Theme: Civilization

  • French are the worlfs most hostile negotiators until china recently pushed them

    French are the worlfs most hostile negotiators until china recently pushed them into seconf place. France died with the revolution and never recovered.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-16 00:03:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680367426326634496

    Reply addressees: @Airmanareiks

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680364344679211009

  • Imploding? Or are we withdrawing after discovering like the European colonials,

    Imploding? Or are we withdrawing after discovering like the European colonials, the Romans before them, and the greeks before them, that we cannot civilize lower IQ peoples no matter how hard we try. We can only either exterminate them as we did in north america, or hybridize with them in south america, or keep them at bay as the byzantines and chinese, but we cannot integrate them, govern them, or civilize them. It’s just not possible.

    Reply addressees: @EdwardSpruit @apollonianflame @Logos_Elect @Lord__Sousa


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 21:39:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680331239964721152

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680330062967578626

  • Of course. Though from shakespeare to dostoyevsky is a pretty amazing spectrum

    Of course. Though from shakespeare to dostoyevsky is a pretty amazing spectrum.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 21:36:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680330534122147842

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680328931134636032

  • Languages are biased to different emphases: – English for science and law – Germ

    Languages are biased to different emphases:
    – English for science and law
    – German for engineering and psychology
    – Italian for emotion and art.
    That’s about all you need to know.

    Oh, and you don’t need to read trash philosophy so french is unnecessary. 😉

    (See what I did…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 21:16:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680325451561029632

  • “Q: Curt: Just trying to think of the next adaptation in our globalised world.”-

    –“Q: Curt: Just trying to think of the next adaptation in our globalised world.”–

    Jump to the end for the TLDR;. 😉

    So to rain on all our parades, including mine, we have to come to understand that we have spent a century of blood and treasure trying to prevent the wars of…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 20:03:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680307033541681153

    Reply addressees: @RuinsMan @EdwardSpruit @Logos_Elect @Lord__Sousa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680301540949520385

  • “Q: Curt: Just trying to think of the next adaptation in our globalised world.”-

    –“Q: Curt: Just trying to think of the next adaptation in our globalised world.”–

    Jump to the end for the TLDR;. 😉

    So to rain on all our parades, including mine, we have to come to understand that we have spent a century of blood and treasure trying to prevent the wars of the age of empires where we fought to control trade routes producing winnter take all imperial states.

    That project has failed. IMO it has failed only because the Americans failed to listen to Patton (Russia), and MacArthur(China), and to correct the errors of the postwar colonies by recreating borders (africa, middle east) that correspond to tribal peoples with low IQs and a long history of athoritarian supernatural tribal warfare. We left the colonial period unfinished just as did the greeks and romans. Because we cannot domesticate the world without eugenics that would make it possible.

    What you see in the world today is the recognition that our enlightenment project to create an ‘aristocracy of everyone (majority middle class)’ that included the underclass and women has failed. Worse, that our postwar project to create a world of nation states under rule of law and free trade has failed. Instead, as Huntington predicted we are returning to a conflict of civilizations, where civilization means race, because each civilization consists of one of the primary races (the four).

    So what is the solution to the natural conflict of major civilizations, the vast differences in IQ and Neoteny (aggression, impulsivity, trustlessness) of those civilizations, where demographic needs determine normative, traditional, institutional, rules and processes given the differences between the population distributions and the economic military and social capacities of those civlizations?

    What we should see is a tier with east asia and the west in our various democratic rule of law. The hybrid races (90s) with state socialism. The middle east and north africa in their authoritarian regimes. And africa to plunder along in the great experiment of how to govern populations with average IQs in the 60s to 70s, which for europeans and east asians would mean mentally defective.

    TLDR;
    Short answer is that we will return to the 19th century and a competition between civilizations instead of just empires. Becaues while we may have natural law between states, the needs of people within states differs.

    I don’t make the rules. I just work to stop us from lying about them so that we solve the underlying problems instad of the problems we create by denying them.

    I don’t make the rules. I just work to stop us from lying about them so that we solve the underlying problems instead of the problems we create by denying them.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 20:03:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680307033277341698

  • Foreigners. The Gulf States, including countries like the United Arab Emirates (

    Foreigners.

    The Gulf States, including countries like the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and others, have been known to import technology, craftsmen, and labor from various parts of the world. This is done through a variety of methods:

    Recruitment Agencies: Many Gulf States use recruitment agencies that specialize in sourcing skilled labor from around the world. These agencies often have networks in countries with a surplus of skilled labor, such as India, the Philippines, Pakistan, and others. They help to match workers with job opportunities in the Gulf States.

    Government Programs: Some Gulf States have government programs designed to attract foreign workers. For example, the UAE has a program called “Mission Visa” which is designed to attract skilled labor for specific projects. Similarly, Saudi Arabia has a “Green Card” program to attract highly skilled professionals.

    Partnerships with Foreign Companies: Gulf States often form partnerships with foreign companies to bring in technology and skilled labor. For example, many tech companies from the U.S., Europe, and Asia have offices in places like Dubai and Doha, bringing with them their own skilled workers.

    Education and Training Programs: Some Gulf States have invested heavily in education and training programs, often in partnership with foreign universities and companies, to develop a local workforce with the necessary skills. These programs often include provisions for foreign students and workers to come to the Gulf States.

    Worker Sponsorship: In many Gulf States, foreign workers must be sponsored by a local entity (usually an employer) to obtain a work visa. This sponsorship system is a key part of the process of importing labor.

    Construction Projects: For large construction projects, companies often directly recruit labor from abroad. This is particularly common for mega-projects where a large workforce is needed quickly.

    It’s important to note that while these methods have helped the Gulf States to rapidly develop and diversify their economies, they have also been criticized for issues related to workers’ rights and conditions. The “kafala” system, which ties migrant workers to their employers, has been particularly controversial.

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212 @EdwardSpruit @Logos_Elect @Lord__Sousa


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 19:40:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680301300045557763

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680297394548662277

  • PROMPT: SUMMARY OF TERNARY LOGIC VIA GPT4: This text appears to be a philosophic

    PROMPT: SUMMARY OF TERNARY LOGIC
    VIA GPT4:
    This text appears to be a philosophical and sociopolitical exploration of the evolution of human civilization, with a particular focus on European civilization. It proposes a series of principles or laws that describe the development and organization of human societies, and it uses these principles to argue for the unique success and value of European civilization.

    Here are some key points:

    Causality and Computation: The text begins with a discussion of causality, suggesting that all existence is the result of the universe’s attempt to decrease entropy (disorder) and increase negentropy (organization). It describes this process as a form of “evolutionary computation,” a term typically used in computer science to describe algorithms that mimic biological evolution.

    Acquisition and Cooperation: The text suggests that all human cognition, emotion, and behavior can be described in terms of acquisition and loss aversion. It also emphasizes the importance of cooperation in decreasing the cost of acquisition, and it suggests that cooperation requires negotiation and reciprocity.

    Division of Labor and Organization: The text proposes that differences in human cognition, emotion, and behavior can be described as sex differences in the division of labor. It also discusses the evolution of human organizations, suggesting that they evolve from three possible means of influence, coercion, and power.

    Institutions and Path Dependence: The text discusses the evolution of human political organizations and the development of institutions. It suggests that the order in which institutions are developed creates a path dependence, with the first institution being the strongest and subsequent institutions being weaker.

    Evolutionary Computation and Human Nature: The text argues that human nature is counter to evolutionary computation because humans naturally seek to minimize costs and resist change. However, it suggests that organizing humans into a system of evolutionary computation can lead to significant benefits, including higher trust, higher risk tolerance, higher economic velocity, higher investment, and faster innovation and adaptation.

    European Civilization: The text argues that European civilization has been uniquely successful in organizing humans into a system of evolutionary computation. It suggests that this success is due to the specific order in which European societies developed their institutions (law > state > religion), as well as the values of self-determination, reciprocity, truth, and duty.

    Christianity and Commons-ism: The text suggests that Christianity was successful because it provided a means for all members of society, including women, immigrants, slaves, and serfs, to contribute to the commons and gain political, social, and self-worth. It contrasts this “Commons-ism” (focused on capitalization) with Communism (focused on consumption).

    Defense of European Civilization: The text concludes with a call to defend European civilization, suggesting that all other civilizations have failed and that the universe would be “dark and full of terror” without it.

    This is a complex and dense text that draws on a wide range of concepts from philosophy, sociology, political science, and other fields. It presents a particular view of human civilization and the role of European civilization that may be controversial or disputed. As with any philosophical or theoretical text, it’s important to critically evaluate the arguments and evidence presented.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 19:22:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680296850966867975

  • “A religion is not what it claims but what it produces.” Search “Hermes and the

    “A religion is not what it claims but what it produces.”

    Search “Hermes and the cart of lies” to learn about the greek understanding of semitic civilization. Read Aristotle’s judgement of semitic civilization. Read Fukuyama’s “Trust”. Read any CIA or other explanation of semitic culture of facelessness, east asian face before truth and european truth before face. Read any state department or consulting business’ lessons on how to deal with Semitic cultures (and east asian an indian for that matter.)

    There is a reason why the arabs can’t field an army, build a large corporation or a rule of law state. Superstition, Tribalism, Low Trust, Deceit, and Corruption as ‘honorable’.

    Reply addressees: @Livinginthis @dawahadvocate92 @Lord__Sousa @sneako


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 17:58:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680275560977580032

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680263836215984130

  • Helps if you study different languages. English is a scientific and legal langua

    Helps if you study different languages.
    English is a scientific and legal language for historical reasons. German is a martial and engineering language for historical reasons. Proto Germanic is a martial and metalworking language.
    Search for “High context, Low Precision, vs High…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 17:54:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680274630156623872

    Reply addressees: @Umekomi53 @Logos_Elect @Lord__Sousa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680265789201432577