THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK: IT ALL BEGINS WITH WAR [I] really want the history of economics to hold the social science’s intellectual high ground. But the fact of the matter is, that after consuming most of intellectual history, in hundreds of books, the most important book on social science that I have ever read remains The History of Warfare by Keegan. It is a work of insight, depth and scholarship that none of the religious, social, political or economic historians have come close to matching. We live our warfare first. That is the foundation of our civilizations. Everything else rests upon it – and more importantly, everything else depends upon it. Our ability to deny others control over geography, determines our ability to construct institutions, which determines our ability to accumulate capital. All property is constructed after all, from the ability to deny others use of that which we claim a monopoly of control over. All prosperity depends upon the formation of property rights. And all property rights depend on the organized application of violence.
Theme: Civilization
-
MOST IMPORTANT BOOK: IT ALL BEGINS WITH WAR OK. So I really want the history of
http://www.amazon.com/A-History-Warfare-John-Keegan/dp/0679730826THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK: IT ALL BEGINS WITH WAR
OK. So I really want the history of economics to hold the social science’s intellectual high ground. But the fact of the matter is, that after consuming most of intellectual history, in hundreds of books, the most important book on social science that I have ever read remains The History of Warfare by Keegan. It is a work of insight, depth and scholarship that none of the religious, social, political or economic historians have come close to matching.
We live our warfare first. That is the foundation of our civilizations. Everything else rests upon it – and more importantly, everything else depends upon it.
Our ability to deny others control over geography, determines our ability to construct institutions, which determines our ability to accumulate capital.
All property is constructed after all, from the ability to deny others use of that which we claim a monopoly of control over.
All prosperity depends upon the formation of property rights. And all property rights depend on the organized application of violence.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-26 02:43:00 UTC
-
WHITE PEOPLE NONSENSE I love humans. π As an art piece. Think about what this s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ninOz5ValUM#t=229AWESOME WHITE PEOPLE NONSENSE
I love humans. π
As an art piece. Think about what this says about your society. It’s good.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-25 00:38:00 UTC
-
Marriage In Iraq
http://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/06/22/fbd-cousin-marriage-and-clans-and-tribes-in-iraq/Cousin Marriage In Iraq
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-22 13:46:00 UTC
-
CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS: HALF NAKED FASHION I still can’t really adjust to the fac
CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS: HALF NAKED FASHION
I still can’t really adjust to the fact that summer basically means women wear sheer, effectively transparent clothing over designer underwear and high heels. I feel like I’m seeing something I’m not supposed to. (How puritanical.)
It’s really, well, like not fair to have this ‘disability’ where your whole brain just shuts down when you see a troop (pack?) of women walk by dressed like that – and it’s not special. it’s just normal dress for them.
V says “Don’t be stupid. We are not shy American girls.” (She thinks I’m pretty stupid about a lot of things it turns out. lol)
V has been hitting the gym, with a trainer, three days a week, two hours a day, and she looks mindblowingly good. She punched me yesterday, (V is definitely a Ukrainian) and I was kind of surprised that it hurt. π So she stole my cookies and told me that when she was ‘fatter’ that it was OK, but I cannot be fat again if she can’t. lol
You know, Celts tend to have bigger chest cavities (me). Germans tend to be bigger “sturdier” all around, and Slavs are much more lithe. These people here are so beautiful. Poles have been exporting genes to all of eastern europe. And now that I see it (that taller thinner german thing) I see it everywhere. The Scandinavians really got the best genes, and if you look at the (few) real dutch they really take the genetic cake. Tall, smart, strong, and healthy. I feel like a little breton runt of the litter next to them. π
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-20 08:40:00 UTC
-
COSMOPOLITANISM: TRIBES AND TRUST (anglo and jewish universalism are impossible)
http://www.joelkotkin.com/content/00265-tribes-and-trustAGAINST COSMOPOLITANISM: TRIBES AND TRUST
(anglo and jewish universalism are impossible)
“Only Tribes held together by a group feeling can survive in a desert.”
–Ibn Khaldun, 14th century Arab historian
From Kotkin’s Site:
http://www.joelkotkin.com/content/00265-tribes-and-trust
“Time to chuck into the dustbin the cosmopolitan notions so celebrated at global conferences: a world run by wise men of the United Nations, science-driven socialists or their ostensibly more pragmatic twins, global free marketers. We are leaving the age of abstractions and entering one dominated by deep-seated ethnic, religious and cultural loyalties, some with roots from centuries and millennia ago.
The 14th century Arab historian Ibn Khaldun noted that what most holds people together is biology and shared history. These create the critical bonds of kinship and trust and a sense of common purpose that have animated every ascendant group from the days of the Greeks and Romans through the British empire, America and modern day China.
You rarely hear such notions discussed by academics, policy wonks and politicians. The well-behaved shy away from the hoary reality that people usually put the interests of their extended family ahead of others.
Yet the more we struggle to be true cosmopolitans, the more humanity expresses our fundamentally tribal nature. In the two decades since I wrote my book Tribes, in-group loyalties appear to have become stronger and more dominant.
Take the Arabs, Ibn Khaldun’s own tribe, now blending ethnic nationalism and religion into a powerful, epoch-shaping mixture. Much as in the 7th or 8th centuries.
Arab Muslim tribalism will remain a powerful force, if for no other reason than their dominance of easily accessible fossil fuel resources. You see signs of a renewed, self-conscious Arab civilization in the new mosques, shining cultural edifices, mega-hotels and office spires sprouting across Kuwait, Dubai, Qatar and Abu Dhabi.
With Arabs, like others, intense tribal feelings can often get out of control. Racial pride and religious fervor have chased many productive cultural minorities–Armenians, Christians, Jews–from once cosmopolitan cities like Damascus, Cairo and Beirut. The Shiite Iranians have followed a similar unfortunate course. Even some in Israel feel an uncontrollable urge to exclude, as evident in a proposal to allow ultra-orthodox Haredi rabbis to determine who is–and who isn’t–a Jew.
The power of the new tribalism is particularly evident among the Chinese. Maoism might have been a radical internationalist movement, but today’s Chinese are seeking to revive the great 15th century “middle kingdom” that led the world in industriousness and commerce, and briefly even “ruled the seas.”
The Han are easily the world’s largest tribe with a common history, language and mythology, and they constitute over 90% of China’s billion-plus population. In contrast, India, the other great rising super power of our time, remains a patchwork of diverse ethnic, linguistic, caste and religious groupings.
The new Middle Kingdom, as Martin Jacques warns in his influential When China Rules the World, may well prove extraordinarily ethno-centric and self-referential. The newly powerful Han may find little use for other races except as customers and suppliers of raw materials.
Despite huge internal pressures, the Chinese are increasingly scornful of the Western business model. A good example of this change of mood: the downgrade of American and European debt by the Dagong rating agency earlier this month.
Other tribes, meanwhile, are waning: Take the Japanese. The Japanese ascendency last century was was built upon imagination, courage and military, followed by a corporate, esprit de corps.
Nothing speaks to tribal decline more than Japan’s shocking birth dearth. The Japanese are running out of new blood about as quickly as any nation on earth. They also seem constitutionally incapable of making the demographic shortfall with immigrants. By 2050 more than one in three Japanese will be over 60, and the workforce 40% smaller than in 2000. The same fate may await some of their Asian cousins, but Japan’s demographic time bomb will go off first.
Europeans face similarly bleak demographic prospects. Many traditional linchpins of trust–national pride, family and religion–have weakened. Lacking some sort of “group feeling,” todayβs Europeans seem unmotivated about creating a great future, as shown by their unwillingness to start businesses or create offspring.
The trendy concept of “European” may also need to be dismissed as archaic given the mounting rift between the frugal and productive north and the anarchic south. After all, how can you speak of one Europe when the Belgians themselves remain congenitally divided between their French and Dutch speakers.
So what other tribes, besides the Chinese, are on the upswing? Best look at the arc of rising countries across Asia–from Turkey and India to Vietnam. All appear to be entering an aggressive, expansive phase.
The new dynamic has restored one historic aspect in the role of cities as hosts for a gathering of tribes. Singapore, for example, has evolved into a modern-day Venice: a convenient, authoritatively ordered place hosting Chinese, Malays, Indians, Vietnamese and those Westerners who want in on Asia’s action.
Many well off Indians, Chinese and others scour the globe for the prospect of a better life–easier admission to college or the prospect of owning a large flat or even a single family house in the suburbs. This lures them to London, New York, Los Angeles, the Bay Area or Houston. Chinese yuppies still fork out big bucks to have their babies born in California.
Tribalism has spread even to that paragon of modernism, Silicon Valley. In the end, technology often fails to trump family and cultural ties. Chinese investors push firms to set up shop with their ethnic compatriots in Taiwan, Singapore or China; the Indians for Bangalore, Chennai or Hyderabad; the Israelis for expanding Tel Aviv.
In our informational age, of course, not all trust networks are based on ethnic DNA. The Mormons have thrived as a tribe based on theology and their remarkable culture of mutual self-help. More than half of the “Saints” now live outside of America, but still Salt Lake City serves as their own ecclesiastical Mecca.
Even decidedly secular groups increasingly display tribal characteristics. Green activists are united by a passionate “group feeling” as powerful as that which mobilized Mohammed’s followers; just substitute “sustainable” for holy.
Smaller tribes like investment bankers, techno-geeks or gays each share their own iconography, rites of passage, tastes in politics and culture. They cluster not only in cyberspace, but in the same neighborhoods, conferences and resorts, and increasingly intermarry.
These secular tribes often insist they, unlike ethnic groups, are motivated by a more enlightened spirit of science, global consciousness or individual self-awareness. But don’t be taken in by such protestations. Nothing could be more tribal.
KOTKIN’S BOOKS TO READ
1) Tribes – How Race, Religion and Identity Determine Success. (particularly diasporic subgroups)
http://www.amazon.com/Tribes-Religion-Identity-Determine-Success/dp/0679752994/
2) The City : A Global History – Kotkin talks about the evolution of the cities and urban life over thousands of years.
http://www.amazon.com/City-Global-History-Library-Chronicles-ebook/dp/B000XUBD1C/
3) The New Class Conflict (Coming This Fall)
http://www.amazon.com/New-Class-Conflict-Joel-Kotkin/dp/091438628X/
—“This book is both a call to arms and a unique piece of analysis about the possible evolution of our society into an increasingly quasi-feudal order.”—
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-20 04:55:00 UTC
-
CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS: MOMMY TRAINING AND MORE American women need classes in ba
CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS: MOMMY TRAINING AND MORE
American women need classes in baby care and child rearing. (Really. hospitals often require it.). And pretty often in cooking. But here in Kiev, where it seems like every woman in her twenties that I know, if not teens, has a small child, they have this novel way of training: they help each other, and they help other women in their families. Sort of ‘hands on training’. Same for cooking. I mean, all the girls can cook, and they don’t think of it as a chore. It’s like breathing.
Kids get LOTS of attention. So they aren’t trying to get attention all the time. It seems that slavic children (and adults) appear to be less aggressive and impulsive. Which isn’t true of Georgians and other black haired tribes to the south and east. I need to get some data on it. Because I’m skeptical that it’s something else. But it seems pretty much the case.
Mysticism, or, I don’t know what to call it, but all the orthodox countries have it, and russians more so: this strange fatalism or belief ‘things work out this way’ as if they never heard of catallactic and self organizing processes. Or in the Russian case: the fear of not knowing something requires ignorance be replaced by confidence in pseudoscience. (I wonder how crazy this culture was before the communists just wiped out church mysticism.).
I dunno. But you know, if you have to live a lifestyle, the whole extended family thing is pretty awesome. And I think it is MUCH BETTER FOR MEN than the ANF which statistically, in a migratory industrial population, leaves you old, lonely, poor, and increasingly suicidal.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-15 15:00:00 UTC
-
Over my lifetime there have been interesting dramatic changes in the underclasse
Over my lifetime there have been interesting dramatic changes in the underclasses that I wouldn’t have expected. We know that the spread of science has had profound impact and is probably responsible for the continued increase in intelligence. We know that the spread of general knowledge has had impact. But we have also seen the spread of ‘general awareness’, which means everyone seems to know about almost everything so that unscientific or irrational rumours are much harder to spread.
A lot of this has accelerated since the expansion of the internet, and now even more so because of the universal spread of smartphones. But it was already happening under television, radio, magazines, newspapers, pamphlets and books.
But while the method and content of intellectual discourse (IMHO) hasn’t changed much in the past 150 years or more, the method and content of underclass conversation has changed so much that it’s unimaginable.
I sat at a kitchen table listening to some ‘poor-folk’ (loggers) as a child and I remember how much it horrified me that adults could talk about such nonsense. I couldn’t have been more than twelve at the time. Probably younger. Conspiracy theory is and must be (Dunning Krueger) part and parcel of underclass experience. And it’s probably the most consistent metaphysical assumption of underclass conversation.
But that level of ignorance has been forced out of all but the sub-80-IQ crowd.
I routinely read academic work written over a century ago, and some back into the post-civil-war period. And honestly, aside from changes in technology, the metaphysical assumptions shared in that thought is pretty consistent across the century. (We have to largely discount the sixties and seventies though as an age of mysticism.) I could talk to most pre-war thinkers on level terms and not feel a void separated us. But if you talked to common people in 1900, 1965 and 2014 the difference would be astounding. Not just in what they talked abut, but what they knew about.
Knowledge is enough. Saturation in information will do the job that training cannot.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-15 08:52:00 UTC
-
THE PLASTICITY OF FAMILY While the structure of human reproduction (family) is h
THE PLASTICITY OF FAMILY
While the structure of human reproduction (family) is highly plastic, and vacillates as needed throughout history, two things strike me as painfully obvious:
1) monogamy prevents all sorts of free riding in a society.
2) monogamous societies eventually conquer polygamous societies.
3) in the short term, polygamous societies produce excess males who can specialize in warfare, but who are universally problematic for society.
If you grow low maintenance crops you have time available for war. If you herd animals you always have time for war. If you farm rice you dont have time for war. So each group produces different warriors: constant raiders, militial warriors, and state soldiers.
The large state can more easily concentrate capital in its military. The militial warriors apply more dynamic tactics and weapons. And raiders simply apply constant pressure at low cost until the economy wears down, or an opportunity presents itself.
(You are much better off as a spoiled western woman….)
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-14 07:46:00 UTC
-
Dear tribe. We must understand what made us different. What made us innovate. Wh
Dear tribe. We must understand what made us different. What made us innovate. What made us adapt. What allowed us to drag humanity out of ignorance and poverty despite our own ignorance and poverty – before our crisis of confidence.
The evidence is in front of us. We are not faster. We are not stronger. We are not smarter. So why did we rule?
Truth. Trust. Property. Violence. Technology. Heroism.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-13 11:50:00 UTC