In this revolution, our people don’t know the words to use yet. We must give them the language to restore western aristocratic culture.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:44:00 UTC
In this revolution, our people don’t know the words to use yet. We must give them the language to restore western aristocratic culture.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:44:00 UTC
http://socialmarketing.org/archives/generations-xy-z-and-the-others/THE LIVING AMERICAN GENERATIONS
****The Depression Era**** “The Fearful Generation”
Born: 1912-1921
Coming of Age: 1930-1939
Age in 2004: 83 to 92
Current Population: 11-12 million (and declining rapidly)
Depression era individuals tend to be conservative, compulsive savers, maintain low debt and use more secure financial products like CDs versus stocks.
These individuals tend to feel a responsibility to leave a legacy to their children. Tend to be patriotic, oriented toward work before pleasure, respect for authority, have a sense of moral obligation.
****World War II**** The Greatest Generation
Born: 1922 to 1927
Coming of Age: 1940-1945
Age in 2004: 77-82
Current Population: 11 million (in quickening decline)
People in this cohort shared in a common goal of defeating the Axis
powers. There was an accepted sense of “deferment” among this group, contrasted with the emphasis on “me” in more recent (i.e. Gen X) cohorts.
****Post-War Cohort**** The Privileged Generation
Born: 1928-1945
Coming of Age: 1946-1963
Age in 2004: 59 to 76
Current Population: 41 million (declining)
This generation had significant opportunities in jobs and education as the War ended and apost-war economic boom struck America. However, the growth in Cold War tensions, the potential for nuclear war and other never before seen threats led to levels of discomfort and uncertainty throughout the generation. Members of this group value security, comfort, and familiar, known activities and environments.
****The Baby Boomers**** “The Fuck Ups”
Born: 1946-1954
Coming of Age: 1963-1972
Age in 2004: 50-58
Current Population: 33 million
For a long time the Baby Boomers were defined as those born between 1945 and 1964. That would make the generation huge (71 million) and encompass people who were 20 years apart in age. It didn’t compute to have those born in 1964 compared with those born in 1946. Life experiences were completely different.
Attitudes, behaviors and society were vastly different. In effect, all the
elements that help to define a cohort were violated by the broad span of years originally included in the concept of the Baby Boomers. The first Boomer segment is bounded by the Kennedy and Martin Luther King assassinations, the Civil Rights movements and the Vietnam War. Boomers I were in or protested the War.
Boomers 2 or the Jones Generation missed the whole thing.
Boomers I had good economic opportunities and were largely optimistic about the potential for America and their own lives, the Vietnam War notwithstanding.
*****Generation Jones***** The Tech Transition Generation
Born: 1955-1965
Coming of Age: 1973-1983
Age in 2004: 39 to 49
Current Population: 49 million
This first post-Watergate generation lost much of its trust in government and optimistic views the Boomers I maintained. Economic struggles including the oil embargo of 1979 reinforced a sense of “I’m out for me” and narcissism and a focus on self-help and skepticism over media and institutions is representative of attitudes of this cohort. While Boomers I had Vietnam, Joneses had AIDS as part of their rites of passage. The youngest members of the Jones generation in fact did not have the benefits of the Boomers class as
many of the best jobs, opportunities, housing etc. were taken by the larger and earlier group. Both Gen X and Boomer II s suffer from this long shadow cast by Boomers.
****Generation X**** The Uncertain Generation
Born: 1966-1976
Coming of Age: 1988-1994
Age in 2004: 28 to 38
Current Population: 41 million
Sometimes referred to as the “lost” generation, this was the first
generation of “latchkey” kids, exposed to lots of daycare and divorce. Known as the generation with the lowest voting participation rate of any generation, Gen Xers were quoted by Newsweek as “the generation that dropped out without ever turning on the news or tuning in to the social issues around them.”
Gen X is often characterized by high levels of skepticism, “what’s in it for me” attitudes and a reputation for some of the worst music to ever gain popularity. Now, moving into adulthood William Morrow (Generations) cited the childhood divorce of many Gen Xers as “one of the most decisive experiences influencing how Gen Xers will shape their own families”.
Gen Xers are arguably the best educated generation with 29% obtaining a bachelor’s degree or higher (6% higher than the previous cohort). And, with that education and a growing maturity they are starting to form families with a higher level of caution and pragmatism than their parents demonstrated. Concerns run high over avoiding broken homes, kids growing up without a parent around and financial planning.
****Generation Y, Millennials (“The Pet Generation”)****
Born: 1977-1994
Coming of Age: 1998-2006
Age in 2004: 10 to 22
Current Population: 71 million
The largest cohort since the Baby Boomers, their high numbers reflect their births as that of their parent generation. The last of the Boomer Is and most of the Boomer II s. Gen Y kids are known as incredibly sophisticated, technology wise, immune to most traditional marketing and sales pitches…as they not only grew up with it all, they’ve seen it all and been exposed to it all since early childhood.
Gen Y members are much more racially and ethnically diverse and they are much more segmented as an audience aided by the rapid expansion in Cable TV channels, satellite radio, the Internet, e-zines, etc.
Gen Y are less brand loyal and the speed of the Internet has led the cohort to be similarly flexible and changing in its fashion, style consciousness and where and how it is communicated with.
Gen Y kids often raised in dual income or single parent families have been more involved in family purchases…everything from groceries to new cars. One in nine Gen Yers has a credit card co-signed by a parent.
****Generation Z****
Born: 1995-2012
Coming of Age: 2013-2020
Age in 2004: 0-9
Current Population: 23 million and growing rapidly
While we don’t know much about Gen Z yet…we know a lot about the environment they are growing up in. This highly diverse environment will make the grade schools of the next generation the most diverse ever. Higher levels of technology will make significant inroads in academics allowing for customized instruction, data mining of student histories to enable pinpoint diagnostics and remediation or accelerated achievement opportunities.
Gen Z kids will grow up with a highly sophisticated media and computer environment and will be more Internet savvy and expert than their Gen Y forerunners. More to come on Gen Z…stay tuned.
FROM
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-14 10:20:00 UTC
Like I said, I’d recommend reading the scientists, economists, Durkheim/Weber/Pareto, military historians.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-11 18:31:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/752570959610179584
Reply addressees: @SanguineEmpiric
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/752292728436760576
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/752292728436760576
The Mises Institute would survive if and only if it transforms from advocacy of the pseudoscientific Ashkenazi enlightenment of Boaz, Marx, Cantor, Frankfurt, and Keynes, Mises and Rothbard, to the Scientific enlightenment of Hayek, Popper, Einstein, Darwin, Spencer, Pareto, Durkheim, and myself.
It is one thing to say “all these men failed, and each brought a piece of the puzzle to the intellectual table, but none was able to assemble it.”
it is another to say Mises and Rothbard were ‘Austrians” of the empirical enlightenment seeking to restate german ethics from rationalism to social science, rather Ukrainians/Russians/Poles of the Ashkenazi pseudoscientific enlightenment seeking to restate eastern European ethics in an evolution of Jewish law. ie: not science. It’s fairly clear that Mises didn’t even understand what the term meant.
Otherwise we must seek to constantly publish that their advocacy of libertinism and low trust ethics is merely an attempt to perpetuate the landless libertine ethics of eastern European borderlands, and European ghettos, as a competitor to the landed high trust aristocratic ethics of the martial peoples of Europe and their ancestors.
There is no libertine liberty of permission, nor can one possess a condition of liberty when one cannot retaliate for unproductive exchanges. The only existentially possible condition of liberty one can possess is that of the high trust produced by the universal, incremental, suppression of parasitism, and the limitation of man to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to externalities of the same.
There is room in the intellectual space for restoration of the Austrian program of empirical social science of non-interference (voluntaryism). We already have honest schools of discretionary economic rule (mainstream Keynesian), non-discretionary economic rule of law (Chicago), but we have lost school of the non-discretionary, non-interference, where were seek only to improve the information provided by institutions not alter it deceptively for any reason. There may, in fact, be room in economic science and political policy for each of these schools because they range from the short term (fiscal-discretionary) to the medium term (monetary0-rule of law), to the long-term (institutional non-interference). But without the existence of all three there exists insufficient intellectual competition for each to be limited to its boundaries.
Currently, our think tanks appear to follow the academic rule that thought only reforms with the death of its proponents. So we are stuck with romantic historicism of Heritage, the Moral Contractualism of Cato, the various smaller groups still hanging on economics rather than all of social science, and the Mises institute still dragging the limp body of failed eastern European libertinism into which they’ve overinvested their life’s works like the Ashkenazi enlightenment has dragged its peers on >>>>> ‘s chain: marxism/socialism and neoconservatism. All are nonsense that deny mankind’s demonstrated behaviors in an attempt – like its religious forbearer – to produce a psychic alternate reality that brings nothing but dark ages.
I am not an advocate of any institution, but of liberty itself. And the only existentially possible liberty is that where we use the promise of organized violence to prevent the alternatives. Because liberty is unnatural to man. It requires productivity that is hard, unforgiving, genetically bound, prone to risk, and entirely meritocratic.
That liberty is produced by a militia, a book of Natural Law, an independent judiciary treating the common natural law as sacred, and the total suppression of parasitism by every possible means, interpersonal, economic, and political.
Hayek was correct in that the common law of natural law and property is the source of liberty. Mises discovered operationalism in economics, at the inspiration of weber and spencer. Popper discovered that darwin;s survival applied to knowledge, and that Hum’s criticism of induction was correct. Rothbard discovered that all ethics, morality and law could be represented as property rights. Hoppe discovered that representatives (agents) cannot possess beneficial incentives, and further explained that all political institutions could be converted into constructions of property rights – providing universal decidability. Haidt discovered that we all vote our reproductive interests, and I discovered that these interests can also be expressed as property rights. My meager contribution has been to unite these thinkers, providing the Wilsonian synthesis, and to extend the division of labor into the division of perception and advocacy on behalf of our reproductive strategies.
This is the future of liberty. Truth and the incremental suppression of parasitism from all walks of life by the judical application and common law discovery of natural law: the law of property
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 08:19:00 UTC
Presidents Matter.
Wilson(German Surrender), FDR(pre-30’s immigrants), Kennedy-Johnson(underclass boomers), Carter(islamic fundamentalism), Clinton (destruction of military tradition), Obama (islamic expansionism, anti-white racism, empire-withrawl)
We must not allow discretion in such matters of intertemporal import.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 07:02:00 UTC
—“The Goths who sacked the Empire…were already living there.”—
No, you cannot recruit barbarians into your culture without full integration.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:53:00 UTC
Christian (caretaking) Universalism is merely a mask over Aryan (domesticating) Universalism. To the aristocracy, Chrstianity is an excuse and nothing more. To the common man it is insurance that the aristocracy continue to take care and evolve, rather than prey upon and merely exploit them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:18:00 UTC
The Russian Needs (emotional)Orthodoxy the way the American Needs (analytic)Constitutionalism. But underneath those masks is the same face: Aryanism: saving mankind through domestication of the bararians.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 06:16:00 UTC
(What classifies you as an Aryan may be in your genes, or it may not be, but it is reducible to the domestication of Man by productive, eugenic, means, that raise him out of ignorance, disease, and poverty.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 05:58:00 UTC
OUR CAUSE IS TO OVERTHROW AND PREVENT THE GREAT LIES FROM EVERY HARMING MANKIND AGAIN
(important piece)(read it and weep)
I had a transformative conversation just out of college with an activist lesbian, and close friend of my girlfriend, who – upon my statement that I tried to be objective and neutral in matters of politics – responded by saying that neutrality is a luxury of those who can afford it.
I think the consequences of that conversation were subtle, but cumulative – and that the only solution to fulfillment for all, is not a monopoly of commons -universalism – but a market for commons. And that such a market for norms requires territories in which to plant, maintain, and harvest that which we desire from them – while at the same time paying the full cost of their development and maintenance rather than supporting one’s preferred norms by parasitic survival on the norms of others.
So while universal negative commons exist: the natural law of non-imposition of costs. Universal positive commons are impossible. because the commons advances the group evolutionary strategy, and within that strategy, the life experience, of the population.
Furthermore, just as groups of all men and all women produce exaggerated behaviors, and their own externalities, groups that favor different compositions of wants(short) and interests(long) will produce their own exaggerated behaviors, and their own externalities. And so these people are either kept in check by their wants and interests, or they will, as western man has done, discover superior means of organizing, superior wants, and superior interests, and modify their norms accordingly.
Ergo, the more ‘diverse'(heterogenous) a single society, the less knowledge is gained, the most redistribution possible, and the most parasitism performed. While the most homogeneous a single society the more knowledge is gained, the most redistribution possible and the least parasitism performed. Because we will fund our wants and interests through redistribution but we will not fund our competitors willingly.
We developed truth telling, sovereignty, and high trust norms, traditions, and institutions out of self-interest. And we domesticated man as a consequence. Because he was drawn to our order out of his own interest in exchange for abandoning parasitism.And where he was not drawn to his order, we out-competed him into adapting it. And where he was incompetent at adaptation we imposed it upon him by colonialism, political coercion, or outright conquest.
And this is where we failed. Because we are not liberating man from oppression. We are suppressing his native parasitism, and domesticating him no differently than we have domesticated plants, animals, and most of the earth’s land, sea, and air.
And this domestication is not in the interests of those who cannot compete in the production of norms, traditions, goods and services, that further extend non-parasitism in concert with our ever-expanding innovations in production, technology, market, and political orders, and the corresponding means of parasitism we also evolve along with them.
Just as the Jews had to invent a false promise of eternal salvation in heaven in order to rebel against our ancient greco-roman ancestors who had dragged man out of ignorance and poverty with truth and contract, the descendants of these same people, in their reaction to the enlightenment, had to invent a false criticism of the west, and a false promise of utopia on earth in order to create a rebellion against our Anglo-Germanic-Italian-French ancestors, who likewise had dragged man out of ignorance and poverty upon finally defeating the curse of mysticism that
Man must be domesticated into prosperity. He must be domesticated into national(genetic interests), contractualism(productive voluntary exchange), productivity(non-parasitism), and eugenic reproduction(non-harm) through the organized use of violence to produce normative, traditional, and formal institutions of domestication. And we must not only domesticate ourselves, but all those who would return us to barbarism through genetic, normative, traditional, and institutional means.
We have insufficiently domesticated man and attempted to rest on the laurels of our ancestors – living in the luxury they have made for us. We have perhaps worse, insufficiently domesticated women – whose parasitism is indirect, consumptive, political, normative, and reproductive, rather than conducted by theft and violence of men. And we must next domesticate ‘those who lie’ so that never again is mankind doomed to the lies of the people who lie – because they cannot compete in innovation, production and reproduction, and so must poison the well of competition in order to succeed.
We must bear arms and defend man, and his future, from the animals that seek to restore the order of animals. And we must make new constitutions, with new laws that treat the informational commons upon which each of us relies, and our future relies, from another cataclysmic grand suite of lies.
THE FIRST GREAT ERA OF LIES: SUPERNATURALISM VS REASON
The First Truthful Civilization: Greco(rational)-Roman(legal)
The First Great Lies: Mysticism: Abrahamism, Christianity, Mythology including Monotheism, supernaturalism, and a holy book of supernatural myth and law, and the promise of life after death in a paradise.
THE SECOND GREAT ERA LIE OF LIES: PSEUDOSCIENCE VS SCIENCE
The Second Truthful Civilization: English-Anglo-Saxon-Hanseatic-Lotharyngian)
Pseudoscience: Boazian anthropology and mythology, Marxist economics and mythology, Freudian psychology and mythology, Cantorian Mathematical Metaphysics, Frankfurtian sociology and mythology, and a promise of a paradise on earth.
We must never gain allow ourselves, or others, to subject mankind to dark ages caused by Jews, Christians, Muslims, and prevent our transformation into the gods we aspire to be.
The end of history is not Democracy. The end of history is the Truthful Civilization, in which none of us prey upon one another, because none of us need to prey upon one another.
Western greatness was achieved through the imposition of non-parasitism, and the demand for productivity in exchange for reproductive possibility.
The problem facing the rest of the world, and a problem the Marxist-socialists have given them because we lacked either the understanding of our domestication of animal-man, or we lacked the courage to state it in the face of our Christian mask of compassion over the face of our Aryan Domesticating Universalism, and lose the self-congratulatory status signals we obtained from the illusion. (Albeit, such acknowledgment may have created in-group cognitive dissonance against our lower classes. )
We must defeat the great lies, with the great truths that we lacked either the knowledge or the courage to admit to ourselves, and advocate to others: that we have since the time of the horse and wheel, dragged man out of ignorance, poverty, and disease by the simple act of governing conquered territories such that we could kill his predators, replace his rulers, and constrain the reproduction of his lower classes leaving only the good behind.
Because the uncomfortable truth of man is that just as each of us can only produce so much excess production above that which we ourselves need, those who organized production in the legal, financial, entrepreneurial, managerial, clerical, and laboring classes cannot compensate for large numbers of the underclasses who parasitically exist by constant warfare against our norms, traditions, myths, institutions, nations, and genes. There is a very simple mathematics to this process in that we must alter the rational choice to engage in production by purchasing that incentive by rewards. But that means that the percentage of people that can be incentivized to engage in non-parasitic actions is determined by the productivity of the nation (group), and its institutions. And if relative competitive productivity of the group declines, then the productive classes that remain will no longer be able to incentivize increasing numbers of the underclasses to refrain from parasitism. Ergo: we must constantly cull the lower classes if we wish to maintain the prosperity that the productive classes seek, and that is necessary for creating the incentives that create the order, that produces the luxury under which we now live.
So it is not just the ecology of the earth that is limited in the population it can support. It is the ability to produce incentives for a population necessary to maintain the status quo.
We fight not just the red-queens of disease, competing tribes, the of the earth, the aging of the earth and sun, but we fight the red queen of productivity upon which the ability to organize society voluntarily using those incentives we call capitalism, depend.
This is what the pseudoscientists wished to hide with their second great era of lies: darwin found the truth and this truth was too much for the parasitic peoples to bear since it meant their extermination.
So we must rule out of self-defense. Not just for us. Not just for our ancestors. Not just for our descendants – but for all mankind. And until we know we are not alone in the universe, for all eternity. We may be little more than gods-in-making. A calculation that the universe makes in an attempt to save itself from the laws that govern its limits, just as our intelligence has allowed us to save ourselves from the laws that govern our limits.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-09 05:57:00 UTC