Theme: Civilization

  • SCI FI SERIES … and the “Asian sci fi problem”. (Ongoing struggle of producing

    SCI FI SERIES … and the “Asian sci fi problem”.
    (Ongoing struggle of producing quality sci fi, that doesn’t get canceled – mostly because of the failure of the studio and distribution system in the states.)

    Silo (s1?) [Rock solid so far]
    From (s2+) [Risk if doesn’t conclude with season 3]
    Last of Us (s1+) [Odd episode pacing, rock solid]
    Foundation (s1+) [Lee Pace victory, Lousy young female lead]
    Black Mirror (s6?) [The expected Mix but great script concept work, and legendary for metalhead alone.]

    The Expanse(s5-) [Flawless] … [more please :)]
    Counterpart (s2-) [Excellent]
    Westworld (s3x) [Started perfect, but weaker each season with S3 a death blow it up – Why? look who they gave the writing to. Couple ‘a ‘chicks. 😉 Lots of lessons to be learned from the S2,3,4 decline of it.]
    Man Who Fell To Earth(s1x) [weak plot, pace, casting]
    1899(Deu)(s1x) [Good but broke the ‘too many gimmes’ rule]
    Raised by Wolves (s2x) [Brilliant S1 but broke the too many gimmes rule on a scale never seen before.]
    War of the Worlds(UK) (s3-) [Iffy start but made it solid with a full story arc]
    Invasion(s1+) [Thought it would get canceled but ok, looking forward to s2, maybe they’ll pull it off.]
    Debris(s1x) [Great premise, horrific cast, sad loss]
    Night Sky(s1x) [Good one-season premise, great cast]
    Altered Carbon(s2x) [Perfect s1, s2 murder by woke casting, unbelievable weak script and weak direction]
    Salvation(s2x) [adequate premise, mediocre plot and script, tried hard, S3 might have been worth providing closure and re-run revenue.]
    Dark Matter (s3x) [Started perfectly, budget in S3 killed it]

    Silent Sea(s1-) [good one-season premise, but weak esp w/ ‘little girl’]
    The Rig (s1-) [Great premise, good cast and production, but omg who wrote that horrible script?]
    Station 11 (s1-) [Couldn’t bear watching it]
    Another Life(s?) [Sat thru it, that’s all]

    Peripheral(s1?) [Great cast, good writing, tired story]
    Resident Alien(s2x) [Good one-season, s2 was underfunded and under developed.]
    Lost in Space(s2x) [Gag. Great production, horiffic script, and absurd sequential catastrophes.]

    ?=Uknown, +=Continuing, -=Ended, x= Cancelled.

    Haven’t Seen:
    The Pact
    Evenfall
    Into the Night
    SnowPiercer
    Utopia
    BioHackers
    neXT
    The War of the Worlds (French)
    Katla(Iceland)
    The 4400
    Exception
    Hot Skull
    The Passage

    Woke Trash:
    Everything Star Trek
    Everything Star Wars
    Everything Halo

    Won’t Bother:
    Fantasy, not SF
    Lame chick flick SF
    Lame teen SF
    Lame Drama Masked as SF
    Lame Comdy SF

    Asian SCI FI:
    Why isn’t Asian sci-fi working?
    Easy: Asian civ is massively insecure and afraid of ‘stick up one’s head’ which is necessary for heroism. Same for ‘what’s wrong with the Japan?’ memes on social media: evidence of insecurity without group affirmation and support, and are only heroic in the context of family. Where Europeans are heroic in the abstract, only err usually by pride or overconfidence, arrogance, or retreat from physical fear. So, Asian drama is ‘effeminate’ in the sense that it’s socially and emotionally insecure rather than masculine in physical insecurity and a warning against hubris – a warning necessary precisely because of our cultural presumption of heroism as virtuous contribution to the commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-04 21:12:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665466530027454471

  • THE LONG HOUSE MEME AND MATRILINEARITY PATRILIEARITY VS MATRIARCHY AND PATRIARCH

    THE LONG HOUSE MEME AND MATRILINEARITY PATRILIEARITY VS MATRIARCHY AND PATRIARCHY

    Much of my (our) work depends on ‘disambiguation into unambiguous measures’

    It’s not matriarchal. It’s matrilineal. Meaning that it’s the most primitive agrarian (and late to post-hunter-gatherer) family structure, consisting of all those birthed by a woman, her mother, her sisters, and defended by uncles and brothers. Cohabitation, if it exists, varies from one direction to the other.

    There is no ‘risk or trust’ required in this family structure. Where uncles and brothers ‘inseminate’ women in other matrilineal households, but maintain the workload in their own families, or share the work between the two. Why? Because men and women live very separate lives. Men are external to the household, and women are internal to the household. And because the concept of ‘individual’ hadn’t arisen because the capacity to survive outside of a family structure was impossible. And we, as products of the West, the Enlightenment, and the industrial revolution, have a hard time envisioning that paradigm of existence.

    Matriarchy is impossible since all disputes are eventually resolved by force, as the lowest common denominator of dispute resolution.

    Patrilineality is an innovation over Matrilineality because (a) scale, (b) property inheritance and especially the prohibition on dividing land and weakening the family in relation to others and (c) the increase in per person productivity – creating opportunity for independence, and increase in freedom of choice, (d) and the increasing dependence on warriors for defense of higher-value territory and resources.

    So i) Patriarchy always exists everywhere, and ii) patrilineality always arises from matrilineality, producing iii) patriarchy and patrilineality except in temporary conditions where the majority of men have been killed in war, but there are no present existential war threats that cause demand for males – usually because the territory women and assets aren’t worth conquering and taxing/tithing/tributing.

    So let’s not conflate:
    Agrarian Patriarchy (Male Head of Household(assets) > headman > chieftain > king > monarch > emperor > (complex government)
    With:
    Pre-agrarian ‘family’ (limited to prohibition on reproduction with offspring) > matrinlineality > patrilineality.

    And let’s not assume that the future, if we have one, will fit either of those models. When it certainly appear that we will, as in all things, diverge into family structures that represent class structures because class structures roughly represent adaptability, and durable relations require paying costs of adaptability – good of the common – over the good of the self, by all parties in the relationship.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @Logos_Elect @Hail__To_You


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-04 17:26:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665409720742494209

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665350947462062080

  • FRENCH INTELLECTUAL ORIGINS French philosophers inherited the logic of the dogma

    FRENCH INTELLECTUAL ORIGINS
    French philosophers inherited the logic of the dogma of the church and simply removed occult superstition as an excuce for clerical authoritarianism and replaced it with behavioral superstition as an excuse for intellectual authoritarianism.

    GENEOLOGY OF INSTITUTIONALIZED LYING
    (Truth, Reciprocity) Greek Empirical Reason and Logic > (Lying, Parasitism) Semitic Mythicism (fictionalism) > Feminine means of antisocial behavior by seduction (baiting) into false, impossible, unwarrantable promise of freedom from the laws of nature > abrahamic religions > french utopian philosophy > german rational philosoply > the marxist pseudoscientific philosophical religions.

    ORIGINS IN SEX DIFFERENCES IN AGREEMENT PERSUASION AND COERCION
    The high trust homogeneous greeks formalized the invention of truthfulness as we understand it, and the older low trust heterogeneous superstitious civilization integrated the european masculine contractual reciprocity, into the semetic feminine authoritarian parasitic. Each eventually embeding in european vs jews law the male and female means of cooperation: agreement on truth and seduction into consent.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @letter2tep @SRCHicks


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-03 14:50:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1665007939524997121

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664703340012359692

  • I think, for our civilization, which is fundamentally aristocratic, and eschewed

    I think, for our civilization, which is fundamentally aristocratic, and eschewed financialism as usury and abuse of the peasantry that the concept of law is easy and natural for us to understand, but the concept of rule by financial manipulation was and still is hard for us to imagine. Yet it is simply the next level of ‘governance’ after the law. And by abrogating that responsibility (once held by the aristocracy) the result has been the subversion of the people government and law by financialism.
    And it’s easily fixed.

    Reply addressees: @WerrellBradley


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-02 18:01:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664693619398266881

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664657525017559040

  • Differences Between US, Anglosphere, and Europe are simple. (a) founders wanted

    Differences Between US, Anglosphere, and Europe are simple. (a) founders wanted to leave behind the dead weight of the aristocracy, the church, and the ‘idle’ peasantry – creating a lower-middle, middle, and upper middle class (productive) society. (b) the
    common law and… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1664603589254234113


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-02 14:23:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664638958339346432

  • It’s against my better judgement to discuss this project, but we have known for

    It’s against my better judgement to discuss this project, but we have known for over a century that there is a relationship between the beauty of the human form, the culture’s idealization of it, ambivilence to it, or denial of it.

    Other than that I’m just going to protect…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-02 03:14:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664470390880477184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664468533932326913

  • @Whatifalthist: Is it worth a video explaining the history of civilizations from

    @Whatifalthist: Is it worth a video explaining the history of civilizations from tribes to city states to empires to federations as developing (domesticating) disparate and heterogenious peoples into homogenous systems of cooperation with homogeneous systems of measurement, from manners to values to concepts to customs to laws to wieghts and measures? Is it obvious or not that we evolved our first institutions and traditions in localities, but through conquest, rule, utility and compromise we gravitated to civilization-wide and now near universal understanding and general rules? Is it obvious or not that progress toward science, universal measurements, the natural law of cooperation, and a natural religion is simply the elimination of error bias deceit crime corruption parasitism and predation from human cooperation?
    Thanks 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-01 23:31:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664414349450936321

  • INTERESTING: History vs Computation Rudyard has expressed his frustration with a

    INTERESTING: History vs Computation
    Rudyard has expressed his frustration with accusations he relies on old texts a couple of times in conversation, and I think it’s rather odd because he’s current with the material. On the other hand it’s kind of surprising how durable we find… https://twitter.com/whatifalthist/status/1664035001879470081


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-01 21:01:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664376640648912903

  • History will overcome propaganda

    History will overcome propaganda.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-31 17:46:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663965220975390722

    Reply addressees: @Jaye_Zhee @12he3 @snaptwiceontw @5d_human @clamezcua119

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663964112957632512

  • Jews aren’t white (European). And Europeans aren’t semites (How the heck tochris

    Jews aren’t white (European). And Europeans aren’t semites (How the heck tochristians come up with this nonsense?)

    For historical reasons the european and south eurasian races were mixed into ‘caucasian’ label, rather than that the caucasians are an admixture of european and… https://t.co/LvRvvsrKDM


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-29 23:30:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663326919146852359

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662867613142368256