http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/01/08/proving-communal-warfare-among-hunter-gatherers-paper/Proving Communal Warfare Among Hunter Gatherers (Paper)
(For Future Reference)
(H/T to whomever sent it to me. pls let me know so I can credit)
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-08 07:02:00 UTC
Germany Must Abandon her Self Punishment and return to Leadership of the West. I am not at this point sure Germany should bear any guilt in the first place. We were wrong, and Germany was right. I suspect coming to terms with this will be a great challenge for Germans. (It was a great challenge for me.)
But Germany (Hanseatica) is the heart of the west. Unless she defends us from the east we will die.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-08 06:00:00 UTC
Beowulf and the Shield Lands. Couldn’t make it thru the first 20 minutes without political correctness, multi-culturalism, and effeminacy of males, general lack of intelligence, and absurd decor making me so nauseated I had to stop. Couldn’t take it any longer.
Watch the new Frankenstein series instead. Or the Last Kingdom. That’s how it’s done.
Once again: smart people write smart things, and stupid people write stupid things and moral people write moral things and immoral people write immoral things.
It should be obvious then that stupid immoral people would write stupid immoral things.
And do.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-07 09:18:00 UTC
[I]t is time for the Papacy, and the Church to right their greatest wrong: the betrayal of and destruction of the poor knights of the temple; and to restore their Order, with the duty of the protection of Christians. If the church does not do so, it is no longer the religion of europa, no longer christian, and must be destroyed, and replaced with one that is Christian and the Religion of Europa.
[I]t is time for the Papacy, and the Church to right their greatest wrong: the betrayal of and destruction of the poor knights of the temple; and to restore their Order, with the duty of the protection of Christians. If the church does not do so, it is no longer the religion of europa, no longer christian, and must be destroyed, and replaced with one that is Christian and the Religion of Europa.
[I]n the west we have three tribes wherein men seem to keep their hair: The Welsh, the Lombards, and one in southern Russia that I can’t name – something in the Georgian region. Now, hair loss in men is caused by complex and asynchronous factors related to testosterone – lower testosterone earlier balding, higher testosterone tends to later balding. The same chemistry that produces facial and body hair causes head hair to go dormant. Some of us simply have more hair than others so it takes longer to go bald, some of us less so that it’s more visible sooner. The reason seems fairly obvious to me, as someone who had so much hair that it would often ‘hurt’, and I would just die in summers – and that is heat dissipation. As we get bigger its harder to dissipate heat when running, and humans were born to run so to speak. So baldness, if it is an adaptation, is likely an adaptation to the increasing need for heat dissipation. it’s more interesting I think to ask why we get beards (armor) on our faces, but lose hair (armor) on our heads.
[pullquote]…on the one hand we could cull about 70% of males and about 20% of females from the average population. But we cannot DEFEND from those who have inferior breeding but a larger number of males with higher aggression.[/pullquote]
If you have ever gone natural long enough (cleaning with water and baking soda and without harsh soap), you can readily grasp that the purpose of body hair is to hold your scent. Which aside from diet is like a less spicy set of variations of sandalwood in both sexes (hence our love of sandalwood incense.) I love that smell on me and women. But the head and facial hair is largely defensive in men, and hair is largely a signal of health and fertility in women. And given that men are about 10% bigger than women, and more ‘dense’ with higher heat retention; and given that about 70% of males will experience male pattern baldness and that women far less; and given that we can clothe our bodies and our heads, apparently nature made a trade off for men: less protection of the head in exchange for greater heat dissipation and durability under stress. One humorous analogy I like to use is that women like a lot of clothes because they aren’t really that different. Men are very different and like uniforms. What I don’t like is the knowledge that nature has evolved men to vary so greatly so that we can serve so many purposes like so many types of warrior ants. And as such a few of us are very valuable mates, and many of us are literally disposable: nature counts on us dying and women selecting our betters for reproduction. Algorithmically this presents a difficult problem. Because on the one hand we could cull about 70% of males and about 20% of females from the average population. But we cannot DEFEND from those who have inferior breeding but a larger number of males with higher aggression. So you see, we have to have this distribution and marriage to survive competition against others. Not because it is the optimum linear algorithm. But it is the optimum game algorithm in an equilibrium. Bet you didn’t see that coming did you? smile emoticon Curt
[I]n the west we have three tribes wherein men seem to keep their hair: The Welsh, the Lombards, and one in southern Russia that I can’t name – something in the Georgian region. Now, hair loss in men is caused by complex and asynchronous factors related to testosterone – lower testosterone earlier balding, higher testosterone tends to later balding. The same chemistry that produces facial and body hair causes head hair to go dormant. Some of us simply have more hair than others so it takes longer to go bald, some of us less so that it’s more visible sooner. The reason seems fairly obvious to me, as someone who had so much hair that it would often ‘hurt’, and I would just die in summers – and that is heat dissipation. As we get bigger its harder to dissipate heat when running, and humans were born to run so to speak. So baldness, if it is an adaptation, is likely an adaptation to the increasing need for heat dissipation. it’s more interesting I think to ask why we get beards (armor) on our faces, but lose hair (armor) on our heads.
[pullquote]…on the one hand we could cull about 70% of males and about 20% of females from the average population. But we cannot DEFEND from those who have inferior breeding but a larger number of males with higher aggression.[/pullquote]
If you have ever gone natural long enough (cleaning with water and baking soda and without harsh soap), you can readily grasp that the purpose of body hair is to hold your scent. Which aside from diet is like a less spicy set of variations of sandalwood in both sexes (hence our love of sandalwood incense.) I love that smell on me and women. But the head and facial hair is largely defensive in men, and hair is largely a signal of health and fertility in women. And given that men are about 10% bigger than women, and more ‘dense’ with higher heat retention; and given that about 70% of males will experience male pattern baldness and that women far less; and given that we can clothe our bodies and our heads, apparently nature made a trade off for men: less protection of the head in exchange for greater heat dissipation and durability under stress. One humorous analogy I like to use is that women like a lot of clothes because they aren’t really that different. Men are very different and like uniforms. What I don’t like is the knowledge that nature has evolved men to vary so greatly so that we can serve so many purposes like so many types of warrior ants. And as such a few of us are very valuable mates, and many of us are literally disposable: nature counts on us dying and women selecting our betters for reproduction. Algorithmically this presents a difficult problem. Because on the one hand we could cull about 70% of males and about 20% of females from the average population. But we cannot DEFEND from those who have inferior breeding but a larger number of males with higher aggression. So you see, we have to have this distribution and marriage to survive competition against others. Not because it is the optimum linear algorithm. But it is the optimum game algorithm in an equilibrium. Bet you didn’t see that coming did you? smile emoticon Curt
UKRAINIAN “CAROLING”
Some random young girl just rang the bell. Came into the doorway, Announced she was singing us a christmas song. Sang it. Three verses with Chorus. (I can’t catch the meaning). The recited a short bit on best wishes. And thanked us. And smiled.
During this entire period we are expected to smile appreciatively (which is pretty easy), then give her a tip.
Now we are not exactly in the nicest area of town, but its all small families in small apartments.
What I am constantly struck by is the ‘us-ness’ of a homogenous population.
It makes me tear.
I remember this in america.
It’s what we lost,
And it is beautiful.
Love your nation.
F_ck the corporeal state.
I am going to kill as many of you as I can with the written word.
And dance in my grave at every twitch of every rope.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-06 13:12:00 UTC
THREE TRIBES OF MEN WITH HAIR
In the west we have three tribes wherein men seem to keep their hair: The Welsh, the Lombards, and one in southern Russia that I can’t name – something in the Georgian region. Now, hair loss in men is caused by complex and asynchronous factors related to testosterone – lower testosterone earlier balding, higher testosterone tends to later balding. The same chemistry that produces facial and body hair causes head hair to go dormant. Some of us simply have more hair than others so it takes longer to go bald, some of us less so that it’s more visible sooner.
The reason seems fairly obvious to me, as someone who had so much hair that it would often ‘hurt’, and I would just die in summers – and that is heat dissipation. As we get bigger its harder to dissipate heat when running, and humans were born to run so to speak. So baldness, if it is an adaptation, is likely an adaptation to the increasing need for heat dissipation. it’s more interesting I think to ask why we get beards (armor) on our faces, but lose hair (armor) on our heads.
If you have ever gone natural long enough (cleaning with water and baking soda and without harsh soap), you can readily grasp that the purpose of body hair is to hold your scent. Which aside from diet is like a less spicy set of variations of sandalwood in both sexes (hence our love of sandalwood incense.) I love that smell on me and women.
But the head and facial hair is largely defensive in men, and hair is largely a signal of health and fertility in women. And given that men are about 10% bigger than women, and more ‘dense’ with higher heat retention; and given that about 70% of males will experience male pattern baldness and that women far less; and given that we can clothe our bodies and our heads, apparently nature made a trade off for men: less protection of the head in exchange for greater heat dissipation and durability under stress.
One humorous analogy I like to use is that women like a lot of clothes because they aren’t really that different. Men are very different and like uniforms.
What I don’t like is the knowledge that nature has evolved men to vary so greatly so that we can serve so many purposes like so many types of warrior ants. And as such a few of us are very valuable mates, and many of us are literally disposable: nature counts on us dying and women selecting our betters for reproduction.
Algorithmically this presents a difficult problem. Because on the one hand we could cull about 70% of males and about 20% of females from the average population. But we cannot DEFEND from those who have inferior breeding but a larger number of males with higher aggression.
So you see, we have to have this distribution and marriage to survive competition against others. Not because it is the optimum linear algorithm. But it is the optimum game algorithm in an equilibrium.
Bet you didn’t see that coming did you? 🙂
Curt
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-06 05:34:00 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ilFbbk9jw4MUST WATCH, MAYBE TWICE: MOLYNEUX ROCKS IT ON THE CRUSADES
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-05 18:48:00 UTC