Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • Do Americans Wear Outdoor-shoes Inside Their Homes As Portrayed In Tellies/movies? Don’t They Maintain Indoor Slippers/shoes Like Asians Or Others?

    Suburban America is an incredibly CLEAN place to live.  Especially because many people drive a LOT and walk very little.  So,  for many Americans, depending upon where you live, it can be seen as ‘village’ behavior – meaning that you’re used to being dirty. Or City behavior (meaning the same). And it can be pretentious (or insulting) to ask guests to remove their shoes.   Within the past few decades its become fashionable to keep house shoes inside, and separate shoes outside.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-Americans-wear-outdoor-shoes-inside-their-homes-as-portrayed-in-tellies-movies-Don’t-they-maintain-indoor-slippers-shoes-like-Asians-or-others

  • CULTURAL METHODS OF UNIVERSAL DECEIT (worth repeating) —“What remains is the a

    CULTURAL METHODS OF UNIVERSAL DECEIT

    (worth repeating)

    —“What remains is the analysis of strategies. Western (scientific) Truth, Anglo-Jewish Political Correctness (deceit), Russian-Jewish Postmodernism (deceit), Jewish Pseudoscience, Pseudo-rationalism, Psudo-moralism, and Overloading (deceit), Chinese Delay and Deceive (deceit), Hindu Avoidance (self-deciet), Buddhist Denialism (self deceit), and Muslim Denial and Rebellion (self-deceit). Each is a strategy for group persistence. Only Western scientific, operational, correspondent, internally consistent, testimony, free of imaginary content is truthful speech. Everything else is deceit. And even western science, by avoiding moral argument that requires the voluntary transfers of our ancestors, is also a deceit. Man lies. Man deceives. All men lie and deceive. But largely because the truth is inconvenient.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-23 09:42:00 UTC

  • Um. It’s IQ first, Impulsivity and Aggression Second, and Culture Third. —“Big

    Um. It’s IQ first, Impulsivity and Aggression Second, and Culture Third.

    —“Big Five traits and IQs of various cultures statistically explained 70% of a nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. The most important predictors of economic success were intelligence and extraversion, which proved to be strongly positively related to GDP.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-22 02:20:00 UTC

  • DECLINE OF EUROPEAN NORTH AMERICA a) the left immigrated the masses when they re

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/03/daily-chart-5THE DECLINE OF EUROPEAN NORTH AMERICA

    a) the left immigrated the masses when they realized whites would not buy the message – we are too moral.

    b) the left was predominantly constructed by the Frankfurt movement.

    c) the flip side is that Mexicans are largely Amer-Indian, and the reconquest of north america is recapturing what was achieved by germ warfare.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-17 03:00:00 UTC

  • “so, the PIE speakers were: a patrilineal, patrilocal, clannish people who proba

    —“so, the PIE speakers were: a patrilineal, patrilocal, clannish people who probably married their cross-cousins to some extent”—

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-15 15:07:00 UTC

  • (Serious, even if it seems antagonistic) So, the principle result of western man

    (Serious, even if it seems antagonistic) So, the principle result of western manorialism was to make best use of land for the community, and by consequence, prevent the reproduction of those who were unproductive. This was an enormously successful program when combined with prohibition on inbreeding – it converted most of Europe into the descendants of the middle class. And while it is an uncomfortable truth that the underclasses are both unproductive and expensive, why is it that we should redistribute to the unproductive, rather than use land to constrain the reproduction of the unproductive, as we have done, and others have done, for thousands of years? We must be equal under the law for a variety of reasons, none of which are just, all of which are necessary for the production of competitive economic velocity. But we are certainly not equal in value to one another. Vast numbers are dead weight on the rest. Even for the productive, I do not understand why I have any particular right to live in central manhattan when those who live there make better value of close proximity to others of exceptional ability than I would make of it. Nor do I understand why progressive taxation of property transactions and income which is onerous already, is not a sufficient means of extraction of value that can be contributed to the commons. I have been struggling to understand this movement for a long time and I am still unfortunately mystified by the assumption that the idea is a ‘good’ one. And I am still hoping that someone can inform me. (Although, truthfully I expect the usual rants rather than to be informed.) Thanks for anyone who helps.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-12 14:46:00 UTC

  • “America conquered Germany but the latter came with a poison pill, the Frankfurt

    —“America conquered Germany but the latter came with a poison pill, the Frankfurt School.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-11 01:11:00 UTC

  • article

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2015/03/09/maps-how-ukraine-became-ukraine/?tid=pm_world_popGood article.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-09 19:19:00 UTC

  • THE ULTIMATE INSURER OF LAST RESORT In the the face of economic catastrophe, Ukr

    THE ULTIMATE INSURER OF LAST RESORT

    In the the face of economic catastrophe, Ukrainains retreat to the villages, with family , where they live largely off the land, and in near self sufficiency.

    The state is not the last resort. The land is.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-08 15:44:00 UTC

  • The Jewish equivalent of art is verbal and imaginary, not material. Diasporic pe

    The Jewish equivalent of art is verbal and imaginary, not material. Diasporic peoples rarely produce arts. Art marks territory. Territorial people make art. With Infrastructure, monument, architecture, sculpture, painting, decoration, and craftsmanly goods constituting a hierarchical expression of their wealth. Their portable literature of the mind is both inexpensive, and impossible to tax, or steal from them. So while we agree that jews do not in practice make arts of landed peoples, they do make their own art. And the differences in those arts inform us.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-07 09:26:00 UTC