12) Why this is so obvious to my African audience (“There is nothing wrong with Africans that shrinking the bottom won’t fix”) and so intolerable to Americans? Because Americans like puritans, are shallow virtue-signaling moralizers masters of deceit without lying in the world.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Theme: Civilization
-
12) Why this is so obvious to my African audience (“There is nothing wrong with
-
12) Why this is so obvious to my African audience (“There is nothing wrong with
12) Why this is so obvious to my African audience (“There is nothing wrong with Africans that shrinking the bottom won’t fix”) and so intolerable to Americans? Because Americans like puritans, are shallow virtue-signaling moralizers masters of deceit without lying in the world.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 13:19:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274331059648421891
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274330444595695617
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JulieBorowski 11) African Americans have only one oppressor: the mirror. The only solution is (a) Separation so that their elites cannot defect, leaving 2/3 of their population incapable of social, economic, and politcal organization and (b) six generations of one child at for unemployables.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1274330444595695617
-
10) African Slavery, industrialized by islam, was a purely economic decision for
10) African Slavery, industrialized by islam, was a purely economic decision for purely rational reasons : resistance to malaria. Even so, at present rates, African Americans will have killed more of one another over a century than slaves were brought to America. (Yes, really).
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski -
10) African Slavery, industrialized by islam, was a purely economic decision for
10) African Slavery, industrialized by islam, was a purely economic decision for purely rational reasons : resistance to malaria. Even so, at present rates, African Americans will have killed more of one another over a century than slaves were brought to America. (Yes, really).
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 13:14:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274329757468033025
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274329249630093317
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JulieBorowski 9) No other people can come close to achieving it, except the Koreans and Japanese, and even then, they can’t produce commons only refrain from consuming them.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1274329249630093317
-
9) No other people can come close to achieving it, except the Koreans and Japane
9) No other people can come close to achieving it, except the Koreans and Japanese, and even then, they can’t produce commons only refrain from consuming them.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski -
9) No other people can come close to achieving it, except the Koreans and Japane
9) No other people can come close to achieving it, except the Koreans and Japanese, and even then, they can’t produce commons only refrain from consuming them.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 13:12:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274329249630093317
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274328804845068295
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JulieBorowski 8) We can only cooperate by trade, but we cannot cohabitate or share suffrage, since our group strategies due to genetic differences and genetic distributions. Only europeans can produce high trust commons with high investment parenting expressly for producing commons. Period.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1274328804845068295
-
2) So instead of the high cost of paying for the repatriation of the slaves, and
2) So instead of the high cost of paying for the repatriation of the slaves, and borrowing to compensate the southern farms to convert to employment labor,we had a far more costly civil war of anti-secession when the north realized that the south would rule the western expansion.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski -
2) So instead of the high cost of paying for the repatriation of the slaves, and
2) So instead of the high cost of paying for the repatriation of the slaves, and borrowing to compensate the southern farms to convert to employment labor,we had a far more costly civil war of anti-secession when the north realized that the south would rule the western expansion.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 12:59:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274325894119788546
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274325333093777408
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JulieBorowski 1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to tolerate the demands of the south, and the south couldn’t economically afford to abandon slavery. The solution was to return them to Africa, and some were, but without Fiat Currency couldn’t do it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1274325333093777408
-
1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to
1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to tolerate the demands of the south, and the south couldn’t economically afford to abandon slavery. The solution was to return them to Africa, and some were, but without Fiat Currency couldn’t do it.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski -
1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to
1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to tolerate the demands of the south, and the south couldn’t economically afford to abandon slavery. The solution was to return them to Africa, and some were, but without Fiat Currency couldn’t do it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-20 12:56:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274325333093777408
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274129785644634116