Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • What World-Intellectual Elites Exist?

    Mar 2, 2020, 3:55 PM

    1. European Aristotelian Masculine 2. Ashkenazi Jewish Abrahamic Feminine 3. The Chinese Act rather than Talk, they don’t create universals, the run their civilization out of self interest. Confucianism isn’t argumentative or combative like scientific truth or abrahamic undermining. 4. If India has intellectual elites they’re invisible to us primarily because they are concentrating as are the Chinese on their own. 5. There are no islamic intellectual elites because it’s an anti intellectual civilization in the sense we meant it as innovative. (open to criticism on this)

  • Yes the P-Constitution Serves All of Western Civ

    Yes the P-Constitution Serves All of Western Civ https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/yes-the-p-constitution-serves-all-of-western-civ/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:08:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266476501232431104

  • Yes the P-Constitution Serves All of Western Civ

    Mar 3, 2020, 10:29 AM

    —“About the Propertarian Constitution, is it only for the United States of America or all of North America and Europe?”—

    A general constitution, with customizations for the american reformation. It is for any country in western civilization (Or any civilization) – presuming customizations. The political structure – means of producing acts – will vary most depending upon the tastes of the population. And the possible choices are listed. We tend to think government is the subject we should focus on, but it’s really the law, then the economy, then the government. Hopefully our constitution corrects this problem and refocuses us on the law and economics – even though our concept of economics is balance sheet rather than income statement driven so includes culture etc. It’s structured as:

    • The Complaint: The reason for the reformation.

    • The Strategy: the ‘tradition’ of european peoples that explains the entire social system in strictly constructed form.

    • The Law: the law that expresses that tradition (definitions, the law, rights and obligations)

    • The Constitution: the constitution proper, that describes the function of every institution political, social, and familial. It’s possible each country(kingdom), or federation(empire) might want to modify these as they see fit.

    • The Acts: Actions that are specific to the american experiment. Every country or group of countries would replace these and add their own acts

    • The Restitutions: the “restitutions and punishments for crimes against our people”: Every country would replace and add their own restitutions and punishments.

  • Yes the P-Constitution Serves All of Western Civ

    Mar 3, 2020, 10:29 AM

    —“About the Propertarian Constitution, is it only for the United States of America or all of North America and Europe?”—

    A general constitution, with customizations for the american reformation. It is for any country in western civilization (Or any civilization) – presuming customizations. The political structure – means of producing acts – will vary most depending upon the tastes of the population. And the possible choices are listed. We tend to think government is the subject we should focus on, but it’s really the law, then the economy, then the government. Hopefully our constitution corrects this problem and refocuses us on the law and economics – even though our concept of economics is balance sheet rather than income statement driven so includes culture etc. It’s structured as:

    • The Complaint: The reason for the reformation.

    • The Strategy: the ‘tradition’ of european peoples that explains the entire social system in strictly constructed form.

    • The Law: the law that expresses that tradition (definitions, the law, rights and obligations)

    • The Constitution: the constitution proper, that describes the function of every institution political, social, and familial. It’s possible each country(kingdom), or federation(empire) might want to modify these as they see fit.

    • The Acts: Actions that are specific to the american experiment. Every country or group of countries would replace these and add their own acts

    • The Restitutions: the “restitutions and punishments for crimes against our people”: Every country would replace and add their own restitutions and punishments.

  • Fragility of Openness of Philosophy + Interest Rate Banking.

    Mar 3, 2020, 9:01 PM FRAGILITY OF OPENNESS OF PHILOSOPHY + INTEREST RATE BANKING. by Maria Al Masani Makienko The reaction of the Muslim world to the same parasites was the commoners demanded silence from the intelligentsia, to quarantine the disease and the most backward form of Islam ever invented to protect the commoners from (((parasitism))) that they could ill afford. I think why middle eastern jews have not been a threat to us, but Asheknazi jews have been a threat to the west is allowing interest rate banking, where we ban interest. This created a group that the majority did not trust due to the parasitic nature of interest banking and often persecuted, so in turn they had strategies to undermine the host culture. You do not see this behavior from Separdic nor Mizarhi Jews. Then you have hereditary PTSD and epegentic behavior in response to the persecution that’s a response to allowing for a long period of time only one out-group minority to provide interest rate banking. Muslim commoners protected themselves from (((parasitism))) and (((undermining)))) through inflicting violence on intellectual class to refrain to develop as a society in the 80s rather than be exposed the the virus of (((undermining))) and keeping intellectual debate to the privacy of salons. As mocked as they were, the Muslim poor were not wrong to do so because they defended their self interest. Blacks in the US in contrast have a 75% out of wedlock birthrate that they can afford with the American welfare state of white people’s taxes. We do not have enough white people creating a great tax base so poor Arabs can afford to raise children in a resource scarce food scarce region. Your openness that allows you to develop intellectual and invent iphones and tech companies opens you to (((undermining))).

    Correct. And excellent. Maria is exceptionally good at providing the Muslim world’s view with western logic and prose. She’s amazing. Note: Staying on message: they could not solve the reciprocity and truth problems nor nationalized consumer interest – we just haven’t put them into practice yet.

  • Fragility of Openness of Philosophy + Interest Rate Banking.

    Mar 3, 2020, 9:01 PM FRAGILITY OF OPENNESS OF PHILOSOPHY + INTEREST RATE BANKING. by Maria Al Masani Makienko The reaction of the Muslim world to the same parasites was the commoners demanded silence from the intelligentsia, to quarantine the disease and the most backward form of Islam ever invented to protect the commoners from (((parasitism))) that they could ill afford. I think why middle eastern jews have not been a threat to us, but Asheknazi jews have been a threat to the west is allowing interest rate banking, where we ban interest. This created a group that the majority did not trust due to the parasitic nature of interest banking and often persecuted, so in turn they had strategies to undermine the host culture. You do not see this behavior from Separdic nor Mizarhi Jews. Then you have hereditary PTSD and epegentic behavior in response to the persecution that’s a response to allowing for a long period of time only one out-group minority to provide interest rate banking. Muslim commoners protected themselves from (((parasitism))) and (((undermining)))) through inflicting violence on intellectual class to refrain to develop as a society in the 80s rather than be exposed the the virus of (((undermining))) and keeping intellectual debate to the privacy of salons. As mocked as they were, the Muslim poor were not wrong to do so because they defended their self interest. Blacks in the US in contrast have a 75% out of wedlock birthrate that they can afford with the American welfare state of white people’s taxes. We do not have enough white people creating a great tax base so poor Arabs can afford to raise children in a resource scarce food scarce region. Your openness that allows you to develop intellectual and invent iphones and tech companies opens you to (((undermining))).

    Correct. And excellent. Maria is exceptionally good at providing the Muslim world’s view with western logic and prose. She’s amazing. Note: Staying on message: they could not solve the reciprocity and truth problems nor nationalized consumer interest – we just haven’t put them into practice yet.

  • The meaning of Civilized

    Mar 5, 2020, 5:19 PM CIVILIZED LIKE VELOCITY IS A THRESHOLD AND SPECTRUM NOT A STATE

    —“Curt, how do we consider the Chinese a civilized nation when they do not engage in reciprocity with anyone, and they hack the whole world with false promises and sh—y, toxic goods?”— Ahmed Reda

    Civilized means ‘urbanized’, meaning ‘markets’, with ‘market ethics’, which we think of as middle class or ‘civilized’ ethics, combined with producing high culture (arts) as monuments (achievements), the ultimate luxury. Chinese civilization has been ‘advanced’ in the sense of (a) urbanized, and (b) producing high culture, since the ancient world. However, Chinese culture has never valued human life as we do in all of its history and the communists made it far worse. A quick perusal of the history of chinese art compared to european will illustrate the self loathing of the chinese toward human beings. A quick read of how many of their own people they have killed in modern, medieval, and ancient worlds, tells the rest. They are a low trust society still trying to emerge out of endemic poverty. We think they are an old people and they claim to be but they are not. The communists did to china what the (((current leftists))) are trying to do to ours, so the chinese lost all their high culture and traditions and ethics and suffered through the communist experience. Their priority in value is harmony over human life. Why this is the case is rather obvious if you understand their history.

  • The meaning of Civilized

    Mar 5, 2020, 5:19 PM CIVILIZED LIKE VELOCITY IS A THRESHOLD AND SPECTRUM NOT A STATE

    —“Curt, how do we consider the Chinese a civilized nation when they do not engage in reciprocity with anyone, and they hack the whole world with false promises and sh—y, toxic goods?”— Ahmed Reda

    Civilized means ‘urbanized’, meaning ‘markets’, with ‘market ethics’, which we think of as middle class or ‘civilized’ ethics, combined with producing high culture (arts) as monuments (achievements), the ultimate luxury. Chinese civilization has been ‘advanced’ in the sense of (a) urbanized, and (b) producing high culture, since the ancient world. However, Chinese culture has never valued human life as we do in all of its history and the communists made it far worse. A quick perusal of the history of chinese art compared to european will illustrate the self loathing of the chinese toward human beings. A quick read of how many of their own people they have killed in modern, medieval, and ancient worlds, tells the rest. They are a low trust society still trying to emerge out of endemic poverty. We think they are an old people and they claim to be but they are not. The communists did to china what the (((current leftists))) are trying to do to ours, so the chinese lost all their high culture and traditions and ethics and suffered through the communist experience. Their priority in value is harmony over human life. Why this is the case is rather obvious if you understand their history.

  • The West Is a Better but More Complex Game

    Mar 5, 2020, 9:46 PM Every social order creates a game. Western civlization demands sovereignty – the antithesis of submission. The game is that we must find ways to govern by limits without imposing on sovereignty. So where most civilizations and moral codes are constructed of via positiva directives at the cost of innovation and adaptation, while western civilization is constructed from via negativa prohibitions within the limits of sovereignty at the cost of people coming to harm from their judgements. We play a more complex game. Self Determination, Sovereignty, Possibility of Success or Failure, Status Rewards for Heroism with tolerance, even accolades, for failure for having tried.

  • The West Is a Better but More Complex Game

    Mar 5, 2020, 9:46 PM Every social order creates a game. Western civlization demands sovereignty – the antithesis of submission. The game is that we must find ways to govern by limits without imposing on sovereignty. So where most civilizations and moral codes are constructed of via positiva directives at the cost of innovation and adaptation, while western civilization is constructed from via negativa prohibitions within the limits of sovereignty at the cost of people coming to harm from their judgements. We play a more complex game. Self Determination, Sovereignty, Possibility of Success or Failure, Status Rewards for Heroism with tolerance, even accolades, for failure for having tried.