Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • LARGELY BECAUSE OF RATES OF REPRODUCTION, RACIAL DIFFERENCES ARE HORMONAL (NO RA

    LARGELY BECAUSE OF RATES OF REPRODUCTION, RACIAL DIFFERENCES ARE HORMONAL (NO RACE IS PROHIBITED FROM TRANSCENDENCE ASSUMING CONTROL OF REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES)

    Lets Stick With Occam’s Razor

    As far as I can tell, the central problems affecting the Chinese people are (a) lack of verbal intelligence (b) a written and spoken language that does not assist in improving verbal intelligence, (c) hierarchy to compensate for lack of verbal intelligence (d) the perpetuation of Sun Tzu’s central argument for ‘deceive and delay’ in which dishonesty, face, and conflict avoidance are considered good social mores.

    But if we look at the inability for Chinese to speak the truth, it is in no small part because IT IS EXPENSIVE and VERBALLY DIFFICULT to tell the truth.

    Now, I generally prefer institutional and normative causes to genetic, just as europeans developed truth telling, individualism, the jury, and polycentrism because of their verbal acumen, it appears that the Chinese developed lying, hierarchy, authority, centralism to compensate for their inability to articulate ideas.

    We have Chinese Engineers on one side of the spectrum, Jewish lawyers and propagandists on the other, and europeans in the middle – and europeans differ in that they weaponized ‘truth’ rather than either delay and deceive, or cunning verbal deception. Asians can’t drive and have verbal limitations. Africans can drive, but have a problem with verbal and abstract limitations. East asians appear to have larger average cranial capacity and hence better memories and modeling capability. It appears that ashkenazim have more white matter (I am trying to make sure this is correct, but it appears so) as a result of higher exposure to malaria. So my working hypothesis is that we Sapiens vary largely in growth pattern and hormonal distribution, and that much of this hormonal distribution is in sexual maturity (most african, least east asian), and sexual bias (solipsistic female-verbal, autistic male-spatial)

    Small things in large numbers have vast consequences. And hormonal variation can create the entire spectrum of homo sapien behavior.

    I suspect that science will eventually eliminate all other possibilities and that this will be the final analysis.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-17 01:44:00 UTC

  • but surely we convert from religious to military-political to economic, to polit

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00U58Y4EA/ref=pe_2240100_159469240_em_1p_1_imSlowly but surely we convert from religious to military-political to economic, to political economy as the vehicle for understanding history.

    About time.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-16 05:27:00 UTC

  • WAR: IN THE LONG RUN, ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID —“The Soviet Union would have def

    WAR: IN THE LONG RUN, ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID

    —“The Soviet Union would have defeated Hitler eventually anyway”—

    As far as I know, and it’s hard to argue against, Stalin himself stated that they would have lost the war without the allies for the simple reasons:

    First, that Germany succeeded in taking or destroying most of Russia’s industry.

    Secondly, while Americans supplied only 12K tanks, she supplied the vast majority of jeeps, trucks, communication gear, that gave Russia her communications and mobility.

    Third the allies provided more than half of Russian explosives. Plus copper and aluminum.

    Once germany had france she had people, industry, and resources, greater than russia and britain combined.

    Another case of: “It’s the economy, stupid”.

    That the west overplays her importance in defeating germany is one thing. That Russia could have done it alone is extremely unlikely. That americans could have taken moscow and collapsed the soviet union is a relative certainty. That the Anglo constraint of German expansion into eastern europe was the cause of the fall of the west, and the destruction of western civlization is unquestionable. The germans were saving the west in both wars, and the anglos were by consequence the fall of the west – and remain so today.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-16 03:29:00 UTC

  • PROPHETS WORDS ARE WIELDED ONLY BY THOSE WHO CAN. Western man, like eastern man,

    PROPHETS WORDS ARE WIELDED ONLY BY THOSE WHO CAN.

    Western man, like eastern man, is poly-philosophical.

    UPPER – TRUTH – RULE – FORCE

    1) Aristotle’s Law of truth, The Common Law, and The Martial Law of those who rule: aristocracy.

    MIDDLE – UTILITY – COOPERATION – TRADE

    2) The Host of Middle Class Philosophers myths of aspiration for cooperation,

    3) Aesop and the Nordic, Celtic, and Germanic Myths of household wisdom,

    LOWER – NECESSITY – INSURANCE – GOSSIP

    4) Aquinas and the Nazarene’s philosophy of poverty, suffering, and hope.

    It is not a mystery that these philosophies roughly correspond to the IQ distribution. Both out of ability and out of utility.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 06:19:00 UTC

  • THE CULTS OF MEGALOMANIA : NON-INTEGRATION Both Jewish and Muslim cults include

    THE CULTS OF MEGALOMANIA : NON-INTEGRATION

    Both Jewish and Muslim cults include the original claims of Megalomania and utopianism that Abraham invested in the doctrine, and which is the excuse used to both create unity and prevent assimilation into host civilizations. The master race of the Nazis was the same argument made by genetic destiny rather than divine command. There is no difference.

    The middle east evolved separatism because it is an intersection of the races, and leadership wanted to prevent assimilation into assyrian, egyptian, and greek civilizations. And none could hold the territory against them. So they all failed to create a territorial ethic. It’s to be expected. They were traders and herders who raided and rain, not farmers who conducted war and held their ground.

    But there is no difference at all between Nazi Racism and Aesthetic-Culturism and Jewish Racism and Religiocity and Muslim Religiocity. None. They are group evolutionary strategies for landed germanic and unlanded semitic peoples. That is all. Nothing more. Nothing less. We carry out history in our genes as well as our cultures.

    Non-integration is the premise of jewish and muslim societies.

    (That ought to ruffle a few feathers.)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 05:04:00 UTC

  • MERKEL “Multiculturalism leads to parallel societies and therefore remains a ‘li

    MERKEL

    “Multiculturalism leads to parallel societies and therefore remains a ‘life lie,’ ” or a sham, she said, before adding that Germany may be reaching its limits in terms of accepting more refugees. “The challenge is immense,” she said. “We want and we will reduce the number of refugees noticeably.”

    Although those remarks may seem uncharacteristic of Merkel, she probably would insist that she was not contradicting herself. In fact, she was only repeating a sentiment she first voiced several years ago when she said multiculturalism in Germany had “utterly failed.”

    “Of course the tendency had been to say, ‘Let’s adopt the multicultural concept and live happily side by side, and be happy to be living with each other.’ But this concept has failed, and failed utterly,” she said in 2010.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 04:31:00 UTC

  • (interesting)(good game everyone should play.) DISTANCE (start) Kin, English, No

    (interesting)(good game everyone should play.)

    DISTANCE

    (start) Kin, English, Northern European, European, Christian, Non-christian, Economist, Scientist. (end)

    BEYOND DISTANCE

    Financier, Entrepreneur. Diplomat. White collar worker, blue collar worker, unskilled worker, ‘the unseen’.

    I realize that I am always an american to non-americans, but I am no longer an american in my metaphysics.

    Incremental suppression, meaning rule of law, has become my cult. Truth in the commons is just the next evolution of suppression.

    Those f__ckers at TRS hooked me into using a meme. lol damn. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 04:28:00 UTC

  • MERKEL: “MUTICULTURALISM, A SHAM” == PARALLEL SOCIETIES (not that we can trust w

    MERKEL: “MUTICULTURALISM, A SHAM” == PARALLEL SOCIETIES

    (not that we can trust what merkel says any more than putin or obama these days) (h/t: Alexander Brown )

    Monday, December 14, Chancellor Angela Merkel was at a her party convention. There, she told her political party people that multiculturalism is indeed a sham, that she would act to stem the raging migrant flow. She however defended her opened door policy that left German borders opened for the migrant influx, and said she is decidedly against aggressive unilateral German action in migrant crisis resolution, insisting that she would seek an European agreement towards a final solution.

    Angela Merkel:

    “Multiculturalism leads to parallel societies and therefore remains a ‘life lie’.

    The [ migrant ] challenge is immense. We want and we will reduce the number of refugees noticeably.”

    The Chancellor told the gathering that the migrants have to integrate, and assimilate German culture, values, and respect laws.

    Already, ONE MILLION migrants made it into Germany, and got registered by the German authorities beginning January 2015.

    She is beginning to speak the truth as per this tide of immigration. The timing however, is significant. She may be doing so to please the political base she was meeting. Or she may mean what was said, in fact.

    If she is serious, question would be when she realised this: now or prior. If earlier, why is she now speaking, and wanting to act albeit still weakly. If now, it further speak to her palpable weakness and cluelessness, even more. Regardless, she is now somewhat awake. And, Germany may close the migrant tap while benefitting from those that already made it in situ.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 04:20:00 UTC

  • Will You Insure Your Brothers?

    [W]hen will you insure your brothers? Is that insurance not the origin of property rights? Is that insurance not the origin of the brotherhood of soldiers? Is not all our civilization built upon our mutual insurance of one another? Our men need confidence that we will insure one another. That we take the oath and will not break the oath. Then they need a few examples. There are enough of us to rebuild the west. But we must understand that there is no one to save us but ourselves. We either draw arms and insure one another or we die like the rest as victims of the hordes. It is the confidence in one another that we must build. Then we must make it so expensive for our oppressors both home and abroad to violate our property, that they choose some alternative venue for their mischief. We will do that by the most expensive cost we can put upon them: Loss, Suffering, Death. Since we act on behalf of our kith and kin, then we will punish the kith and kin of those who violate our property. This means that if a man works against us, he risks his life, his kin, his home, and his relations. No mercy. We insure one another so that families restrain one another. Civilization has never been so frail. They have no choice – if we have the will.

  • Will You Insure Your Brothers?

    [W]hen will you insure your brothers? Is that insurance not the origin of property rights? Is that insurance not the origin of the brotherhood of soldiers? Is not all our civilization built upon our mutual insurance of one another? Our men need confidence that we will insure one another. That we take the oath and will not break the oath. Then they need a few examples. There are enough of us to rebuild the west. But we must understand that there is no one to save us but ourselves. We either draw arms and insure one another or we die like the rest as victims of the hordes. It is the confidence in one another that we must build. Then we must make it so expensive for our oppressors both home and abroad to violate our property, that they choose some alternative venue for their mischief. We will do that by the most expensive cost we can put upon them: Loss, Suffering, Death. Since we act on behalf of our kith and kin, then we will punish the kith and kin of those who violate our property. This means that if a man works against us, he risks his life, his kin, his home, and his relations. No mercy. We insure one another so that families restrain one another. Civilization has never been so frail. They have no choice – if we have the will.