Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • Diversity + Proximity = Conflict

    Feb 7, 2020, 7:52 AM Diversity + Proximity = Conflict

    —“There is not a single example throughout human history that you can point to to prove that formula wrong over any extended period of time. It’s been tried, it always fails.” —JC Trott

    —“Multiculturalism is a euphemism for multiracialism. Multiculturalism doesn’t work and will never work. Countries have been organized on the basis of race since the dawn of civilization. A nation is a group of people living in a region who share a common race, language, and religion. Most of the world’s countries are ethnostates: Japan, China, Israel, multiple black countries in Africa, and multiple Arab Muslim countries in the ME. Only in white countries is “diversity” or “multiculturalism” being pushed, and that is because non-whites want to enjoy the safety and prosperity of white society. But they will necessarily destroy it if they come en masse. Therefore, whites are in the unique position of having to forcibly stop third-world invaders and remove those already here. If they do not, their white societies will be lost. And Jewish people are leading the propaganda campaign against whites from doing so, both by demonizing those who already advocate this as “racists” and by stupefying those who haven’t awakened with their “diversity is our strength” brainwashing. People aren’t flooding into Vietnam, El Salvador, Somalia, or Egypt en masse from other parts of the world. They are only doing this into the West (white countries). “—John Morrison

  • Diversity Means Division

    Feb 7, 2020, 9:15 AM

    —“Diversity is synonym for Division and Division’s not a strength it’s a weakness. Strength arises from Unity not Division. Diversity between nations is a strength for humanity, but Division within Nations is a weakness.”–Bic Verger —“Diversity isn’t necessarily synonymous with division, it is however necessarily antonymous to equality.”—Martin Štěpán

    Equality is made possible by appealing to ending status and power competition using kin selection. Devolve the federal government once again and restore the constitution to an alliance of nation-states. Europe solved this problem and only napoleon undermined it. A large number of small homogenous nation states produces a market for different commons producing polities and the greatest tolerance for reciprocity and proportionality

  • Diversity Means Division

    Feb 7, 2020, 9:15 AM

    —“Diversity is synonym for Division and Division’s not a strength it’s a weakness. Strength arises from Unity not Division. Diversity between nations is a strength for humanity, but Division within Nations is a weakness.”–Bic Verger —“Diversity isn’t necessarily synonymous with division, it is however necessarily antonymous to equality.”—Martin Štěpán

    Equality is made possible by appealing to ending status and power competition using kin selection. Devolve the federal government once again and restore the constitution to an alliance of nation-states. Europe solved this problem and only napoleon undermined it. A large number of small homogenous nation states produces a market for different commons producing polities and the greatest tolerance for reciprocity and proportionality

  • Feb 8, 2020, 9:47 AM —“Homogeny is closer to equality, but absolute equality o

    Feb 8, 2020, 9:47 AM

    —“Homogeny is closer to equality, but absolute equality only exists as entropy(devolution). What we want is an equilibrium where benefits of division of labor most outweigh the costs of diverging interests.”—Martin Štěpán

    (This is an example why I spent years at this task. To make new leadership for a new world. And look at these guys. Something happened. A new critical mass. It’s beautiful.)

  • Feb 8, 2020, 9:47 AM —“Homogeny is closer to equality, but absolute equality o

    Feb 8, 2020, 9:47 AM

    —“Homogeny is closer to equality, but absolute equality only exists as entropy(devolution). What we want is an equilibrium where benefits of division of labor most outweigh the costs of diverging interests.”—Martin Štěpán

    (This is an example why I spent years at this task. To make new leadership for a new world. And look at these guys. Something happened. A new critical mass. It’s beautiful.)

  • The Cost of Non European Civilizations to Themselves

    Feb 11, 2020, 7:32 AM

    —“Do you think being a european or not can be measured by the volume of the hazards of the externalities a person causes while coercing/persuading one’s self? And how the community constantly arranges to insure the externalities and and cover the damages?”— Mea Culba

    Non european communities seek to minimize stress of adaptation through relative equality and harmony – producing relative stasis – rather than adaptive competitive excellence – producing relative evolution, and the continuous distribution of the benefits of innovation and adaptation. Well, that’s the inverse of saying european civilization’s realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, identity, logic, rational choice, reciprocity, together that constrain our logics, sciences and laws, collected in the physical laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the laws of testimonial thought and speech, place the highest burden on our conscientiousness and reason in exchange for eliminating frictions personal interpersonal political and external, and therefore the least frictions of innovation adaptation and evolution. We (europeans) evolve the fastest because we minimize the personal, interpersonal, social, political, and external hazards of falsehoods, each of which seeks to avoid the cost of stress required by continuous competition, innovation, adaptation, limited to reciprocal, truthful, and productive means.

  • The Cost of Non European Civilizations to Themselves

    Feb 11, 2020, 7:32 AM

    —“Do you think being a european or not can be measured by the volume of the hazards of the externalities a person causes while coercing/persuading one’s self? And how the community constantly arranges to insure the externalities and and cover the damages?”— Mea Culba

    Non european communities seek to minimize stress of adaptation through relative equality and harmony – producing relative stasis – rather than adaptive competitive excellence – producing relative evolution, and the continuous distribution of the benefits of innovation and adaptation. Well, that’s the inverse of saying european civilization’s realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, identity, logic, rational choice, reciprocity, together that constrain our logics, sciences and laws, collected in the physical laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the laws of testimonial thought and speech, place the highest burden on our conscientiousness and reason in exchange for eliminating frictions personal interpersonal political and external, and therefore the least frictions of innovation adaptation and evolution. We (europeans) evolve the fastest because we minimize the personal, interpersonal, social, political, and external hazards of falsehoods, each of which seeks to avoid the cost of stress required by continuous competition, innovation, adaptation, limited to reciprocal, truthful, and productive means.

  • “What’s Your Vision for Post Majoritarian America, Europe, Western Civilization?”

    Feb 11, 2020, 8:06 AM

    —“Do you wish to implement a caste system in America? And, if so what would it be regarding: racial based or social status based?”—Amit Patel

    Are parties castes? No. Are tribes castes? no. Are classes castes? Close but no – a class is alterable by demonstrated behavior, but a caste isn’t. The reason for european success in the ancient and modern world is sovereignty, and sovereignty requires markets in every aspect of life, and markets produce continuous adaptation and evolution without political consensus and intervention. I want to create markets in everything, where we may not seek to circumvent those markets in display word or deed without severe consequences. In politics i want to recreate the market between the classes for the production of commons – using houses of the classes in the traditional British european model. And a market for polities that produce those commons suitable to the needs of different people, in the traditional european model – particularly the hundreds of princedom’s in the german holy roman empire. For some of us we will prefer the English, Prussian, Germanic, orderly, clean, aesthetic, homogenous, redistributive, civil society where most of our investments are in the commons. For others they will prefer the ‘latin, catholic, leisurely, communal life of the family with state (feudal) responsibility for the commons. For others the individual they prefer the cosmopolitan (jewish) urban, high stimulation, high consumption, high opportunity, low responsibility, low investment in the commons. For others they will prefer the close membership and mutual insurance of the semitic hyper familial tribe, at the high cost of the many externalities, including demand for authoritarian religion and state.

  • “What’s Your Vision for Post Majoritarian America, Europe, Western Civilization?”

    Feb 11, 2020, 8:06 AM

    —“Do you wish to implement a caste system in America? And, if so what would it be regarding: racial based or social status based?”—Amit Patel

    Are parties castes? No. Are tribes castes? no. Are classes castes? Close but no – a class is alterable by demonstrated behavior, but a caste isn’t. The reason for european success in the ancient and modern world is sovereignty, and sovereignty requires markets in every aspect of life, and markets produce continuous adaptation and evolution without political consensus and intervention. I want to create markets in everything, where we may not seek to circumvent those markets in display word or deed without severe consequences. In politics i want to recreate the market between the classes for the production of commons – using houses of the classes in the traditional British european model. And a market for polities that produce those commons suitable to the needs of different people, in the traditional european model – particularly the hundreds of princedom’s in the german holy roman empire. For some of us we will prefer the English, Prussian, Germanic, orderly, clean, aesthetic, homogenous, redistributive, civil society where most of our investments are in the commons. For others they will prefer the ‘latin, catholic, leisurely, communal life of the family with state (feudal) responsibility for the commons. For others the individual they prefer the cosmopolitan (jewish) urban, high stimulation, high consumption, high opportunity, low responsibility, low investment in the commons. For others they will prefer the close membership and mutual insurance of the semitic hyper familial tribe, at the high cost of the many externalities, including demand for authoritarian religion and state.

  • Restoring Beauty

    Feb 11, 2020, 8:08 AM

    —-“As a carpenter/tradesman, I’m mostly disappointed in the decline of architecture. It would be much more rewarding to build beautiful structures, to say nothing of the furtherance of learning involved to do it. As beneficial as the “assembly line” model of building has been to economics, I believe it has been equally detrimental in that it has lowered basic educational requirements to attaining, and retaining, employment. Combine this with the governments takeover of educating our children, and you have the masses being minimally educated to do menial tasks. All the while they’re being spoon-fed woefully one sided, jingoistic propaganda. But I digress… #BeautyMatters “—Marc Kaller

    It’s something trump is trying to put thru in government architecture. It’s something I’ve put in the constitution. Efficiency in the aesthetic is a dirty word. 😉