Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • “Disagree with the idea that christianity is a cause for the decline of western

    —“Disagree with the idea that christianity is a cause for the decline of western civ. 1.Christianity is inherently synonymous with western civ itself. 2. Truth is a value in Christianity unlike islam and Judaism which you appear to be conflating it with.”—@ShiarTal

    You think that because you read what was written. I look at economic and legal data and I see in the past what I see today: Abrahamic propaganda saturating the literary classes, meanwhile the ordinary folk remain only ceremonially christian, and the state, law, economy march on.

    So with a forced monopoly on literacy, a banning and burning of books, a mandate to ‘believe in a falsehood’, the parasitism of the church on useful capital, of course we see SOMETHING. We just see trivialities compared pre roman, roman, greco-roman, civilizations.

    Why, if people can be misled by Marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, all of which are a revolt against darwin on one hand and western tripartism on an other would you think it would not be easier with one vehicle of communication: the pulpit and the big lie.

    Abrahamism: False Promise, Pilpul, Critique sold via women and the underclass as a means to undermine aristocratic rational, empirical, legal, commercial civilization, and into semitic poverty, where the gullible are constantly led against the imaginary evil of their betters.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:58:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576286297770240

  • HOW MANY ANGLO SAXON REVOLUTIONS HAVE THERE BEEN? (Why people talking sh*t are f

    HOW MANY ANGLO SAXON REVOLUTIONS HAVE THERE BEEN?
    (Why people talking sh*t are full of sh*t)

    I love predictions from people fantasizing rather than comparing to three or more events in human history especially within the same civilization, nation, or culture.

    How many anglo saxon revolutions have there been to reform the contract between the sovereign men and the monarchy or government?

    We have the oldest system of government in western civilization. We have to oldest government in western civilization.

    There is a reason.
    Man up.
    Shut up.
    Show up.
    Fight.
    Make and Take Damage
    Make and Take Casualties

    Under Rule of Law
    In a system of laws
    Under a constitution of Natural Law
    In a competition and balance of powers.
    Adjudicated by an independent judiciary.
    Under oath to the cult of the Law.
    All that mest change,
    is the ‘programming’
    that the system of government
    operates by:
    – The Constitution
    – The Institutions
    – The Legislation
    – The Regulations
    – The Findings of Law.
    And the militia’s willingness to use violence to enforce them.

    CHOOSE
    – reformation, or
    – separation, or
    – politicide, or
    – ethnocide, or
    – genocide, or

    What you won’t get is the status quo.

    -Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:51:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576258395551038

  • So, you’re a parasite, a liar, and a fraud, attempting to destroy that which our

    So, you’re a parasite, a liar, and a fraud, attempting to destroy that which our ancestors risked the anglo scottish enlightenment, the english civil war, and the revolutionary war, to construct, and which generations died to persist. you want socialism. To end the third way.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 23:14:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158879099689066496

    Reply addressees: @s_cala

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158878474075066368

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @s_cala You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the american experiment in a third way – commercial cooperative rather than political or religious with the nuclear family as the purpose of policy – as hate.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158878474075066368

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @s_cala You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the american experiment in a third way – commercial cooperative rather than political or religious with the nuclear family as the purpose of policy – as hate.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158878474075066368

  • You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of

    You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the american experiment in a third way – commercial cooperative rather than political or religious with the nuclear family as the purpose of policy – as hate.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 23:12:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158878474075066368

    Reply addressees: @s_cala

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158866579863560199

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158866579863560199

  • So NO MORE LIES please. NO MORE LIES. The world returns to nationalism, core sta

    So NO MORE LIES please. NO MORE LIES. The world returns to nationalism, core states, and spheres of influence within an homogenous civilization sharing the same kin groups and strategies, producing suitable commons, and the cosmopolitan socialist authoritarian era is over.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 15:14:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158758279947984897

    Reply addressees: @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158757896001327104

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski There is no familial, social, economic, political order superior to nationalism and that’s without exception. The only alternative is if one’s group strategy (gypsies, jews, islamists) is dependent upon parasitism upon the host that because they were farmers can produce commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158757896001327104

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski There is no familial, social, economic, political order superior to nationalism and that’s without exception. The only alternative is if one’s group strategy (gypsies, jews, islamists) is dependent upon parasitism upon the host that because they were farmers can produce commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158757896001327104

  • There is no familial, social, economic, political order superior to nationalism

    There is no familial, social, economic, political order superior to nationalism and that’s without exception. The only alternative is if one’s group strategy (gypsies, jews, islamists) is dependent upon parasitism upon the host that because they were farmers can produce commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 15:13:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158757896001327104

    Reply addressees: @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158757555805589505

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski Nationalism isn’t non-conformist. Just the opposite. Individualism as an unlimited good is an ideal promoted by socialists and postmodernists, not westerners. The west requires accountability for self expression, and limits self expression to accountability for externality.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158757555805589505

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski Nationalism isn’t non-conformist. Just the opposite. Individualism as an unlimited good is an ideal promoted by socialists and postmodernists, not westerners. The west requires accountability for self expression, and limits self expression to accountability for externality.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158757555805589505

  • Nationalism isn’t non-conformist. Just the opposite. Individualism as an unlimit

    Nationalism isn’t non-conformist. Just the opposite. Individualism as an unlimited good is an ideal promoted by socialists and postmodernists, not westerners. The west requires accountability for self expression, and limits self expression to accountability for externality.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 15:11:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158757555805589505

    Reply addressees: @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158757019903569921

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski So I mean you packed a lot of lies into one tweet now didn’t you?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158757019903569921

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski So I mean you packed a lot of lies into one tweet now didn’t you?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158757019903569921

  • Did you have to practice that little bit of Pilpul and Critique in front of a mi

    Did you have to practice that little bit of Pilpul and Critique in front of a mirror? Nationalists are the defenders of their genome, their kin, the commons ad institutions that persist them across generations. Hong Kong to exit Europeans; India Muslims; Europe Jews and Muslims.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 15:03:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158755544510926849

    Reply addressees: @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158703716603715585

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158703716603715585

  • @Diomedes “Weapons exist so that people like us can prevent people like you from

    @Diomedes

    “Weapons exist so that people like us can prevent people like you from ending our civilization and its invention of sovereignty, reciprocity, rule of law, universal standing, the nuclear family and the demand for marriage and self sufficiency prior to reproduction, so that your costs are not born by others at the expense of their children, kin, and generations.

    In other words, weapons exist so that we can put you down when we need to. That is the origin of anglo civilization. And it is why we will persist.

    By putting you down.”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 14:58:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102570623822640651

  • Yes. But if we can’t stop immigration it won’t matter. We can’t integrate people

    Yes. But if we can’t stop immigration it won’t matter. We can’t integrate people this fast, and we haven’t been able to since the 60s undermining of Nuclear Family as the central unit of policy and production. The left sought by invasion what they can’t by ideas. #CivilWarComes

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 11:05:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158695708742078464

    Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump @ainsleyearhardt @foxandfriends

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158693498566131712

    IN REPLY TO:

    @realDonaldTrump

    “It’s political season and the election is around the corner. They want to continue to push that racist narrative.” @ainsleyearhardt @foxandfriends And I am the least racist person. Black, Hispanic and Asian Unemployment is the lowest (BEST) in the history of the United States!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158693498566131712