Theme: Civilization

  • “Patton was a staunch anti-communist and saw the Soviet Union as a greater threa

    –“Patton was a staunch anti-communist and saw the Soviet Union as a greater threat to the United States and the Western world than Nazi Germany. He believed that after defeating Germany, the U.S. should have turned its attention to confronting the Soviet Union and preventing the…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 04:51:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798940739331899542

    Reply addressees: @ANewMythology @AiddenToops

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798937311042003418

  • Ok. I’m off a call. A less quick answer. There are no examples in history where

    Ok. I’m off a call.
    A less quick answer.
    There are no examples in history where these circumstances exist that has not led to internal conflict.
    There are no examples in history where these external conditions haven’t lead to external conflict.
    Pick which one you think will happen first.
    If the external happens first it will delay the internal.
    If the internal happens first it will immediately cause the external.
    The civil war in the USA will likely be an incremental escalation of local violence to a patter of violence to a breakdown in transport, trade, communications, and government.
    I have worked on this problem for a very long time.
    The dates vary but by 2032 it’s almost a certainty.
    How long, how serious, and what happens after is all random.

    Reply addressees: @AiddenToops


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 02:24:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798903947811495937

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798900657954451682

  • Robert Sepehr is trying to restore western mythos to our natural traditions, in

    Robert Sepehr is trying to restore western mythos to our natural traditions, in a technique called ‘mythicism’ that combines historical and mythical content – and he’s good at it. And in that sense I support his efforts.
    In the sense that I have the problem of decidability, truth, and reciprocity in the law, I have to separate that which is basically spiritual (what he’s doing) from what is material (what I do).
    So if you ask me, I would suggest you interpret him through that lens. But then, I would hope he would say the same about me.

    Reply addressees: @Raytional


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 01:03:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798883349383278592

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798880482505138364

  • Q: CURT: “WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THE WORLD AFFAIRS?” I would need a more specific q

    Q: CURT: “WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THE WORLD AFFAIRS?”
    I would need a more specific question otherwise the answer might not interest you. In general the industrial revolution was quite powerful, the first world wars ended the monarchies, and the second ended the empires. The Americans did not finish off the chinese communists or the Russian communists, so the Americans left two groups seeking to preserve empires. Western technological advantage has been mediated by global trade. Americans can no longer afford to police the world pattern of finance and trade, so the three civilizational empires are seeking restoration: Russia, China, and Iran as a caliphate. These three groups are harmful to their people but they have maintained enough power, that they see an opportunity for expansion as the USA withdraws and europe’s population collapses along with their economies. At the same time the success of the postwar neo-marxists has succeeded in sewing discord in western countries -particularly the USA, that in the absence of monarchies has no means of repressing those seditions. As such the world is returning to a conflict of civilizations, a decline in trade routes, a decline in globalism, and a rather scary decline in world standards of living. The USA is very close to a civil war which we should expect by 2032, and the only question is whether that civil war or a world war happens first. Which will be the end of empires as a continuation of the unfinished world wars, or the end of nation states, national sovereignty, human rights, free trade, and the western production of the current state of prosperity.

    Everything else happening in the world is just ‘noise’ as that process proceeds to it’s deterministic conclusion.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 00:06:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798869161449259008

  • OUT OF AFRICA AND BACK AND FORTH Alternative theories are nonsense on stilts. Ye

    OUT OF AFRICA AND BACK AND FORTH
    Alternative theories are nonsense on stilts. Yes, there was back and forth gene flow. There was back and forth gene flow between previous generations of man. But the what’s called ‘the whole kit’ emerged in east africa, spread across into then-green saudi peninsula, but settled in the then-dry persian gulf and it’s many rivers and marshes – the optimum ground for mankind. And then spread out following the coastal route. Because once you have fishing you’re never going to starve. Conversely, if you migrate for large game up the rivers whether the Tigris and Euphrates or the Indus, you will find game that has no experience with humans and the returns on that game, especially given the furs, skins, and bones, were better than those of the fish in the sea. So yes there has always been back and forth gene flow, and yes some of the backward gene flow was contributory because it’s easier to isolate and speciate outside of africa than in it – if you have the ‘full kit’ of technologies necessary to survive in numbers outside of africa.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 23:37:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798861839742464000

  • RT @SaitouHajime00: A future historian documenting the 20th century destruction

    RT @SaitouHajime00: A future historian documenting the 20th century destruction of western civilization will come to the same conclusions.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 23:35:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798861184583581960

  • THE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS OF THE FINANCIERS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION AND THE

    THE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS OF THE FINANCIERS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR
    The question of overlap between those who financed the Bolsheviks during the Russian Revolution and those who financed the Allies during World War I is complex and somewhat…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 22:12:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798840371297849786

  • THE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS OF THE FINANCIERS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION AND THE

    THE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS OF THE FINANCIERS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR
    The question of overlap between those who financed the Bolsheviks during the Russian Revolution and those who financed the Allies during World War I is complex and somewhat controversial.

    (CD: the point here is the ambition to destroy the european monarchies which are the primary means of defense against the globalists and you know who.)

    Wall Street and International Financiers:
    Connections to Both Sides: Some prominent financiers and financial institutions, particularly those based on Wall Street, had interests and involvement in both the Allied war effort and the Russian Revolution. For example, firms like J.P. Morgan and individuals like William Boyce Thompson had substantial influence and connections that spanned different geopolitical interests.
    Bolshevik Funding: There are claims and documented instances suggesting that certain Wall Street bankers and firms provided financial support to the Bolsheviks. This support was often framed as part of broader strategies to influence or control post-revolutionary Russia for economic or political gain. Antony Sutton’s work, “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution,” explores this in detail, although his conclusions are subject to debate and scrutiny​ (modernhistoryproject)​​ (modernhistoryproject)​.

    Strategic and Economic Motives:Financial Opportunism: The motivations for financing both the Allies and the Bolsheviks can often be traced back to strategic and economic opportunism. For financiers, supporting various sides in a conflict could ensure influence and favorable conditions for future business dealings, regardless of the outcome.
    Centralized Control: Some historians argue that international financiers saw potential in centralized political systems, like that of the Bolsheviks, because these systems could offer stable and predictable environments for business, contrary to the chaos of decentralized, laissez-faire economies​ (modernhistoryproject)​​ (Foreign Policy Research Institute)​.

    Sisson Documents and German Involvement:
    German Facilitation: The Sisson Documents, although largely discredited as forgeries, did highlight real aspects of German involvement in facilitating the Bolshevik Revolution, particularly in aiding Lenin’s return to Russia. This support was part of Germany’s strategy to destabilize Russia and remove it from the war, which indirectly benefited the Allies by diverting German resources and attention​ (modernhistoryproject).

    Conclusion

    The overlap in financiers supporting both the Bolsheviks and the Allies highlights the complex and often contradictory nature of international finance during times of upheaval. While direct evidence of coordinated efforts is contentious, the involvement of major financial institutions and prominent financiers on multiple fronts reflects broader strategic interests that transcended individual conflicts.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 22:12:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798840371016765440

  • THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Carroll Q

    THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT
    “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Carroll Quigley provides an in-depth look at the secretive group of influential individuals in Britain and the United States who sought to shape global politics and maintain British imperial power through a network of elite institutions and influential figures.

    –“the british empire had ‘lost it’s steam’ in world war one and the british felt that the german ascent would displace the british empire in global influence if the british did not compete against it.”–Dr Brad

    The Secret Society:
    Origins: Quigley discusses the formation of a secret society by Cecil Rhodes, an influential British imperialist, aimed at preserving and expanding the British Empire. Rhodes’s vision included creating a global network to exert influence over world affairs.
    Structure: This society, often referred to as the “Round Table Group,” consisted of key figures from British politics, banking, and academia. It operated through semi-secret organizations and sought to wield significant influence over British and international policy.

    Notable Members:
    Alfred Milner: Quigley highlights the role of Alfred Milner, a prominent British statesman, who became a leading figure in the Round Table movement after Rhodes’s death. Milner’s efforts were pivotal in promoting British imperial interests.
    Lord Esher, Lord Lothian, Lionel Curtis, and Others: The book profiles various members who contributed to the group’s activities and spread its influence through various institutions, including the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the United States.

    Institutions and Influence:
    Educational and Policy Influence: The group used institutions like Oxford and Cambridge to groom future leaders aligned with their vision. They also influenced policy-making bodies and international relations through think tanks and advisory roles.
    International Relations: Quigley details how this network influenced British and American foreign policies, particularly in the early 20th century, including during World War I and the interwar period.

    World War I and Aftermath:
    War Strategy: The Round Table’s influence on British war strategy and post-war reconstruction efforts is examined. Their vision for a post-war world included establishing the League of Nations to promote global governance and prevent future conflicts.
    Anglo-American Cooperation: A significant part of the group’s strategy involved fostering close ties between Britain and the United States to ensure mutual dominance in global affairs.

    Critique and Legacy:
    Criticism of Methods: Quigley is critical of the group’s secretive methods and the lack of transparency in their efforts to manipulate political outcomes. He argues that their undemocratic approach undermined genuine democratic processes.
    Enduring Impact: Despite his critique, Quigley acknowledges the significant impact this network had on shaping 20th-century international relations and their lasting influence on contemporary global politics.

    Conclusion
    Carroll Quigley’s “The Anglo-American Establishment” provides a thorough examination of a secretive and influential network that sought to shape global affairs through strategic alliances and institutional control. The book uncovers the ambitions, methods, and enduring legacy of this elite group, offering a critical perspective on their role in world history.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 22:08:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798839350077321216

  • THE TRUTH WILL EVENTUALLY WIN –“You’ve been lied to since 1939. As general Patt

    THE TRUTH WILL EVENTUALLY WIN
    –“You’ve been lied to since 1939. As general Patton said, we fought for the wrong side. The Germans were not the bad guys, we had no reason to go after Germany other than helping the British, who supported the polish in their misbehavior against the germans in Silesia killing 50,000 Germans prior to the war. And even then, the British, who had offers of peace and refused them. We should have stayed out of it. But instead we destroyed the capacity of Germany to keep the east at bay. We destroyed the British empires, failed to destroy the chines and Russian communist empires, brought about the American empires by default, and the same people that destroyed Russia and Germany are destroying the americans by the same means.”– f


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 21:44:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798833475530690560