@mayoroflondon London is occupied by the 3rd world in the 2nd Conquest of the ancient civilization of the Isles. First romans, now Islam.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 14:00:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872815593283612672
@mayoroflondon London is occupied by the 3rd world in the 2nd Conquest of the ancient civilization of the Isles. First romans, now Islam.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 14:00:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872815593283612672
EMPIRES ARE A BAD IDEA. KIN NOT CORPORATION.
Empires MUST eventually rely on diplomacy rather than force. diplomacy must eventually rely on deception rather than truth.
The only people with whom we share common interest as scale are our kin.
NATIONS NOT EMPIRES.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 09:24:00 UTC
The Chinese want to insulate themselves and rule by influence.
The west has been expansionist, because the west tries to profit from rule.
The problem is, that western civilization requires the imposition of markets and the continuous reorganization of the dominance hierarchy, and this has been unsuccessful in every other civilization.
It is increasingly appearing that it might be genetic as well as cultural.
We must contain ourselves to our realms until the other peoples, purely by want of imitation, adopt our methods.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 09:01:00 UTC
China like America, is not a country but an empire. Europe is not a country but a civilization. China succeeded in combining a civilization, empire, and country, due to successful conquest and administration.
Imagine if europe had built a wall at least across the straights of gibraltar, the bosporus, the caucuses, and the Urals?
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:11:00 UTC
WHY CHINA IS RIGHT.
(important)(revise your values)
China will dominate the future for the simple reasons that they have succeeded at juvenilization, succeeded at culling the lower classes, have succeeded at building an intolerant, militial ‘national’ (kinship) army, have succeeded at both building a wall AND not venturing outside of it, and succeeded at prohibiting incursion by any variation of Abrahamism, and succeeded at adopting aristotelianism, and consumer capitalism – all of that despite being UNABLE to adopt western truth, high trust, and rule of law, because it is contrary to the confucian teaching that one must preserve harmony rather than disrupt the dominance hierarchy through truthful speech.
Conversely the west COULD dominate the future by replicating the chinese strategy of:
(a) preserving our juvenilization,
(b) preserving (and expanding) our culling of the underclasses
(c) restoring our militial (kinship) National army.
(d) building a wall between the european and non european peoples.
(e) withdrawing from adventurism outside the wall.
(f) suppressing, and eliminating all versions of abrahamism, and all forms of supernaturalism.
(g) preserving our truth, high trust, and rule of law.
In Addition
(g) protecting our intellectual property from distribution.
Otherwise we will, for purely genetic reasons, experience another dark age, and there exist no remaining isolated white peoples to rescue us from it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 07:57:00 UTC
“YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW”
You mean, islam destroyed north african, levantine, byzantine, and persian civilizations. Is trying to destroy Indian civilization. And is only successfully resisted by Chinese civilization? And is only going to succeed at destroying western civilization, because of the prior conquest of western civilization by the previous generation of islam: christianity?
So for 1400 years islam has destroyed four major advanced civilizations, and is in the process of destroying all but one: china.
With the only ‘break’ in the conquest of the advanced civilizations has been the past 200 years, where we have had advanced technology with which to defeat their numbers, and ability to maneuver.
And that we are reaping the sewing of our christian ethic?
😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 07:45:00 UTC
If you think so, then you will be surprised what uncivilized looks, smells, sounds and feels like should he fail and we come in his stead.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 20:44:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872554785010057218
Reply addressees: @Letterlout
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872441067601317888
IN REPLY TO:
@Letterlout
@curtdoolittle Trump isn’t civilised.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872441067601317888
I can say that we consider ourselves (rightfully) as possessing a superior civilization that has dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, superstition, tyranny, and disease in both the ancient and modern worlds. And I can say we finally know why that is true.
I can say that some of us consider white people more attractive than people with less success at Juvenilization through reproductive selection.
I can say that aside from attractiveness, it is hard to say one is superior to the Han/Korean/Japanese – although what they have gained in health and memory we have gained in language and creativity. And this tradeoff is worth studying.
I can say that whites were disproportionately responsible for civilizations, and that non-whites have disproportionately been responsible for the Dark Ages – in particular, Abrahamism, whether Jewish/Marxist/Socialist/Libertarian, Christian/Postmodern, or Islamic/Islamist appears to be the worst thing that has every happened to mankind – it’s been more deadly than the plague.
As the center of history, I think that the center of history is the war between white/chinese ‘aristocracy’ and everyone else’s underclass. And that an analysis of history is reducible to the see saw of that conflict.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 20:23:00 UTC
THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE FEMININE: THE FRENCH AND THE JEWISH
The the French court embraced effeminacy. The French language is grammatically effeminate. Rousseau’s French enlightenment was effeminate, obsessively sexual, and was the origin of Freud’s pseudoscience of psychology, and Marx’s sociology. What remained of French martial sentiments survived while the napoleonic generation lived, but the French gossiped and fought like women as soon as the industrial revolution began, and submitted to defeat like women. Today’s French men remain the most effeminate on earth other than the more flamboyant homosexuals. We do not grasp that jewish dress is effeminate and submissive, nor that their strategy is feminine.
So is it any wonder that the French produced the revolution, the jews produced marxism, and the french produced postmodernism?
We are born with reproductive strategies out of necessity. We choose our reproductive strategies if we can. We signal with them if it’s advantageous.
But there are only two ends of the spectrum: The masculine meritocratic and eugenic, and the feminine equalitarian and dysgenic.
And there are only two ends of the speech spectrum: the truthful and the untruthful.
The west chose truthful and masculine.
The french did not. The jews did not.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 17:10:00 UTC
#Trump The Abrahamic, Marxist, Socialist, Postmodern attempt at the second conquest of the west through our women and underclass will fail.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 13:07:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872439863127281664