Jan 25, 2020, 4:31 PM —“So, you would consider Christianity a desert cult?”—Dan Ver Woert I don’t do name-calling, but I would consider the advice of Jesus to be a philosophy that is, at least by present scientific standards, the optimum for man. I would say that as I’ve secularized it, it’s just a statement of social science. I would say that the supernatural elements are nonsense and that the pilpul and critique with which it was promoted, are human cancer, but if Jesus had been added to the pantheon rather than a monopoly we would have had contributed to the Janus-face of man. Instead, Christianity was used and is used to keep man ignorant by undermining the only ‘true’ religion “debt to ancestors nature in the continuous evolution(transcendence) of man”.
Theme: Civilization
-
Yes I Know It’s Hard for Christians
Jan 25, 2020, 4:31 PM I know this is hard for the devoted Christians but until we come to terms with the Christian destruction of the ancient world and the Jewish, Christian, Islamic dark ages that resulted, we cannot understand the reason for the success of the second Abrahamic destruction of the western world by the pseudoscientific version of Abrahamism by marxism, cultural Marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and that form of denialism and deceit we call political correctness. All western people are a mixture of Aryan and Germanic, Greco Roman, Christian, and Aristotelian-scientific heritages. There is something wonderful to be taken from each. It’s not hard for me because I find no challenge imitating Aristotle, Alexander, and Jesus as the three faces of our people.
-
Yes I Know It’s Hard for Christians
Jan 25, 2020, 4:31 PM I know this is hard for the devoted Christians but until we come to terms with the Christian destruction of the ancient world and the Jewish, Christian, Islamic dark ages that resulted, we cannot understand the reason for the success of the second Abrahamic destruction of the western world by the pseudoscientific version of Abrahamism by marxism, cultural Marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and that form of denialism and deceit we call political correctness. All western people are a mixture of Aryan and Germanic, Greco Roman, Christian, and Aristotelian-scientific heritages. There is something wonderful to be taken from each. It’s not hard for me because I find no challenge imitating Aristotle, Alexander, and Jesus as the three faces of our people.
-
The difference between western thought and all other thought
The difference between western thought and all other thought https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/the-difference-between-western-thought-and-all-other-thought/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 15:33:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266754546358865920
-
The difference between western thought and all other thought
Jan 27, 2020, 9:19 AM The difference between western thought and all other thought is the difference between zero and one: infinite. Why? Truth, operationalism, completeness. Yeah, western thought is harder, and less intuitive, and less satisfying and not at all sedating. It is, however, the only means by which we have converted the universe to an instrument of man’s will.
-
The difference between western thought and all other thought
Jan 27, 2020, 9:19 AM The difference between western thought and all other thought is the difference between zero and one: infinite. Why? Truth, operationalism, completeness. Yeah, western thought is harder, and less intuitive, and less satisfying and not at all sedating. It is, however, the only means by which we have converted the universe to an instrument of man’s will.
-
Our Pagan Ancestors Were Monogamous
Our Pagan Ancestors Were Monogamous https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/our-pagan-ancestors-were-monogamous/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 15:01:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266746678117367808
-
Our Pagan Ancestors Were Monogamous
Jan 29, 2020, 8:20 PM by Igor Rogov The only principal difference is that monogamy in “pagan” world included sexual relationships with concubines and slaves within the same household as a lawful sexual activity, with progeny either being accepted as slaves or officially adopted by household owner, or becoming “proletariat” through an official practice of abandonment. Jewish monogamy narrowed down what was allowed significantly, but not entirely – sexual relationships with slaves persisted in Jewish households under Ottoman empire. Christianity almost entirely got rid of concubines and slaves as acceptable sexual partners and out-of-wedlock progeny was reduced to historical minimum for centuries up until 20th century. Counting Islam as Abrahamism, it was a significant step backwards with a return of official practice of concubinage, slavery and multiple wives.
(CD: AFAIK: the root of the IE word for wife was ‘abducted’. lol )
-
Our Pagan Ancestors Were Monogamous
Jan 29, 2020, 8:20 PM by Igor Rogov The only principal difference is that monogamy in “pagan” world included sexual relationships with concubines and slaves within the same household as a lawful sexual activity, with progeny either being accepted as slaves or officially adopted by household owner, or becoming “proletariat” through an official practice of abandonment. Jewish monogamy narrowed down what was allowed significantly, but not entirely – sexual relationships with slaves persisted in Jewish households under Ottoman empire. Christianity almost entirely got rid of concubines and slaves as acceptable sexual partners and out-of-wedlock progeny was reduced to historical minimum for centuries up until 20th century. Counting Islam as Abrahamism, it was a significant step backwards with a return of official practice of concubinage, slavery and multiple wives.
(CD: AFAIK: the root of the IE word for wife was ‘abducted’. lol )
-
Prelude to Civil War – Via Washington Himself
Jan 30, 2020, 5:20 PM
“At a time, when our lordly masters in Great Britain will be satisfied with nothing less than the deprivation of American freedom, it seems highly necessary that something should be done to avert the stroke, and maintain the liberty, which we have derived from our ancestors. But the manner of doing it, to answer the purpose effectually, is the point in question. That no man should scruple, or hesitate a moment, to use arms in defence of so valuable a blessing, on which all the good and evil of life depends, is clearly my opinion. Yet arms, I would beg leave to add, should be the last resource, the dernier resort. Addresses to the throne, and remonstrances to Parliament, we have already, it is said, proved the inefficacy of. How far, then, their attention to our rights and privileges is to be awakened or alarmed, by starving their trade and manufacturers, remains to be tried.” ~ George Washington, Letter to George Mason (April 5, 1769)