What CAUSED them to expand?
Pull up a map of the timeline of migrations.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 18:38:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638973533773524997
Reply addressees: @_Evwald @enigma3078 @TabbyTeamster
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638973209700626436
WE TRIED TO MAKE THE WORLD GET ALONG – SMITHIAN FREE TRADE.
We failed at technological redistribution. We failed at free trade redistributing economic prosperity. We failed at encouraging self-rule and self-determination by self-government and rule of law. We failed at colonization. We have only succeeded at ‘replacement’ and we have decided that we don’t want to do that again.
NO “ONE SIZE” OF GOVERNMENT FITS ALL
We created free trade and ended the possibility of empires. There are empires that want the privilege of empires instead of the merit of free trade. And there are countries that are incompetent enough that they need empires and monopoly trade routes to survive.
Peoples of the world are vastly different, especially in average intelligence, and as such in average norms, traditions, values, institutions, and resulting economies and standards of living.
The way we ‘get along’ is to return to the ‘conflict of civilizations’ which is now the conflict of federations of advanced civilizations against the empires of failed imperial civilizations.
Civilizations must satisfy the genetics and consequences of genetics, of the people who are born into them. And that means while natural law is a universal good, the means of bringing about anything close to that human condition requires a spectrum of governments from authoritarian to libertarian.
There is only one truth. There is only one set of laws of nature. There is only one natural law. There is only one means of rule of law by the natural law. But as for governments that organize cooperation, reproduction, production, distribution and trade, No one size fits all.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @MudKevin @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 18:19:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638968609018900480
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638964425574215681
WE TRIED TO MAKE THE WORLD GET ALONG – SMITHIAN FREE TRADE.
We failed at technological redistribution. We failed at free trade redistributing economic prosperity. We failed at encouraging self-rule and self-determination by self-government and rule of law. We failed at colonization. We have only succeeded at ‘replacement’ and we have decided that we don’t want to do that again.
NO “ONE SIZE” OF GOVERNMENT FITS ALL
We created free trade and ended the possibility of empires. There are empires that want the privilege of empires instead of the merit of free trade. And there are countries that are incompetent enough that they need empires and monopoly trade routes to survive.
Peoples of the world are vastly different, especially in average intelligence, and as such in average norms, traditions, values, institutions, and resulting economies and standards of living.
The way we ‘get along’ is to return to the ‘conflict of civilizations’ which is now the conflict of federations of advanced civilizations against the empires of failed imperial civilizations.
Civilizations must satisfy the genetics and consequences of genetics, of the people who are born into them. And that means while natural law is a universal good, the means of bringing about anything close to that human condition requires a spectrum of governments from authoritarian to libertarian.
There is only one truth. There is only one set of laws of nature. There is only one natural law. There is only one means of rule of law by the natural law. But as for governments that organize cooperation, reproduction, production, distribution and trade, No one size fits all.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 18:19:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638968609157312513
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638964425574215681
NO, WE CAN’T ALL JUST ‘GET ALONG’ (GLOBALLY)
Nice thinking though.
(a) The rest of the planet is low trust, so it wants benevolent authoritarianism and certainty to compensate for low trust of one another – and they do NOT want our political ‘doing laundry in public’ adversarial democracy – at all. None of it.
(b) The remaining agrarian empires resist our suppression of their aggression (Russia, China, MENA/Iran). This prevents them from continuing their parasitism upon their people.
(c) The whole world wants us to stop exporting ‘liberalism’ which is reducible to a warfare on the primacy of the family by the advocacy of decadence and hedonism. (Most of us here don’t want it either.)
(d) They’ve already accepted consumer capitalism. The whole world has begun to understand incentives and the necessity of prices.
(e) But we sold them democracy that’s irrelevant instead of rule of law by the natural law that’s not.
(f) Democracy isn’t a good. It is only a temporary luxury that results from the successful implementation of rule of law by a large enough middle class to create a sustainable economy and middle-class rule.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 18:12:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638966866310823937
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638964425574215681
RT @dannysmanifesto: @curtdoolittle I’d rather be a part of the group that fails at saving the West, than the group that succeeds at destro…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 17:03:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638949720482521106
TESTIMONY
you will have a hard time understanding almost anything I say without the historical knowledge to do so. 😉
Watch @whatifalthist, especially the videos on civilizations. https://twitter.com/BlakeAn77455669/status/1638947565604405248
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 16:57:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638947975840907265
https://twitter.com/BlakeAn77455669/status/1638947565604405248
Nope. I’m correct. The indo european EXPANSION did cause these effects, just as the sequence of expansions in the early to high middle ages did.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 16:45:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638945142299062272
Reply addressees: @enigma3078 @TabbyTeamster
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638944486603513856
SO GOOD
One of my favorites.
Again, to understand my work, please understand at least @whatifalthist’s civilizations videos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wf2PxI1tx5k
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 16:40:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638943886927355904
The bronze age collapse was caused by the invention of the indo-europeans and their cognitive, technological and cultural superiority vs the ancient agrarians who had stagnated. Just as the Mediterranean age did the same. Just as the Atlantic and steel age did the same. What we learned was that the river valleys first, and the silk road second, were the only reason for ME wealth despite their primitivism., Once those territorial assets were made irrelevant by the age of sail, of empiricism, of the commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions, the igorance and failure of those civilizations, and their decline beginning in 800 because of the semitic destruction of the ancient civilizations, was made obvious to all. And they still resist modernity. The internet is achieving through knowledge and information what our failure to conquer and domesticated them in the bronze, iron, medieval, and modern ages failed to.
Reply addressees: @enigma3078 @TabbyTeamster
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 16:25:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638940086623412225
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638938942169858056
The bronze age collapse was caused by the invention of the indo-europeans and their cognitive, technological and cultural superiority vs the ancient agrarians who had stagnated. Just as the Mediterranean age did the same. Just as the Atlantic and steel age did the same. What we learned was that the river valleys first, and the silk road second, were the only reason for ME wealth despite their primitivism., Once those territorial assets were made irrelevant by the age of sail, of empiricism, of the commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions, the igorance and failure of those civilizations, and their decline beginning in 800 because of the semitic destruction of the ancient civilizations, was made obvious to all. And they still resist modernity. The internet is achieving through knowledge and information what our failure to conquer and domesticated them in the bronze, iron, medieval, and modern ages failed to.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 16:25:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638940086719987712
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638938942169858056