RT @BradWilcoxIFS: New from Pew:
Staggering drop in conventional family life for American adults:
✔️1970, 67% prime-aged Americans marrie…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:18:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720520898761887961
RT @BradWilcoxIFS: New from Pew:
Staggering drop in conventional family life for American adults:
✔️1970, 67% prime-aged Americans marrie…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:18:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720520898761887961
Do you know how many times I”ve been ridiculed for saying that cities are genetic sink holes that breed dysgenia, and always have been?
–“It’s even worse in large cities where singles make up 40% of households.”–
If you don’t breed, particularly above the middle, you’re causing a decline in the median and average. The most costly thing a talented person can impose upon society is the failure to produce at least three children per woman.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:16:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720520407726350337
RT @cboyack: The U.S. Census shows that people living alone made up 8% of all households in 1940.
The share of solo households doubled to…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:15:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720520000639738305
RT @AscendantPower: The percentage of 25-34 year olds living with a spouse has dropped from 80% to 38% over the past 50 years
The next tim…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:14:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720519903042539949
RT @arpitrage: The decline in marriage — fraction of people in the US married by age 38-42 by income decile.
Universal decline, but conce…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:14:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720519865478295573
RT @texasrunnerDFW: “In 2010, the rate of unmarried 40-year-olds began a dramatic upward ascent to 20%, and up another 5% to 25% in 2021, a…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:14:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720519757584040301
RT @nickgerli1: 📉The Demographic Decline of America.
For first time EVER, there’s more People Living Alone (37.9M) than Households with a…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:13:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720519690370363744
EXPLAINING CONFLICTING NUMBERS IN HOUSEHOLD MEASUREMENTS
The percentage of adults living with a spouse decreased from 52% to 50% over the past decade. At the same time, living alone became slightly more common: 37 million (15%) adults age 18 and over lived alone in early 2021, up from 33 million (14%) in 2011. The percentage of adults living with an unmarried partner also inched up over the past decade, from 7% to 8% (Though that’s not relevant other than for tax filing purposes – and the marriage penalty in taxation disincentivizes marriage. (there are some suggestions in the literature that this causes duplication of household counts and masks real household income.)
Household: This unit is defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as “all the people who occupy a housing unit.” This includes related family members and all the unrelated people, if any, such as lodgers, foster children, wards, or employees who share the housing unit. A household can consist of a person living alone or multiple unrelated individuals or families living together.
Non-household Individuals (or Non-institutionalized Group Quarters): These are people who live in settings that are not considered households. The U.S. Census Bureau identifies two types of group quarters: institutional (such as prisons, nursing homes, and hospitals) and non-institutional. The latter includes places like college dormitories, military barracks, group homes, and missions. Individuals in non-institutional group quarters are not considered “households” because they typically do not have a separate living arrangement that allows for independent cooking and living from others in the same unit.
The categories of non-household individuals can be broadly enumerated as:
Institutional Group Quarters: These include residents of nursing facilities, mental hospitals, correctional facilities for adults, and juvenile facilities. AFAIK this is around 1%+.
Noninstitutional Group Quarters: These encompass people in college or university student housing, military quarters, emergency and transitional shelters, group homes, and workers’ dormitories. AFAIK this is around 1.2%+
AFAICT: there are conflicting definitions of households – one that includes just a residence with at least one person, and another that includes a residencde with more than one person. (That appears to be a pretty close set of numbers.)
(FWIW, I’m working to find consistency in these numbers because … they’re all over the map. And it appears that there are categorical differences creating inconsistencies.)
In other words household income SHOULD drop and continue to drop as the number of individual households, single mother households, and the number of divorced households, continues to rise.
Reply addressees: @mattbramanti @jskayfshd
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:13:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720519630530211840
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720512555431363036
–“Q: Curt what are your thoughts on the positive impact of women on society, say, as expressed in the image of Madonna and child (Isis and Horus, Mary and Christ etc),”–
1. Humans are superpredators.
2. But we are also social because of the distproportionate value of cooperation – even indirect cooperation.
3. So we all seek signals of non-aggression almost first before all other signals.
4. Women specialize in signals of non aggression
Despite that women aggress via interpersonal and social warfare – it’s at least not physical and immediate even if it is cumulatively just as harmful.
5. Beauty is the presence of resources – that’s all. We tend to prefer a presence of resources created by the hand of man. And the demadn for truth and beauty is a demand for extra effort when producing commons.
6. Women promise both non aggression a presence of resources not the least of which are care and reproduction.
“Men are a threat and women are an opportunity”
So in the arts we use these symbols of women to identify and promote the status of non aggression and resources which are essentially peace offerings: plenty.
Religions consist of systematizing signals of non aggression, to limit conflict, alienation, and the mental instability of neuroticism as populations increase and our individual ‘value’ to others decreases.
So Religions use the feminine just as the State (military and politics) use the masculine: scarcity.
It’s just physics at play at scale. And it’s so obvious that we want to find more to it than that.
Cheers.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @Alexanderistalt @MillionMustMeme @seracoate
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 16:13:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720474337516351488
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720471316745138580
No. It’s civic by nature, and culturally dependent. That does not mean that within the context of another civilization the work is not high art.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 21:13:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720187483189547431
Reply addressees: @burkenbine_mark
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720186396843909315