Theme: Civilization

  • Catherine Nixey, The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical W

    Catherine Nixey, The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World
    https://www.amazon.com/Darkening-Age-Christian-Destruction-Classical-ebook/dp/B073XBS8S5/
    (Of course, libgen is your friend for academic works.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-10 15:26:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667553880396136449

    Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667547432723283970

  • Catherine Nixey, The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical W

    Catherine Nixey, The Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World
    https://t.co/rygWW7ttzz
    (Of course, libgen is your friend for academic works.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-10 15:26:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667553880324857856

  • If I am in any country I work to better that country on the terms of that countr

    If I am in any country I work to better that country on the terms of that country. It is not my place to criticize unless it is constructive. We are always and everywhere guests.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-09 20:29:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667267790259077120

    Reply addressees: @DreadBobby1 @GonzaloLira1968

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667263849584644097

  • THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF “RELIGION” IS NOT SUPERNATURAL – BUT EXPLANATORY AN

    THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF “RELIGION” IS NOT SUPERNATURAL – BUT EXPLANATORY AND ADVISORY.
    The correct interpretation is that all civilizations require a narrative that explains non-aggression, distributes rules of non-aggression, provides personal and public rituals to reinforce non-aggression (not equality), and as such, provides a means of mindfulness.

    The evidence is rather obvious that given the spectrum of present and historical religions(Abrahamic, Hindu, Buddhist), natural religions (Shinto) and pseudoreligions (Confucianism), and replacements for religion (European stoicism), secular humanism, nationalism, and communism, that there is no need for supernatural religion.

    There is instead, just a need for an intuitionistic means of achieving mindfulness despite the alienation that first arose in the agrarian age over ten thousand years ago. But we are past the agrarian age. And our Christian religion,d despite coming to terms with natural law failed to reform, producing an equivalent without the superstition.

    Reply addressees: @junkodama10 @MrAtheistPants @MsMelChen @michaelshermer


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-09 19:41:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667255617440960516

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667253417943748611

  • Correct. The laws-of-nature needed an ‘allegory’ in order to be followed by the

    Correct. The laws-of-nature needed an ‘allegory’ in order to be followed by the simple minded masses: Christianity did that best … by permitting Christians to be virtuous without being smart, strong, educated, wealthy, traveled, powerful.

    Hierarchy of Understanding:
    Generation 1
    Embodiment: sense+perception+prediction
    .. Anthropomorphism: Projection
    .. .. Generation 2
    .. .. Mythology; Fictionalization
    .. .. .. Theology: Generalization+Rules
    .. .. .. .. Generation 3
    .. .. .. .. Philosophy: Reason+Syllogism
    .. .. .. .. .. Natural Philosophy: Empiricism+Mathematics
    .. .. .. .. .. .. Generation 4
    .. .. .. .. .. .. Science: Empiricism+Calculus
    .. .. .. .. .. .. .. First Principles: Causality+Computatio+

    Reply addressees: @Paulp6363 @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-09 14:47:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667181581952249860

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667143519440363526

  • “”Western Civilization,” which is a term of art invented by….”– That’s just f

    –“”Western Civilization,” which is a term of art invented by….”–

    That’s just false.

    The historian Herodotus (l. c. 484-425/413 BCE) famously made the distinction between ‘civilized’ Greeks and ‘barbarous’ non-Greeks in his Histories. And Aristotle would be considered a white supremacist by any and every measure.

    The word ‘civilization’ was first used in eighteenth-century France, but the Western idea of a civilized society dates back to ancient Greece and Rome.

    The middle east (“Orient”) referred to the West as the West back, I don’t recall, but certainly in antiquity. The word “west” in west indo european languages originated in pre-history as nighttime, and east for daytime, to reflect the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.

    It is impossible to defend Christianity on any grounds other than giving the underclasses a means of obtaining status in Aristocratic Western civilization and thereby rising above the status of domesticated animals.

    Rome was evolving in the same direction (as were all religions at the time of the roman empire, about 800 years (~one civilizational cycle), from recovery from the bronze age collapse. In other words, it takes 800 years to cook a philosopher for reasons we are just beginning to understand.

    Good luck comparing any Christian to Aurelius. Any theologian to the Greeks, or the post-Christian ‘natural philosophers’.

    There is nothing good in Christianity that was not good in pre-Christian Europe, other than integrating peasants into society. And that was, truly, a wonderous ambition. But unfortunately, it came at the cost of superstition and the very sophisticated means of Abrahamic deceit. And it is Abrahamic deceit that causes Christians, Muslims and Jews, as much or more as other faiths, to engage in excuse-making and lying to preserve their superstition.

    Reply addressees: @CBasiji


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-09 14:33:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667178141662560256

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667138972211089408

  • IS CULTURE ENOUGH TO RESTORE WESTERN CIV? Good Piece by @ConceptualJames today.

    IS CULTURE ENOUGH TO RESTORE WESTERN CIV?
    Good Piece by @ConceptualJames today.

    One disagreement: James believes in the efficacy cultural change because that is the venue of his competency. Some of us (myself included) have less confidence in culture producing policy, legislative, and constitutional changes.

    Why? Because fundamantally, as a first principle, the left is selling freedom fromresponsibiilty and the right is demanding individual responsibility. “The right has nothing to sell to women and immigrants.”

    And so, some of us simply see too much risk in exclusively depending upon cultural change. For our part (our organization) presumes:
    1) discourse has failed (institutional capture)
    2) voting has failed (women and immigration)
    3) appeal to congress has failed (again, capture)
    leaving only:
    4) appeal to the court (reverse lawfare)
    5) revolt in the imitation of our founders.

    So we emphasize the state and federal courts, as well as the founder’s court of common law, to sue the state for a redress of grievances – and upon exhaustion of those two remaining options, only revolt.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-09 11:06:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667126048553594883

  • Thought experiment: Is this just applicable to children in western civilization?

    Thought experiment: Is this just applicable to children in western civilization?
    Western civilization’s pursuit of responsibility for commons and heroism in contribution to the commons, by truth and beauty, duty and reciprocity, discovery and innovation, adaption and evolution. Now, take the same claim and apply it to the foundations of other civilizations. Western man seeks to defeat the vicissitudes of nature. What would the child in other civilizations seek to defeat?
    (How many of them, Western man?)

    Reply addressees: @SRCHicks


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-08 22:16:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666932178360365059

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666930316676571136

  • “THE FIVE WORST NEIGHBORHOODS IN EUROPE” Not sure I’d use these examples. Too he

    “THE FIVE WORST NEIGHBORHOODS IN EUROPE”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FaB9-AtJ5w

    Not sure I’d use these examples. Too heavily post-soviet. They Leave out the slightly better Western European urban equivalents.

    But they’re a good example for comparing Baltimore, Detroit, and Oakland to…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-08 17:30:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666860186261237770

  • “THE FIVE WORST NEIGHBORHOODS IN EUROPE” Not sure I’d use these examples. Too he

    “THE FIVE WORST NEIGHBORHOODS IN EUROPE”
    https://t.co/3Nh3sOwdBj

    Not sure I’d use these examples. Too heavily post-soviet. They Leave out the slightly better Western European urban equivalents.

    But they’re a good example for comparing Baltimore, Detroit, and Oakland to European equivalent cities. Which are obvious.

    Less obvious to most Americans are the four worst neighborhoods in America are in Los Angeles, three are in San Francisco, one each in Kansas City, and Portland.

    So, if like me, you grew up in new england, thinking there was no intelligent life west of the Hudson river, but that ghettos were the result of the democratic party’s leftist imitation of the Soviets by forcible relocation of southern blacks to urban high rises, or the result of the rust belt caused by the war era movement of farmers to the cities for manufacturing, or the vast problem of underclass European immigration in the twenties, it’s clear that none of those catastrophes hold a candle to the left coast immigration crisis.

    We know of the Destruction of the Cities by the left by relocation. We know it was done on purpose. We also know of the destruction of the cities by the left by immigration. We know it was done on purpose.

    We know that the leftists are seeking power, by the promise of irresponsibility for self and commons, quite unlike the conservatives (rightists) who are seeking to prohibit power – to force people to take responsibility for self and commons.

    The left is a cancer and always has been.

    We know that leftism is a mental illness and that there is a high correlation between leftism and mental defect.

    The rest are just pseudo-elites seeking power by forcing the productive classes to pay for the irresponsibility of the pseudo-elites and their clientele.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Source: Forbes.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-08 17:30:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666860186051522563