Theme: Civilization

  • IT’S TIME TO RETURN TO VIKING! (important and counter-intuitive idea) For 500 ye

    IT’S TIME TO RETURN TO VIKING!

    (important and counter-intuitive idea)

    For 500 years, europeans have made the market and increase in markets a group evolutionary advantage through the combination of advanced technologies – especially in weapons, rule of law and the cult of jurors, and accounting. However, if you haven’t noticed, *the market is not a disadvantage to group evolutionary strategy*. Ergo: the advancement of group evolutionary strategy that is succeeding is the extra-market strategy. Just as the group evolutionary strategy of warfare is extra-state. So if I could wish my brothers to understand something, it would be, that return to our usual occupation of warriors, raiders, and conquerors is once again more profitable than markets. And that’s not a theory it’s evidence. It’s Time For Viking.

    (Let that sink in)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-31 10:43:00 UTC

  • THE RESIDUES OF CHRISTIANITY ARE RESIDUES OF ARYANISM Or even better. That those

    THE RESIDUES OF CHRISTIANITY ARE RESIDUES OF ARYANISM

    Or even better. That those myths and that content, was originally greek, roman, and european – and that it was always there even before the church.

    It doesn’t matter what name we call those residues (Pareto called them Residues and Derivations). It isn’t helpful to associate them with the church.

    Those residues and derivations can be stated scientifically, rationally, and mythically. They don’t need the fiction around them at all.

    Rabbinical Judaism was an innovation (reformation) produced from greek ideas.

    Christianity was an innovation (reformation) on judaism produced from greek, roman, and persian ideas.

    What was retained was the 1) the false history to add legitimacy by contrast to the new reformation, 2) the trials of christ story to replace the trials of Achilles story; 3) the underlying argument that the unlanded (poor, ignorant) pastoralists were somehow divine (rather than inferior) to the agrarians and their aristocracy (the strong, wealthy, powerful), 4) the use of all of the above to undermine the aristocracy, commercial, and agrarian society.

    —“when the Christian myths became unbelievable, they left in the minds of even intelligent and educated men a residue, the detritus of the rejected mythology, in the form of superstitions about “all mankind,” “human rights,” and similar figments of the imagination that had gained currency only on the assumption that they had been decreed by an omnipotent deity, so that in practical terms we must regard as basically Christian and religious such irrational cults as Communism and the tangle of fancies that is called “Liberalism” and is the most widely accepted faith among our people today. I am a little encouraged that today some of the more intelligent “Liberals” are at last perceiving that their supposedly rational creed is simply based on the Christian myths they have consciously rejected. I note, for example, that Mary Kenny, who describes herself as “a former radical”, has come to the realization that “so many of the [Liberals’] political ideas… are religious at root. The search for equality in the secular sense is a replacement of the Judaeo-Christian idea that God loves every individual equally… The feelings of guilt or, indeed, pity, which once went into the religious drive, are being transferred to secular ideas to the ultimate destruction of our civilisation.”-Revilo P. Oliver—


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-30 17:06:00 UTC

  • BOOK UPDATE Over the past three days I’ve separated out the libertarian-reformat

    BOOK UPDATE

    Over the past three days I’ve separated out the libertarian-reformation content into a separate book. I found it distracted from the main argument, which is western restoration. So I have a separate book on reforming libertarianism into sovereignty. It includes all the criticism of Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe etc. It’s a more manageable 150 pages or so.

    And this allows me to shorten the main work. Which is enormous.

    So Major book “Truth”

    Minor book “From Libertarian to Sovereign”

    And no, it’s not a big deal. From pretty much every standpoint, multiple books are better. And it takes less effort this way.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-28 14:03:00 UTC

  • funny how moderns and christians want to attribute meaning to scandinavian symbo

    funny how moderns and christians want to attribute meaning to scandinavian symbols, but the uniqueness of the west is its absence of mysticism and magic. magic was much closer to what we think of as science and medicine, religion much closer to mythology. loading and framing are semitic inventions. we are living in an age of mysticism.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-27 19:14:00 UTC

  • THE SPECTRUM FROM ATLANTIC TO PACIFIC European … Continental … … Germanic

    THE SPECTRUM FROM ATLANTIC TO PACIFIC

    European

    … Continental

    … … Germanic (North)

    … … … Nordic Germanic

    … … … Celtic – Germanic

    … … … Continental Germanic

    … … … North Italian Germanic

    … … Polish(Northern, western) Slavic

    … … Russo – Finic

    … … Mediterranean

    … … Southern Slavic

    … Aegean (Bridge Civilization)

    … … Greek

    Anatolian (continental) (Bridge Civilization)

    … Hittites

    … Phrygians

    Iranian

    … Phoenician ( Babylonian Levantine Anatolian)

    … Babylonian (Babylon –

    … … Assyrian, Akkadian, Sumerian, Babylonian

    … … Persian (Persepolis)

    … Egyptian (Egypt/Memphis)

    … Jewish/Arab (Yemeni-Ethiopian)

    Central Asian / West Asian.

    … Turkic (China)

    Indian

    … (extinct)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-27 14:55:00 UTC

  • What does this mean for the Indo-European vs Abraham narrative? Cc Alexander Zav

    What does this mean for the Indo-European vs Abraham narrative?

    Cc Alexander Zavialov


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-27 09:43:00 UTC

  • What Is The Most Popular Language Spoken At Home And In Family Environment In The City Of Kiev? Is It Ukrainian Or Russian?

    Think of Ukraine from east to west like the USA from north to south: one accent(northern Anglo Saxon) to another (southern Scotts-Irish), with Ukraine being in the middle of a spectrum of Polish > Ukrainian > Mixed( > Russian.

    The soviets tried to kill off local languages. And they imported people from Russian peasantry to eastern european cities in order to conquer them just as Western civilization is being conquered by immigration of underclasses from the third world.

    In downtown Kiev, everyone speaks both languages – they differ in pronunciation and conventions but are mutually intelligible.

    A lot of people outside the cities in ukraine speak “sool’-zhik” which is a mixture of Ukrainian and Russian.

    If you spend time in Lviv, then people speak Ukrainian and prefer it.

    If you spend time in Donetsk, they speak Russian and prefer it.

    Why? Soviets immigrated more people in the east and fewer people in the west. Plus people in the west were previously part of the Polish, Lithuanian and Austrian-hungarian empires, and they have more affinity for european market civilization than authoritarian steppe cultures.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-most-popular-language-spoken-at-home-and-in-family-environment-in-the-city-of-Kiev-Is-it-Ukrainian-or-Russian

  • What Is The Most Popular Language Spoken At Home And In Family Environment In The City Of Kiev? Is It Ukrainian Or Russian?

    Think of Ukraine from east to west like the USA from north to south: one accent(northern Anglo Saxon) to another (southern Scotts-Irish), with Ukraine being in the middle of a spectrum of Polish > Ukrainian > Mixed( > Russian.

    The soviets tried to kill off local languages. And they imported people from Russian peasantry to eastern european cities in order to conquer them just as Western civilization is being conquered by immigration of underclasses from the third world.

    In downtown Kiev, everyone speaks both languages – they differ in pronunciation and conventions but are mutually intelligible.

    A lot of people outside the cities in ukraine speak “sool’-zhik” which is a mixture of Ukrainian and Russian.

    If you spend time in Lviv, then people speak Ukrainian and prefer it.

    If you spend time in Donetsk, they speak Russian and prefer it.

    Why? Soviets immigrated more people in the east and fewer people in the west. Plus people in the west were previously part of the Polish, Lithuanian and Austrian-hungarian empires, and they have more affinity for european market civilization than authoritarian steppe cultures.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-most-popular-language-spoken-at-home-and-in-family-environment-in-the-city-of-Kiev-Is-it-Ukrainian-or-Russian

  • Alexander………… Aristotle..Aurelius..DaVinci ……………..Jesus

    …………..Alexander…………

    Aristotle..Aurelius..DaVinci

    ……………..Jesus…………….


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-25 09:06:00 UTC

  • When has (((any group))) demonstrated that they can create and maintain a societ

    When has (((any group))) demonstrated that they can create and maintain a society?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-21 06:29:00 UTC