—“There is nothing wrong with Hartford that bullets, fire, and bulldozers won’t fix.”—
Yes, well, that applies to most urban toilets.
.
.
.
(FYI: it’s how napoleon made paris a beautiful city from a slum. Which the french have no returned to slum…)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:29:57 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424706898818210
A SHARP DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN AND LEVANTINE TRADITIONS
by Tim Beckley-Spillane
(“The next levantine tide on the rise: [Islamism, Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism”: every form of lie possible.)
I always turn back to Joseph Campbell on the topic of Abrahamism and the West. He draws a sharp distinction between the European and Levantine traditions in “Occidental Mythology” (1964), summarizing their 2.5 thousand year-long antagonism thus:
—“By and large, the recent history of Occidental mythology can be described in terms of a grandiose interplay of these two contrary pieties; specifically a violent tidal seesaw of exchanges, East to West, West to East, East to West, West to East again, commencing with the first serious Persian attempt against Greece in 490 B.C. Alexander’s conquest of the Levant turned the Levantine tide and was followed by the victories of Rome… Christianity followed, after which the European empire fell, and Levantine Byzantium assumed both its name and its role as the New or Second Rome. Next, Mohammed’s revelation burst upon the world, in 622 A.D., and through the following millennium bade fair to become the ultimate religion of mankind- until, once again, the tide turned. For as Persia had been stopped at Marathon (490 B.C.), so at Pontiers (732 A.D.) was Islam; and thereafter the stirring desert cry of the muezzin to communal prayer was year by year forced back. Within Christianized Europe itself, furthermore, the absolute authority of One Church was dissolved through the irresistible return to force of the native European principles of individual judgement and the worth of rational man. The Reformation, Renaissance, Enlightenment, and present Age of Science followed, culminating, as of now, in the European spiritual conquest of world- with, however, the next Levantine tide already on the rise [Marxism/Feminism/Postmodernism].”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:27:14 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424696184226696
A SHORT COURSE ON ABRAHAMISM AND THE JEWISH QUESTION – ONE DOC.
Explanation of the war between oriental and occidental that has raged since persia first attacked the hellenes.
(FB problem with Long Notes, so must be published on site.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:26:57 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424695083709230
Sure, the Italians and germans were trying to save western civilization – and they were right. Because the core of western civilization is Lotharingia and the north and baltic seas.
France in her despotic feminine monopoly ambitions to rule all of europe, has always been the enemy of all. She gave birth to, protection to, and support of rousseu and the anti-aristocratic movement that culminated in marxism and communism.
Russian ambitions imposed on german territorial and cultural expansion. The powers sought to maintain the balance of powers and continue corporatism of the atlantics rather than the aristocracy of the central europeans.
The jews were successful in defeating the weakest government in europe – the Russians, by rallying the most backward people in europe, by false promise of worker’s utopia.
Then europe resisted the Lotharingian attempt to defend europe from the communists.
Sorry but you know, people do what they can with the knowledge and recourses they have arguing in the traditional moral grammar they have.
That’s what was different in the movements.
However al movements were doing similar things
Advancing their group strategies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:23:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424681123476053
–“…I think Christian Nationalism would be equally possible. But, I get that’s not your thing.”—
Hmm… Christian Nationalism…
Christianity(love) > Heathenism (kin, ancestors, nature) > aristotelianism (truth, law, science).
That series can be made exclusive under law, and all other religions easily suppressed. But we cannot mandate supernaturalism for ‘the rest of us’.
We will not ask you to deprive yourself of the supernatural, but you may not ask to deprive us of the ancestral, natural, truthful and scientific.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:16:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424652139244210
FLOOD!!!
Its 5,000,000bc. Central mediterranean. You and the other hominids are playing grab-ass and shit-slinging under the trees, trying to impress the red bottomed chicks, when you hear this thundering sound in the distance…
It’s 77,000 bc, Red Sea. You and the misses and the munchkins are sitting around the hut, and while you’ve noticed something’s wrong with the rivers, you suddenly hear this horrible thundering sound in the distance….
It’s 13000 bc, northwest america. You and the misses and the munchkins are sitting around the hut, and while you’ve noticed something’s wrong with the rivers, you suddenly hear this horrible thundering sound in the distance….
It’s 12000bc, Persian Gulf. You and the misses and the munchkins are sitting around the hut, and while you’ve noticed something’s wrong with the rivers, you suddenly hear this horrible thundering sound in the distance….
It’s 6400bc. Doggerland. You and the misses and the munchkins are sitting around the hut and, while you’ve noticed that the marshes have gotten wetter since you were a kid, this horrible thundering sound in the distance….
It’s 5600bc. The Black Sea. You and the Missus and the munchkins are sitting around the hut and this horrible thundering sound in the distance and the flood starts….
The gods love to seriously f*k with us, using plagues, droughts, floods, volcanos, and asteroids. I mean. It’s like a dungeons and dragons game ‘cept we never get a turn….
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:15:33 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424650233164498
—“In all cases, the Arab geocultural unit is the largest in the world after Russia and Anglo-America. The size of this unit exceeds 375 million people and spans more than 14 million square kilometers.”—
Again. I don’t blame genes, but DISTRIBUTIONS (class sizes), and CULTURE that produces those distributions (abrahamism).
The problem was the arab conquest and the expansion of islam (judaism and christianity) and all abrahamism, which is devolutionary (underclass) and a reversal of the eastern and western programs of incremental eugenics (domestication).
In the west the church PROHIBITED cousin marriage out to as many as eight generations in order to break up the land holdings of the great families,so that the church (pseudo-state) could buy it up – resulting in half the capital in europe being ‘dead’ and keeping the people poor until the overthrow of the church.
In islam the opposite happened. Inbreeding continued in order to preserve scarce capital among tribal peoples living in an empire each of whcih was unable to produce a government that produced commons suitable to their ends. In no small part because it was cheaper and easier to tax concentrated agrarian production (river farming) and trade routes (at the center of four continents), than it was to in europe and east asia where production was more evenly distributed over vary large (and wetter) territories.
Abrahamism is a dysgenic cancer upon mankind and must be ended forever.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:12:29 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424638207233095
(…continued)
The debates that are open as far as I know, are:
(a) whether anatolians came counter-clockwise around the black sea, or clockwise. I have assumed that it’s counter-clockwise until evidence otherwise – the reason being their arts.
(b) And whether the Iranic people went south of the caspian sea, or north into central Asia and then down and back eastward into today’s Iranic lands.
(c) I don’t think anyone disputes that the turkic people were far eastern edge, and moved southwest under pressure from the east asians. (I generally ignore the central asians because they have’t produced a ‘civilization’ per se.)
(d) Whether the Mesopotamians, and whether they are indigenous “marsh arabs”, or a mixture of everyone in the region. It sure looks like they are north semites (marsh arabs). And it sure looks like the south west eurasians and northeast africans merged in what is today’s somalia-yemen-red sea -persian gulf basins, and split between river(north semitic) and sea (south semitic) groups.
(d) whether anatolians or caucasians or arabs (afro-asiatics) occupied the eastern mediterranean but that over time we’ve seen admixture between groups.
(e) whether the berber (north african) peoples emerged from the north of africa (top of the red sea, egypt, or the east (horn) of africa. I operate under the assumption that they migrated north and the were relatively insulated (they were on and off insulated).
(f) the timing and mode of the competition between modern east asians, central eurasians, and the same for modern east asians (mongolids) and their fork from broader souther-route negroids (austronesians).
There are others but they don’t affect my pursuit f the problem of truth and institutions.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:10:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424630975094590
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS I got another supposed criticism last night without explaining what, from fans of population genetics. However, I can’t separate out their bias from anyone else’s. I have three people I can ask, but they have stopped participating, apparently because I won’t conform to their bias. That bias is to limit discussion to pop gen, and not further disambiguate by language, and further disambiguate by group competitive (evolutionary) strategy. In other words, I’m solving for the big questions of (a) where did technological competitiveness, paternalism, heroism and maneuver, truth and duty, sovereignty, reciprocity(property), commons, tort and jury, come from, (b) why, (c) how was it purified(west) or polluted (semitism), hinduism, buddhism. I use the same research everyone else does. I just am solving for ‘the western group evolutionary strategy that produced sovereignty, law, reason, logic, empiricism, science, technology. So I am interested in the civilizations, their technology, means of production, cooperation, and organization, and fighting. Those groups that we think of as caucasian (really: west eurasian) are spread along the lower boundary of the ice from Spain to Mongolia (or even further?) (So does Caucasian mean west eurasian? the people of the caucuses today? the people that spread into the levant? the people north and west of the black sea? I try to avoid the term because it’s useless.) The black sea is fresh water at that point and seems to be where the rapid evolution of west eurasians peaks, beaks into the IE expansion, and that in to north and west (european), south west (old european), from old european to Anatolian. And from caucuses east to the Tocharian, and south to the coastal middle east, and southeast into the Iranic peoples, then further east into the old indus river peoples (india). Where did truth come from and why did we do it, and why didn’t anyone else? A coincidence: tech, animals, territory, economics, strategy (ooda-loop/maneuver), entrepreneurialism, law, debate, argument, reason, contract. (continued…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540
GENETIC SPREAD BY TRADE ROUTES
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-09 17:22:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148643682410729473
subhumans , humans, transhumans. what’s the difference between then and now?
none. we just demarcate by civilizational and genetic development.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-09 15:44:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148618847873896449
Reply addressees: @Gyeff
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148341325366013953
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148341325366013953