Theme: Civilization

  • Correct. The semitic revolutions of judaism, christianity, and islam that destro

    Correct. The semitic revolutions of judaism, christianity, and islam that destroyed the genetics, civilizations, governments, traditions, cultures, arts, letters, technology, of all the great civs in the ancient world and the Jewish-Muslim revolts against modern are Anti-Darwin.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 16:35:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1249737903472812034

    Reply addressees: @ekiekipatang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1249729150685978625

  • (sarcasm) The french have a monopoly on the bad ideas of modernity. It’s sorta d

    (sarcasm)

    The french have a monopoly on the bad ideas of modernity. It’s sorta down hill after descartes. The ship of state leaks with the prosecution of the protestant business class. It’s a sinking-of-the-titanic by the French Revolution, and the peasantry’s genocide against the aristocracy. … There is no equal to russian literature. There is no equal to shakespeare. There is no equal to british empiricism and government. There is no equal to scottish enlightenment. There is no equal to italian art. No equal to german engineering. No equal to american law. …. Nor any equal to french folly. 😉

    I love pissing on the french. lol

    ( Well, technically parisians. )


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 22:00:00 UTC

  • “School… What a waste of life. If I could go back in time I would make my own

    —“School… What a waste of life. If I could go back in time I would make my own curriculum. 3 hours a day reading the best of European literature, 1 hour a day writing an analysis of what I had just read, half hour on developing sharp arithmetic skills, 1 hour playing an instrument, 1 hour a day learning a trade or craft, and the rest of the day exercising ,learning survival, self-defense, and military skills.”—Erik Leaf

    I’d argue that you’d learn that trade or craft best by doing menial labor helping the skilled in whatever trade or craft.

    (cd: edited for completeness)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 15:44:00 UTC

  • WHY SOUTH AMERICA? 1. Population of natives and slaves. 2. christianity => incre

    WHY SOUTH AMERICA?

    1. Population of natives and slaves.

    2. christianity => increase trust to increase cooperation.

    3. church => will to power by the weak.

    4. church => high rates of reproduction, mysticism to govern them and anti-empiricism and anti-meritocracy to maintain control over them.

    5. high rates of reproduction => underclass poverty

    6. vast underclass poverty => demand for socialism.

    7. demand for socialism => demand for authority instead of rule of law.

    8. lack of rule of law = lack of militia to defend against corruption under rule of law by threat of overthrow.

    This is the cycle of poverty, dysgenia, corruption, and stagnation under the church – a cycle only broken in northern europe by aristocratic manorialism to suppress the growth of the underclass, and the subsequent middle class restoration of trade, and the subsequent restoration of rule of law, and the subsequent wealth, and the subsequent literacy, and the subsequent break with the parasitism mysticism and dysgenia of the church, and the subsequent conquest of the world, and the subsequent industrial, scientific, technical, medical, and informational revolutions, and the subsequent dragging of mankind – kicking and screaming against the european aristocracy – out of their addiction to ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the victimhood of nature all but hostile to life.

    Then the academy, which had evolved as an extension of the church to teach church dogma, shifted from mythology, theology, and the granting of indulgences to alternate history, pseudoscience, and the granting of useless diplomas under the second jewish attack on western civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 13:05:00 UTC

  • The Secret of Western Civilization

    The Secret of Western Civilization

    The Secret of Western Civilization https://t.co/o5khu0wC2z


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 00:38:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1248772274758565895

  • There are only two success stories

    There are only two success stories

    There are only two success stories. https://t.co/hTTz6CyIYz


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 00:37:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1248772148648435715

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93398399_254017489329745_27377431123

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93398399_254017489329745_27377431123

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93398399_254017489329745_2737743112318222336_o_254017482663079.jpg The Secret of Western CivilizationThe Secret of Western Civilization


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 20:37:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93305510_254017165996444_67201710455

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93305510_254017165996444_67201710455

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93305510_254017165996444_6720171045552128000_o_254017162663111.jpg There are only two success stories.There are only two success stories.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 20:37:00 UTC

  • GRAHAM HANCOCK —“Curt, What do you think of Graham Hancock?”— If I’m sympath

    GRAHAM HANCOCK

    —“Curt, What do you think of Graham Hancock?”—

    If I’m sympathetic: I think he is honest about what he does. He makes up, or promotes, myths to inspire and entertain people – to restore wonder to their lives. yes some of what he harps about has a grain of truth in it. I’m charitable because it’s good for us to look back into the past with wonder, the same way we teach children fairy tales so that they will eventually mature into reading history.

    If I’m charitable, the world needs a few of these people so that we make sure wacky stuff doesn’t get overlooked, and the wrong story entrenched (geology in the past and mathematical physics in the present are the best examples).

    If I’m doing my job: he’s using pseudoarchaeology (pseudoscience) to get attention, and it’s been a profitable career for him. and given that his stuff is pretty hard to believe I suspect he’s helping us find suckers, catch them, and reeducate them before they do something harmful to themselves or others. Of all the kind of sucker-magnets in the world he’s the least harmful.

    If I want to correct him, and the audience, it is all but certain that Doggerland, isn’t alone, and the black sea the persian gulf, the red sea, the mediterranean, and the lost lakes and marshes of the south of africa, and various other coastal areas, now obscure much of our long, early, glacial and pre-glacial development with flooding. We may be living in a period of extraordinary technology, but the first five thousand years of chasing the glaciers back north, in doggerland, on the shorts of the black sea has to be about as close to paradise as hunter-gatherers can discover.

    That said, there is no evidence whatsoever of anything pre-glacial but animals, and nothing obscured by post glacial flooding that gave hints to what is necessary for the evolution of man: fire, metal, and pottery. Yes, people do lose technology (austronesians). Yes people do mature into depth rather than neoteny (equatorial africans). But in general, the long graudal line of history up until the 80-40k, and 40k-10k, and 10k incremental explosions, and the past 400 years of european explosion of knowledge, is so regular in retrospect it looks ordinary.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 15:23:00 UTC

  • WORLD RELIGIONS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES —“Curt Doolittle: in comparison between

    WORLD RELIGIONS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES

    —“Curt Doolittle: in comparison between Orthodoxy and evangelical Christianity in making states more or less better or first world or third world?”—Ibrahim Abd El Shihead

    Narrow Point:

    The fact that the orthodox church didn’t or couldn’t compete with the state on one hand, and didn’t try, as catholicism, to compete with science, reason, commerce, and law, (competition) and remained a specialist in family affairs (unity, community, love) is why it is still regarded as sacred to the people. This is why I don’t ever seem to have a problem with the orthodox community “church is for church, law is for disputes to be avoided at all costs, state is for state to protect us, and we all get along fine if we do our f-king jobs”.

    The problem i have with xianity is that western christians haven’t given up on fantasy of monopoly – theocratic rule, and can’t seem (like russians and traditional americans) to practice the natural trichotomy of state, law, and faith., Under the rather (insane) presumption that the church, having failed so drastically wouldn’t do so again.

    So to in this sense while evangelical christianity is closest to jesus’ teaching, the orthodox church is closest to the institutional church we need, and the catholic church and the protestant churches to that sought to limit the parasitism of the church, were failures. In other words, orthodoxy seems to have avoided both the catholic attempt to rule, the protestant attempt to undermine the church’s corruption, the necessity of catholic and protestant churches to attract members of the aristocracy as local administrators, and best preserved the role of the church in society. Another example of the value of intolerant monarchies.

    Broader Point:

    Aristotelianism seems to produce scientific and technical potential.

    Christianity seems to produce political and commercial potential but it wasn’t enough in russia probably because they missed the renaissance, reformation, and enlightenment.

    Islam seems to resist political, commercial and scientific potential, but produces underclass harmony.

    Judaism produces organized crime families that prey on the commons, which is extremely profitable for them at the cost of the host people. Judaism hasn’t been nearly as destructive as islam – but it’s certainly been bad for germany, russia, america, and now all of western europe.

    Hinduism is some kind of absolutely beautiful madness that I still struggle to get my arms around, but their problem seems to be demographic and without division into sub-states politically impossible to overcome.

    buddhism produces an equally kind harmony at the cost of stagnation. china is trivially easy to understand because they escaped religion. japan and korea easiest to understand.

    Without christianity (enforced) scandinavia, and without buddhism (enforced) japan/korea, would have come provided a pattern we needed. the optimum ‘religion’ was rule of law, militia, monarchy (imperialism), paganism (aristocracy), stoicism(middle) epicureanism (lower middle) heathenism (family), and a priesthood of any kind to take responsibility for the peasantry.

    This competition serves better than monopoly but it needs strong rule of law to prevent any usurping the rest. The problem is, markets are susceptible to intolerant monopolies and monotheism is intolerant and intolerance wins, so the only ‘total intolerance’ we need is defense of those markets.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 12:09:00 UTC