THE ANGLO GRAVE
—“First the anglo imported cheap indentured labor, then black labor, then the scotch Irish settled the west, then the Hungarians were sent to the coal mines and steel mills, the Irish used as cannon fodder, the Chinese as railroad work, the Mexicans as cheap landscapers and construction labor, and now the Indians for cheap tech support.
The Anglo has dug his own grave.”—Danny Bogdan Polishchuk
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-21 14:07:00 UTC
THE CORPSE WE CALL NEW ENGLAND
My experience living in New England is that moral responsibility is something people feign but never practice. Not that people are necessarily immoral, but that they leave morality entirely up to the individual without taking responsibility for one another.
There is nothing left here. It’s a desiccated carcass devoid of moral moisture, by a long drought of self congratulatory puritans trading asceticism for socialism in search for even higher-minded virtue signals with which to express their authoritarianism.
The civic society of the town-square imported from ‘little England’, gradually dissipated to the dry utopian winds along with investment, culture, aesthetics, optimism, by the crushing weight of importing working classes, rising soviet influences, followed by industrial flight. Then, having failed to enthrall the common man, trading up again, and importing underclass immigrants, rising postmodern influences, followed by white flight. As if repeating past failures might lead to different outcomes. Asceticism, socialism, and postmodernism are just excuses for high minded, authoritarian, rule which produces genetic, cultural, economic, and intellectual wastelands. The market creates, authority destroys.
Hartford, New Haven, Bridgeport, Waterbury, Danbury are right behind Baltimore and Detroit, with a glimpse of Oakland frequently visible on the horizon through the skeletons of industrial, cultural, and genetic remains.
The Big Sort Continues. The Foundry continues to throw good money after bad. The Heartland pleads for reason. The South waits out the fall. The mid atlantic bleeds them dry. And coastal Techno-eco-topia creates the illusion that there is hope.
This was once the most beautiful place on earth to live.
But Puritan and Jewish authoritarianism laid waste to the eden we had made here.
Curt Doolittle
(and yes, I am a son of puritan founders)
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-20 22:37:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2015/09/26/as-far-as-i-know-this-is-the-definitive-analysis-of-the-church/—“Curt, I’m sure we can agree to an extent that the adoption of Christianity led to many advancements within European society. I would like to know you’re thoughts on those who wish to see a return to the traditions of pre-Christian Europe. Not only from a religious aspect but from a societal change as well. While some people enjoy the fascinating aspects from a purely historical standpoint of pre-Christian European society what do you think the ramifications would be if such a large change took place in Europe?”—
Well the change is here. The question is whether or not we do something about it.
A SHORT COURSE ON THE PAST AND FUTURE OF RELIGION
https://propertarianism.com/2015/09/26/as-far-as-i-know-this-is-the-definitive-analysis-of-the-church/
https://propertarianism.com/2015/06/29/the-church-amplified-western-civilization-it-did-not-create-it/
https://propertarianism.com/2016/10/07/the-church-failed-to-reform-and-the-sciences-didnt-have-time-to-complete-their-evolutionary-program/
https://propertarianism.com/2016/11/26/christianity-judaism-and-islam-moral-or-immoral/
https://propertarianism.com/2016/03/08/the-athenian-art-of-truth-vs-jerusalems-art-of-lying/
https://propertarianism.com/2016/02/04/why-discuss-lies-youre-just-being-a-useful-idiot-a-host-for-lies/
https://propertarianism.com/2016/11/23/lets-give-everyone-a-precise-language-and-for-the-discussion-of-religion/
https://propertarianism.com/2016/05/30/the-good-in-religion-is-the-civic-ritual-not-the-content/
https://propertarianism.com/2016/06/19/weve-been-focused-on-the-wrong-institution-we-need-the-church/
https://propertarianism.com/2016/11/25/the-church-of-tomorrow/
https://propertarianism.com/2016/08/17/our-new-church-lets-frame-this-question-of-the-church-correctly/
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-19 20:29:00 UTC
El Problema: La regresión constante de la calidad de los hombres por debajo de la media y las desviaciones estándar crean la necesidad para que existan presiones persistentes que mantengan una necesidad genética en los grupos humanos. Esto quiere decir que los grupos pueden perder calidad muy fácilmente en cualquier momento que permitan mezclarse entre sí o que haya un cambio en las tasas de reproducción dentro de los grupos. Valor: Los hombres se pueden adaptar a cualquier circunstancia sin que tengan que mutar de forma evolutiva, pero debido a la simple frecuencia en la que se expresan los caracteres de una población en un lugar, espacio y tiempo determinado en la forma que la naturaleza los requiere. Esto trae como consecuencia que el hombre sea altamente capaz de adaptarse como organismo. Nosotros nos adaptamos cuando aprendemos, por medio de normas sociales, y por tasas de reproducción entre clases. Porque las clases son y siempre han sido expresiones genéticas superior y e inferiores. Especialización: Tal parece que todos los hombres hemos estado involucrados en el proceso de erradicar a todos los competidores del Homo sapiens sapiens, y luego nos comenzamos a subdividir en razas. Existen cuatro razas principales: Negroide, mongoloide, caucasoide: Europeo (Del Norte, de los bosques y llanuras) Caucasoide, Iraní (sureño, del desierto y las estepas) Caucasoide y muchas otras sub razas como las semitas (africano/iraní-caucasoide) todas las cuales tuvieron que experimentar de manera directa un proceso de especialización. Las diferencias entre estas razas están descritas y son explicables desde un punto de vista endocrino, ya que los humanos “crecen” y los cambios endocrinos modifican las expresiones de ciertos caracteres, comportamientos y apariencias entre las razas. Es por ello que:
¿Cuál es el secreto del hombre occidental entonces? Los hombres occidentales somos los pueblos que más hemos puesto en práctica la eugenesia, “para mejorar nuestra raza”. Eso no nos hace mejores per se. Simplemente hemos matado a todos lo peor y lo malo durante tanto tiempo que muchas familias buenas y mejores tribus han surgido y sobrevivido que las tribus y familias malas. La revolución industrial cambió todo eso La democracia cambió esta antigua estrategia cultural porque cambiamos de una familia productiva (no sólo un hombre) un voto, a votos igualitarios para todos – y desde que las mujeres se volvieron reproductivamente irresponsables (disgénicas) y las clases bajas se volvieron reproductivamente dañinas (disgénicas también), y juntos esos dos factores son más numerosos pero no superiores en calidad, implementaron políticas que revirtieron la excelencia genética que alguna vez tuvo Occidente. Hemos experimentado una “explosión” (efecto Flynn) que luce estadísticamente como un dispositivo que mejora la nutrición y distribución de las clases inferiores. Sin embargo este efecto puede ser neutralizado (revertido) ya que las tasas de reproducción de las clases inferiores continúan en expansión. Es probable que la tasa reproductiva de las clases inferiores disminuya conforme los caracteres genéticos negativos continúen perpetúandose, pero eso es cuestión de un número no determinado de generaciones y mutaciones indeterminadas. Es así de sencillo Es necesario poner en práctica políticas de eugenesia. No se puede tener libertad y prosperidad si no se tiene una civilización eugénica y racialmente homogénea.
El Problema: La regresión constante de la calidad de los hombres por debajo de la media y las desviaciones estándar crean la necesidad para que existan presiones persistentes que mantengan una necesidad genética en los grupos humanos. Esto quiere decir que los grupos pueden perder calidad muy fácilmente en cualquier momento que permitan mezclarse entre sí o que haya un cambio en las tasas de reproducción dentro de los grupos. Valor: Los hombres se pueden adaptar a cualquier circunstancia sin que tengan que mutar de forma evolutiva, pero debido a la simple frecuencia en la que se expresan los caracteres de una población en un lugar, espacio y tiempo determinado en la forma que la naturaleza los requiere. Esto trae como consecuencia que el hombre sea altamente capaz de adaptarse como organismo. Nosotros nos adaptamos cuando aprendemos, por medio de normas sociales, y por tasas de reproducción entre clases. Porque las clases son y siempre han sido expresiones genéticas superior y e inferiores. Especialización: Tal parece que todos los hombres hemos estado involucrados en el proceso de erradicar a todos los competidores del Homo sapiens sapiens, y luego nos comenzamos a subdividir en razas. Existen cuatro razas principales: Negroide, mongoloide, caucasoide: Europeo (Del Norte, de los bosques y llanuras) Caucasoide, Iraní (sureño, del desierto y las estepas) Caucasoide y muchas otras sub razas como las semitas (africano/iraní-caucasoide) todas las cuales tuvieron que experimentar de manera directa un proceso de especialización. Las diferencias entre estas razas están descritas y son explicables desde un punto de vista endocrino, ya que los humanos “crecen” y los cambios endocrinos modifican las expresiones de ciertos caracteres, comportamientos y apariencias entre las razas. Es por ello que:
¿Cuál es el secreto del hombre occidental entonces? Los hombres occidentales somos los pueblos que más hemos puesto en práctica la eugenesia, “para mejorar nuestra raza”. Eso no nos hace mejores per se. Simplemente hemos matado a todos lo peor y lo malo durante tanto tiempo que muchas familias buenas y mejores tribus han surgido y sobrevivido que las tribus y familias malas. La revolución industrial cambió todo eso La democracia cambió esta antigua estrategia cultural porque cambiamos de una familia productiva (no sólo un hombre) un voto, a votos igualitarios para todos – y desde que las mujeres se volvieron reproductivamente irresponsables (disgénicas) y las clases bajas se volvieron reproductivamente dañinas (disgénicas también), y juntos esos dos factores son más numerosos pero no superiores en calidad, implementaron políticas que revirtieron la excelencia genética que alguna vez tuvo Occidente. Hemos experimentado una “explosión” (efecto Flynn) que luce estadísticamente como un dispositivo que mejora la nutrición y distribución de las clases inferiores. Sin embargo este efecto puede ser neutralizado (revertido) ya que las tasas de reproducción de las clases inferiores continúan en expansión. Es probable que la tasa reproductiva de las clases inferiores disminuya conforme los caracteres genéticos negativos continúen perpetúandose, pero eso es cuestión de un número no determinado de generaciones y mutaciones indeterminadas. Es así de sencillo Es necesario poner en práctica políticas de eugenesia. No se puede tener libertad y prosperidad si no se tiene una civilización eugénica y racialmente homogénea.
MY ANCESTORS WERE NOT IMMIGRANTS THEY WERE CONQUERORS
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-19 10:12:00 UTC
WHITE / RED RUSSIANS ~= ENGLISH ROSES
Who were the “White Russians”?
—“The White movement (Russian: Бѣлое движенiе/Белое движение, tr. Beloye dvizheniye; IPA: [ˈbʲɛləɪ dvʲɪˈʐenʲɪɪ]) and its military arm the White Army (Бѣлая Армiя/Белая Армия, Belaya Armiya), also known as the White Guard (Бѣлая Гвардiя/Белая Гвардия, Belaya Gvardiya) or the Whites (Белые and белогвардейцы, “White Guardsmen”), was a loose confederation of Anti-Communist forces that fought the Bolsheviks (большевики, “Majority”), also known as the Reds, in the Russian Civil War (1917–1922/3) and, to a lesser extent, continued operating as militarized associations both outside and within Russian borders until roughly the Second World War.
Remnants and continuations of the movement, some of which only had narrow support, endured within the wider White émigré community until after the fall of Communism.”—
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 13:22:00 UTC
RELIGION AND REVOLUTION
(very important post)
Religion functions as a regulatory institution limiting culture. It is one thing to allow religious ‘ghettos’ for political utility, another to tolerate those ghettos for commercial utility, and it’s quite another to create a poly-logical cultural (normative) equivalent to the mono-logical legal system. In other words, it is no more logical(honest) to produce a poly logical legal order, than it is a poly logical ethical order, than it is to produce a poly logical aesthetic order. These are not matters of preference but of truth. And matters of truth are not positive assertions but negative prohibitions. By the possibility of prohibiting that which violates physical, natural, and informational laws, we create a market for goods, but we prohibit a market for bads.
So the separation of church and state is incorrect. That separation is necessary not so that we may permit competing religions – not so whatsoever – but (a) to prevent the conflation of religion with law, and (b) to allow the evolution of religions increasingly compatible with informational, natural, and physical laws.
The military, organized crimes(federal police), local crimes (local police), and sheriffs (community police) must be independent because they do not choose, they only ACT. The judiciary must be independent to prevent its conflation, misuse, and corruption as an organization that decides (chooses) not acts. The church (and I use that term very loosely to describe all forms of aesthetics) must be independent for the same reasons as the judiciary and the military – to prevent its conflation, misuse or corruption. These are regulatory bodies for (1) military:force, (2) judiciary:exchange, and (3) aesthetics:good commons.
The academy must be independent for the same reasons as the military, judiciary, and church: to prevent its conflation, misuse, and corruption. However this limits the academy to the sciences (the true) and preserves ‘the good’ as work for the church. Ergo, the aesthetic (allegorical) disciplines then are the providence of the regulation of the church, not the research and training of the academy. The Academy may produce good as a byproduct of truth, but the church must limit the good.
Our Laws of Nature: Physical Laws, Cooperative Laws(Natural Law), and Informational Laws (Testimonial Law) must then limit all of these disciplines.
Our germanic ancestors unfortunately did not grasp the genius of the ethics of the germanic oath (responsibility for truth, life, property, and commons), and the utility of common over continental law which enforced this oath not only upon the citizens but on the very institutions of government and religion themselves. The germans feared anglo truth. The anglos were seduced by the commercial gains of cosmopolitan empire – as are all empires that fail.
The national socialists did not understand what they had discovered: a post-mystical religion – one that we all desire, and (unfortunately) one that we need. They too practiced conflation. They had one piece of the institutional puzzle but not enough of it to prevent ‘bads’.
We can create a new ‘church’ and make use of our established monuments. That church must fulfill its duty as a limiter of aesthetics, just as the military(force), and judiciary(cooperation), create limits.
But we must not make the mistake that other civilizations have made when their primary institutions fail: conflation. The answer we seek to restore western civilization is found in the choice of: Sovereignty, and the consequential choice of Transcendence and the consequential necessity of Markets in Everything. And in the means of decidability under them: The Laws: Physical, Cooperative(Natural), and informational (testimonial). And in the specialized institutions that limit the three means of coercion: Military, Judiciary, Church. And the one institution that provides innovation: Science, Academy, School, and Gymnasium.
The human mind seeks simple models. We call them under various terms: stereotypes, ideal types, and ideals. It’s the most simple form of comparison. We want one rule,and one institution. But this ‘want’ leads us into conflation, and conflation leads us into misuse, corruption, stagnation, and failure.
In retrospect our ancestors practiced soveregnty and tripartism (estates of the realm), intuitively and habitually, rather than scientifically (operationally and analytically). When the economic shift provided by the end of the plagues, the evolution of the hanseatic civilization as a competitor to the mediterranean, and the scientific enlightenment, unfortunately the middle class seized power by overestimating the potential of the commercial order and the power of markets.
The accumulated cultural capital did take a long time to spend down. But spend it down we have. And by spending it down we can claim one benefit: by analyzing our loss, we can understand our error. And having understood our error, we can repair it.
Deconflate the conflations of the enlightenment. End the attempt to construct an institutional monopoly – the antithesis of our historical reasons for success. Restore markets in everything. Restore markets in everything by restoring a judiciary under natural law, and adding informational law to the responsibility of that judiciary. Restore the church by restoring its responsibilities, and chartering it with a new natural rather than supernatural mission. Restore the military to its pervasive position in society as the central method of emergency services of all kinds.
How can this be done?
– Moral Permission (we have it)
– A set of demands (a more precise version of that which is stated above)
– A plan of transition (a demand for a new constitution, the reformation of our institutions, and the purge of certain institutions).
– A plan of ‘persuasion’ ( Promise violence against the status quo, then incrementally increase it, until those demands are either met- or we descend into civil war, and we impose them ourselves.)
Why is it possible?
– because no civilization in history other than perhaps the Late Roman or Late Ottoman has been as fragile as ours is today.
Opportunity knocks.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 09:42:00 UTC
CHINESE CONFLATIONISM
Not only were there no terms for politics vs society, but there was no distinction. It’s one vast hierarchy. An enormous family. Which many of us agree with, and which produces exceptional ends. However, there also exists nothing but conflation and the total absence of competition. And without competition one relies on outsiders to force one to evolve. And without others to force one to evolve, one adopts the decision of ‘stability’ rather than ‘innovation’. which is desirable in many cases. But in the end, it means you will stagnate and eventually be conquered.
Man must transcend the animal, the domesticated animal, the fully human.
The universe’s clock ticks.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 09:17:00 UTC
ADMITTING OUR ‘GERMANNESS’, THAT ANGLOS WERE WRONG, AND THAT EVERYONE ELSE WAS TOO.
(lolz)
—“We anglos acknowledge our own german-ness and have included you germans in the circumpolar civilization club (we even jump in snow banks on new years eve)…but you will never be forgiven for Kant.”— Bill Joslin
I just say we we anglos were wrong about everything but at least we speak scientifically – in deflationary language. The germans were right about everything, but they speak in conflationary nonsense. The french were wrong about everything and took down Europe and poisoned the world’s information system because of it. And they simply are too ashamed to admit it. The jews were either wrong about everything or lied about everything and killed 100M people this time around – but even they themselves aren’t still don’t know the difference between truth and lying. Same agency problem as women for the same reason. lol
We’re all freaking nuts. We had evolved the perfect government. And we screwed it up.
The scientific enlightenment was awesome, and the rest of the so called ‘enlightenment’ is actually a counter-revolution against it.
Truth has a name but it’s uncomfortable to speak it,
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-17 18:17:00 UTC