Why am I going to answer this given that I know it’s a waste of time?
(a) northern european institutions, especially within the Hajnal Line, Under Manorialism, and most so under the British invention of the modern state, maximized the responsibility of individuals through training, culture, religion, education, and law, and directed dominance expression to the production of commons. We sometimes call this the protestant ethic, but it is simply the northern european ethic, and protestantism was a natural reform of religion to suit the protestant ethic as we entered the age of literacy.
(b) The “Liberal: Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Postmodern, Feminist, PC-Woke, anti-male, anti-western, anti-behavioral science” promise of freedom from scarcity, the nature of man, and evolutionary pressures of mutation and genetic load accumulating in the lower classes consist of a rebellion against the responsibility demanded by these western institutions. This has resulted in infantilization of the population: devolution. And infantilization increases the demand for authority (parenting).
(c) We can (I have), fairly easily, enumerate natural rights and obligations that maximize individual self determination(freedom), by sovereignty (liberty) and reciprocity (morality), and in doing so reverse the infantilization of the population, and end the demand for authority.
(d) however there are people who are incapable of ‘whiteness’: responsibility for mind, self, others, and commons – whether by genetic defect, developmental defect, or choice. Some of these people will ‘check out’ as artists etc. Some of these people will demand parenting. Some of them will demand that their irresponsibility grant them equality of standing with those who are responsible.
So the last two groups are rather obvious. And they require ‘blue’ authority and parenting.
Why? because agency decreases with population density, so responsibility decreases with population density, and so we give up agency and responsibility in return for the reduced opportunity costs of population density (hyperconsumption), and cost of residency, and near prohibition on reproduction because of the high cost of children in population density.
So individuals will choose density, and families seek absence of density. Families breed in the absence of density. Individuals don’t breed in cities because it’s too expensive, so they have to attract immigrants instead, who also increase demand for authority.
Good people will keep fleeing the decaying cities until there are alternative cities that attract good people. (Nashville, Austin). Then once enough good people create enough good things the parasitic bad people will come and destroy the good things again, and the process continues.
We want to stop the bad people.
It’s all behavioral economics. It’s very simple.
And it’s just physics in the end and you can’t get around it.
Cities are genetic sinks.