Theme: Civilization

  • 2) Under vast asymmetry, like when inheriting a fortune or winning a lottery, we

    2) Under vast asymmetry, like when inheriting a fortune or winning a lottery, we can afford to transgress previous norms and traditions that preserved our common interests. Conversely, having SPENT DOWN all that accumulated capital, we now return to the historical mean: nations.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 13:53:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184104907894378497

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184104200759844864


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 1) NO. NO. NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural, and genetic asymmetry and conspicuous consumption of compromises between genes, gender, class, and interests. We are no longer in conditions making possible conspicuous consumption of signal goods.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184104200759844864


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 1) NO. NO. NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural, and genetic asymmetry and conspicuous consumption of compromises between genes, gender, class, and interests. We are no longer in conditions making possible conspicuous consumption of signal goods.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184104200759844864

  • 1) NO. NO. NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural,

    1) NO. NO. NO. We came out of a period of vast economic institutional, cultural, and genetic asymmetry and conspicuous consumption of compromises between genes, gender, class, and interests. We are no longer in conditions making possible conspicuous consumption of signal goods.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 13:50:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184104200759844864

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184066817414828032


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184066817414828032

  • If you can find someone more knowledgeable than I am and able to argue the succe

    If you can find someone more knowledgeable than I am and able to argue the successes and failures of history, then (a) good luck in your search, and (b) that person will either agree with me or face public falsification for attempting otherwise. Won’t happen. I know. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 13:14:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184095252677906432

    Reply addressees: @911Netizen @Bipin_karki @CGTNOfficial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183999788704030721


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183999788704030721

  • Superiority will never end. Supremacy in the sense of rule, then yes, because re

    Superiority will never end. Supremacy in the sense of rule, then yes, because responsibility for white man’s burden of domesticating fellow humans has ended – we found you unworthy of the peerage. 😉 This is why Nationalism returns. The false hope in your ability to join us.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 00:00:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183895509829935104

    Reply addressees: @911Netizen @Bipin_karki @CGTNOfficial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183887511187275777


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183887511187275777

  • COUNTER -SIGNALING ANTI-BRITISH SENTIMENT (reciprocity)(hostile countersignal on

    COUNTER -SIGNALING ANTI-BRITISH SENTIMENT
    (reciprocity)(hostile countersignal on twitter)

    —“The British dragged you out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=484630262133869&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 22:49:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183877408107192320

  • COUNTER -SIGNALING ANTI-BRITISH SENTIMENT (reciprocity)(hostile countersignal on

    COUNTER -SIGNALING ANTI-BRITISH SENTIMENT

    (reciprocity)(hostile countersignal on twitter)

    —“The British dragged you out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature – and you kicked and screamed all the way – and still do. We could have, instead of Christian ethics, emptied the world of all of you – easily. And you are giving us incentive to stop dragging you, and instead correct our error.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 18:48:00 UTC

  • The British dragged you animals out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvat

    The British dragged you animals out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature – and you kicked and screamed all the way – and still do. We could have, instead of Christian ethics, emptied the world of all of you – easily.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 14:59:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183759184048865281

    Reply addressees: @Bipin_karki @CGTNOfficial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183694111297064961


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Bipin_karki

    @CGTNOfficial British have always suffocated this world in past as well as at present…..its time now to bear consequences of their own deeds and Britian should also dis-integrate….Let British people enjoy Rebublic dreams…..

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183694111297064961

  • No The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Demographics (Class) (In Arabic)

    1. هل يمكن لذوي الذكاء المنخفض مثل العرب أن يتفوقوا على الأوروبيين معنويا وعسكريا ودبلوماسيا وقانونيا واقتصاديا؟ من الخطأ دائمًا قول هذا. الذكاء البشري يختلف عن القوة. بعض قوي بعض أضعف ، وبعض ذكي ، وبعض غير ذكي. بغض النظر عن عدد الرجال ، رجل واحد سيكون دائما أكثر ذكاء ، وذكاء رجل واحد أكثر ميزة من قوة رجل واحد. إن المشكلة بالنسبة للعرب ، مثل إفريقيا ، مثل الهند ، مثل أمريكا الجنوبية ، هي أكبر من عدد الأشخاص الموجودين في القاع ، وهي أكبر بكثير من أعداد الأشخاص الموجودين في القمة. هذا هو كل شيء يعني الذكاء. يجب أن يكون الرقم أعلى حتى تكون الحقيقة وسيادة القانون ممكنة بدون فساد. ويجب أن يكون أعلى بالنسبة للناس لإنتاج السلع التي يمكن بيعها في الأسواق العالمية. ويجب أن يكون أعلى لتنظيم الناس عن طريق الحوافز التجارية بدلا من القواعد والأوامر. أي شخص يستخدم قانون P لدينا ، ويبطئ تكاثر الأشخاص السفليين ، سيصبح مثل الأوروبيين في 100 – 150 عامًا. هذا هو وقت قصير جدا لتغيير الحضارة. الديمقراطية لا تستطيع أن تفعل هذا. يمكن للملوك أو الجنرالات فقط القيام بذلك. لأن الفقراء يريدون الترفيه عن طريق الجسم (بسيط) والأثرياء يريدون الترفيه للعقل (معقد). هذه هي المشكلة. المساواة ، على امتداد فترات زمنية طويلة ، مدمرة. هذا هو الدرس المؤلم للمسيحية والإسلام ، والهندوستان ، والصين. ما نريده ليس جيدًا بالنسبة لنا. نريد المخدرات والكحول والدعارة والقتل والسرقة والغش والكذب ، لذلك نعتقد أننا متوسطون وليس القاع. بدلاً من ذلك ، يجب أن نختار الطريق الوسط بين ما نريد ، وما هو جيد بالنسبة لنا ، والسماح لنا بالوقت للقيام بذلك. آمل أن يكون هذا مفيدا.

    ENGLISH QUESTION: Can low-IQ people like Arabs be able to outperform Europeans morally, militarily, diplomatically, legally and economically?ANSWER: It is always a mistake to say this. Human intelligence is more different than strength. Some strong some weaker, Some smart, Some not smart. No matter how many men, one man will always be smarter, and one man’s intelligence more an advantage than one man’s strength. The problem for Arabs, like Africa, like India, like South America, is than the number of people in the bottom, are too many for the number of the people at the top. This is all IQ means. The number must be higher for truth and rule of law to be possible without corruption. And it must be higher for people to produce goods that can be sold on world markets. And it must be higher to organize the people by commercial incentives instead of rules and commands. Any people that uses our P-law, and slows the reproduction of the bottom people, will become like europeans in 100 – 150 years. This is a very short time to change a civilization. Democracy cannot do this. Only kings or generals can do this. Because the poor want entertainment by the body (simple) and the wealthy want entertainment of the mind (complicated). This is the problem. Equality, over long time spans, is destructive. This is the painful lesson of christianity and islam, and Hindustan, and China. What we want is not good for us. We want drugs, alcohol, prostitution, to murder, to steal, to cheat, to lie, so believe we are average rather than the bottom. Instead, we must choose the middle road between what we want, and what is good for us, and let time do it’s work on us. I hope this is helpful.

  • No The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Demographics (Class) (In Arabic)

    1. هل يمكن لذوي الذكاء المنخفض مثل العرب أن يتفوقوا على الأوروبيين معنويا وعسكريا ودبلوماسيا وقانونيا واقتصاديا؟ من الخطأ دائمًا قول هذا. الذكاء البشري يختلف عن القوة. بعض قوي بعض أضعف ، وبعض ذكي ، وبعض غير ذكي. بغض النظر عن عدد الرجال ، رجل واحد سيكون دائما أكثر ذكاء ، وذكاء رجل واحد أكثر ميزة من قوة رجل واحد. إن المشكلة بالنسبة للعرب ، مثل إفريقيا ، مثل الهند ، مثل أمريكا الجنوبية ، هي أكبر من عدد الأشخاص الموجودين في القاع ، وهي أكبر بكثير من أعداد الأشخاص الموجودين في القمة. هذا هو كل شيء يعني الذكاء. يجب أن يكون الرقم أعلى حتى تكون الحقيقة وسيادة القانون ممكنة بدون فساد. ويجب أن يكون أعلى بالنسبة للناس لإنتاج السلع التي يمكن بيعها في الأسواق العالمية. ويجب أن يكون أعلى لتنظيم الناس عن طريق الحوافز التجارية بدلا من القواعد والأوامر. أي شخص يستخدم قانون P لدينا ، ويبطئ تكاثر الأشخاص السفليين ، سيصبح مثل الأوروبيين في 100 – 150 عامًا. هذا هو وقت قصير جدا لتغيير الحضارة. الديمقراطية لا تستطيع أن تفعل هذا. يمكن للملوك أو الجنرالات فقط القيام بذلك. لأن الفقراء يريدون الترفيه عن طريق الجسم (بسيط) والأثرياء يريدون الترفيه للعقل (معقد). هذه هي المشكلة. المساواة ، على امتداد فترات زمنية طويلة ، مدمرة. هذا هو الدرس المؤلم للمسيحية والإسلام ، والهندوستان ، والصين. ما نريده ليس جيدًا بالنسبة لنا. نريد المخدرات والكحول والدعارة والقتل والسرقة والغش والكذب ، لذلك نعتقد أننا متوسطون وليس القاع. بدلاً من ذلك ، يجب أن نختار الطريق الوسط بين ما نريد ، وما هو جيد بالنسبة لنا ، والسماح لنا بالوقت للقيام بذلك. آمل أن يكون هذا مفيدا.

    ENGLISH QUESTION: Can low-IQ people like Arabs be able to outperform Europeans morally, militarily, diplomatically, legally and economically?ANSWER: It is always a mistake to say this. Human intelligence is more different than strength. Some strong some weaker, Some smart, Some not smart. No matter how many men, one man will always be smarter, and one man’s intelligence more an advantage than one man’s strength. The problem for Arabs, like Africa, like India, like South America, is than the number of people in the bottom, are too many for the number of the people at the top. This is all IQ means. The number must be higher for truth and rule of law to be possible without corruption. And it must be higher for people to produce goods that can be sold on world markets. And it must be higher to organize the people by commercial incentives instead of rules and commands. Any people that uses our P-law, and slows the reproduction of the bottom people, will become like europeans in 100 – 150 years. This is a very short time to change a civilization. Democracy cannot do this. Only kings or generals can do this. Because the poor want entertainment by the body (simple) and the wealthy want entertainment of the mind (complicated). This is the problem. Equality, over long time spans, is destructive. This is the painful lesson of christianity and islam, and Hindustan, and China. What we want is not good for us. We want drugs, alcohol, prostitution, to murder, to steal, to cheat, to lie, so believe we are average rather than the bottom. Instead, we must choose the middle road between what we want, and what is good for us, and let time do it’s work on us. I hope this is helpful.

  • WESTERN MAN’S UNIQUENESS IN PURPOSE: RAISED TO RULE Let me put it in perspective

    WESTERN MAN’S UNIQUENESS IN PURPOSE: RAISED TO RULE

    Let me put it in perspective, white people, our fairy tales, our myths, our religion, our education – we were brought up to rule. Ourselves, our families, our polities, our nations and the world. This is what the rest of the world cannot grasp, and what the underclasses cannot achieve. Our civilization evolved for the continuous production of agency – we were all brought up to be princes and princesses – to rule. An aristocracy of everyone capable of joining the aristocracy. and the paternal rule of those who are not.

    I have been complaining about the anglo seizure of power by the middle class, and the american attempt to create an aristocracy of everyone. But the western man has been trying to create an aristocracy of everyone since we first put horse to wheel.

    The problem is that loosened the requirements for the demonstration of agency – one’s ability to rule one’s self ,one’s family, on’s business, one’s polity, one’s nation.

    And we failed to create additional houses for the classes that did demonstrate ability as they evolved education and limited agency.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 21:02:00 UTC