This is a solid truth that’s worth quoting and repeating.
Islam conquers from the bottom the way the west conquers from the top.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 18:30:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713260899216027650
Reply addressees: @Jawgenius @dvorstone
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713148123512476119
RT @Jawgenius: @dvorstone @curtdoolittle The purpose of Islam is not to civilise but to populate. Arguably, civilisation is a ‘false prophe…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 18:29:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713260663563317596
If you observe russian behavior it is far closer to muslim ethics than to christian – because it is a low trust society like the muslim and not a high trust like the christian.
We should have let Patton finish the job. We would have saved the russian people, and uniting germany…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 18:28:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713260474211369101
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713151570882285576
FWIW: Linquistic analysis makes it obvious he’s from islamic culture, and I don’t doubt he understood the difference between the primary values of both civilizations – simply because this is a very ‘western’ way of thinking and he was in an environment where we teach the western analytic method but also contrast with other cultures.
I think his thesis could have been expanded upon but given it’s simplicity it’s pretty useful. And we know why, historically our cultures diverged. Because europeanism began as an aristocratic military organization and christianity only as a mocement for womenand slaves, while the fertile crescent was a region of constant conflict from collisions of four continents and an endless supply of raiders from all directions. Then islamic civ began in no small part as a revolt against tribal chieftains, and a long history of conquerors and oppressors who were abusive. In other worlds western top down (like china) and islam bottup up. And the infighting between persia and europe made it possible. And the Nicean attempt to convert christianity from a middle eastern informal system to european formal system made it intolerable, especially for the people of the peninsula.
I wouldn’t doubt he was influenced or given the idea, but he clearly understood the meaning of it. Unfortunately like many thinkers he didn’t solve the problem. That is, that monarchies are far more durable and reliable than democracies, and that the system of government is all but irrelevant if you have rule of law of the natural law, which is effectiely dispute resolution by who ‘paid’ for something.
My complaint about the west is the absolutely devastatingly foolish ambition to spread democracy that just incdreases infighting and corruption, instead of rule of law and a court system and reliable police to enforce it. The tendency of democratic governments is to get involved in everything. Where the natural law and rule of law, are just about who owns a thing and pays for a thing.
There is a value to western naivety becaues it is part of our high trust of one another. Btu we are unlike all other people in the world, and we are often foolish that what works for us will work for others, who do not have that trust, and whose politicians are not trustworthy.
Reply addressees: @elbanna101
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 18:08:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713255547049295872
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713243317549281415
YES DUGIN’S A CRACKPOT – BUT HE HAS ONE POINT WORTH GRASPING: WOMEN ARE MAKING THE WEST LOSE.
Of course Dugin’s is a crackpot. However my point is that even a crackpot gets something right once in a while:
I use every possible example I can, to explain that the world regjection of the west is primarily due to the introgression of women into economy and polity, and jewish elites providing the marxist sequence of justifications for female antisocial behavior: Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), Postmodernism (truth marxism), Anti-Male Feminism (Female Marxism), Woke (Race Marxism), providing women a false pretense of victimhood imposed by white men, when it’s the laws of the universe, laws of nature, and laws of the genetic division of cognition, valuation, labor, and advocacy, between teh sexes, classes, civilizations, and races. And the capture of our education, our academy, our bureaucracy, and our government by jews and women advancing the female strategy of seditious undermining to getnerate conflict under the pretense of oppression, when in fact women are always and everywhere hyperconsumers, evading responsibilty for both private and common, and in the process forming the army that is destroying our civilization from within – the same way women destroyed the Roman civilizatoin from within using thhe false promises of christianity as a women’s and slaves’ revolt against aristocratic meritocratic western civilization. So jews, (muslims) and women are bringing in another dark age if we don’t stop the destruction they’ve brought about, and the world conflict they’ve brought about through the export of their natural immorality and deviancy to the rest of the world as a virtue rather than a crime.
Reply addressees: @Nataraj4308
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 17:45:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713249621751783424
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713222944178995289
Can We Reform Women And Restore Our Civilization?
Women aren’t consciousof their antisocial behavior as unethical, immoral, and criminial evasion of responsibility for the commons. I’ve done the work: we can clearly implement the law prohibiting their behaviors by either sex and in doing so train the entire population back ito a high trust society.
The problem is, without this articulation of the cause, the behavior, and the limits on the behavior, and without the reinforcement of the law, women will not constrain one another to prosocial behavior,and will continue to manufacture false oppression narratives that they hide behind to excuse their antisocial behavior – which always and everywhere is nothing but the evasion of responsibility for the commons, which, in the end, is what citizenship consists of.
If you can’t defend the commons, by taking responsibilty for defending the commons, including by display word and deed, despite the emotional, social, and physical risk, then you can’t have access to citizenship because that’s what citizenship means: responsibility.
You can have juridical defense (negativa) but you can’t have political or legislative influence(positiva).
Reply addressees: @Agkistrodon14
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 17:36:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713247362179629056
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713234637126836240
–“Billions globally are convinced that the collective West and its allies represent the utmost evil – the civilisation of the Antichrist. (CD: It’s just women). Perhaps only Trump’s return to US leadership, or the onset of a full-blown civil war there, can save the world from Apocalypse or at least delay it. Democrats, globalists, and neoconservatives are leading humanity straight into the abyss, which, strictly speaking, is the demonic mandate.”– Alexander Dugin (RU)
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 15:37:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713217405965549568
(a) demographic age/timing issue. (b) all data sources give lebanon israel as outliers. I’m forgetting one other because it’s midnight. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 03:54:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713040519113179296
Reply addressees: @Ptolemy94__
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713036631043674282
–“Q: Have you written anything on the Islamic “golden age” or the Christian “dark age”?”–
Nothing like a substantive analysis, just short FB or twitter posts to countersignal false claims by all parties. Catherine Nixey’s book is the best on christianity, there are endless sources on the islamic golden age and how quickly it came to an end. Wikipedia entry’s long but it’s correct.
WHEN
—“Khan (2003) identifies the proper golden age as being the two centuries between 750 and 950, arguing that the beginning loss of territories under Harun al-Rashid worsened after the death of al-Ma’mun in 833, and that the crusades in the 12th century resulted in a weakening of the Islamic empire from which it never recovered.”–
WHY (Greek Knowledge)
–“The golden age is considered to have come into existence through a gigantic endeavor to acquire and translate the ancient sciences of the Greeks between the eighth and ninth centuries. The translations era was followed by two centuries of splendid original thinking and contributions, and is known as the “golden age” of Islamic science. The era after this period is conventionally known as the “age of decline.”–
END (Fundamentalism)
–“Economic historian Joel Mokyr has argued that Islamic philosopher al-Ghazali (1058–1111), the author of The Incoherence of the Philosophers, “was a key figure in the decline in Islamic science” and that this led to a cultural shift shunning away from scientific thinking.”–
Reply addressees: @turtard
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 03:49:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713039401058443264
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713017283423953196
THE UNEDUCATED IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA
–“In sub-Saharan Africa, roughly two-thirds of Muslim adults (65%) have no formal schooling. The same is true for roughly four-in-ten Muslim adults in the Middle East-North Africa region (42%) and three-in-ten in Asia-Pacific region (32%).”–Pew Research
–“65% of Muslims in sub-Saharan Africa had no formal education—the highest anywhere in the world. By contrast, only 30% of Christians in the region had not enrolled or completed any form or level of schooling”–
Overall, about half of the middle eastern people are functionally uneducated. And you wonder why they’re poor. Without a reformation of islam and an education system built on that reformation it’s no wonder that there is a conflict between majority middle class jews, and majorty underclass (not even working class, not even lower class, but underclass) muslims.
I’ve been watching this number for thirty years and it’s not impressive, even compared to india, and it’s insulting compred to china.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 01:42:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713007230012850176