Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • WHY REQUEST EXCHANGE OF TRIBAL LOYALTY BETWEEN EUROPEAN RELIGIOUS FACTIONS? —“

    WHY REQUEST EXCHANGE OF TRIBAL LOYALTY BETWEEN EUROPEAN RELIGIOUS FACTIONS?

    —“Upon what foundation then did the progenitors of civilisation, Greece then Rome, build itself?”—

    We evolve a means of production, and a means of military competition under that means of production, an organization to manage both, and a narrative to justify both, so that we can reduce the cost and opportunity for conflict in order to maintain those strategies. Every civilization’s strategy is fairly easy to express in those terms.

    European civilization in mediterranean, continental, north sea, and Atlantic eras continue the aristocratic egalitarian tripartite trifunctional organization, and the old military strategy, old law (legal), old myths (social), philosophical, and theological (political) varying little other than the replacement of the ancient warrior-hunter-farmer heroic religion with the medieval farmer-peasant submissive religion of christianity. But given tripartism and trifunctionalism the law and the military remains constant and the church rise and fell. Today the new church is again semitic, with islam, judaism, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism, in competition with our traditional masculine hierarchical markets and law.

    —“Are not their successes constituted of the virtues they upheld?”–

    Virtues are excuses for the group competitive strategy we rarely if ever know. Values persist because they persist the competitive strategy. values can be undermined. Judiasm, christianity, marxism, postmodernism, and feminism sought to undermine european values and succeeded because women are vulnerable to the false promise and men are vulnerable to satisfying the demands of women unless in continuous competition with other males.

    Our natural ancestral religion upon which our civilization is founded is one of chaotic gods we compete, cooperate, and trade with – not one we are submissive to. These gods of warriors, whether the greek, roman, germanic pantheons. The church sought to supplant them with submissive gods of slaves who were docile in their fear and ignorance – and who the church could extract revenue from by rent seeking.

    Submission to gods so that one is devoid of responsibility is a christian innovation, achieving its zenith in islam. This is why it is seductive. Devotion to gods so that one is free of status pressure is not a christian innovation. It is even more seductive. Submission to scripture so that one is free of continuous calculation for which one may fail or be subject to blame is semitic innovation. It is seductive as well. These seductions are successful and they are the opposite of the aryan demand for non submission and non-alienation of rights and responsibilities, including pursuit of status, achievement, and innovative reason.

    The church failed the aristocracy succeeded, and we have not yet found a means of accommodating christianity in its decline, while producing a non-false religion. We are in a time of transition. Either the second dark age of the jews will succeed, the second dark age of the muslims, or we will discover a means of combining our three religions chistian(feminine), heathen-nature(familial), pagan-hero(masculine), and aristotelian(judicial), or at least exchanging loyalty between the three, so that we are not subject to a second semitic dark age.

    So we are still and will always be a triparite people: Scientific and Legal and heroic (agency), Philosophical and practical for the able, theological and submissive for the less able or more sensitive to conflict and social pressure (or the dysfunctional who confuse their spiritual accommodation of reality with reality itself.

    —“What Christianity was there here?”–

    What “here” are you referring to?

    —“When you come to Christians asking not the renunciation of their faith but merely loyalty, remember that this is all the Romans first asked of the Christians too.”—

    Our ancestors came to jews. Who we were too tolerant of, just as we are too tolerant of islamists, jews, marxists, postmodernists, feminists and science denialists. And because of our tolerance the jews used false promise, to bait our people into hazard, causing a dark age of ignorance and poverty and disease and suffering only aristotelian thought reversed, and ended the centuries of corruption by the church. Corruption not seen by americans until the prosecution of the deviancy of catholic churches, because protestants have forgotten the corruption of the church prior to the reformation, and the personalization of the relationship between the individual and god first, and the individual and jesus second – due largely to american evangelical protestants.

    —“Remember, it wasn’t the strange and foreign beliefs of the Christians that first caught the attention of the Romans, but rather their abstention from community.”—

    It was the use of christianity to undermine greco roman civlization just as islam, judaism, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and their science denialism is used to undermine european civilzation for the past century and a half.

    Sol invictus was the migration of roman religion from zeus-jupiter. Mithras was the migration of the persian version of Mithra – the perfect man. Christianity was invented by using the victim-narrative and the promise of life after death, in stead of the Zeus-Sol-Mithra character we should aspire to be, and the jesus narrative invented so that it could replace the Epic Cycle (Homer) which had conquered and was about to erase the semitic world.

    Judaism, christianity, ad islam were invented by the poor ignorant desert peasantry as a means of using the female group strategy of undermining by gossip, to overthrow the invention of markets, law, reason, merit, and transcendence of man into gods.

    And I am, like my predecessors, trying once again to prevent another semitic dark age – by accommodating christians.

    Christians who have not yet converted christianity into a hearth religion. But are very close to having done so.

    If not for the invasion by jews, muslims, and the underclasses – because of christian tolerance – we would have had the time for christianity to evolve, and science to falsify the marxists, postmodernists feminists and difference-denialists.

    So we are in a position where I must, or at least, someone of ability must, try to discover a vehicle for unity at faster pace than would naturally evolve.

    If not for immigration I would not need to do this work. Because science has solved the lies.

    But false promise to the vulnerable is seductive and spreads more quickly than we can stop it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 12:38:00 UTC

  • Robert Sephr is writing a fictional account of history from the pagan european’s

    Robert Sephr is writing a fictional account of history from the pagan european’s point of view. This is not a bad thing. But it is still a historical fiction. What you want to get from people like him is that it is possible to reinterpret history from our point of view. And that the *sentiment* he gets across to the audience is about right. And that’s a good thing. You can’t approach his reading of the history itself any more accurately than the pseudo history he’s countering. It’s emotionally rewarding historical fiction. And he weaves together absolute nonsense – obvious falsehoods, myths, and fantasies – with the evidence. If he stuck to the hard material and was a little more accurate then I’d regard it differently.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 09:12:00 UTC

  • MORE FROM JOY ON MY “THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH AFRICANS” POSITIONS Joy is an a

    MORE FROM JOY ON MY “THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH AFRICANS” POSITIONS

    Joy is an african american libertarian, who seems to be frustrated by my argument that there is nothing wrong with africa that six generations of one child policy wouldn’t fix. This isn’t a controversial statement – it’s true for any underdeveloped or developing people. This is our second or third go around. And I think her intellectual bias must be american. Because I tell this to africans all day every day as a way of saying “There is nothing wrong with you or your people except class sizes.” Yet when an american woman hears it she keeps trying to find some irrational racism that isn’t there. I’ve said the same thing for over ten years: the difference in races is neoteny and class size when combined with human ethnocentrism produces political conflict when living in proximity, that generates demand for different commons, different norms, redistribution and authoritarianism at the cost of the high trust civli society.

    —Hi Curt, I know my opinion doesn’t mean anything to you…. You said you didn’t think there was anything wrong with black people but you do. You think white people evolved some ability to “create” truth that the rest of “farm animals” do not have. What does this mean? And please provide proof of it.

    This is Joy, from Quora.”—

    Ah, well, you’re confused. I said there is a difference in the size of the classes of different ethnic and racial groups. The size of the bottom burdens the top, who cannot lift the people using ‘Pareto Distributions of Assets’ (meaning market economies). I said white people have almost eliminated their bottom classes. And we have had a long time without bottom classes to eliminate bad behavior in our people in the rest of the classes.

    As for truth, I say because of our history, only white people could develop scientific truth, and high trust societies because of it.

    But I said that any people on earth that will limit the reproduction of the bottom will eventually be able to have the same high trust society as european people.

    There is no difference between humans and the other animals we have domesticated. We are just animals like our farm animals.

    —“I know what you said, but historically speaking even though white people have been responsible for most scientific discoveries, you cannot claim the ability to create truth is exclusive to them. Northern and Subsaharan Africans developed technologies smaller and slower than that of white people but still scientific regardless- as did Arabs and Asians although I suspect you consider them white. And as for the “high-trust” societies claim, do you mean democracy? Cos it’s a terrible idea that sounded great when it started but only went downhill. Many races have had civilizations and gods governing their philosophies- the Western world might be the most successful but that doesn’t mean the ability to detect those ideals was exclusive to them. However, I think we are operating on completely different levels of knowledge. You have worked on these philosophies for a good chunk of your life and I’m just getting started. As much as I approach everything in good faith, I don’t take kindly to my race being referred to as “farm animals” (you used this exclusively differentiating from white people) and undesirable but I can’t help but keep going down this rabbit hole.”—-

    I didn’t make that claim. I made the claim that (a) europeans invented scientific truth (promissory, performative, realism, naturalism, operationalism) because we were a purely military social order (militia), and that is military epistemology. And we invented sovereignty (every man is sovereign and none is above him ever). With truth and sovereignty you can only have our laws of sovereignty, tort, reciprocity and jury. Our sciences evolved from the application of our the logic of our laws to our understanding of the universe. So the only means of organizing our people was markets (competition).

    So we evolved genetically culturally institutionally and scientifically much, much, much faster than all other people combined – both in the prehistoric, in the ancient, and in the modern world. And when we are invaded we are as overwhelmed and fail like all other peoples fail. Because the bottom becomes too big for the top.

    I didn’t refer to your race (or any race) as farm animals.

    I said “We are just animals like our farm animals.” and we are self domesticated like we domesticated our farm animals. You might imply I stated others were farm animals when I stated all of us are indifferent from farm animals – domesticated.

    I you want to take that approach of misstating my words, I’ll say that every race, including whites, has ‘farm animals’ because we are all farm animals – but that some races have far more farm animals than they can raise out of ignorance, superstition, criminality, corruption, and poverty. That’s comical version of saying the same thing: we self domesticated.

    Which is what I say to all people in africa: there is nothing wrong with africa that six generations of one-child policy will not solve. This is africa’s only problem. It is not to say africans are inferior. it is to say that there are too many at the bottom for whom education in any technology is impossible.

    This is just statistics. it’s not possible for the bottom to join the advanced world that requires independent learning. and that’s what IQ does. above 105 you start to be able to learn how to repair machines by reading instructions on your own. This is the minimum ability for modern economic survival in a global economy. The problem for africa and for many countries outside of africa is that there are many, many, people that are below that number. This is why china modernized faster than say india, the middle east, and africa.

    Conversely, it is simply false to say that whites are not the most evolved genetic race, because we are the newest genetic race. We are just ten thousand years old. The primary difference in our race is a minor difference in agency (self control) because of substantial increase in neoteny (slowing the rate of maturity), that we evolved at the cost of emotional instability. Whites are less emotionally stable and more agreeable and introverted. Africans are less agreeable but more extroverted. These differences are small but there are differences. In general, inability to develop neoteny is the problem for the african races: the territory is extremely hostile because of the presence of disease – so rapid maturity was necessary for survival. This rapid maturity has consequences in behavioral development versus more neotenous races, which is well documented in the literature, and visible in all african populations. So between the geography, the distance from major trade routes, the vast size of the lower classes, and faster rates of maturity (and deeper maturity), and the lack of far eastern or western manorialism (eugenic farming) africa’s population distribution is less favorable to advanced development. That says nothing about individual africans and everything about the size of the classes in african countries.

    The only difference between the smartest africans (usually Ghana and Nigeria) and europeans jews and asians, is minor differences in our verbal and spatial abilities, and the rate at which we can continue learning into older age. However, it is not our best people that determine our fate. It is the number at the bottom that prevents the best people from improving the condition of the rest.

    Now don’t say you can’t understand that and therefore confirm everyone’s bias. ok?

    My job is to tell the truth that no one else will so that we solve the problem rather than develop cyclones of lies that just make us all angry.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 16:59:00 UTC

  • WHY CHRISTIANITY (Religion) WORKS An obvious truth I don’t like: Europeans are n

    WHY CHRISTIANITY (Religion) WORKS

    An obvious truth I don’t like: Europeans are not only the youngest race (~10k ybp), and more neotenous than other races – except east asians who are more neotenous than we are – but our neoteny comes at the cost of greater emotional instability – which explains european women. We are in a middle range and east asians are off the neotenous cliff. And what does this mean? Neoteny has interesting consequences: not enough and you mature too early for agency except late in life and prevent lifelong learning. If you have enough you develop agency later and lifelong ability to learn, and too much you develop agency early at the cost of life long learning ability. (I might be one of the first people to discuss this, I’m not sure, but it’s obvious in the data.)

    We could test IQ, Conscientiousness, and Emotional Stability and then democracy might work. Or we could just restore property owning, married, european males and females employing any number of non-family members – which is demonstrated evidence of intelligence, conscientiousness and emotional stability rather than test evidence. And then a house of women and a house of men to negotiate differences between genders.

    The chinese used the former, for access to bureaucracy. I recommend the latter because we use markets for production. Evidence is evidence.

    So what’s my point? My point is that christianity is more necessary for europeans to stabilize the emotions than is obvious from our average intelligence. We tnd to link the two but that’s not really it. That’s why while there is a relationship between religiosity and intelligence, the chistian ethic remains constant across the population.

    I also understand that for those of us who are more pagan, we respect christians out of LOYALTY, like we respect the flag out of LOYALTY and our ancestors out of loyalty.

    As such I am loyal to my christian brothers, and observant out of loyalty. Even if my god is far closer to Thor-Tyr-Zeus, and my prophets are lawgivers: Odin and Aristotle.

    The solution is to request loyalty in exchange not that we seek to defeat the gods of dominance and submission to which the opposite cannot tolerate thanks (debt).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 15:29:00 UTC

  • By Ricardo Duchesne via MacDonald’s blog. —“today’s races are very young (outs

    By Ricardo Duchesne via MacDonald’s blog.

    —“today’s races are very young (outside Africa), and did not appear until about 12,000 to 10,000 years ago; and it may be that the European race is the youngest race, the last evolutionary stage of homo sapiens.”—

    —“According to Sandra Wilde et. al. “strong selection favoring lighter skin, hair, and eye has been operating in European populations over the last 5000 years”. In terms of these physical markers, Europeans are a very young race emerging in the course of centuries from a preceding people that were not European. This evolution, of course, was not merely about the evolution of “white” physical traits, though we should not underestimate the importance of these traits. It stands to reason that there were other key traits, including behavioral traits, which did not emerge at once but through time, which means that it is difficult to state with any definiteness when the inhabitants of Europe became “European”.”—

    —“We need to think of Europeans as a race that evolved through thousands of years inside Europe, not always gradually, but at an accelerated pace from about 10,000 years ago, in response both to the unique ecology of Europe and to their own unique cultural activities.”—

    —“Europeans were a race that evolved certain anatomical and behavioral traits by reason of breeding for thousands of years within a geographical area we call Europe. The I-Es were not a “mysterious” people who came from outside Europe but a people native to this continent. The official geographical definition of the “continent of Europe” is consistent with the cultural history of this continent in comprising “European Russia”, the Pontic Steppes located north of the Black and Caspian seas, present day Ukraine, the original homelands of the I-Es. … Other than the EFs who came from Anatolia, who already had genes for white skin, and then evolved into Europeans in Europe, there is strong genetic evidence showing that once a European race emerged out of the three populations MacDonald highlights, Europe did not experience any major genetic mixing from non-European immigrant races.”—

    —“Angles and Saxons who colonized Britain around AD 400-600 came from the Proto-Germanic Corded Ware and Bell-Beaker cultures that had melded during the Nordic Bronze Age (1730-760 BC) in Jutland, or what is present day Denmark. “—

    —“Europeans evolved in the course of time inside Europe and have remained European through almost their entire history until mass immigration came to be promoted in the last three decades.”—

    Its reversible.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 15:01:00 UTC

  • GOING INTO DEPTH ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM VS COMPETING CIVILIZATIONS In the Proto-Ind

    GOING INTO DEPTH ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM VS COMPETING CIVILIZATIONS

    In the Proto-Indo-European mythology, each social group had its own god or family of gods to represent it and the function of the god or gods matched the function of the group.

    There are only three possible means of coercion (weapons of influence) available to humans, and we have developed genetic abilities, moral intuitions, and cultural institutions to reflect them:

    1) The Established Male: Defense/Force

    2) The Ascendent Male: Trade/Deprivation

    3) The Female: Advocacy/Undermining

    We have three sets of faculties

    1) The Physical and Performative : Science and evidence

    2) The Verbal and Rational : Reason and logic

    3) The Emotional and Intuitive: instincts and incentives

    There are also three methods of Fictionalisms (falsehoods)

    1) Override Physical Intuition Magic to Pseudoscience

    2) Override Verbal Intuition: Sophistry to Philosophy

    3) Override Emotional Intuition: Occult to Theology

    This specialization has led to three classes:

    1) Those who Fight (and judge) > Force/Defense

    2) Those who Pray (an teach) > Undermining/Advocacy

    3) Those who Produce (work) > Trade/Deprivation

    and

    4) … Slaves (farm and household labor)

    and

    5) … Animals (farm labor and foodstuffs)

    This pattern remains the same throughout western history until the possibility of the organization of complex production, distribution and trade, expands the influence of the middle class (elites) from those who produce, making them equal to those who fight and pray.

    The reason is simple, because of the division of labor between the material and spiritual elites, there was never the necessity for either to claim authority over the other. The result then was that during the age of transformation – the beginning of our religious traditions – the west developed a market of philosophy rather than a monopoly theology. it wasn’t until the intentional destruction of the western roman empire and the extermination of western thought by the jews christians and then muslims that we lost our philosophy to the semitic attempt at replicating supernatural equalitarian monopoly in Western tripartism and its markets.

    Semitic monotheism was not successful in europe because it was unable to displace the military aristocracy and instead evolved into a corrupt wing for second tier sons of wealthy families who could obtain politial position. By the end of the early middle ages the church was so corrupt that the monasteries took over – hence poverty – as a means of suppressing the parasitism of the church.

    So our aristocracy and our common law remained and the catholic church was an usuccessful competitor to the traditional european group strategy, and served only as administrative wing of the aristocracy and nobility.

    And then when Aristotle was restored to Europe, the legal profession advocated empiricism and once literacy returned then our ancient traditions were again expressed in wave after wave of reformation, resulting in the english constitution on one end, the protestant reformation, and the french attempt at preserving that feminine authoritarianism of the church first by killing the middle class – the protestants – and then by killing the aristocracy, and the by killing the church – all the most backward institutions in europe and instead of a protestant reformation and a middle class, napoleon’s conquest sought to achieve by arms what the church failed to do, and destroy the aristocratic heart of europe: the holy roman empire of the german states, that had governed the majority of europe from the 800’s onward – and defended europe against the dangers (hordes) of the east.

    The germans unified into a modern state in order to prevent yet another french conquest, and the french conspired with the rest of the world to keep german expansion in check – to continue the long running attempt by France to restore roman authoritarian order over Europe under the pretense of french enlightened view of man. But France’s enlightenment was a reaction AGAINST – a counter -revolution against – the british restoration of the european tradition of our Natural law, Sovereignty, and aristocracy and the meritocratic rather than elite government that results from meritocracy.

    Germany was suppressed and ‘de-prussianized’ by design by france’s dictate, and american self demagoguery not by anglo demand.

    So, today, because of increases in the complexity of production we have:

    1) Those who Fight: Military and

    … Judiciary (rules, order)

    2) Those who Pray: Priesthood(replaced), and

    … Politicians / Academy / Media / Entertainment

    3) Those who Produce: Finance and Entrepreneurs, and

    … Craftsmen, Engineers, Professionals, and Scientists

    and

    4)… “Slaves”: Labor, Service Labor,

    and

    5) … “Animals”: Machines

    And in our gods we still have:

    1) Fight: The Heroes of History and

    … Aristotle and the Law (rules, order)

    2) Pray: The Philosophers (and theologians – what is left of them)

    … and Writers and Artists (Verbal)

    3) Produce: The Economic Scientists, and Physical Scientists,

    … the Artisans (Material)

    and

    4) … Slaves: The Liars: pseudoscientists sophists and supernaturalists

    and

    5) … Machines: The Engineers

    And we see Civilizational Differences in Strategy:

    1) The West (Tri-Hierarchy: Fight, Pray, Produce) Markets in everything. We use Extend tolerance as long as we can in favor of developing markets. Solve Problems Quickly when they arise so that they do not escalate beyond our ability to correct them

    2) The Steppe (Russian) tries to balance the European tri-functionalism, with the Chinese mono-hierarchy, in an attempt to produce (unique) byzantine durability, and this balance has served them. And the west has not yet helped them. And this is yet another of our real crimes vs the false crimes of slavery and colonialism we have been criticized for.

    3) The Chinese use Mono-Hierarchy: Bureaucratic familial hierarchy – by contrast use ‘reasonableness’ rather than reason proper. They use Delay, Deceive, and Accumulate power sufficient that they cannot be fought.

    4) The Hindus use Caste Hierarchy: a “soft” military hierarchy – by contrast use myth and wisdom literature. They use their peninsular isolation, vast population, and lack of formal organization to make capture of rule possible but conquest impossible – only islam (the cancer) has been effective.

    5) The Semites(Equalitarian families) by contrast use monopoly conflation of law, history, mythology. The use social cultural institutional and civilizational undermining from the bottom up, and continuous raiding to destroy the economy and exhaust the military, as a means of competition. They then destroy knowledge arts and letters, and use dysgenic reproduction to destroy the gene pool.

    I solve for transcendence: Adaptability and rapid evolution by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Heroism, Adversarialism, and Markets in Everything, at the cost of the suppression of the production of the underclasses, so that proceeds can be devoted to the production of commons and the high returns therefrom. The only counter-claim is devolution – anti-evolution. This means it is always and everywhere decidable whether a claimed good is such.

    The west was not first, but fastest.

    And because fastest best.

    And best because of commons.

    That is what I seek to restore.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 11:11:00 UTC

  • Western man always used markets. We had markets for leadership under trifunction

    Western man always used markets. We had markets for leadership under trifunctionalism, and under trifunctionalism, western man had two declared priesthoods: Juridical and Spiritual, and one undeclared: Science – which was metallurgy. When you hear our folktales of ‘spells’ it’s derived from metal smelting. Because our ancestors combined Horse, wheel, and bronze to conquer the known world. Philosophy was our ‘synthesis’ of the trifunctional, just as monotheism was the synthesis of the monopoly theology of the middle east. So, Yes, philosophy was and to some degree remains is the natural ‘theology’ of western man and heathen(nature, spirits, ancestors) and pagan(heroes, gods). Our philosophy was corrupted by the addition of monotheistic theology, resulting in the strange synthesis by Augustine. And it is this synthesis that failed repeatedly in the semitic dark ages, was replaced by literacy in the early modern period, with pure faith surviving in orthodox and american protestant forms, and catholicism and catholic dogma lost. So the question is whether we are returning to Law, Science, Philosophy and Faith, having finally left the failure of theology behind. And whether we will restore our ancestral religions of heathens and religion of the hearth (folktales, fairy tales, myths, legends), paganism (historical figures, aryanism), and maintain Christianity is yet to be discovered.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 08:36:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle There are two priesthoods in our civilization, the material and t

    Curt Doolittle There are two priesthoods in our civilization, the material and the faithful. I did not realize that this is one of the secrets of our success until recently. I will work on faith when I am done with law. Law was very difficult. But faith that is true is an even greater test of my ability and I think it is possible I might solve it for all of those who want religion, whether spiritual, rational, or scientific, and whether submissive, practical, or aryan (heroic). It is possible. I dont know if I can do it

  • Curt Doolittle There are two priesthoods in our civilization, the material and t

    Curt Doolittle There are two priesthoods in our civilization, the material and the faithful. I did not realize that this is one of the secrets of our success until recently. I will work on faith when I am done with law. Law was very difficult. But faith that is true is an even greater test of my ability and I think it is possible I might solve it for all of those who want religion, whether spiritual, rational, or scientific, and whether submissive, practical, or aryan (heroic). It is possible. I dont know if I can do it

  • THE NATURAL LAW OF EUROPEAN PEOPLE IN MOST REDUCTIVE FORM (getting close to most

    THE NATURAL LAW OF EUROPEAN PEOPLE IN MOST REDUCTIVE FORM

    (getting close to most reductive and complete form)

    SOVEREIGNTY REQUIRES RECIPROCITY

    Reciprocity in Nature: …cooperation and consciousness ( … )

    Reciprocity in Deed(Actions): Due Diligence in tests of productive, fully informed[6], voluntary transfer[7] of demonstrated interests[2] within the limits of proportionality[4], free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality[8]; and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability[5].

    Reciprocity in Word(Speech): Due Diligence in categorical and internal consistency within the limits of human faculties; operationally possible within the limits of human abilities, empirically correspondent within the limits of realism, naturalism and operationalism, rational within the limits of bounded rationality[1], reciprocal in rational choice, and fully accounted within stated limits.

    If you cannot pass those tests you cannot claim to engage in reciprocity in display, word, or deed. If you cannot engage in reciprocity you are either ignorant or ir-reciprocal. Even if you are ignorant, once informed, and continue you are ir-reciprocal.

    DECIDABILITY

    We may boycott(separate) if not a threat, cooperate(cohabitate) if we can, or prey(war) upon one another if we must.

    Since all irreciprocity constitutes free riding, parasitism, or predation, the only reason to let another individual or group exist, is reciprocity – all others are not only enemies, but devolutionary, and prohibiting the transcendence of man into the gods we imagined.

    This is the Natural Law.

    EUROPEAN GROUP STRATEGY:

    An Entrepreneurial Militia,

    Using Technology, Adaptability, Maneuver, and Speed

    Under Contractual Warfare, Oath, Duty, Loyalty

    Status in exchange for Heroism, Wealth, Excellence, Beauty

    With Differences adjudicated by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth,

    Under Natural Law of Reciprocity, Jury, Thang or Senate, King as judge of last resort.

    Leaving only survival in markets for everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polity, defense, and war.

    Causing suppression of the reproduction of the less able, and the devotion of the savings in surplus to the production of commons, and the disproportionate returns on the commons.

    And devoting high investment to the raising of our offspring to produce and defend the commons.

    (…)

    Transcendence of man into gods the gods we imagined.

    THE LAW OF OPTIMUM POLITIES

    A Power distribution of the Natural law(Suppression of Parasitism); A Pareto Distribution of Assets (organize voluntary production); A Nash Distribution of Rewards

    (Market Income); An Egalitarian Distribution of Commons (Earnings); At the cost of A Suppression of Reproduction of the Demonstrated Underclasses (Eugenics); Equal Distribution of Defense of all of the above. And Zero Tolerance for Violation of any of the above (Intolerance).

    EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION

    The history of western civilization consists of the incremental suppression of parasitism from all walks of life by use of the west’s unique, empirical, common, judge discovered natural law. Western Man domesticated himself just as he had plants and animals before. And both our aristocracy our people profited from the process. But, man was not exploited — he was domesticated from a animal to a human through generations of cultural selection pressure and aggressive culling of malcontents and free riders.

    OPTIMUM HUMAN ORDER

    There is no more coherent or successful nor possibly superior means for humans to evolve into the gods we imagine, with each generation living in the optimum conditions while doing so.

    ENFORCEMENT

    “So perhaps you don’t understand. This isn’t a negotiation. This isn’t a compromise. These are demands. We will restore our sovereignty, and leave you in peace, or we will conquer, enslave, or kill you – and all like you – until your consent is no longer required.“

    ===

    Definitions:

    1. Bounded Rationality: man is not omniscient, omnipotent, or free or error, and seeks practical action in satisfaction of wants within his limits rather than optimums.

    2. Demonstrated Interest: man demonstrates continuous consumption, acquisition, preservation. Anything man demonstrates an interest in consuming, acquiring, preserving, whether by action or refraining from action, constitutes a demonstrated interest. In P law we categories demonstrated interest as Property-in-toto when referring to individuals or Capital-in-toto when referring to commons and we enumerate all categories of both under the definition of property-in-toto.

    3. Operational, Operationalism: possible to perform and speak of performing, a sequence of subjectively testable human actions. where subjectively testable means by imitating (physical), sympathizing (thinking), empathizing (feeling).

    4. Limits of Proportionality: incentive to defect given predictable future given accumulated results of reciprocal display word and deed. (Defense against systemic undermining).

    5. Restitutability: the possibility of restitution, and sufficient resources to perform restitution.

    6. Fully Informed: Reciprocal in Speech (testimony).

    7. Voluntary Transfer: loss, consumption, transfer of possession, right, or title

    8. Externality: involuntary transfer against the demonstrated intersets of those not involved in the action or exchange.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 11:26:00 UTC