortly, the public understanding will adjust to the evidence, and the evidence is pretty clear that camps were created with the intent of relocation, that the war caused need for slave labor, then drove deprivation, starvation, and killings. That smaller numbers died than claimed. That postwar propaganda was used for political purposes. That the Germans were organizing to prevent the expansion of Jewish bolshevism from Russia into Germany (and anglo liberalism as well). That the postwar jewish marxists moved from germany to the usa and converted from class warfare that caused russian and german conflict, to race warfare that caused broader european and american social conflict. As such, there was no different intention of a purge of the jews this time than any other, or any different from the exit of the Moors from Spain, and that the original rather optimistic nature of the camps degenerated as the war pressed on for rather ordinary reasons that would occur and have occurred in history as resources are depleted. As far as I know, that’s the empirical evidence, and it’s all rational, it’s not dramatic, or especially ‘evil’ at all. It’s nothing compared to the Albegentsian crusades, the Inquisition, or even the protestant use of claims of witchcraft as a proxy for continuing the dominance of Protestantism over catholicism and other ‘heretics’. ( continued in comments … )
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696138112274496
@Afterrthought Even ‘just men’ works fine. Even houses for men and women with different spheres of influence works. Houses for classes where women are a class works. Economic voting works. The only thing that doesnt’ work is universal equalitarian democracy where the bottom rules.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 19:15:15 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684699564887916
@sWampyone Hitler delegitimized soft eugenics. Jews went to war on eugenic and group differences. Jews moved to america and converted from using the working class against white upper classes, to using blacks against white upper classes, because women are suckers for it – and bit hard. So we are just going through the repeat of the christian destruction of roman ethics, to the jewish destruction of german culture, to the jewish destruction of russian government and culture, to the jewish destruction of american culture – all european culture, by the lie that soft eugenics (natural selectino) is not necessary given the inequality of people, the regression to the mean, and the accumulatino of genetic defect in the lower classes, and the accumulation of neotenic evolution in the upper classes.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 23:47:31 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107663120891496277
@Appeal2Heaven I would be in the category of extraordinarily successful men while you are in the category of useless over opinionated dumb fuck – yes. I have more respect for those BLM guys than you. You are the shit end of the white gene pool.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-19 04:37:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107647275723186349