Theme: Civilization

  • CURING LIBERTARIAN IGNORANCE (“ILLITERA-TARIANISM”) (instead of rothbard, read s

    http://www.amazon.com/War-What-Good-For-Civilization/dp/0374286000LITERACY: CURING LIBERTARIAN IGNORANCE (“ILLITERA-TARIANISM”)

    (instead of rothbard, read something by someone honest, intelligent and moral)

    WAR: WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR? (A LOT REALLY)

    http://www.amazon.com/War-What-Good-For-Civilization/dp/0374286000

    THE REVENGE OF GEOGRAPHY

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Revenge-Geography-Conflicts-Against-ebook/dp/B007MDJY5K/

    THE RUSSIAN ORIGINS OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Russian-Origins-First-World-ebook/dp/B0081YHYHO/

    WAR AND HUMAN CIVILIZATION

    http://www.amazon.com/War-Human-Civilization-Azar-Gat-ebook/dp/B006QV81C6/

    1177BC THE YEAR CIVILIZATION COLLAPSED

    http://www.amazon.com/1177-B-C-Civilization-Collapsed-Turning-ebook/dp/B00GU1JHIY/

    THE MEASURE OF CIVILIZATION

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Measure-Civilization-Development-Decides-ebook/dp/B00BFGW3H6/

    HOW THE WEST WON

    http://www.amazon.com/How-West-Won-Neglected-Modernity/dp/1610170857/

    INVENTING FREEDOM: HOW THE ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES MADE THE MODERN WORLD

    http://www.amazon.com/Inventing-Freedom-English-Speaking-Peoples-Modern-ebook/dp/B00BATKSIO/


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-24 14:41:00 UTC

  • THE ENLIGHTENMENT ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYBODY VS THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT ARISTOCRACY

    THE ENLIGHTENMENT ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYBODY VS THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT ARISTOCRACY OF THE WILLING

    The intention of the anglo enlightenment was to create an aristocracy of everyone, by granting aristocratic property rights and obligations to everyone.

    The program succeeded as long as there were members of the non-aristocratic classes, that observed aristocratic traditions.

    But with first the introduction of the catholic non-aristocratic classes, and then women, and then eastern european jews, and now members of third world socialistic cultures, this model could not survive.

    It could not survive because meritocracy is not to the advantage of cultures that depend upon systemic free riding both within the family, and between the family and the state.

    Aristocratic Egalitarianism of the Dark Enlightenment returns to the intention of the enlightenment with one exception: I seek to limit aristocracy to those that desire it, will act to obtain it, and will act to defend it. There is no reason whatsoever that a society needs an homogenous set of rules, rights and obligations for all members. If certain people want to maintain their socialistic policies between themselves, and others to maintain their aristocratic policies between themselves, then this is adequate as long as neither group makes a claim on the property of the other, and obtains the property of the other only in voluntary exchange.

    Aristocracy is a high risk way of life, that rewards that high risk, or punishes it. Not all people and all peoples are capable of this way of life. Collective insurance and collective risk is more appropriate to their wants and abilities. It is immoral to ask them to embrace aristocratic life and aristocracy’s requirement for self-insurance. Likewise many of us desire liberty and meritocracy, and the status and wealth that comes from it, even if we must carry the risk of self-insurance against the vicissitudes of life. For ‘the best’ our competitive ability, our wits, our will, our strength, is our insurance against the vicissitudes of life. It is immoral to ask us to pay collective insurance and to limit ourselves to collective risk.

    We are unequal. We must make use of unequal strategies if each of us is to flourish to the best of his abilities, in the meager time we have on this earth.

    Aristocracy is a choice we make, and a burden we carry, in exchange for the freedom to flourish to the best of our abilities. Yet we cannot ask those whose flourishing depends on collective efforts to adopt individual risk and reward.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-23 12:40:00 UTC

  • They may not be pretty, but I love my gene pool anyway. I love this country

    They may not be pretty, but I love my gene pool anyway.

    I love this country.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-22 03:57:00 UTC

  • This article seems to track to the evolution of events in the Old Testament: a s

    This article seems to track to the evolution of events in the Old Testament: a small society of up to 70 people faces depredations until, through an extended series of skirmishes, it becomes a kingdom.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-18 10:16:00 UTC

  • No matter what color you are, language you speak, the traditions you practice, o

    No matter what color you are, language you speak, the traditions you practice, or gods you worship – you must love yourself, your language, your traditions, and your gods.

    But if you must leave your people to live amongst others, the question you must ask yourself is what is wrong with your people, your language, your traditions, or your gods that you should desire to live amongst those whose language, traditions and gods are different?

    The only measure of a people, its language, its traditions, its gods, is the economic status that they live under. Reason functions largely as a means to lie to ourselves. The only scientific test of a culture is the economic status of its members.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-17 18:40:00 UTC

  • SHOPPING : LONDON Like an oasis. Visit to the Apple store today to stock up on e

    SHOPPING : LONDON

    Like an oasis.

    Visit to the Apple store today to stock up on equipment. :). It feels like Christmas! Whoo hooo! ;).

    I haven’t been to civilization in over a year.

    Ralph Lauren. 7 Jeans. English leather. Tailored sport jackets. Eyeglasses from Japanese designers. A visit to the movies. A show. A club. And starbucks coffee in venti size.

    More shoes for V’s addiction.

    Sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-14 09:01:00 UTC

  • London The architecture, the art, the history, the shopping, the security of you

    London

    The architecture, the art, the history, the shopping, the security of your rights, and the quality of the infrastructure almost can aesthetically compete with the beauty, culture, and character of Ukrainian people themselves.

    Almost.

    I prefer my art in human form.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-13 19:13:00 UTC

  • CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : GAY LIFE IN KIEV You know, Ukrainian’s get a lot of flac

    CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : GAY LIFE IN KIEV

    You know, Ukrainian’s get a lot of flack over their supposed intolerance of gays. But I don’t see any evidence of it. The Butch college girls sitting next to me look and act just like they do in in the west. They could be from Seattle given the way they’re dressed – particularly the girl with blue hair.

    It might be that I live in one of the university districts, but the gay men here are just a little less flamboyant at attracting attention than their american counterparts. But ALL Ukrainians are less flamboyant and seeking of attention than their American counterparts. They have these strange things called ‘extended family’ and ‘real friends’, and daily participation in ‘social life’ that they get attention from, rather than living in McBoxes, surrounded by ‘stuff’ and dependent upon media for a sense of membership in a group that gives them positive status rewards. (Strange as it is, Americans are outliers in this regard – aliens to the rest of the world.)

    You can’t celebrate being gay, which is to force it into the social and political realm. And you certainly can’t politicize it. You can’t politicize much of anything here really. Politicizing anything is (rightly) considered an attempt to gain privileges of some sort – and attention. Both of which are not ‘Ukrainian’ values.

    I mean, my ‘hairmaster’ (hairdresser) would look right at home in San Francisco or Seattle – both of which are pretty friendly to gender differences.

    RACISM VS GAY LIFE

    I see the very clear genetics of every damned tribe from the Urals to the western Celts in this city. It’s absolutely beautiful, and a crucible for the study of european tribalism. But it’s pretty clear that there is a very big difference between the western Indo European/Uralic, Turkic, Afro-Asiatic (Arabic), African cultures and the third group: East asians, and southeast asians. And while in the states our history with slavery has forced us to attempt equality, it’s pretty clear here that ‘troublemakers’ are not desirable. But why are they considered ‘troublemakers?’ Well, for the same reason blacks and hispanics in the states and muslims and Romanians in the UK, and Turks in Germany are considered ‘troublemakers’: because statistically it’s true.

    All clubs do exercise “Face Control”, which means that if your face would reduce the desirability of the club then they’ll reject you. You don’t have any ‘rights’ per say to enter a business. Nor they to serve you. The clubs just protect their brand value.

    A lot of turkic and arabic men come to Kiev trying to find women. A very few black men. (A lot of ‘douchebag’ Americans do too, and that’s just one of the reasons that I avoid the expat community like lepers. A trip to the Embassy is all I need to remind me how pathetic fat, ignorant and privileged americans are.) Yes, Ukrainian women are absolutely the best women in the world. It’s true. It’s one of those things that’s just inconceivable to people who haven’t lived here. And because of the open sexuality (pervasive display of feminine confidence, pride, desirability and power) a lot of men think that these women will be ‘easy’. Which is pretty much the opposite of the truth. Women are more honest here. But you must COURT them. They ‘give it up’ a lot less easily than in the west. They just do it honestly. Sure, it’s a lot easier to have a fling with an attached woman here, and it appears to me that italian-style ‘mistresses’ are pervasive, family is still the center of all personal life. And courting a woman is a matter of determining your potential as a family member. (I think I have that right. The generations differ a bit. But I think I have that right.)

    And like any society, especially one where so many men are ‘useless, unproductive, alcoholic, and lazy’ a less desirable, but aggressive, higher testosterone male, who is willing to court, can pick up marginal and below the margin women here, who are vastly superior to the women they could find at home.

    Unfortunately, they’re considered ‘creepy’, profane and rude. So the clubs use ‘Face Control’ to keep the places ‘desirable and safe’ for women. Women in turn draw men. And that’s the economics of clubs.

    COMPARISON

    So I tend to look at these things the same way: society is just a big extension of the FAMILY and families here – not a corporation. So within your ‘family and circle’ you can do whatever you want. But politicking aside from criticizing the corrupt government seems to pretty much reject particularism of any kind.

    It’s actually a means of enforcing the local perception of equality.

    Given that all political privileges are by definition thefts, I have to pretty much agree with how things are done here.

    If it weren’t for the pervasive political corruption and soviet-induced absence of the rule of law, then this would be one of the most desirable societies on earth.

    Curt Doolittle

    Kiev.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-11 08:13:00 UTC

  • “Absolute Nuclear Family”, (“A.N.F.”, “ANF”)

    http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/07/absolute-nuclear-families.html?m=1DEFINITION: “Absolute Nuclear Family”, (“A.N.F.”, “ANF”)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-10 09:22:00 UTC

  • THE POPULAR WILL : MURDER –“…our civilization rests on the death of two perso

    THE POPULAR WILL : MURDER

    –“…our civilization rests on the death of two persons: a philosopher (Socrates) and the Son of God (Jesus), both victims of the popular will.”– Madariaga


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-09 18:35:00 UTC