Theme: Civilization

  • The Parallel Between Germany and China – Perfection, But For One Terrible Error

    PARALLEL BETWEEN GERMANY AND CHINA CHINA China was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had ethnically spread cross near countries and evolved them, China had a long educational history. China had a profound bureaucracy. China had a more than competent military China had a more than competent workforce China had an industrial advantage over the eastern continent. China had been wronged by the British empire, China had had a failed ‘new government’ with terrible consequences. GERMANY Germany was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had spread across nearby countries and evolved them. Germany was the intellectual and academic core of europe. Germany had the best bureaucracy in the advanced world. Germany had a better more advanced industry and polity that was a quality advantage over the western continent. Germany had a martial aristocracy – the best in the world. Germany had been wronged by napoleon (destroying the core of Europe – the holy roman empire) Germany had been wronged in ww1 (attempting to restore herself and her people) Germany would be wronged in ww2 (attempting to restore her self and her people) THE MODEL FOR BOTH Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. An army of society. PERFECTION … BUT It was perfect for both countries. But … … AH overreached and practiced ideology over empiricism. … Just as Xi Jinping has overreached and is practicing ideology over empiricism. THIS IS THE BEST MODEL FOR MAN: Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. BUT THIS IS THE REASON FOR ALL FAILURE OF MAN: Ideology (or faith) over Evidence. Overreach.

  • The Parallel Between Germany and China – Perfection, But For One Terrible Error

    PARALLEL BETWEEN GERMANY AND CHINA CHINA China was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had ethnically spread cross near countries and evolved them, China had a long educational history. China had a profound bureaucracy. China had a more than competent military China had a more than competent workforce China had an industrial advantage over the eastern continent. China had been wronged by the British empire, China had had a failed ‘new government’ with terrible consequences. GERMANY Germany was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had spread across nearby countries and evolved them. Germany was the intellectual and academic core of europe. Germany had the best bureaucracy in the advanced world. Germany had a better more advanced industry and polity that was a quality advantage over the western continent. Germany had a martial aristocracy – the best in the world. Germany had been wronged by napoleon (destroying the core of Europe – the holy roman empire) Germany had been wronged in ww1 (attempting to restore herself and her people) Germany would be wronged in ww2 (attempting to restore her self and her people) THE MODEL FOR BOTH Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. An army of society. PERFECTION … BUT It was perfect for both countries. But … … AH overreached and practiced ideology over empiricism. … Just as Xi Jinping has overreached and is practicing ideology over empiricism. THIS IS THE BEST MODEL FOR MAN: Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. BUT THIS IS THE REASON FOR ALL FAILURE OF MAN: Ideology (or faith) over Evidence. Overreach.

  • AMERICAN GENERATIONS 1997 to 2012: Generation Z (Snowflake Generation) … Gen Z

    AMERICAN GENERATIONS

    1997 to 2012: Generation Z (Snowflake Generation)

    … Gen Z.2 The “Economically Hopeless”

    … Gen Z.1 The “Kids with Mobile Phones”

    1981 to 1996: Millennials or Gen Y (Pet Generation)

    …. Gen Y.2 (First Full internet generation)

    …. Gen Y.1 (The desktop generation)

    1965 to 1980: Generation X (latchkey Generation, Cable TV, Fast food Franchises, Malls, mtv, lots of tv,)

    1955 to 1964: Jones generation (oil crisis / Wall Street / Tech)

    1946 to 1955: Baby Boomers (postwar, little pink houses)

    …. Gen BB.2 civil rights, communist bombings, summer of love

    …. Gen BB.1 Beatles, and Kennedy

    1928 to 1945: the Silent Generation (war gen)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 14:31:00 UTC

  • GERMANIZATION OF EARLY MEDIEVAL CHRISTIANITY: 12 POINT SUMMARY James C Russell’s

    GERMANIZATION OF EARLY MEDIEVAL CHRISTIANITY: 12 POINT SUMMARY

    James C Russell’s ‘Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity: A Sociohistorical Approach to Religious Transformation’ (GOEMC) is an excellent study on the evolution of Christianity from a predominantly Mediterranean religion to a northern European one. [1] The book has recently gained popularity on the internet right, and it’s now regarded as a “must read” in some circles.

    Russell is a conservative historian and theologian who authored another book condemning the role of organized Christianity in the facilitation of mass immigration into the United States and other Western countries. [2] Russell published GOEMC through the Oxford University Press in 1994.

    SUMMARY

    In GOEMC’s concluding chapter, Russell summarized his work’s twelve main points. [3]

    (1) Early Christianity emerged from an urban, heterogeneous, and low social capital society. German society at the time of first contact with Christianity was rural, homogeneous, and high social capital.

    (2) Early Christianity was “world rejecting” and “salvation” focused. In contrast, the pre-Christian German worldview was world accepting and socio-biological (ethnic and immediate).

    (3) The first Christian missionaries to Germany accommodated Christianity to the religopolitical and magicoreligous elements of the German worldview. [4]

    (4) Early efforts to convert Germans to Christ resulted in the reinterpretation of Christianity through the Germanic worldview.

    (5) Catholic Christianity’s political reliance on Germanic nations, like the Franks, led to the increased influence of their interpretation of Christianity over the Western Church.

    (6) Some Germanic nations attempted to preserve their unique ethnic identity and independence by adhering to Arianism rather than subjecting themselves to the outside power of Church hierarchy.

    (7) The “Christianization” of the Germans was very shallow until at least the reign of Charlemagne (768 – 814) because there was no catechumanate system or qualified teachers to finish instruction. The Church prioritized baptism over teaching because they thought the apocalypse was near. The German worldview was too strong to allow full Christianization.

    (8) Early missionaries to the Germans were as successful as they could have been. If they had not accommodated Christianity to the German worldview they probably would not have found any success.

    (9) The initial accommodation of Christianity to the German worldview laid the foundation for later indoctrination of Christian worldview and ethics.

    (10) Christian missionaries misrepresented the extent of disparity between the Germanic and Christian worldview when initially accommodating Christianity to a fresh German audience.

    (11) Early Christian accommodation left Germans with the impression that Jesus was one among many magicoreligous gods to include in their pantheon. New German converts did not possess doctrinal or ethical concerns.

    (12) Contributing factors to Christianity’s German spread included: the association of Christianity with Frankish political aims, an imagined causal association of Christianity with Roman grandeur, and a coincidental similarity between German myths and Christian beliefs, rituals, and symbols.

    This book is in the P reading list.

    Source: https://cocmillennial.blogspot.com/2016/11/germanization-of-early-medieval-christianity-review.html

    (Apologies. I don’t know who sent me this link to me)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 13:45:00 UTC

  • <-Aurelius <- Caesar -> Alexander-> … Aurelius: (Stoic) the virtuous ruler and

    <-Aurelius <- Caesar -> Alexander->

    … Aurelius: (Stoic) the virtuous ruler and general

    … … Caesar: (Epicurean) the political and pragmatic ruler and general

    … … … Alexander: (Aristotelian) the pure, unapologetic, ruthless, excellence, expression of Aryan ego of militaristic expansionary dominance.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 12:34:00 UTC

  • NON-FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF WEST AFRICA (the late, but growing empires of west Af

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfUT6LhBBYsIMPORTANT, NON-FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF WEST AFRICA

    (the late, but growing empires of west Africa)

    While Africa was late to development – for geographic reasons, there were three proto-empires in west Africa prior to the colonial period.

    This is the non-false ‘we was kangs’ argument of west Africans. No it was not an advanced empire. But nor were any most early empires outside of the fertile crescent.

    And yes, colonialism interrupted their growth and left the region as it did the middle east, a chaos of artificial borders.

    Germany had 350 states. The middle east should have dozens. Africa should have a thousand.

    A thousand nations must bloom.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfUT6LhBBYsUpdated Jul 22, 2020, 11:06 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 11:06:00 UTC

  • Age-Old “Athens and Jerusalem” Aristotelianism (europeans) and Abrahamism (jews)

    Age-Old “Athens and Jerusalem”
    Aristotelianism (europeans) and Abrahamism (jews)

    Philosophy as the religion of the aristocracy (male violence), vs theology as the religion of the peasantry (female undermining)

    Male Political Superpredators vs Female Social Superpredators.

    Reply addressees: @noxaxis1

  • Age-Old “Athens and Jerusalem” Aristotelianism (europeans) and Abrahamism (jews)

    Age-Old “Athens and Jerusalem”
    Aristotelianism (europeans) and Abrahamism (jews)

    Philosophy as the religion of the aristocracy (male violence), vs theology as the religion of the peasantry (female undermining)

    Male Political Superpredators vs Female Social Superpredators.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 00:43:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285737286169231360

    Reply addressees: @noxaxis1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285736241472966656

  • However, despite neoteny, class size is more relevant. Northern Europeans practi

    However, despite neoteny, class size is more relevant. Northern Europeans practiced eugenics throughout our entire history. East Asians too. So we both have the most neotenic and smallest underclasses and the most advanced civilizations because of it.

    Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS

  • However, despite neoteny, class size is more relevant. Northern Europeans practi

    However, despite neoteny, class size is more relevant. Northern Europeans practiced eugenics throughout our entire history. East Asians too. So we both have the most neotenic and smallest underclasses and the most advanced civilizations because of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 21:50:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285693553889423360

    Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285690098647027717