Theme: Civilization

  • It wasn’t europeans that developed global religion, global marxism, global socia

    It wasn’t europeans that developed global religion, global marxism, global socialism, global cosmopolitanism, global postmodernism, global hbd-denialism, or europeans that undermined rule of law.

    It was feminine intuition, and people of it, that cannot scale.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 20:58:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251616222082408454

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @berggruenInst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251615773195411457


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @berggruenInst Consensus, getting heads together, leadership, these are all village-thinking. The female intuition doesn’t scale. We have institutions and rule of law of tort for a reason – it scales, at the cost of suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, keeping natural selection.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1251615773195411457

  • Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the old world, Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism

    Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the old world, Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Denialism in the Modern world – the revolt by the cognitively feminine underclass dysgenic against the cognitively masculine middle and upper class eugenic civilizations of east and west. 2k yr War.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 20:24:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251607632235945986

    Reply addressees: @DuchesneRicardo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251583017971331072

  • “I actually think Johannesburg represents the future. My version of what I think

    —“I actually think Johannesburg represents the future. My version of what I think the world is going to become looks like Johannesburg.”— Neil Blomkamp

    Exactly.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 18:25:00 UTC

  • And did precisely nothing with it. Why? We know why China failed. (a)harmony ove

    And did precisely nothing with it. Why? We know why China failed. (a)harmony over competitiveness (b)face over truth (c) monopoly bureaucracy (d) abandonment of empirical management, (e)failure to develop rule of law. This prevented the transformation to a majority middle class.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 00:02:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251300061637750785

    Reply addressees: @SenzoTeoh @healingbyhenry @sunkiisss

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251296105809076224

  • Just as french write informal universalist secular theology of the feminine, and

    Just as french write informal universalist secular theology of the feminine, and germans write formal universalist philosophy that is secular theology of harmony, the russians write masculine very informal nationalist propaganda as a secular theology of the masculine. These are the result of geographic location and cultural history.

    While yes my implementation of rule of law is pretty intolerant, and I jokingly refer to my work as either rule of law fascism or market fascism, and while I advocate for nationalism, and restoration of the anglosphere – remains of the british empire – to create the scale necessary for preservation of the defense of the sea trade between our continents – my work is also in large part dispassionate.

    So where duggin has his ambitions, writes, speaks, and argues passionately and romantically in what I consider nonsense-propaganda, I write in pretty rigorous analytic argument dispassionately and unromantically. And this lack of romance and passion – my anglo empiricism – is not what the passionate market wants me wo write. What the young passionate male mind wants is an heroic and often esoteric secular-religious vision. Yet I’m just updating the founding fathers, with their formality and martial reserve.

    So in that sense whether french feminine passive aggressive essay, german rational inspirational harmony, russian low trust machismo, and anglo high trust empirical, and chinese face-before-truth authoritarian, or jewish feminine undermining using magical thinking to bait into hazard, we are all arguing for our futures in a world returning to normal after a century of jewish intellectual pseudoscience and sophistry in marxism, syndicalism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, neoconservatism – a sequence of attempts by the jewish counter-revolution against the empirical revolution and it’s darwinian consequences. They sought to capture europa for their ends just as the french, germans, and russians sought to capture it for their ends. They have failed. Or it will be evident shortly that they failed.

    So I see the world differently, that we are all turning to the masculine defense of our peoples and cultures after the undermining and destruction of the leftist feminine attempts to use european wealth, and christian tolerance, to turn the world into another middle eastern equalitarian desert under totalitarian feminine presumption that knitting-circle consensus and harmony is possible, or that continued knitting circle gossip and undermining among usurers of our civilization is possible. It isn’t. It’s Magical thinking.Updated Apr 17, 2020, 7:54 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-17 07:54:00 UTC

  • Wait. So (a) you want a guarantee of the outcome of a war? (b) the cost of war i

    Wait. So (a) you want a guarantee of the outcome of a war? (b) the cost of war isn’t worth your civilization? (c) You don’t have any other solution or plan but surrender, defeat, conquest, and extermination of your people?

    You’re a coward. We are men. We are not. I understand.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 17:52:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250482222685196290

    Reply addressees: @readomain @MattPirkowski @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250472967475286016

  • Domestication of primitive demi-human animals. If we hadn’t been so christian an

    Domestication of primitive demi-human animals. If we hadn’t been so christian and charitable we’d have let McAuthur domesticate you too. Unfortunately we are always too kind. Greek, Roman, British and American. We are too optimistic about the animals. They need domestication.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 17:12:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250472069361471489

    Reply addressees: @ZhiYeC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250465276367437824

  • THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE WILL RETURN TO HISTORICAL NORM – AND THAT’S NOT MONOGAMY

    THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE WILL RETURN TO HISTORICAL NORM – AND THAT’S NOT MONOGAMY

    During most of agrarian age history, when man and woman married they could divide labor of creating common property (household) so that man could have a tribe and woman a nest, and both freedom from parental control over the allocation of resources.

    Getting married meant freedom and sovereignty. A lot. This was true until the postwar boom.

    In the present age, unless a woman wants to raise replacement levels of children, children are now an amusement, and men are an unnecessary and more easily sacrificed cost.

    Without the need for children’s support in old age there is no incentive to have them sufficient to preserve the incentive to invest in marriage and replacement level children.

    Social Security was suicidal. The pill added a noose. No fault divorce created the hanging tree.

    We already know, of course, that women wield the ultimate veto power in the mating game. It is women who give thumbs-up or thumbs-down to any advances or proposals from men.

    Briffault clarifies by asserting that intimate relationships between men and women result from a calculated cost/benefit analysis by women.

    Will she or won’t she acquire a net gain from any relationship with the man? This does not necessarily mean monetary gain, although it might. Other types of gain might be social status, sexual compatibility, anticipated future happiness, emotional security, and the male’s capacity for fatherhood.

    Men are costly for a woman in attention, emotion, time, effort and reproductive opportunity – and her children take priority over him. Their value at present is largely income and status and that is decreasingly immaterial.

    Women are costly for men in his specialization, lower adaptivity to new groups, his cellular damage, his shorter life span, his shorter working life, and his shorter savings horizon, and his reproductive opportunity.

    But a woman’s care is extremely valuable to a man. He trades all these things for the care of a woman. Unless both parties stay socialized and fit, sex dissipates quickly.

    It isn’t clear that agrarian marriage can continue as a majority habit and it’s more likely we will continue to return to human norms of serial monogamy, treating relationships like careers, except for the upper classes that as always gain so much value from shared assets status shared oppporutnity that the economics still make sense.

    ===

    (Some content in this post is from John Brennan)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 16:45:00 UTC

  • If we were really anti china we would put you back in the dark ages with ease. U

    If we were really anti china we would put you back in the dark ages with ease. U

    If we were really anti china we would put you back in the dark ages with ease. Unfortunately, despite our christian charity, your barbarism remains. You’re animals. https://t.co/LHnD9jDKpZ


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 16:42:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250464566800252930

    Reply addressees: @ZhiYeC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250463691205681157

  • What outcome is that? Restoration of rule of law, of constitution, civilization,

    What outcome is that? Restoration of rule of law, of constitution, civilization, continued transcendence of western man, and the suppression of false promise, baiting into hazard, financialization, propaganda, legislation from the bench, politicization, and islamization?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 16:41:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250464206681509889

    Reply addressees: @readomain @MattPirkowski @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250419209416237065