Theme: Civilization

  • ART Contemporary art is fashion not monument. It is high(short) time preference.

    ART

    Contemporary art is fashion not monument. It is high(short) time preference. A proletarian art. Not an aristocratic one.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-29 04:15:00 UTC

  • Thoughts on RamzPaul’s Guide to the Dark Enlightenment

    [R]AMZPAUL’S POINTS (See Video: https://gloria.tv/media/7TcJehsj2GJ_ 1) The term Counter-Enlightenment was taken already. But the Dark Enlightenment is a counter-enlightenment movement. The Dark Enlightenment. (I disagree with conflating the dark ages and the middle ages. Western civic society is largely the result of the late middle ages, not dark ages.) 2) The Cathedral includes the Academy, The Media, The State, The Deep State. 3) The Religion of the Cathedral is Cultural Marxism : Having failed scientifically (Scientific Socialism), Having failed organizationally (Syndicalism), Having failed through Postmodernism (lying) AND having started with demand for access to opportunity, expanded their demands to equality of opportunity, and having expanded their demands to equality of outcome, and failing because of the empirical difference in ability between individuals, the only solution was to import vast numbers of underclass people from the third world, encourage single motherhood, destroy the family, and create dependence upon the state sufficient that the state could take control of all functions in life. 3) Red Pill : Accepting the truth of the evidence of man’s behavior and abandoning the enlightenment fallacies. 4) Inequality and Diversity: People are empirically unequal, and Diversity empirically decreases trust and increases demand for tyranny. (The reason we are unequal is largely the difference in rates of reproduction of our classes. While homo-sapiens of the various races are similar, we vary in the success at suppressing our underclass reproduction. Those who succeed have advanced societies, and those who failed have impoverished societies. The cold solved this problem for us. The underclasses are a problem. Everywhere and always.) 5) Democracy: Democracy is the worst possible system because it is dependent upon lies not reality or scientific reality, and surrenders control to the lower classes and elites who pander to them. CURT DOOLITTLE’S EXPLANATIONS The purpose of the enlightenment: 0) To end the Aristocratic Rule of the Landed Monarchies, and the Landed Church. 1) To justify the middle class takeover of government (means of producing commons) from the landed aristocracy. 2) To justify the diminution of religion and religious mysticism in favor of science and reason, assisting in the middle class takeover of the government. The Fallacy of the Enlightenment 1) That it was possible to create an aristocracy of everyone. It’s not possible because meritocracy is not in the interest of the underclasses. Parasitism is. The Institutional Error 1) Instead of creating a new house for the middle class, and then a new house for proletarians, which would have made it possible for classes to conduct exchanges, we created a single house with majority rule and as a consequence, found that the lower classes, and women in particular had no interest in the aristocracy everyone, and instead, voted to incrementally destroy the aristocratic civilization we call ‘the west’. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Thoughts on RamzPaul’s Guide to the Dark Enlightenment

    [R]AMZPAUL’S POINTS (See Video: https://gloria.tv/media/7TcJehsj2GJ_ 1) The term Counter-Enlightenment was taken already. But the Dark Enlightenment is a counter-enlightenment movement. The Dark Enlightenment. (I disagree with conflating the dark ages and the middle ages. Western civic society is largely the result of the late middle ages, not dark ages.) 2) The Cathedral includes the Academy, The Media, The State, The Deep State. 3) The Religion of the Cathedral is Cultural Marxism : Having failed scientifically (Scientific Socialism), Having failed organizationally (Syndicalism), Having failed through Postmodernism (lying) AND having started with demand for access to opportunity, expanded their demands to equality of opportunity, and having expanded their demands to equality of outcome, and failing because of the empirical difference in ability between individuals, the only solution was to import vast numbers of underclass people from the third world, encourage single motherhood, destroy the family, and create dependence upon the state sufficient that the state could take control of all functions in life. 3) Red Pill : Accepting the truth of the evidence of man’s behavior and abandoning the enlightenment fallacies. 4) Inequality and Diversity: People are empirically unequal, and Diversity empirically decreases trust and increases demand for tyranny. (The reason we are unequal is largely the difference in rates of reproduction of our classes. While homo-sapiens of the various races are similar, we vary in the success at suppressing our underclass reproduction. Those who succeed have advanced societies, and those who failed have impoverished societies. The cold solved this problem for us. The underclasses are a problem. Everywhere and always.) 5) Democracy: Democracy is the worst possible system because it is dependent upon lies not reality or scientific reality, and surrenders control to the lower classes and elites who pander to them. CURT DOOLITTLE’S EXPLANATIONS The purpose of the enlightenment: 0) To end the Aristocratic Rule of the Landed Monarchies, and the Landed Church. 1) To justify the middle class takeover of government (means of producing commons) from the landed aristocracy. 2) To justify the diminution of religion and religious mysticism in favor of science and reason, assisting in the middle class takeover of the government. The Fallacy of the Enlightenment 1) That it was possible to create an aristocracy of everyone. It’s not possible because meritocracy is not in the interest of the underclasses. Parasitism is. The Institutional Error 1) Instead of creating a new house for the middle class, and then a new house for proletarians, which would have made it possible for classes to conduct exchanges, we created a single house with majority rule and as a consequence, found that the lower classes, and women in particular had no interest in the aristocracy everyone, and instead, voted to incrementally destroy the aristocratic civilization we call ‘the west’. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Human History as Tribes not Governments

    [S] tatists and Priests love to teach the history of governments to give them legitimacy. But just as mathematics ought to be taught as a sequence of historical problems humans had to overcome, and we would understand it very easily, if we taught human history as the evolution of how our tribes evolved and expanded (now that we can teach it) we would find a very different world that was much easier to understand. And we would be a lot more concerned with peoples than corporate governments.

    Human history is not a very long period to cover. It’s a few thousand years. if you study land masses at geologic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study the solar system at galactic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study man at tribal time, it’s easy to understand. If you study technologies at technological time, it’s easy to understand. But if you teach these things all as a cacophony of unrelated events without a surrounding narrative it’s confusing as hell. Our myths make history seem long, mystical and confusing. But history of man’s evolution once we develop domestication is pretty simple. Before that it’s actually trivial, because it’s such a slow process. What humanists won’t like is that each wave of increasingly aggressive human wiped out the previous wave of less aggressive people.
  • Human History as Tribes not Governments

    [S] tatists and Priests love to teach the history of governments to give them legitimacy. But just as mathematics ought to be taught as a sequence of historical problems humans had to overcome, and we would understand it very easily, if we taught human history as the evolution of how our tribes evolved and expanded (now that we can teach it) we would find a very different world that was much easier to understand. And we would be a lot more concerned with peoples than corporate governments.

    Human history is not a very long period to cover. It’s a few thousand years. if you study land masses at geologic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study the solar system at galactic time, it’s easy to understand. If you study man at tribal time, it’s easy to understand. If you study technologies at technological time, it’s easy to understand. But if you teach these things all as a cacophony of unrelated events without a surrounding narrative it’s confusing as hell. Our myths make history seem long, mystical and confusing. But history of man’s evolution once we develop domestication is pretty simple. Before that it’s actually trivial, because it’s such a slow process. What humanists won’t like is that each wave of increasingly aggressive human wiped out the previous wave of less aggressive people.
  • ESTONIA: INTERESTING FACTS Population: 1,265,420 (July 2015 est.) !!! Fertility

    ESTONIA: INTERESTING FACTS

    Population: 1,265,420 (July 2015 est.)

    !!! Fertility Rate: 1.59 children born/woman (2015 est.)

    Urban Population: TALLINN (capital) 392,000 (2014)

    % urban population: 67.5% of total population (2015)

    Labor Force: 669,800 (2014 est.)

    Unemployment, youth ages 15-24: total: 20.9%

    !!!! Obesity 24.5% (2014)

    !!!! Ethnicities: Estonian 68.7%, Russian 24.8%, Ukrainian 1.7%, Belarusian 1%, Finn 0.6%

    % Forest: 52.1%

    GDP: $35.63 billion (2014 est.)

    GDP PPP: $26,600 (2014 est.)

    Population below poverty line: 22.1% (2013 est.)

    Budget: revenues: $9.811 billion

    Manpower fit for military service: males age 16-49: 210,854

    Military expenditures: 2% of GDP (2013)

    THE IMMIGRATION SOLUTION USED BY ESTONIA

    Stateless persons: 88,076 (2014); note – following independence in 1991, automatic citizenship was restricted to those who were Estonian citizens prior to the 1940 Soviet occupation and their descendants;

    Thousands of ethnic Russians remained stateless when forced to choose between passing Estonian language and citizenship tests or applying for Russian citizenship;

    One reason for demurring on Estonian citizenship was to retain the right of visa-free travel to Russia;

    Stateless residents can vote in local elections but not general elections; stateless parents who have been lawful residents of Estonia for at least five years can apply for citizenship for their children before they turn 15.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 15:50:00 UTC

  • ON THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT RAMZPAUL’S POINTS 1) The Counter-Enlightenment was tak

    https://gloria.tv/media/7TcJehsj2GJRAMZPAUL ON THE DARK ENLIGHTENMENT

    RAMZPAUL’S POINTS

    1) The Counter-Enlightenment was taken already. But this is a counter-enlightenment movement. The Dark Enlightenment. (I disagree with conflating the dark ages and the middle ages. Western civic society is largely the result of the late middle ages, not dark ages.)

    2) The Cathedral includes the Academy, The Media, The State, The Deep State.

    3) The Religion of the Cathedral is Cultural Marxism : Having failed scientifically (Scientific Socialism), Having failed organizationally (Syndicalism), Having failed through Postmodernism (lying) AND having started with demand for access to opportunity, expanded their demands to equality of opportunity, and having expanded their demands to equality of outcome, and failing because of the empirical difference in ability between individuals, the only solution was to import vast numbers of underclass people from the third world, encourage single motherhood, destroy the family, and create dependence upon the state sufficient that the state could take control of all functions in life.

    3) Red Pill : Accepting the truth of the evidence of man’s behavior and abandoning the enlightenment fallacies.

    4) Inequality and Diversity: People are empirically unequal, and Diversity empirically decreases trust and increases demand for tyranny. (The reason we are unequal is largely the difference in rates of reproduction of our classes. While homo-sapiens of the various races are similar, we vary in the success at suppressing our underclass reproduction. Those who succeed have advanced societies, and those who failed have impoverished societies. The cold solved this problem for us. The underclasses are a problem. Everywhere and always.)

    5) Democracy: Democracy is the worst possible system because it is dependent upon lies not reality or scientific reality, and surrenders control to the lower classes and elites who pander to them.

    CURT DOOLITTLE’S EXPLANATIONS

    The purpose of the enlightenment

    0) To end the Aristocratic Rule of the Landed Monarchies, and the Landed Church.

    1) To justify the middle class takeover of government (means of producing commons) from the landed aristocracy.

    2) To justify the diminution of religion and religious mysticism in favor of science and reason, assisting in the middle class takeover of the government.

    The Fallacy of the Enlightenment

    1) That it was possible to create an aristocracy of everyone. It’s not possible because meritocracy is not in the interest of the underclasses. Parasitism is.

    The Institutional Error

    1) Instead of creating a new house for the middle class, and then a new house for proletarians, which would have made it possible for classes to conduct exchanges, we created a single house with majority rule and as a consequence, found that the lower classes, and women in particular had no interest in the aristocracy everyone, and instead, voted to incrementally destroy the aristocratic civilization we call ‘the west’.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 13:51:00 UTC

  • “New institutions, or the demise of old institutions, alter incentives and conse

    —“New institutions, or the demise of old institutions, alter incentives and consequently mechanically affect material behavior and reproductive behavior, and metaphysically affecting spiritual condition. The resulting changes in material and reproductive behavior can be immense and rapid – as the normative changes in family support and reproductive behavior over the last 50-75 years illustrate. The spiritual changes are less rapid, perhaps due in some part to cultural inertia and to genetic memory as 50 generations of megalomaniacs and charming psychopaths were caught out and punished by their peers in the nobility and church.”— Karl Brooks


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-23 04:38:00 UTC

  • #tcot #nrx The Church then chartered nobility with love and trust – and left the

    #tcot #nrx The Church then chartered nobility with love and trust – and left them to war and justice (production). They federated our tribes


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 10:10:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623797175391252480

  • #tcot #NRx Failing to parent the young, and failing to parent less advanced poli

    #tcot #NRx Failing to parent the young, and failing to parent less advanced polities differ only in scale. Aristocracy must parent.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-22 09:50:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/623792318672412672