Theme: Civilization

  • Islam is entropic. It has caused consistently since the 800s, continuous devolut

    Islam is entropic. It has caused consistently since the 800s, continuous devolution, dysgenia, stagnation, decay, corruption, poverty, and the inability to form durable governments, rule of law, large organizations.
    And this is despite having the two great river systems of food production, and the silk road trade system, and the intersection of four continents, making it the optimum region for knowledge production and accumulation.
    But instead, islam teaches ignorance in exchange for peace of mind (mindfulness). Christianity would be as bad if not for germanization. Hinduism is hobbled by the caste system, diversity, and population size. Buddhism has a less significant effect. Confucianism and Stoicism and eventually Humanism have achieved the advancement the more superstitious religions of sedation have failed to mirror.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 16:50:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631698570616229889

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631695581935435786

  • THE FALSE PROMISE OF ISLAM AND THE COST OF THE TRADE The “mindfulness” (peace of

    THE FALSE PROMISE OF ISLAM AND THE COST OF THE TRADE
    The “mindfulness” (peace of mind) you refer to in islam is the purpose of all myths, religions, cults, philosophies, and even scientific knowledge., So no, Islam’s means of mindfulness is not ignored. We just understand the terrible consequences.

    Western civilization does not do the same thing. It is the most psychologically and emotionally costly civilizational strategy. We require peace of mind by DOING.

    Christianity was germanized so that it was useful to the west, in that it demands forgiveness and provides mindfulness where otherwise (as in islam) slights are common and offensive.

    The result is obvious. Evolutionary velocity by innovation and adaptation and the prosperity that results. But it DOES require high costs.

    This may be why the different religions, social systems, traditions, norms, and ‘rules’, relfect the diversity, neoteny, and average IQ of different civilizations – because higher IQ provides greater agency, and greater agency and greater neoteny are required for the high trust civilizations of western europe and far eastern asia.

    It may be necessary for diferent groups to rely on different means of ‘mindfulness’ because of their evolutionary progress (neoteny, IQ), Demographics, and diversity. The evidence suggests so.

    So we can’t cohabitate between europeans and islam if you want the benefits of western civilization without paying the costs.

    Because it doesn’t take much ‘crime against the civilizational traditinos’ to undermine them. And thejewish christians already undermined the west in Rome, and the jewish Marxist, neoMarxist cultural marxists, Marxist-Postmodern truth-marxists, and most recent Race Marxist Woke cults have tried to repeat the process in the modern world.

    Religion is the opiate of the masses and islam is the Fentanyl of Religions. We spent hundreds of years trying to stop middle eastern religious “decadence”, as the Romans considered the problem. And we have spent 600 years dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, saravation, disease, suffering, early death, and the mercilous hostility of a nature and universe almost entirely hostile to human life.

    We cannot do that without our culture’s ‘stress’ versus the ‘rest’.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 16:36:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631695120977346561

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631691441675091968

  • It would be better for everyone else if you’d leave, because Islam is antithetic

    It would be better for everyone else if you’d leave, because Islam is antithetical to western realism, naturalism, reason, logic, empiricism, science, law, education, institutions, republicanism, democracy, culture, religion (as secular as it may be), ethics, morals, high trust, and the innovation, adaptation, and prosperity that results, at the cost of continuous Christian forgiveness, European heroism in truth-before-face, and duty, commons, and polity before self or family, and the adversarial competition, stress, agency, and hierarchy, that together produce our rapid evolution and prosperity.
    Islam works to produce psychological security by the exactly opposite means as Europeanism, and even supernatural Christianity is finally disappearing as Europeans return to their natural religion: Man and Nature.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 14:30:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631663385740754944

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631601828021301248

  • RT @whatifalthist: The only hope the West has to prevent itself from the stagnat

    RT @whatifalthist: The only hope the West has to prevent itself from the stagnation that comes with the Universal Empire is through the int…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 14:21:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631661164995178496

  • THE REAL PROBLEM IS DESOCIALIZATION: OR WHAT NOW IS ANTISOCIALIZTION. (the conse

    THE REAL PROBLEM IS DESOCIALIZATION: OR WHAT NOW IS ANTISOCIALIZTION.
    (the consequences of individualism over familism)

    From Whatifalthist @whatifalthist
    -“I was reading what Google said the causes of mental health were among Gen Z and they said stuff like climate change, school shootings and I was thinking damn, I see why society is so broken where people can’t even see clearly what the problems are.
    I mean the answers are:
    1) nihilism
    2) loneliness
    3) lack of role models
    4) family breakdown
    5) social media
    6) bad economy
    etc..”-

    Correct.

    The interesting question is why the media forwards the political narrative instead of the truth. The answer, as always, is that you can blame others for the narrative, but you have to blame yourself, change your behavior, change your political bias, and actually DO something to fix the real problem.

    The media hooks your attention with moral outrage, and then sedates your moral outrage by justifying it, by blaming others, and letting you continue to decline without changing your behavior, understanding, or values.

    If you know anything about baiting individuals into the spiral of addictive decline – that’s how.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 14:18:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631660244689362946

  • High neoteny, similar intelligence, long history of civilized behavior, similar

    High neoteny, similar intelligence, long history of civilized behavior, similar lack of tribalism, similar value of education, similar ethics of hard work etc.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 02:30:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631482235172864001

    Reply addressees: @shermanklumpp

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631477182458642433

  • It dies. The problem is it takes the most productive members down with it. So, w

    It dies. The problem is it takes the most productive members down with it. So, we can disappear like the Spartans, and the Romans, or we can choose not to. I would prefer to choose not to. And all it requires is showing up in large numbers, with demands for correction and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 21:24:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631405207966892033

    Reply addressees: @MaunaLoona

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631404263112060928

  • WHY IS INDIA THE MOST RACIST? BECAUSE OF MULTICULTURALISM. –“I believe many Ind

    WHY IS INDIA THE MOST RACIST? BECAUSE OF MULTICULTURALISM.
    –“I believe many Indians get opportunities to show overt racism because the country is the most multicultural on the planet. When you have 1.3 billion people of a dozen different cultures packed into a small space, what you get is more chances to show such attitudes.”–

    Just as an intellectual alone, I love India and India because the complexity is incomprehensible compared to every other civilization. And calls into question everything we presume about civilizational formation. But the truth is that they’ve been invaded but never truly conquered over and over again. While the gene pool is a gradient from NW to SE it covers so many different racial and ethnic groups, that gradient is a vast oversimplification. India and China are almost certain to be eternal if for no other reason than geography climate, scale, and population.

    Meanwhile, a tiny population of Europeans united the world, dragged it out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, and suffering, and are being displaced from our homelands. By creating the multiculturalism that is the cause of racism and conflict, low social and political trust, corruption, stagnation, and absence of innovation, that ended the progress of the age of agriculture and caused a dark age of a thousand years.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 00:46:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631093546571685888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631091566344302592


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    It’s not just 4k years or the cast system, but the complexity of the gene pool, number of invaders, and legacy of ‘white conquest’. Like most ‘brown’ people lighter skin is a higher status symbol internally. So people INSIDE the country are exposed to as much or more racism than people from OUTSIDE of india.

    I love that crazy country, culture, and people, because they’re the exception to every rule, and because of that they help us analyze ourselves and other cultures with greater depth, curiosity, and uncertainty.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1631091566344302592

  • AFAIK (a) It’s from interbreeding. (b) It wasn’t always rape. Sometimes it was r

    AFAIK
    (a) It’s from interbreeding.
    (b) It wasn’t always rape. Sometimes it was rape (assuming often), sometimes it was romantic, sometimes it was voluntary, sometimes it was ‘for something’, and sometimes it was prostitution, and sometimes prostitution was a business. And it was ‘taken for granted’ at the time. Which we find repulsive but historically was a norm. Example: The reason Muslim women wear veils originated in demonstrating they weren’t prostitutes, given that prostitution via slavery was a mainstay of the Islamic world. That demonstration became universal in the culture.
    (c) just for humor: for all. Intents and purposes the races are species: phenotypical adaptation to local environments. The requirement for speciation is a bias in selection – not reproduction. However, humans’ evolutionary niche is adaptation itself, and humans (at least human males) are hyper-adaptive (meaning will have sex with things, animals, people, or anything at all). So human species (races) intermixed more often than other species, producing more hybridization, both with peers (sapiens sapiens) and will ancestors (Neanderthals, Denisovans, and possibly others.).
    (d) While we know the single primary direction of human evolution (Neotenenic evolution, trading aggression and impulse, for extended childhood cooperation and self-regulation), contrary to postwar anti-Darwinian dogma, the differences between the races are substantial and meaningful, and we are only now learning of some of the goods and bads that come from hybridization. (See Reich’s lab’s research.)
    (e) The evidence I’m carefully watching as it rolls out, is how much of this difference, most of which is a very minor variation that results in cognitive differences, results in increases in neuroticism or other cognitive or emotional errors.
    (f) Yet it’s obvious that any intermixing between two races (neotenic generations of mankind, benefits the less neotenic class producing the results that are an admixture (average) of the two (somewhat).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 20:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631022851733028865

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631018055001313280

  • ETYMOLOGY OF RACE, RACIST, RACISM (“People of a common ancestor”) Simple version

    ETYMOLOGY OF RACE, RACIST, RACISM
    (“People of a common ancestor”)
    Simple version. The concept and origin is ancient. Aristotle uses it.

    The meaning of RACE developed via the sense of “tribe, nation, or people regarded as of common stock” to “an ethnical stock, one of the great divisions of mankind having in common certain physical peculiarities” by 1774.

    The Modern Usage originates in the Fascist-and-Counter-Fascist propaganda of the 30’s. But appears largely in the 1950s as it was popularized by the Race Marxists.

    OUR DEFINITION (BEHAVIORAL ECON)
    –“Racism consists in assessing the cost of a group stereotype attribute against an individual of that group AFTER that individual has paid the cost to demonstrate their personal positive deviation away from that specific group stereotype attribute to you.” –Luke Weinhagen

    RACE
    race (n.2)
    [people of common descent] 1560s, “people descended from a common ancestor, class of persons allied by common ancestry,” from French race, earlier razza “race, breed, lineage, family” (16c.), possibly from Italian razza, which is of unknown origin (cognate with Spanish raza, Portuguese raça). Etymologists say it has no connection with Latin radix “root,” though they admit this might have influenced the “tribe, nation” sense, and race was a 15c. form of radix in Middle English (via Old French räiz, räis). Klein suggests the words derive from Arabic ra’s “head, beginning, origin” (compare Hebrew rosh).

    Original senses in English included “wines with characteristic flavor” (1520), “group of people with common occupation” (c. 1500), and “generation” (1540s).

    RACISM
    racism (n.)
    by 1928, in common use from 1935, originally in a European context, “racial supremacy as a doctrine, the theory that human characteristics and abilities are determined by race;” see racist, and compare the various senses in race (n.2) and racialism. Applied to American social systems from late 1930s.

    RACIST
    racist (n.)
    1932 (as an adjective from 1938), from race (n.2) + -ist. Racism (q.v.) is in use by 1928, originally in the context of fascist theories, and common from 1936. These words replaced earlier racialism (1882) and racialist (1910), both often used early 20c. in a British or South African context. There are isolated uses of racism from c. 1900.

    Earlier, race hatred (1852 of the Balkans, 1858 of British India, 1861 of white and black in America), race prejudice (1867 of English in India, 1869 of white and black in America, 1870 of the English toward Irish) were used, and, especially in 19c. U.S. political contexts, negrophobia. Anglo-Saxonism as “belief in the superiority of the English race” had been used (disparagingly) from 1860. Anti-Negro (adj.) is attested in British and American English from 1819.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 16:27:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630968101515698176