Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • Our Kin Are Only As Old As The Enlightenment

    Please think about this very seriously and try to understand what it means to be ‘european’. We are so closely related it’s actually ‘odd’ that we don’t look even more alike. Everything that comes out only serves to confirm that europe has undergone a series of genetic miracles because of our upwardly redistributive social order. –“The most recent common ancestor of every European today (except for recent immigrants to the Continent) was someone who lived in Europe in the surprisingly recent past—only about 600 years ago. In other words, all Europeans alive today have among their ancestors the same man or woman who lived around 1400. Before that date, according to Chang’s model, the number of ancestors common to all Europeans today increased, until, about a thousand years ago, a peculiar situation prevailed: 20 percent of the adult Europeans alive in 1000 would turn out to be the ancestors of no one living today (that is, they had no children or all their descendants eventually died childless); each of the remaining 80 percent would turn out to be a direct ancestor of every European living today.”– THE GREAT PURGE WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL

  • OUR KIN ARE ONLY AS OLD AS THE ENLIGHTENMENT Please think about this very seriou

    OUR KIN ARE ONLY AS OLD AS THE ENLIGHTENMENT

    Please think about this very seriously and try to understand what it means to be ‘european’. We are so closely related it’s actually ‘odd’ that we don’t look even more alike. Everything that comes out only serves to confirm that europe has undergone a series of genetic miracles because of our upwardly redistributive social order.

    –“The most recent common ancestor of every European today (except for recent immigrants to the Continent) was someone who lived in Europe in the surprisingly recent past—only about 600 years ago. In other words, all Europeans alive today have among their ancestors the same man or woman who lived around 1400. Before that date, according to Chang’s model, the number of ancestors common to all Europeans today increased, until, about a thousand years ago, a peculiar situation prevailed: 20 percent of the adult Europeans alive in 1000 would turn out to be the ancestors of no one living today (that is, they had no children or all their descendants eventually died childless); each of the remaining 80 percent would turn out to be a direct ancestor of every European living today.”–

    THE GREAT PURGE WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-01 22:21:00 UTC

  • Why Does The World Allow America To Rule Alaska?

    Because, “Ivan”, for the same reason China lets Russia rule anything east of the urals. And the same reason Muscovy rules the former Golden Horde territories, and the same reason Muscovy rules former Novgorod, and the same reason Muscovy rules Kaliningrad (which we will someday correct), and the same reason Muscovy rules Crimea, and the same reason Muscovy DOESN”T rule eastern europe any longer.

    Becuase decisions are made by the capacity to conduct and preserve the violence necessary to rule.

    The last people on earth to make judgements of others are the Russians.

    You killed millions of your own, and set your self back a century, then set back eastern europe by a century. Spread the disease of markxism around the world at the cost of 100M lives.

    You didn’t protect us from the germans. The germans were trying to protect us from you.

    Why on earth the Anglos didn’t let you conquer and retake Turkey is beyond me.

    Why we didn’t overthrow and modernize you at the end of the world war is merely one of the great follies in history. Had we continued to moscow and Beijing we would have cut the number of murders you caused in half.

    Own it. Your national mythology is an out and out lie. Your national hero was one of the most evil men ever to walk the earth. The germans were right.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-world-allow-America-to-rule-Alaska

  • Why Does The World Allow America To Rule Alaska?

    Because, “Ivan”, for the same reason China lets Russia rule anything east of the urals. And the same reason Muscovy rules the former Golden Horde territories, and the same reason Muscovy rules former Novgorod, and the same reason Muscovy rules Kaliningrad (which we will someday correct), and the same reason Muscovy rules Crimea, and the same reason Muscovy DOESN”T rule eastern europe any longer.

    Becuase decisions are made by the capacity to conduct and preserve the violence necessary to rule.

    The last people on earth to make judgements of others are the Russians.

    You killed millions of your own, and set your self back a century, then set back eastern europe by a century. Spread the disease of markxism around the world at the cost of 100M lives.

    You didn’t protect us from the germans. The germans were trying to protect us from you.

    Why on earth the Anglos didn’t let you conquer and retake Turkey is beyond me.

    Why we didn’t overthrow and modernize you at the end of the world war is merely one of the great follies in history. Had we continued to moscow and Beijing we would have cut the number of murders you caused in half.

    Own it. Your national mythology is an out and out lie. Your national hero was one of the most evil men ever to walk the earth. The germans were right.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-world-allow-America-to-rule-Alaska

  • Why Do White Americans Appropriate European Culture?

    Um. (a) Why do europeans (overwhelmingly) appropriate American culture? (b) Americans pay very little attention to europe other than the UK. And (c) Because while europeans are better cultured, and often better educated, and certainly better disciplined – europeans are also ‘provincial’ from our perspective, and the data bears that out.

    The french are effeminate and have been our enemies since the second world war. The Germans are culturally compatible with us, but … cowardly by comparison. And the Brits have all gone soft and mad. And frankly other than italy, which we share love of food and beauty with, there isn’t much reason to think about europe at all. (Really).

    If the Germans ever regain their self respect and return to military leadership of europe, so that we don’t have to carry their moral self indulgence any longer, that would be something worth talking about. 😉

    I mean, the people we are most interested in are the japanese and the russians.

    At least they have some SPINE.

    Europe is a conquered continent, and really needs to recover.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-white-Americans-appropriate-European-culture

  • Why Do White Americans Appropriate European Culture?

    Um. (a) Why do europeans (overwhelmingly) appropriate American culture? (b) Americans pay very little attention to europe other than the UK. And (c) Because while europeans are better cultured, and often better educated, and certainly better disciplined – europeans are also ‘provincial’ from our perspective, and the data bears that out.

    The french are effeminate and have been our enemies since the second world war. The Germans are culturally compatible with us, but … cowardly by comparison. And the Brits have all gone soft and mad. And frankly other than italy, which we share love of food and beauty with, there isn’t much reason to think about europe at all. (Really).

    If the Germans ever regain their self respect and return to military leadership of europe, so that we don’t have to carry their moral self indulgence any longer, that would be something worth talking about. 😉

    I mean, the people we are most interested in are the japanese and the russians.

    At least they have some SPINE.

    Europe is a conquered continent, and really needs to recover.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-white-Americans-appropriate-European-culture

  • by @MartialSociety The Great Intellectual division of The West—Aristotle vs Plat

    by @MartialSociety The Great Intellectual division of The West—Aristotle vs Platonism, Empiricism vs Rationalism, Naturalism vs Idealism—finds its origins in the acquisitional (worldly) conflict between those who posses agency, and consequently produce order & the transcendence of Man from beast… …to gods through the incremental mastery over self, ignorance & nature against those who lack agency, submit to chaos, produce a dysgenic dominance hierarchy & surrender to a hostile & unknowble nature. Less poetically, this conflict has always been familial (genetic) in nature, and that by the time of the Axial age, that warfare became of those who can compete in the market for rule & sovereignty against those who could not compete nor provide sufficient incentive to… …cooperate by market through strict observance to the natural laws of sovereign men & to the norms that produce (increase) & maintain agency. More scientifically, Inter-group (familial, tribal, ethnic, racial) competition in the acquisition of (a) resources (free-energy & raw materials, which we employ in the production of consumption goods, capital & (warfare) technologies at increasing rates of entropy dissipation).. … (b) females (temporal persistence: genetic survival across time) & (c) territorial assets (strategic holdings of superior land, ports, trade routes & natural defense) selects for groups with marginally, yet incrementally, superior/optimal management of human capital by norm.. …law & institutions via incremental elimination/suppression (negativa) of groups with suboptimal, marginally inferior institutions, norms, genetic capital, territorial (resource) holdings. Let us return from our detour, though it is worthy to note that I found the reduction necessary so as to avoid any charges that I hold to convictions contrary to the facts produced by the sciences, but I also wanted to preface a more abstract discussion on language and grammars.. …with parallel (commensurable) arguments, written with increasing informational completeness covarying with specificity in terminology, and varying inversely with the degree of assumed context (shared frames of reference). As outlined above, incompletely admittedly, the origin of philosophical (metaphysical, epistemic & methodological) disagreement stems from genetic conflict. And we know that from the cognitive sciences that the latter determines the former, though the particular-manifestations… …will vary according to the relevant decision-ecologies; which can be modeled as Nash equilibriums, as acquisitional games between competing agents & clusters (familial, tribal, class, ethnic & racial) with three means of acquisition: (a) remuneration, (b) violence… (c) manipulation of social accnting (gossip, fraud & deceit). The agents will be bounded by these constraints & and produce a Pareto-optimal distribution as they inter-act (make choices in a social ecology) w/ other agents in forming & joining clusters (defect<->cooperate axes). & when competing with other agents and clusters (suppression/defense<->parasitism/predation axes). I maintain that competitively-inferior kin-groups and their individual members, have the incentive to form larger coalitions inasmuch as they *must* do so in order to survive… …(resist domestication), &that in order to maintain the cohesiveness (sufficient degree of non-conflict) of coalitions between non-kin requires the production of abstract (non-worldly) symbols and memes, and consequently the norms & signals required for… …the functioning of the dominance hierarchy.

  • by @MartialSociety The Great Intellectual division of The West—Aristotle vs Plat

    by @MartialSociety

    The Great Intellectual division of The West—Aristotle vs Platonism, Empiricism vs Rationalism, Naturalism vs Idealism—finds its origins in the acquisitional (worldly) conflict between those who posses agency, and consequently produce order & the transcendence of Man from beast…

    …to gods through the incremental mastery over self, ignorance & nature against those who lack agency, submit to chaos, produce a dysgenic dominance hierarchy & surrender to a hostile & unknowble nature.

    Less poetically, this conflict has always been familial (genetic) in nature, and that by the time of the Axial age, that warfare became of those who can compete in the market for rule & sovereignty against those who could not compete nor provide sufficient incentive to…

    …cooperate by market through strict observance to the natural laws of sovereign men & to the norms that produce (increase) & maintain agency.

    More scientifically, Inter-group (familial, tribal, ethnic, racial) competition in the acquisition of (a) resources (free-energy & raw materials, which we employ in the production of consumption goods, capital & (warfare) technologies at increasing rates of entropy dissipation)..

    … (b) females (temporal persistence: genetic survival across time) & (c) territorial assets (strategic holdings of superior land, ports, trade routes & natural defense) selects for groups with marginally, yet incrementally, superior/optimal management of human capital by norm..

    …law & institutions via incremental elimination/suppression (negativa) of groups with suboptimal, marginally inferior institutions, norms, genetic capital, territorial (resource) holdings.

    Let us return from our detour, though it is worthy to note that I found the reduction necessary so as to avoid any charges that I hold to convictions contrary to the facts produced by the sciences, but I also wanted to preface a more abstract discussion on language and grammars..

    …with parallel (commensurable) arguments, written with increasing informational completeness covarying with specificity in terminology, and varying inversely with the degree of assumed context (shared frames of reference).

    As outlined above, incompletely admittedly, the origin of philosophical (metaphysical, epistemic & methodological) disagreement stems from genetic conflict. And we know that from the cognitive sciences that the latter determines the former, though the particular-manifestations…

    …will vary according to the relevant decision-ecologies; which can be modeled as Nash equilibriums, as acquisitional games between competing agents & clusters (familial, tribal, class, ethnic & racial) with three means of acquisition: (a) remuneration, (b) violence…

    (c) manipulation of social accnting (gossip, fraud & deceit). The agents will be bounded by these constraints & and produce a Pareto-optimal distribution as they inter-act (make choices in a social ecology) w/ other agents in forming & joining clusters (defect<->cooperate axes).

    & when competing with other agents and clusters (suppression/defense<->parasitism/predation axes). I maintain that competitively-inferior kin-groups and their individual members, have the incentive to form larger coalitions inasmuch as they *must* do so in order to survive…

    …(resist domestication), &that in order to maintain the cohesiveness (sufficient degree of non-conflict) of coalitions between non-kin requires the production of abstract (non-worldly) symbols and memes, and consequently the norms & signals required for…

    …the functioning of the dominance hierarchy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-30 06:33:00 UTC

  • by @MartialSociety The Great Intellectual division of The West—Aristotle vs Plat

    by @MartialSociety The Great Intellectual division of The West—Aristotle vs Platonism, Empiricism vs Rationalism, Naturalism vs Idealism—finds its origins in the acquisitional (worldly) conflict between those who posses agency, and consequently produce order & the transcendence of Man from beast… …to gods through the incremental mastery over self, ignorance & nature against those who lack agency, submit to chaos, produce a dysgenic dominance hierarchy & surrender to a hostile & unknowble nature. Less poetically, this conflict has always been familial (genetic) in nature, and that by the time of the Axial age, that warfare became of those who can compete in the market for rule & sovereignty against those who could not compete nor provide sufficient incentive to… …cooperate by market through strict observance to the natural laws of sovereign men & to the norms that produce (increase) & maintain agency. More scientifically, Inter-group (familial, tribal, ethnic, racial) competition in the acquisition of (a) resources (free-energy & raw materials, which we employ in the production of consumption goods, capital & (warfare) technologies at increasing rates of entropy dissipation).. … (b) females (temporal persistence: genetic survival across time) & (c) territorial assets (strategic holdings of superior land, ports, trade routes & natural defense) selects for groups with marginally, yet incrementally, superior/optimal management of human capital by norm.. …law & institutions via incremental elimination/suppression (negativa) of groups with suboptimal, marginally inferior institutions, norms, genetic capital, territorial (resource) holdings. Let us return from our detour, though it is worthy to note that I found the reduction necessary so as to avoid any charges that I hold to convictions contrary to the facts produced by the sciences, but I also wanted to preface a more abstract discussion on language and grammars.. …with parallel (commensurable) arguments, written with increasing informational completeness covarying with specificity in terminology, and varying inversely with the degree of assumed context (shared frames of reference). As outlined above, incompletely admittedly, the origin of philosophical (metaphysical, epistemic & methodological) disagreement stems from genetic conflict. And we know that from the cognitive sciences that the latter determines the former, though the particular-manifestations… …will vary according to the relevant decision-ecologies; which can be modeled as Nash equilibriums, as acquisitional games between competing agents & clusters (familial, tribal, class, ethnic & racial) with three means of acquisition: (a) remuneration, (b) violence… (c) manipulation of social accnting (gossip, fraud & deceit). The agents will be bounded by these constraints & and produce a Pareto-optimal distribution as they inter-act (make choices in a social ecology) w/ other agents in forming & joining clusters (defect<->cooperate axes). & when competing with other agents and clusters (suppression/defense<->parasitism/predation axes). I maintain that competitively-inferior kin-groups and their individual members, have the incentive to form larger coalitions inasmuch as they *must* do so in order to survive… …(resist domestication), &that in order to maintain the cohesiveness (sufficient degree of non-conflict) of coalitions between non-kin requires the production of abstract (non-worldly) symbols and memes, and consequently the norms & signals required for… …the functioning of the dominance hierarchy.

  • Eric Danelaw It all begins with a militia. That is what separates the west from

    Eric Danelaw It all begins with a militia. That is what separates the west from the rest. Without concentrated production capital (flood river valleys) that ‘industrialized’ production, it was not possible to concentrate sufficient wealth to form armies. Instead, the wealthy (nobility) supplied their own men, steeds, arms and armor, and the militia fought with them to hold their land, the property, their women, and the civilization from conquest. The byproduct of the order of the militia is a shareholder arrangement between peers – and the one law of reciprocity. –Curt Doolittle