Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • I understand, and I agree. The last century was wars over the jewish ideas, and

    I understand, and I agree. The last century was wars over the jewish ideas, and this is going to be the war of the muslim ideas. India is a vast ancient civilization and cannot fail. The term “Failed State” refers to the ability of a government to satisfy demands of the commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-24 01:08:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176302380822007808

    Reply addressees: @YashPunia4 @AEI

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176299610551115776

    IN REPLY TO:

    @YashPunia4

    @curtdoolittle @AEI India is a failing state?😂😂 India is the fastest growing economy brother and islam is a threat for our whole planet not just india…It has not contributed anything for the world and has waged countless wars against humanity and pakistan is what we call a failing state…

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176299610551115776

  • In different Nations

    In different Nations… https://t.co/c7jA7KGLJA

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 22:00:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176255005407531010

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176254996570132482

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    in different Densities…. https://t.co/yDIreYVx1G

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176254996570132482

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    in different Densities…. https://t.co/yDIreYVx1G

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176254996570132482

  • in different Densities

    in different Densities…. https://t.co/yDIreYVx1G

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 22:00:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176254996570132482

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176254986499608578

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Immigrant waves. Farmers by land. Peasants in Cities. So we continue the racial and ethnic composition of the USA, but adding another wave of (poor) immigrants to cities.

    It’s not complicated. https://t.co/skRMbXxjeQ

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176254986499608578

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    Immigrant waves. Farmers by land. Peasants in Cities. So we continue the racial and ethnic composition of the USA, but adding another wave of (poor) immigrants to cities.

    It’s not complicated. https://t.co/skRMbXxjeQ

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176254986499608578

  • Immigrant waves. Farmers by land. Peasants in Cities. So we continue the racial

    Immigrant waves. Farmers by land. Peasants in Cities. So we continue the racial and ethnic composition of the USA, but adding another wave of (poor) immigrants to cities.

    It’s not complicated. https://t.co/skRMbXxjeQ

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 22:00:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176254986499608578

  • The Origins of Individualism

    The Origins of Individualism https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/23/the-origins-of-individualism/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 15:22:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176154790386122762

  • The Origins of Individualism

    —“Individualism” properly defined, as the mutual respect of humans for each other’s direct connection to God …”—

    [I] don’t know where that comes from, but as far as I now individualism in the marxist, postmodern sense is relatively recent invention, with the unique western tradition of individual sovereignty under rule of law the origin of what we group under the term individualism. We often conflate that with christian consideration (care) for the individual and christian tolerance for the individual. But we prohibited collective punishment, created law for the individual not family, and created policy for the intergenerational family. Civilizations all talk about their via-positivas but they cooperate by their via-negativas instead. The purpose of a via-positiva as far as I know is to circumvent the via-negativa, and by habituation, remove it from cognition (metaphysical presumptions).

  • The Origins of Individualism

    —“Individualism” properly defined, as the mutual respect of humans for each other’s direct connection to God …”—

    [I] don’t know where that comes from, but as far as I now individualism in the marxist, postmodern sense is relatively recent invention, with the unique western tradition of individual sovereignty under rule of law the origin of what we group under the term individualism. We often conflate that with christian consideration (care) for the individual and christian tolerance for the individual. But we prohibited collective punishment, created law for the individual not family, and created policy for the intergenerational family. Civilizations all talk about their via-positivas but they cooperate by their via-negativas instead. The purpose of a via-positiva as far as I know is to circumvent the via-negativa, and by habituation, remove it from cognition (metaphysical presumptions).

  • The False Dichotomy Of Capitalism vs Socialism is Another Abrahamic Deception

    The Anarchism(impossible) to Capitalism(rule of law universalism) to classical liberalism(rule of law nationalism ) to National Socialism to communism (impossible, universalism) is another bit of sophistry sold by the abrahamic left: whereas the difference is one of rule of law vs rule by discretion. So, as usual in the abrahamic method of deceit, the public is presented with a false dichotomy, between two economic models where all economies are and must be mixed economies, and where the debate is only over the rule of law that forces cooperative solutions , and rule of man, which forces uncooperative solutions. The Romans solved this problem by preserving the senate (aristocracy), and the middle classes (plebeians) during times of market cooperation, and dictators (generals) in time of war. As far as I know there is no better system than authority in war, houses in peace, and redistribution of windfalls. And all of that is possible only when the law is empirical and sacred, and men will willingly kill usurpers at every opportunity.

  • The False Dichotomy Of Capitalism vs Socialism is Another Abrahamic Deception

    The Anarchism(impossible) to Capitalism(rule of law universalism) to classical liberalism(rule of law nationalism ) to National Socialism to communism (impossible, universalism) is another bit of sophistry sold by the abrahamic left: whereas the difference is one of rule of law vs rule by discretion. So, as usual in the abrahamic method of deceit, the public is presented with a false dichotomy, between two economic models where all economies are and must be mixed economies, and where the debate is only over the rule of law that forces cooperative solutions , and rule of man, which forces uncooperative solutions. The Romans solved this problem by preserving the senate (aristocracy), and the middle classes (plebeians) during times of market cooperation, and dictators (generals) in time of war. As far as I know there is no better system than authority in war, houses in peace, and redistribution of windfalls. And all of that is possible only when the law is empirical and sacred, and men will willingly kill usurpers at every opportunity.

  • José Francisco Mayora In spite of development of firearms since XVI century, the

    https://youtu.be/l2KWTEhyVX8by José Francisco Mayora

    In spite of development of firearms since XVI century, the duel as an ancestral western method to resolve conflicts, stayed unaltered until very recent years (early XX century), with fencing and boxing till death as a “non plus ultra” example of eugenics in justice and law enforcement.

    Since the firearms “democratised” war as equalizers between highly skilled and strong knights vrs vulgar peasants who could easily kill them on those conditions, the art of fencing was indeed used as a procedure for summary (instantaneous) trials between getlements where skills, strength and honor were the values to determine reason through fair, regulated and witnessed exercise of violence to reivindicate rights inter pairs (gentlemen only) in an unnappealable way for the loser.

    Legally backed Dueling was indeed a great guarantee of justice: it repealed a lot of conflicts rather than fomenting them just by the consequences -transaction costs of self defense of rights were very low- of lying, slander and defamation, severely punished with virtual death penalty thanks to the institution of dueling. Economically powerful but morally indecent individuals could be faced fairly by a man with the truth, physical strength and courage on his side, regardless of artificial laws to foment pillage and corruption between pairs. Banning duels, true justice was taken from free men, enslaving them to the tyranny of corruptible judges.

    Once dueling was banned from western civilization, prevarication became the new justice.

    A DUEL WAS REAL AND VINDICATIVE JUSTICE.

    https://youtu.be/l2KWTEhyVX8Updated Sep 21, 2019, 4:08 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 16:08:00 UTC