Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • LETS KEEP PRAISE OF PUTIN TO WHAT HE’S ACTUALLY DOING WELL (from Elsewhere) Well

    LETS KEEP PRAISE OF PUTIN TO WHAT HE’S ACTUALLY DOING WELL

    (from Elsewhere)

    Well, lets just say that American Utopianism is a failed experiment because only Protestants have been able to construct a high trust society. The Anglo mythos is that oppressed people need to be free, rather than strong government and strong institutions are require in low trust societies in order to maintain any semblance of order.

    American (and Anglo) utopianism has worked where it spread consumer capitalism (property rights, contracts, rule of law, fiat money and credit). But the Democratic experiment has been a catastrophe. Democratic utopianism has failed because only Germanic peoples have been able to construct a high trust society reasonably free of corruption.

    Other societies cannot do this without generations of a functional middle class, and as aggressive a campaign to suppress the rates of reproduction of the lower classes, and prohibition on cousin marriage. The west hung 1% of people a year for most of its history. They starved those who were unproductive over harsh winters.

    So it is disingenuous for westerners to criticize the harsh punishment of developing societies. It was only since 1900 that the west stopped aggressive use of hanging, and it has led to vast numbers of incarcerated peoples.

    Most other polities cannot imagine a society with as little small crime as america has. This is because of aggressive prosecution in order to preserve their high trust society and the economic velocity that results from it. America has much violent crime among its minorities, but about the same violent crime as Europe among whites.

    So american high trust society is dying from aggressive immigration of underclasses that reverse 3000 years of history – it was started in the 1960s by our ‘left’ (socialists) as a means to seize power by immigration where they could not achieve it in a predominantly germanic country by persuasion and propaganda.

    Putin is a reasonably good Czar who has managed to seize most of the heavy industry in the country for personal purposes. Most of those personal purposes are designed to restore Russia to what he considers its history (despite the rather murderous history of the Soviets, Ivan the Terrible, and the Mongols.)

    If Putin were simply HONEST and said “I must do this to change my society” most of the world would agree with him.

    If Putin had purchased Crimea from Ukraine (by asking the west to force the deal – they would have) for discounted oil and gas, he would not have caused the entire western world to pivot to contain Russia again in fear that another group of soviet lunatics had seized power. Instead eastern Europe is simply waiting for the ability to acquire nuclear weapons to keep Moscow at bay. This was foolish.

    If Putin simply stated why he was doing what he does the world would agree with him because westerners KNOW that democracy has failed us. We KNOW that decadence has been spread by our left and its alliance with feminism.

    If Putin would stop the RT propaganda that is totally fabricated then the western conservatives would support the growth of Russian power as the SAVIOR of the west rather than anther lunatic they need to contain.

    If Putin stayed on message that the western liberal model has been a failure he would lead the world, not by fear of lunacy, but by being THE ONLY RATIONAL MAN STANDING.

    There is no need to LIE when you are RIGHT, and when everyone AGREES with you. It’s ridiculous.

    Thankfully Syria has provided a means for Russia to obtain a Pipeline south, and taken responsibility from the states for policing the muslim world. Also this lets Putin demonstrate wisdom and strength to his people, and allow Russian warriors to gain some experience, without scaring neighbors further and causing more damage to the Russian economy.

    The Russian empire can never expand into the east again. it was a disaster the last time. Soviet Occupation was intolerable and the people of eastern Europe fear Russians more than they ever feared nazis.

    However, all of the islamic world needs adult supervision and Russia is the only adult in the neighborhood. And pretty clearly, utopian westerners are unfit to parent primitive peoples into modernity.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 09:42:00 UTC

  • More On Race. Sorry. I don’t Do Racism. I do Aristocracy for Every Clan, Tribe, and Nation.

    [I] am an aggressive supporter of kin-preference, aristocratic families, paternal aristocracies, and as many of them as man can make. My position on the friction between the races is that democracy and multiculturalism causes conflict between them. And that nationalism, aristocracy, paternalism and local separatism improve everyone. My position on the cause of the *meaningful* differences between the races is the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses over long periods of time. My means of criticizing other groups is whether their group evolutionary strategy is objectively more or less moral than some others. My demand for changes is not to place it upon others, but to change our weaknesses so that we are no longer subject to the damage of the less moral, yet can reap the benefits of the more moral. I am very fond of my non-kin friends. I want to help them raise themselves and their families, as all aristocracy should assist other aristocracies in raising themselves and their families. So I don’t really want to lose those friends because you choose to criticize others successful reproductive strategies, rather than to criticize and repair your (our) own failed reproductive strategies. I don’t do racism. I might agree or disagree with you on some criticism or other. But my goal is the evolution of man. I prefer every tribe evolve together, not that any tribe be subsumed by another. I want to see a world of many tribes – of many extended aristocratic families, raising their extended families. I do not seek to dominate others, only to preserve my tribe and to advance it and mankind’s tribes in the long journey to becoming gods. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • More On Race. Sorry. I don’t Do Racism. I do Aristocracy for Every Clan, Tribe, and Nation.

    [I] am an aggressive supporter of kin-preference, aristocratic families, paternal aristocracies, and as many of them as man can make. My position on the friction between the races is that democracy and multiculturalism causes conflict between them. And that nationalism, aristocracy, paternalism and local separatism improve everyone. My position on the cause of the *meaningful* differences between the races is the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses over long periods of time. My means of criticizing other groups is whether their group evolutionary strategy is objectively more or less moral than some others. My demand for changes is not to place it upon others, but to change our weaknesses so that we are no longer subject to the damage of the less moral, yet can reap the benefits of the more moral. I am very fond of my non-kin friends. I want to help them raise themselves and their families, as all aristocracy should assist other aristocracies in raising themselves and their families. So I don’t really want to lose those friends because you choose to criticize others successful reproductive strategies, rather than to criticize and repair your (our) own failed reproductive strategies. I don’t do racism. I might agree or disagree with you on some criticism or other. But my goal is the evolution of man. I prefer every tribe evolve together, not that any tribe be subsumed by another. I want to see a world of many tribes – of many extended aristocratic families, raising their extended families. I do not seek to dominate others, only to preserve my tribe and to advance it and mankind’s tribes in the long journey to becoming gods. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • How and Why The Collapse of Britain Mirrors The Collapse of Rome: Pseudoscience Over Mysticism – But Still The Same Lie

    (some important insights) [P]eter Hitchens (all), If you put the ‘dumbing down’ of the British population in historical context, it is an attempt to establish a secular version of christianity under pseudo-scientifc argument, and the closure of the church, and the extermination of the aristocracy, using forcible conversion by the state, using the same aggressive means that christianity was a successful attempt to establish a mystical christianity, using forcible conversion by the state, and the closure of the pagan temples and stoic schools, and the extermination of the aristocratic families. In the modern era, feminism and socialism and the attack on marriage and family have caused a population collapse as great as any plague in history. In the ancient era, the transfer of rates of reproduction from the middle and upper class to the lower classes, plus rapid immigration by the lower classes, was followed by devastating plagues that left the western roman empire indefensible. Our middle ages did not experience immigration, so we survived that plague. IN the ancient and modern world we did not, and may not unless we learn from it. In this context there is no difference between the prelude to the dark ages in the collapsing roman empire, and the prelude to another dark age in the collapse of the British empire. There is no talk necessary. We will destroy, fight and kill, or be little more than the priests at Lindesfarne as the boat people come to steal from us. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV3rfd0JqGA

  • How and Why The Collapse of Britain Mirrors The Collapse of Rome: Pseudoscience Over Mysticism – But Still The Same Lie

    (some important insights) [P]eter Hitchens (all), If you put the ‘dumbing down’ of the British population in historical context, it is an attempt to establish a secular version of christianity under pseudo-scientifc argument, and the closure of the church, and the extermination of the aristocracy, using forcible conversion by the state, using the same aggressive means that christianity was a successful attempt to establish a mystical christianity, using forcible conversion by the state, and the closure of the pagan temples and stoic schools, and the extermination of the aristocratic families. In the modern era, feminism and socialism and the attack on marriage and family have caused a population collapse as great as any plague in history. In the ancient era, the transfer of rates of reproduction from the middle and upper class to the lower classes, plus rapid immigration by the lower classes, was followed by devastating plagues that left the western roman empire indefensible. Our middle ages did not experience immigration, so we survived that plague. IN the ancient and modern world we did not, and may not unless we learn from it. In this context there is no difference between the prelude to the dark ages in the collapsing roman empire, and the prelude to another dark age in the collapse of the British empire. There is no talk necessary. We will destroy, fight and kill, or be little more than the priests at Lindesfarne as the boat people come to steal from us. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV3rfd0JqGA

  • Empirical Evidence of the Superiority of Western Truthfulness

    [T]he Chosen People is an argument to supremacy. Islamism is an argument to supremacy. Evidence is of european supremacy whether pagan or christian. Actually, its against christian mysticism, and in favor of pagan science, independence and testimony. If we look at RATES of evolution (development) instead of earliest development, it’s pretty obvious that the superior people, the superior system of government, the superior system of production of the arts and sciences, is european. A small backward people on the edge of eurasia outperform every civilization in history in both the prehistoric (british isles), the ancient (greco-roman-danubian), and modern (anglo-german) eras. This is merely empirical. “Who did it first” is just a dishonest framing. The more important question is, who consistently does it faster. And in the ancient and modern periods the philosophy of aristocracy (truth) has defeated every competitor. The only challenge came from the jews in both eras: christian mysticism extended Egyptian authoritarianism using babylonian mythos. And in the modern era, jewish pseudoscience: boaz, freud, marx, cantor, mises, Frankfurt, rothbard, and rand. The reason it worked in both eras: WOMEN and SLAVES united with JEWISH argument against us. The only challenge came from lies.

  • Empirical Evidence of the Superiority of Western Truthfulness

    [T]he Chosen People is an argument to supremacy. Islamism is an argument to supremacy. Evidence is of european supremacy whether pagan or christian. Actually, its against christian mysticism, and in favor of pagan science, independence and testimony. If we look at RATES of evolution (development) instead of earliest development, it’s pretty obvious that the superior people, the superior system of government, the superior system of production of the arts and sciences, is european. A small backward people on the edge of eurasia outperform every civilization in history in both the prehistoric (british isles), the ancient (greco-roman-danubian), and modern (anglo-german) eras. This is merely empirical. “Who did it first” is just a dishonest framing. The more important question is, who consistently does it faster. And in the ancient and modern periods the philosophy of aristocracy (truth) has defeated every competitor. The only challenge came from the jews in both eras: christian mysticism extended Egyptian authoritarianism using babylonian mythos. And in the modern era, jewish pseudoscience: boaz, freud, marx, cantor, mises, Frankfurt, rothbard, and rand. The reason it worked in both eras: WOMEN and SLAVES united with JEWISH argument against us. The only challenge came from lies.

  • The Melting Pot That Isn’t

    (worth repeating) — “The only thing that melts in our non-existent melting pot, is rule of law. Everything else is just an expression of the ongoing battle between our genes that we call gender, class, race, and religious competition.“—

  • The Melting Pot That Isn’t

    (worth repeating) — “The only thing that melts in our non-existent melting pot, is rule of law. Everything else is just an expression of the ongoing battle between our genes that we call gender, class, race, and religious competition.“—

  • Philip Saunders Frames The Narrative Correctly

    [F]rom Philip:

    “The operating philosophy of the 20th century was relativism in the domain of ideas, combined with universalism in the realm of institutions. This expressed itself in the subjectivistic movements of modernism and postmodernism, combined with the socio-economic trends of communism, fascism and statist neoliberalism. “The 21st century is the polar opposite. With unlimited access to information and global connectivity, we’re moving towards more universalism in the domain of ideas, culture and philosophy (which is not to be misunderstood for homogeneity, but rather the belief that there are universal standards by which ideologies or cultures can be judged or disputed), combined with relativism in the domain of institutions. “