Theme: Civilization

  • Because we invented individualism, property rights, the absolute nuclear family,

    Because we invented individualism, property rights, the absolute nuclear family, merit based inheritance, high trust society, the commons as an informal corporation thereby decreasing income needs, producing the institutionalization of unlimited individual responsibility, the resulting soft eugenics, mobile workers in populations, the fragmentation of families by the industrial revolution, mass migration to industrial employment, and the subsequent development of the welfare state, and by the 1960s the repeal of ancient laws obligating children to support destitute parents.

    Y’all didn’t.

    In my work I recommend restoration of responsibility using the singapore model.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-06 14:39:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919763997324402704

  • Because we invented individualism, property rights, the absolute nuclear family,

    Because we invented individualism, property rights, the absolute nuclear family, merit based inheritance, high trust society, the commons as an informal corporation thereby decreasing income needs, producing the institutionalization of unlimited individual responsibility, the resulting soft eugenics, mobile workers in populations, the fragmentation of families by the industrial revolution, mass migration to industrial employment, and the subsequent development of the welfare state, and by the 1960s the repeal of ancient laws obligating children to support destitute parents.

    Y’all didn’t.

    In my work I recommend restoration of responsibility using the singapore model.

    Reply addressees: @adulpanget @yaycapitalism @ItIsHoeMath @memeticsisyphus @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-06 14:39:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919763997236330497

  • “Q: Have you people considered maybe the West relegating their elders…”— The

    —“Q: Have you people considered maybe the West relegating their elders…”—
    The rates of change, accelerating since 1900, faster postwar and more rapidly since the 1980s defeated the perceived value of elders in society economy and politics which caused us to ignore elders in the one thing that mattered: self-full fillment through family, friends, and civic participation. Blame TV and the entertainment sector because it absorbed all that time and energy that we previously devoted to family, friends, and socialization where we developed understanding and compromise with one another. Instead we live in a mental model of an artificial universe created by narrative media, trapped in artificially lit glow of media projectors.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-06 03:40:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919598000395190317

  • “Q: Have you people considered maybe the West relegating their elders…”— The

    —“Q: Have you people considered maybe the West relegating their elders…”—
    The rates of change, accelerating since 1900, faster postwar and more rapidly since the 1980s defeated the perceived value of elders in society economy and politics which caused us to ignore elders in the one thing that mattered: self-full fillment through family, friends, and civic participation. Blame TV and the entertainment sector because it absorbed all that time and energy that we previously devoted to family, friends, and socialization where we developed understanding and compromise with one another. Instead we live in a mental model of an artificial universe created by narrative media, trapped in artificially lit glow of media projectors.

    Reply addressees: @adulpanget @yaycapitalism @ItIsHoeMath @memeticsisyphus @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-06 03:40:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919598000294576128

  • RT @TheRISEofROD: The main 🇮🇱 culprit ✡️ behind the complete destruction of west

    RT @TheRISEofROD: The main 🇮🇱 culprit ✡️ behind the complete destruction of western civilization. https://t.co/wYtc2hfEXd


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-04 01:36:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918842119218684355

  • Fascinating example in the comments: class conflict. the peasants want behavior

    Fascinating example in the comments: class conflict. the peasants want behavior excused and the civilized people want behavior to conform.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 20:37:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918404430371905974

  • Fascinating example in the comments: class conflict. the peasants want behavior

    Fascinating example in the comments: class conflict. the peasants want behavior excused and the civilized people want behavior to conform.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 20:37:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918404430371905974

    Reply addressees: @hartgoat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918275643894047044

  • RETURNING ANGLO NAVAL OPTIMISM AND CLASSICAL LIBERALISM TO GERMANIC CONTINENTAL

    RETURNING ANGLO NAVAL OPTIMISM AND CLASSICAL LIBERALISM TO GERMANIC CONTINENTAL CAUTION AND CONSERVATISM.

    Martin and I have been holding a long standing discussion between my anglo imperial optimism, and his continental national pessimism.
    Both of us hold these positions for…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 02:35:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918132156834169132

  • RETURNING ANGLO NAVAL OPTIMISM AND CLASSICAL LIBERALISM TO GERMANIC CONTINENTAL

    RETURNING ANGLO NAVAL OPTIMISM AND CLASSICAL LIBERALISM TO GERMANIC CONTINENTAL CAUTION AND CONSERVATISM.

    Martin and I have been holding a long standing discussion between my anglo imperial optimism, and his continental national pessimism.
    Both of us hold these positions for rational reasons. But our decidability appears to be the result of different ambitions.
    I am attempting to create a science that describes an optimum frictionless human order such that we can measure the costs of pragmatic deviation from it by acknowledging those costs are paid for our national preferences.
    In doing so I hope to end the second abrahamic feminine destruction of the west, and our tolerance internal competition that is against the interests of our people.
    Martin’s objective is narrower and clearer, which is to restore a less optimistic, less tolerant, more national, provincial, and familial order that people would actually prefer LIVING in, and which was insulated from the evils that the permissiveness of anglo liberalism has enabled by it’s creation of the postwar international system. Which itself was subject to capture by the feminine political and abrahamic global tribalism, must as the aristocracy was destroyed by liberalism instead of augmented by it.
    Those of you who know my work recognize that I advocate expansion of government by glasses but not conquest of government by classes. As such rule of law, monarchy, republic, and maximum political participation by those demonstrating responsibility and competency to bear the burden of choice.
    Martin’s final success in helping me understand his position was to convince me that the deviation from germanic civilization by the anglosphere after 1830 converted the moral content of the west to an economic content and system of decidability putting us in line withthe long history of the crimes of that other minority who abandoned ethics for income in the form of rent seeking.
    I should note that I am sometimes an immovable rock because my epistemic standards is so far above normal that it exasperates others. And I should note that Dr Brad Werrell has tried for years to help me understand this – with his usual patience like water on a rock.
    But while I will not change my scientific mission going forward I will attempt to understand that the restoration of the germanic civilization’s permisos is a necessary consequence of the exhaustion of the capacity of consumerism to organize and incentivize human behavior.
    And while it is this latter reaction that helped me understand how to interpret what I consider the backward looking regressivism of Martin and Brad, and their failure to recognize we had dragged mankind out of poverty with that postwar anglo strategy – the fact of the matter is that this period is over and as such it’s time to reunite anglo and germanic civilization because the anglo empire is as impossible as any other now that we have equilibrated science, technology, and economics worldwide erasing the 600 year advantage of the anglosphere that enabled it’s conquest and reformation of the world.
    We saved man from agrarian poverty.
    We are still the most moral people on earth.
    Even if we are the most foolishly optimistic in the face of the pervasive nature of man.
    Affections
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-02 02:35:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1918132156557344768

  • Misses the point. Western Tradition vs Provincial Tradition (central, south, and

    Misses the point. Western Tradition vs Provincial Tradition (central, south, and eastern)


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 11:59:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917911650675626170

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917910321773334592


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AutistocratMS

    @curtdoolittle They were talking about both, even in your GPT summary. Primary Yockey’s work is, of course, The Enemy of Europe. You have it on your reading list.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917910321773334592