Theme: Civilization

  • I have usually ignored Africa, because it hasn’t been a threat to deal with. But

    I have usually ignored Africa, because it hasn’t been a threat to deal with. But Ayelam has eradicated some of my ignorance, and now got me freaking’ pissed.

    I don’t care what continent you’re, or what gene’s you’re carrying. If you desire liberty I will fight for you to obtain it.

    That is what ‘egalitarian’ means when we say Aristocratic Egalitarian.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-07 09:13:00 UTC

  • Valentine Agaliba One of the most politically incorrect things to say about west

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/04/pakistan-christian-couple-killed-alleged-blasphemyAyelam Valentine Agaliba

    One of the most politically incorrect things to say about west Africa

    1. The muslim conquest of the sahara was and is more disastrous than

    2. The southern shift of the desert and malaria combined

    3. In light of 1 and 2, the european conquest of west Africa is the best thing that happened to Sahel and especially the Grunsi [ my people]


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-05 12:14:00 UTC

  • THE GREATEST TRAGEDY IN HUMAN HISTORY ? (revised- updated – expanded – reposted)

    THE GREATEST TRAGEDY IN HUMAN HISTORY ?

    (revised- updated – expanded – reposted) (worth reading: replacing the evil religion with what?)

    RE: Lawrence Krauss says Religion Could Be Gone In a Generation.

    WHICH RELIGION?

    That presupposes that Democratic Secular Pseudoscientific Humanism isn’t also a religion. Which is what he presupposes. And what all of the members of the Cathedral presuppose.

    But, all things considered, there is no comparison between Christianity’s unification of Europe, or even the Stoic Schools, and:

    1) The death and destruction of Marxism led by the Academy, and the battle against it – resisted by the Academy,

    2) Keynesianism (reformed marxism) – led by the academy, and fought by religious groups;

    3) The cognitive, social, and normative damage done by postmodernism – led by the academy, fought by traditionalist groups;

    4) Anthropological, biological, and social pseudoscience and psychologism – led by the academy and fought by religious and traditional groups;

    5) The destruction of the law of property and the common law – led by the academy and fought by religious and traditional groups.

    6) The current pseudoscientific justification of democracy – led by the academy, and fought by traditional groups.

    7) The destruction of the family – led by the academy and resisted by religious groups.

    So if we critically, empirically, rationally, and scientifically analyze the comparative differences, then all that we would find, is that eliminating mysticism and replacing it with general rules, has made more effective workers. But in every other respect, religion and tradition have been superior to rational and pseudoscientific and immoral advocacy by the academy.

    THE ACADEMY AS IMMORAL PRIESTHOOD

    The academy functions as a religion because its central propositions – other than the nearly accidental success at disassembling the physical universe into general rules – are ALL FALSE.

    In fact, physical science used to justify all the other falsehoods of the Pseudoscientific democratic secular socialist humanitarian religion, despite the contrary evidence.

    THE ACADEMY PROFITS FROM SELLING IMMORALITY BECAUSE THE FILTERING OF A COLLEGE EDUCATION PROVIDES ACCESS TO JOBS.

    We don’t learn much in the university, other than how to cooperate with one another, and to work hard on complex tasks in the service of professors. This turns out to be fairly good training for white collar jobs, since these behavioral disciplines are what are necessary for survival in white collar work forces. However, that does not mean that subject matter we are taught is valuable – just the opposite. IN the work force, students use almost nothing that they learn from the subjects that they study in college, and they remember nothing of college afterwards.

    What they are taught does not serve society or industry – and arguable is in the disservice of the students. Because what they are taught does little but preserve the mythos of the Cathedral, the Academy and the State. It is an exceptional racket: to filter people by natural ability and teach them to work together, but teach them how to work together on immoral objectives.

    If instead of paying upfront for this defective product – a product consisting of a behavioral half truth, and a mythological suite of pseudoscientific lies – we instead paid for our educations from a percentage of our lifetime earned incomes. You would see the subject matter in the Academy change rapidly to suit the needs of the customer, rather than the fraud of the Academy and State.

    We have perhaps created the most perverse incentives in the world by sacrificing our parent’s retirements for an education that is harmful to our society, in every possible way, and has rendered our people incompetent to compete on the world stage, by the myth that a college education is the secret to wealth and prosperity, when in fact, your capability is the secret to your prosperity, the academy teaches you nothing, and is little more than a behavioral boot camp that tests your social, physical, and mental endurance at a very high price.

    How this state of affairs, where the academy sells parchments claiming you have knowledge, to pay for new buildings and more administrative personnel, is materially any different from the priesthood selling Indulgences claiming you are forgiven of sins, to pay for the construction of St Peters and an increase in the number of members of the priesthood hard to determine – primary because there is precisely no difference whatsoever. All that has happened by the rapid expansion of the costs of university education, is that teaching professors are both paid less, are less secure in their jobs, are deprived of tenure, and they have nearly disappeared from the academy, while bureaucrats have multiplied, endowments have multiplied, and the physical plant – the buildings – owned by the academy has expanded dramatically.

    Humans follow incentives no matter how perverse, and the academy, particularly once it could educate women, has done nothing but follow its perverse incentives. And it is impossible (I know) to argue otherwise.

    So the Cathedral: the academy and state religion, funded by the sale of modern indulgences in the form of a parchment – and constituting an organizational which persists by profiting both materially and in social status, from the sale of dysgenic reproduction, via the generation of hyper-consumption, and the consequential destruction of the family, is a religion.

    A religion wherein millions of horrid crimes against not only humanity, but western civilization, are justified by but one success – the success of physical science – over which the academy’s fallacies have no jurisdiction.

    The irony is suffocating.

    So. Yes. It would be wonderful if we could stamp out religion in one generation. Especially the religion of pseudoscientific democratic secular, socialist humanism. Which has finally succeeded in overcoming the christianization of Europe as the greatest tragedy in human history.

    ALTERNATIVES

    I have a wonderful suggestion. Why don’t we return to worshiping, as in, holding celebrations of remembrance for, our heroes in:

    1) Our Military generals and our statesmen.

    2) Our Philosophers, scientists and engineers.

    3) Our Saints, Caretakers, Healers, nurses, and mothers.

    4) Our Entrepreneurs, Capitalists, businessmen and laborers who struggle to raise us from poverty to prosperity.

    5) Our tribes and families which as kingdoms bear each other no offense, and every possible opportunity to learn.

    6) The planet that birthed, raised, loves and nurturers us, and upon which we depend.

    BUT WAIT!!!!

    Oh. Wait!!! That would mean returning us to our original european religion before the state imposed Christianity upon us by forcing closed the stoic schools and imposing the church upon us, in the same way that the academy and state have incrementally destroyed our churches, and imposed pseudoscientific, democratic secular socialist humanism upon us!!!!

    HISTORY

    History is the only thing worth celebrating. Our heroes the gods to speak to – meaning pray to. Because if we understand the lives of those heroes well enough, we will find that the answers to our prayers to them are already within us waiting to be heard.

    SCIENCE IS THE PRESTIGE – A DISTRACTING GESTURE BY WHICH THE LIARS JUSTIFY THEIR LIES

    Science is a ruse to distract us from history. The false dichotomy the liars have created is between the church and science, when it is between history, pseudoscience, and mysticism.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-05 07:15:00 UTC

  • TRUTH IS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE Because no one else does it. And no one else do

    TRUTH IS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

    Because no one else does it. And no one else does it because it’s expensive.

    And so telling the truth is the highest tax we can pay for our civilization.

    Germanic westerners pay the highest normative taxes in the world — by far.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-03 11:01:00 UTC

  • SURPRISE FINDING : ANCESTRAL LANDS I knew something was in the back of my head.

    SURPRISE FINDING : ANCESTRAL LANDS

    I knew something was in the back of my head. And I have to translate it a bit from its current state. But I thought people might find this excerpt from the ending of the video interesting:

    —“Therefore I would argue, that you not only possess a universal moral right to your transformed and improved ancestral lands it they were taken from your people by force, but, that assuming you produced and do produce, a higher standard of Propertarian morality than it’s takers, that you possess a universal moral obligation to restore ancestral lands, whether your own lands or otherwise.”—

    Now, you have to understand the rather narrow conditions in support of this argument. But still, if you had asked me going into this analysis I would never have predicted that conclusion at all – and would have said it was crazy. But it’s not. It stands.

    Not sure how long before I get the video out. I keep thinking I will finish it but I didn’t’ get time to work on the script until today – and only for an hour or two.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-02 14:44:00 UTC

  • I just don’t really understand sociological luddites. Sorry, but the agrarian er

    I just don’t really understand sociological luddites. Sorry, but the agrarian era was not idyllic until the invention of power equipment, and then it became irrelevant. So I really have no patience for luddites of any form, libertarian or otherwise.You’re just marxists of personal property rather than marxists of common property.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-01 10:30:00 UTC

  • THE FLIRTATIONS OF OLDER WOMEN (Cultural Observations: older Ukrainian women fli

    THE FLIRTATIONS OF OLDER WOMEN

    (Cultural Observations: older Ukrainian women flirt like humans communicate with cats – you have to sort of ignore them if you want their attention. The same for older Ukrainian women. They give you that look that is long enough to say you exist, but not long enough to give you positive encouragement. It’s hysterical. I am not sure why I didn’t cue on it before. (too subtle.) Then they wonder why foreign men just assume that they’re not interested. And my guess is that the women think the men don’t consider them attractive. But it’s not the case. It’s that they think that they’ve been rejected already. Western men are simple. Just smile and say hello. Ask directions, or the time. It works the other way ’round you know, except that the more unwanted attention a woman gets the less friendly she tends to be, while the less unwanted attention she gets the more conversant she will be. The ‘game’ system is really a young people’s art. Because you don’t have evidence that you’re worthwhile. As you get older the evidence that you have your shit together or not is more obvious. And harder to fake.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-31 07:09:00 UTC

  • THE OTHER WHITE MEAT I wonder what spices they used on roasted neaderthal?

    THE OTHER WHITE MEAT

    I wonder what spices they used on roasted neaderthal?


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-28 16:29:00 UTC

  • TODD ON FAMILIES AND PARTICULARLY LIBERTY: —“communitarian countries … again

    TODD ON FAMILIES AND PARTICULARLY LIBERTY:

    —“communitarian countries … against foreign occupiers chose to be communist. The communist vote in India (including recurring communist governments of certain states) appears to largely correlate with the communitarian family.

    As with liberal-egalitarian countries, these countries embraced a pseudo-universalist ideology that explicitly rejected racism of the Nazi type.

    Whereas all the other family types tend to favor one or other aspect of modernity, Todd finds that the communitarian family appears to correlate with stability (or “backwardness”), remaining peasant nations even as other modernize around them, until the tensions become such that they are (often brutally) jolted out of their conservatism. The overwhelming majority of humanity (i.e. Eurasia) is communitarian. ***Todd speculates that as this family type develops it then slows down historical development***, leaving only peripheral non-communitarian areas to be dynamic (i.e. Western Europe, Japan).

    ***Liberty alone characterizes absolute nuclear countries.*** The child leaves the family household as soon as he reaches adulthood and parents are free to dispose of their property as they wish. He sees a connection with the Lockean vision of liberal, non-egalitarian and contractual nature of government (which also characterizes America, with the added propensity for westward emigration and “fleeing” problems).

    Todd argues that the perception of autonomous and different individuals within the family translates into ***Anglo-liberal politics, a preference for isolationism and a high tolerance for ethnic “ghettos” (that is, as “normal,” not necessarily considered a problem (as the French do)). Anglo-segregation and Dutch Apartheid are the norm whenever these peoples come into contact with non-whites.*** (Ed: My position as well – curt.)

    Todd argues: “The English conception of the nation is particularly tolerable because it is tolerant. Unlike the French and German visions, which deny the right of peoples to an autonomous cultural existence.”

    Otherwise the main characteristics of pure liberal nations appears to be a certain atomization of individuals, a certain political stability and respect for liberal oligarchic regimes (most monarchies in Europe are in pure liberal nations and have been rarely if ever toppled). There is little hard ideology. British Labourism is for Todd a “zero-socialism,” an organized labor movement which in practice very early accepted an unequal and individualist society as tolerable. “—


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-26 15:52:00 UTC

  • Brilliant *** –“It’s true, actually science is Dennett’s “universal acid” that

    Brilliant ***

    –“It’s true, actually science is Dennett’s “universal acid” that will dissolve everything we hold dear except life itself. In this sense, conservatives are more correct than liberals, since the former correctly believe that evolution contradicts everything they believe.

    The liberals, whose beliefs are more ambiguously related to science, refuse to accept the smaller adjustments necessary to accommodate science, even though so many more of them do accept the “modern scienctific worldview”.”– Adam Voight


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-26 10:09:00 UTC